logo
A witchcraft case involving Zambia's president brings scrutiny of a colonial-era law and traditions

A witchcraft case involving Zambia's president brings scrutiny of a colonial-era law and traditions

Independent24-02-2025

Two men are on trial in Zambia on charges of practicing witchcraft and possessing charms intended to harm the country's president, in a case that has become a source of fascination in the southern African nation.
The interest reflects a belief in forms of magic and supernatural phenomena that remains in parts of southern Africa — and some irritation at a colonial-era law that brands it witchcraft and criminalizes it in Zambia.
'I hate that colonial piece of legislation that attempts to outlaw a practice that it does not understand,' said Gankhanani Moyo, a cultural heritage lecturer at the University of Zambia. He said it fails to consider the nuances of traditional African beliefs.
'Traditional Zambian societies and individuals believe in a strong relationship between the human world and the supernatural," Moyo said.
The trial also has a heavy dose of political intrigue. Prosecutors allege the two men were hired by a brother of Emmanuel Banda — a former lawmaker who is now on the run — to curse President Hakainde Hichilema.
Some have dismissed it as a stunt by Hichilema, who faces an election next year. The president hasn't commented on the case.
'Will the court allow witch doctors and other alleged witches to testify as expert witnesses?' a column in the Lusaka Times newspaper asked with scorn.
But some politicians and other public figures in Zambia have said they believe in witchcraft, seeking out supernatural help to make them stronger or more popular.
Hichilema himself was accused of using witchcraft as an opposition leader by the late President Michael Sata, who asserted that the magic from his home region was stronger. Hichilema didn't respond to that accusation more than a decade ago.
Police say the men in the current case were arrested in a hotel room in the capital, Lusaka, in December after a cleaner reported hearing strange noises. They were found in possession of a bottled chameleon and other items including a mysterious white powder, a red cloth and an unidentified animal's tail. The men also face charges of cruelty to animals.
Police said one man confessed they had been hired for a curse to kill Hichilema. He testified in court they were promised more than $1 million.
The case has captured attention because many Zambians take witchcraft seriously, said Enoch Ngoma, a journalist for more than 30 years who has covered many such trials.
Zambia's judiciary had said it would allow this trial to be broadcast live on television, which would have been just the second time that's happened for a trial. But it reversed the decision, citing 'stakeholders.' Zambia's influential Council of Churches had said it was opposed to a live broadcast.
When the trial opened last week, the courtroom was packed.
Many traditional beliefs have survived in Zambia alongside its official Christian religion. A study by the Zambia Law Development Commission, which has a mandate to reform laws, found that 79% of Zambians believed in the existence of witchcraft as of 2018.
The study was conducted because the Witchcraft Act has been questioned.
It was passed in 1914 when Zambia was part of the British 'sphere of influence.' The act defines practicing witchcraft as pretending to exercise any kind of supernatural power, witchcraft, sorcery or enchantment calculated to cause fear, annoyance or injury.
Witchcraft cases have been difficult to prosecute in Zambia, with evidence tricky to collect. The cases are normally heard in traditional courts, and this is a rare one to reach the magistrates court in Lusaka. The penalty for practicing witchcraft is a fine or up to two years in jail, with the possibility of hard labor.
Meanwhile, protecting against witchcraft can be good business.
Rodwell Vongo, who goes by the name Dr. Vongo, is a traditional healer and president of the Zambian Traditional Healers Association. He said he would be referred to as a witch doctor under the law but calls that term derogatory.
He lives in a plush suburb of Lusaka and said he has a long list of middle-class clients, rejecting the presumption that such beliefs are only held by rural folk.
The majority of his customers are women who seek charms and spells for happy marriages, he said, but many others come looking for protection against witchcraft.
Wisdom Kaunda, a teacher, said he was closely following the witchcraft trial and believes it can help determine how his country treats the subject in the future.
'Personally, I feel people should be punished for planning to cause harm to someone,' he said, but added: "It is so difficult to prove witchcraft in the courts of law."
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees

Western Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees

Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Nearly 20 families and several faith schools brought the legal challenge (Aaron Chown/PA) Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.

Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees

North Wales Chronicle

time7 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees

Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.

Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees
Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees

Rhyl Journal

time7 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Private schools and parents lose High Court challenges over VAT on school fees

Several schools, children who attend them and their parents, previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy of applying VAT to fees is discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law. This includes children and families at faith schools, and families who have sent their children with special educational needs (Sen) to private school. The Treasury defended the challenges over the policy, which was introduced on January 1, with HM Revenue and Customs and the Department for Education (DfE) also taking part. Three judges at the High Court dismissed the three challenges in a decision given on Friday. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said in a 94-page decision that while the legislation does interfere with some of the group's human rights, there is a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected by the policy against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. During a hearing in April, Lord David Pannick KC, representing one group of children and their parents, previously told the court in London that for some children currently in private schools their needs are not met by state schools, but the new law applies 'irrespective' of a family's need. The High Court was told that as well as religious beliefs and SEN, some children are privately educated because of a need for a single-sex environment because of previous abuse, or because they are only temporarily in the UK and need to be educated in line with their home national curriculum. Bruno Quintavalle, representing four small Christian schools and parents who have sent their children to them, also previously said the 'ill-thought-out proposal introduced in haste' placed parents in 'impossible positions'. However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the DfE, said abolishing the VAT exemption for private school fees was a prominent feature of Labour's manifesto at the last general election and is expected to yield between £1.5 and £1.7 billion per year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store