
American beef key issue in Trump tariff talks
The US is pushing for looser rules on American beef imports in tariff talks, a senior Albanese government minister says.
Australia has been vying for an exemption from both the Trump administration's baseline 10 per cent levies on foreign goods and the 50 per cent imposts on steel and aluminium.
Donald Trump had told Anthony Albanese that an Australian carve out was 'under consideration' but ultimately decided there would be 'no exemptions' as he set about prosecuting his 'America first' agenda.
Health Minister Mark Butler said on Friday that Australian officials were working through a request to accept beef from cattle slaughtered in the US that originated in third countries.
'We will be making a decision in the national interest,' Mr Butler told Seven's Sunrise.
'That's what we've done in relation to pharmaceuticals – we've said there's no way our PBS will be on the negotiating table and we won't compromise our biosecurity laws either.'
He said the government had been 'reviewing this issue for some time'.
'This is US beef that's raised in Canada or Mexico, not cattle raised in the US itself but then brought into America, slaughtered there and proposed for exports,' Mr Butler said.
'This will be a decision taken on its merits, not for convenience, not to get a deal.'
Noting Australia's 'very strict biosecurity laws', he said the officials had been reviewing the safety of American beef with third country origins even before the request was made.
Appearing opposite Mr Butler, opposition senator Jane Hume said the Coalition supported the caution.
'We certainly don't want to see a watering down of our biosecurity laws that would potentially put our beef industry in danger,' Senator Hume said.
'This isn't about protecting an industry's prosperity, it's about protecting an industry's integrity.
'If you are tweaking biosecurity laws by watering them down that's something I think we would be very concerned about.'
The Prime Minister has also ruled out watering down biosecurity laws to get a deal.
'No, we will not change or compromise any of the issues regarding biosecurity, full stop, exclamation mark,' Mr Albanese told the ABC.
'It's simply not worth it, so it's that simple.'
Only the UK has been able to secure a partial exemption from the US President's blanket tariffs.
A key UK concession was scrapping its 20 per cent duties on American beef and raising the import quota to 13,000 metric tonnes.
But with many British goods still subject to tariffs, analysts have questioned whether the deal was worth it.
The US has trade surpluses with both the UK and Australia.
Australia also has a free-trade agreement with the US, meaning goods should be traded mostly uninhibited.
The Albanese government has repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to slap tariffs on Australian products as 'economic self-harm' and 'not the act of a friend'.
Trade Minister Don Farrell is in Europe this week for high-level negotiations on a free-trade deal with the EU.
He also met with his US counterpart and pressed for an Australian exemption from the 'unjustified' tariffs.
'Australia's position has been consistent and clear,' Senator Farrell said in a statement.
'These tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend.
'They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade.
'We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.'
Mr Albanese has vowed to raise tariffs with Mr Trump when the two leaders meet at the G7 in Canada later this month.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Trade talks to start between US and China next week
US President Donald Trump has confirmed trade talks between the US and China will commence next week in London. President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have spoken on the phone in the last 24 hours. Allegedly, the US government has asked the UK government to facilitate these talks.
Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
‘We should not take a backwards step': Littleproud on Australian biosecurity laws
The National Party says Australia's biosecurity should not be used as a bargaining tool for the removal of US tariffs. The Albanese Government is reportedly considering amending rules, making it easier for the US to export beef to Australia, as long as it can be done safely. Last year, Australia sent almost 400,000 tonnes of beef to America, worth more than $4 billion. Nationals Leader David Littleproud says "we should not take a backwards step and concede biosecurity protocols that are protecting the agricultural industry".

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Whitlam-esque': Zoe McKenzie blasts Labor's divisive tax hike on super accounts, slams Tasmanian opposition for triggering early election
Victorian Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie has lambasted Labor for continuing to advance its plan to hike taxes on superannuation accounts and impose levies on unrealised gains whilst hammering the Tasmanian opposition for sending punters to a winter election. Labor's plan to raise taxes on superannuation accounts over $3 million to 30 per cent and to target unrealised capital gains has sent shockwaves throughout the political and business arena, with financial doyens accusing the government of discarding decades of precedent. The Coalition was previously in talks with the Albanese government to revise certain elements of the legislation, chiefly the concept of taxing unrealised gains, however shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien officially confirmed on Thursday the LNP would oppose the bill. Yet, former Reserve Bank board members Donald McGauchie and Roger Corbett, in addition to a litany of major Liberal Party donors, have pressed the Coalition to remain at the negotiating table and to secure what it deems crucial exemptions for illiquid assets including farms and small businesses. Ms McKenzie, an outspoken moderate who holds one of the Liberal's last outer-suburban seats, railed against the policy, but did not address if the Coalition would resume talks with Labor to modify the legislation. 'I think this is a terrible piece of policy and a terrible precedent for the future, Labor is effectively saying that they will tax money in your pocket, and you do not yet have this money,' she told Sky News on Saturday. The Member for Flinders echoed criticism from industry magnates in relation to the controversial concept of taxing unrealised gains, stating, 'you may have it in the future, you may not have it in the future, but you will be taxed on it'. 'You may incur a loss in the figure, and you won't get that tax back and that's the principle that we must fight here, because once it's started, it could go anywhere,' indicating that the tax could be extended to a range of other assets including real estate and stocks. 'This is a devilish tax and should be fought by the Coalition parties most stridently, this government is very good at speaking liberal-light in terms of their economic narrative, but it is utterly Whitlam-esque in terms of its impact on the Australian economy'. While the Coalition has vowed to fight the legislation, the bill is expected to pass both houses of parliament unopposed, with the Greens joining with Labor in the Senate despite lobbying for the policy to be levied on those with super accounts over $2 million. 'The point is they're going after money no one yet has, these are paper profits, these are family businesses, these are farms held in super funds that people may well have to liquidate just to pass a putative profit that may not exist when finally realised in years to come," Ms McKenzie said. 'They will need the Greens support in the Senate and as you know, the Greens are pushing to lower that threshold from three million to two million. So, it gives the Australian people a very clear indication of what might happen when Labor and the Greens run the show for the next three years'. The shadow assistant minister then turned her attention to the ongoing political chaos in Tasmania. Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in parliament on Thursday, with the speaker casting the deciding vote, resulting in the state heading to it's second election in as little as 14 months. Ms McKenzie savaged Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter for sending the state to a snap winter poll and argued the opposition parties had collectively torpedoed a popularly elected government. 'I think the Tasmanian people would be very disappointed with what's happened this week, basically holding an elected government hostage, so it looks like they will be going back to a mid-winter election. We've all done them and they're horrendous," she said. 'I'm sure the people of Tasmania will not be grateful for being dragged back to the polls so soon after a federal election and indeed just 14 months after a state election." Tasmanians will have to wait until next Tuesday to find out when they will return to the polls, with the parliament scrambling to draft emergency legislation to fund government services of which are due to be tabled on the same day. Independent MPs including Craig Garland have called on the beleaguered Premier to resign, with Mr Rockliff guaranteeing he would not sell off state-owned assets to pay down debt if he won the election, of which served as a key factor in sparking the political row.