Inside the small business success story of Tony's Chocoloney, which rakes in $162 million yearly thanks to influencers and Gen Z values
Tony's Chocolonely is a small business success story. Launched in 2005, the independent chocolate company has become a $162 million staple among young shoppers, competing with the likes of Lindt and Hershey. It has social media and Gen Z values to thank.
Sandwiched between Ghirardelli truffles and bags of Lindt on store shelves are colorful chocolate bars emblazoned with funky lettering: Tony's Chocoloney products stand out.
Despite having less name recognition and higher prices than competitors, the Dutch chocolate is fast becoming a staple among young Americans.
The small sweets company was founded in 2005, but most devout fans probably didn't hear about it until the past couple years. It's now partnering with the likes of Ben & Jerry's, ALDI, and Feastables, raking in $162 million annually with its chocolate bars and other treats.
Gen Z and millennials in particular are fueling that growth—hungry for a sweet snack with a deeper purpose.
Since the beginning, Tony's has operated with two things in mind: the company mission and product taste.
The brand established itself as a fair cocoa producer in an industry riddled with forced labor and exploitation. Unwrap one of Tony's chocolate bars, and you won't find it divvied up in pretty little squares; its uneven pieces represent the wealth inequality in West Africa's chocolate production.
Affluent young buyers—known for putting money where their values are—are on board with a $6 chocolate bar. They're already in the candy aisles of Target, Whole Foods, and Walmart, with Costco and Kroger coming up.
'People want mission-driven brands. They want premium, and they want better for you—either better or healthier ingredients,' Dusan Vujovic, head of North America for Tony's, tells Fortune. 'This is a natural trend that Tony's fits into. Our consumers are younger, higher-income consumers that retailers really want to get back into the stores. They all fight for that type of consumer.'
To drive its messaging and products, Tony's has partnered with like-minded brands including The Washington Post, through its 'Conversation Starter Bundle' featuring chocolate bars wrapped in packaging designed exclusively by the publication's creative team. The business also joined forces with the Radio City Rockettes several times, creating exclusive candy bars and handing out samples after the iconic holiday shows in New York.
Most notably, however, is Tony's connection with Ben & Jerry's—another iconic brand known for its activism and fan-favorite flavors. The ice cream giant signed up to 'Tony's Open Chain' network, sourcing cocoa for its products through Tony's supply system. ALDI, Waitrose, and Feastables have also joined the pledge.
While Tony's has been around for two decades, it didn't actually turn to advertising until it found an organic way to connect with consumers. Social media was the entry point.
'We only started advertising two, three years ago. Before that, we were very anti-media,' Aidaly Sosa Walker, head of U.S. marketing for Tony's, tells Fortune.
It all started with one viral TikTok trend: people pouring espresso over chocolate bars, slowly melting the bar into their mug before the coffee pours over. It was satisfying to watch—and Tony's saw it as the perfect viral moment to get their products into the cultural zeitgeist.
'We saw that trend, which was using chocolate. So then we started working closer with this influencer sending more products,' Walker says. 'We then identified multiple trends that we could tap into.'
Tony's leaned into the social media craze, partnering with influencers across foodie, homemaking, and cooking communities on TikTok and Instagram. The company says a lot of this traction was natural—even among celebrities like Pharrel Williams and Idris Elba, who have shared their endorsements.
Their advertising blew up after Tony's hit the shelves of Walmart in 2022; reaching more shoppers of different socioeconomic classes, the money-making success afforded a nicer marketing allowance.
'We were like, 'Okay, we have a little bit of budget now, so let's actively pick a few influencers that can speak to the mass chocolate audience, and to the Walmart shopper,'' Walker explains. 'So we had a few influencers that we worked with that would go into Walmart, buy their chocolate, take it home, try it in the car, and do reviews.'
Another reason why Tony's social media advertising strategy has worked so well is because there's an emotional draw in the marketing. Young, chronically online consumers are known to have parasocial relationships with their favorite influencers. Watching their glowing endorsements of Tony's as a sweet treat—and premium product—fosters a bond with the brand and drives the idea of the chocolate as a personal experience.
'It's really adding to that emotional experience,' Walker says. 'People feel like, 'Okay, when I have this chocolate, it's for me, it's my treat. It's the moment to myself.' We see there's an increase in consumer experience with that…having a moment of sanity has become more important.'
