Life expectancy in England rising more slowly than rest of Europe
Life expectancy in England is rising more slowly than in the rest of Europe, according to a new Lancet study.
Obesity, bad diet and a lack of physical activity are behind a decade of life expectancy stagnation, the researchers said, with stalling progress to tackle deaths from heart disease and cancer.
Scotland had the lowest life expectancy among the 20 countries analysed, followed by Wales and Northern Ireland.
However, England was the country that had made the slowest progress since 2011.
Between 1990 and 2011 life expectancy in England improved every year by an average of 0.25 years.
However, from 2011 to 2019 the rate of improvement fell to just 0.07 years on average.
The Covid-19 pandemic saw life expectancy decrease by 0.6 years between 2019 and 2021, wiping out the previous decades' progress.
As of 2019, the life expectancy in England was 81.69 years, ranking 14th out of the 20 European countries assessed.
While all countries apart from Norway saw their progress fall between 2011 and 2019, the new analysis revealed that England's advancement slowed the most.
Experts from the University of East Anglia have called for urgent action to help people get healthier, with poor diets and couch-potato lifestyles partly to blame.
Advances in life expectancy between 1990 and 2011 have been attributed to improvements in care for heart disease and cancer.
Poor diet, low levels of exercise and increasing body mass index scores have been linked to the slowdown of these improvements from 2011 to 2019.
Academics compared several factors linked to life expectancy across England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden.
Between 2019 and 2021, which includes the first part of the Covid-19 pandemic, most countries saw a fall in life expectancy except for Ireland, Iceland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark.
Researchers said that the countries which best maintained improvements in life expectancy had fewer heart disease and cancer deaths.
They called for government action to improve overall population health, including helping people have better diets and more exercise.
Prof Nick Steel, the lead author from UEA's Norwich Medical School, said heart disease was the main cause for the slowing progress in life expectancy since 2011, as well as the pandemic.
'Countries like Norway, Iceland, Sweden, Denmark, and Belgium held onto better life expectancy after 2011, and saw reduced harms from major risks for heart disease, helped by government policies,' he said.
'In contrast, England and the other UK nations fared worst after 2011 and also during the Covid pandemic, and experienced some of the highest risks for heart disease and cancer, including poor diets.'
He added: 'We have high dietary risks in England and high levels of physical inactivity and high obesity levels. These trends are decades long – there isn't a quick fix.'
He said the message to the current Government was that societal change needed to be bigger than 'easy access to scanners and a well man check or well woman check with your already overloaded GP'.
'This is about the big, long-term population protections from risk – so engaging with the food industry to improve our national diet to make it easier for people to eat healthier food and make it easier for people to move a little bit in our day-to-day lives.'
Prof Steel added: 'Life expectancy for older people in many countries is still improving, showing that we have not yet reached a natural longevity ceiling.
'Life expectancy mainly reflects mortality at younger ages, where we have lots of scope for reducing harmful risks and preventing early deaths.
'Comparing countries' national policies that improved population health were linked to better resilience to future shocks.'
Figures from the Office for National Statistics released last week show that about one in five girls born in the UK in 2030 is projected to live on average to at least 100 years old, rising to almost one in four by 2047.
The projections are lower for boys but still indicate a rise, with more than one in eight males born in 2030 living to celebrate their centenary, climbing to about one in six by 2047.
The study is published in The Lancet Public Health journal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Richton Park nursing home must pay $5.5 million in wrongful death lawsuit
More than four years after 85-year-old Sandy Brooks died under the care of Landmark of Richton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, his family received news that a jury awarded them $5.5 million in a wrongful death lawsuit brought on his behalf. Brooks was an honest, hardworking husband, father and grandfather who wore his heart on his sleeve, said his daughter Andrea Brooks, 59. Though he had end-stage renal disease that required he receive dialysis three times per week, Andrea said Brooks was generally healthy and lived independently with his wife, Barbara, until he experienced a traumatic fall in October 2020 while watering plants outdoors at their South Side home. Brooks faced intensive treatment for a brain bleed at Advocate Christ Medical Center and made progress before being transferred to Landmark for physical therapy Nov. 25, Andrea Brooks said. 'We were expecting him to come home, because (doctors) were like, 'oh, he just needs therapy, and then from there he should be OK,'' Brooks said. Although COVID-19 era lockdowns remained in effect, Andrea Brooks said family members were able to regularly visit her dad at the hospital. That changed when he was admitted to Landmark, where he stayed for 13 days before he died after, according to the lawsuit, caregivers neglected to give him his required dialysis. 'We were not able to have any phone calls, there was no communication,' Brooks said. 'Nobody was updating us on anything.' Sandy's wife, Barbara, contacted the nursing home up to 10 times per day, rarely receiving responses, Andrea said. On Dec. 6, the family was allowed a brief FaceTime call with Sandy, who was unable to speak, she said, and he was found unresponsive in his room the next day. Sandy missed five dialysis appointments while under the care of Landmark, his family would later discover, prompting their lawsuit that concluded May 30. 'It appears that they were providing him some very basic care,' the family's attorney, Madison Cogan, said Friday. 'And by that, I mean they were going into his room, as far as we can tell. But as far as getting dialysis, that never happened, and I think that is what makes this so egregious. All it took is one nurse to recognize that Sandy needed his dialysis and that he wasn't receiving it.' A jury agreed, holding Landmark and its management company, Infinity Healthcare Management of Illinois LLC, accountable for $5.5 million in damages for neglecting Brooks, whose need for dialysis was chronicled by the hospital where he was previously treated. Landmark of Richton Park did not return messages requesting comment. Cogan said the family had sought between $6 million and $8 million. 'It's really hard to put a number on a life,' she said. Andrea said nothing has been the same since she lost her dad. 'This case, it made me relive everything,' she said. 'I could not believe the magnitude of how my dad suffered, and it just hurt me. It broke my heart that someone could just not care or not do their job.' ostevens@


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Richton Park nursing home must pay $5.5 million in wrongful death lawsuit
More than four years after 85-year-old Sandy Brooks died under the care of Landmark of Richton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, his family received news that a jury awarded them $5.5 million in a wrongful death lawsuit brought on his behalf. Brooks was an honest, hardworking husband, father and grandfather who wore his heart on his sleeve, said his daughter Andrea Brooks, 59. Though he had end-stage renal disease that required he receive dialysis three times per week, Andrea said Brooks was generally healthy and lived independently with his wife, Barbara, until he experienced a traumatic fall in October 2020 while watering plants outdoors at their South Side home. Brooks faced intensive treatment for a brain bleed at Advocate Christ Medical Center and made progress before being transferred to Landmark for physical therapy Nov. 25, Andrea Brooks said. 'We were expecting him to come home, because (doctors) were like, 'oh, he just needs therapy, and then from there he should be OK,'' Brooks said. Although COVID-19 era lockdowns remained in effect, Andrea Brooks said family members were able to regularly visit her dad at the hospital. That changed when he was admitted to Landmark, where he stayed for 13 days before he died after, according to the lawsuit, caregivers neglected to give him his required dialysis. 'We were not able to have any phone calls, there was no communication,' Brooks said. 'Nobody was updating us on anything.' Sandy's wife, Barbara, contacted the nursing home up to 10 times per day, rarely receiving responses, Andrea said. On Dec. 6, the family was allowed a brief FaceTime call with Sandy, who was unable to speak, she said, and he was found unresponsive in his room the next day. Sandy missed five dialysis appointments while under the care of Landmark, his family would later discover, prompting their lawsuit that concluded May 30. 'It appears that they were providing him some very basic care,' the family's attorney, Madison Cogan, said Friday. 'And by that, I mean they were going into his room, as far as we can tell. But as far as getting dialysis, that never happened, and I think that is what makes this so egregious. All it took is one nurse to recognize that Sandy needed his dialysis and that he wasn't receiving it.' A jury agreed, holding Landmark and its management company, Infinity Healthcare Management of Illinois LLC, accountable for $5.5 million in damages for neglecting Brooks, whose need for dialysis was chronicled by the hospital where he was previously treated. Landmark of Richton Park did not return messages requesting comment. Cogan said the family had sought between $6 million and $8 million. 'It's really hard to put a number on a life,' she said. Andrea said nothing has been the same since she lost her dad. 'This case, it made me relive everything,' she said. 'I could not believe the magnitude of how my dad suffered, and it just hurt me. It broke my heart that someone could just not care or not do their job.'
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. Used 'Disinformation' to Defend Change to Vaccine Schedule, Expert Says: Reports
The Department of Health and Human Services sent Congress a document that cited disputed studies and misrepresented other findings, according to NPR and KFF Health News The document was written in support of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to change federal COVID vaccine recommendations for healthy kids and pregnant women 'This is RFK Jr.'s playbook,' said Sean O'Leary, chair of the Committee on Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of PediatricsThe Department of Health and Human Services sent Congress a document to support Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to change federal vaccine recommendations that cited unpublished or disputed studies and misrepresented other findings, according to NPR and KFF Health News. In late May, Kennedy, who has a history of vaccine skepticism, announced on X that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed the COVID vaccine from the recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, while touting President Trump's Make America Healthy Again agenda. "It is so far out of left field that I find it insulting to our members of Congress that they would actually give them something like this. Congress members are relying on these agencies to provide them with valid information, and it's just not there," Dr. Mark Turrentine, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Baylor College of Medicine, told KFF Health News, the outlet that obtained the FAQ document. The outlet also reported that the document suggests a link between heart conditions like myocarditis or pericarditis and the COVID vaccine, but updated research suggests that connection has decreased with newer vaccine procedures. The document also left out multiple other peer-reviewed studies that show the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis is greater after getting sick with COVID for both vaccinated and non-vaccinated people than the risk of the same complications after vaccination alone, per KFF Health News. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "There is no distortion of the studies in this document. The underlying data speaks for itself, and it raises legitimate safety concerns. HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay it. We will follow the data and the science," a HHS spokesperson told KFF Health News. 'This is RFK Jr.'s playbook,' Sean O'Leary, chair of the Committee on Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told KFF Health News. 'Either cherry-pick from good science or take junk science to support his premise — this has been his playbook for 20 years.' Read the original article on People