The chocolate industry is a tough nut to crack—a select few chocolatiers have the name recognition to withstand the test of time. Tony's Chocolonely has already made space for itself with an international team of less than 500 employees, and a marketing budget dwarfed by giants like Cadbury, Mars, and Toblerone.
For other small businesses looking to enter a crowded market, Vujovic and Walker lay out five factors to keep in mind in advertising with a limited budget.
Tony's marketing and sales teams are in 'lockstep,' instead of being further apart. Joining forces helps reinforce brand messaging.
Despite being in business for two decades, Tony's didn't go full throttle in the U.S. until a few years ago. That's because it didn't adopt the typical 'move fast and break things' business mentality.
Tony's understood that its shoppers were young, affluent, and mission-driven, so it found the best way to push the brand was through popular social media trends.
As companies expand internationally, they must understand how their markets respond to their products. Through data collection, Tony's knew U.S. shoppers were less value-driven than U.K. buyers, so marketed to each differently.
Tony's calls its whimsical chocolate bar packaging its 'billboards,' as the bold wrapping on grocery shelves stands out among the flat color palettes. The eye always eats first.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
14 minutes ago
- UPI
Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage
A proposed federal act would raise the federal minimum wage law to $15 an hour on January 1, two U.S. senators announced on Tuesday. The Service Employee International Union was fighting for that wage in 2021 (pictured). File Photo by Tasos Katopodis/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- The federal minimum wage would rise to $15 per hour, with annual cost-of-living increases based on inflation, in a proposed bipartisan measure. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Peter Welch, D-Vt., co-sponsored the bill that they have named the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act" and would increase the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 per hour for non-exempt workers. "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said on Tuesday in a joint press release with Welch. "One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day," Hawley added. Welch said inflation and rising costs are making it too hard for families to afford basic necessities. "We're in the midst of a severe affordability crisis, with families in red and blue states alike struggling to afford necessities like housing and groceries," Welch said. "A stagnant federal minimum wage only adds fuel to the fire," he continued. "Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table -- $7.25 an hour doesn't even come close." "Times have changed, and working families deserve a wage that reflects today's financial reality," Welch added. Hawley said the current federal minimum wage is less than what a worker earned in 1940 when adjusted for inflation. If the proposed federal minimum wage increase is passed into law, it would take effect on Jan. 1 and allow cost-of-living increases that match inflation in subsequent years. Many states have respective minimum wage laws that exceed the current and proposed federal minimum wage, but a dozen still were at the federal minimum wage in 2024. Many large employers also have higher minimum wages, including Walmart, which has paid its workers at least $14 an hour and often more since 2023. President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the federal government to pay contract workers at least $15 an hour. California lawmakers in 2022 raised the state's minimum wage for many fast-food workers to up to $22 an hour.
Miami Herald
15 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is Elon Musk right to oppose the budget bill? What Americans said in a new poll
During his public falling out with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk slammed the president's proposed spending bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — claiming it will balloon the deficit. It turns out, most Americans agree with his critique, new polling reveals. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked to react to a statement from Musk on the GOP-backed spending bill, which passed in the House without a single Democratic vote. The legislation, Musk wrote on X on June 3, 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and burden (American) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' A majority of respondents, 56%, said they agreed with this statement, while just 17% said they disagreed. More than one-quarter, 27%, said they were unsure. The answers were largely linked to partisan affiliation, with Democrats largely siding with Musk for a change. Seventy-two percent of Democrats said they concurred with the billionaire's statement about the spending bill, as did 55% of independents. Among Republicans, a plurality, 44%, said they agreed. The poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6-9 — posed the same statement before the other half of respondents, but this time, it did not attribute it to Musk. Without reference to Musk, a slightly smaller share, 49%, said they agreed with the statement, while 23% said they disagreed. Smaller shares of Republicans, independents and Democrats agreed, though Democrats saw the largest decrease in support — from 72% to 60%. The poll has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The spending bill, which provides funding for fiscal year 2025, passed in the House in a 215-214 vote in late May and is now under consideration in the Senate. It contains many pieces of Trump's agenda, including a road map to extend the 2017 tax cuts, as well as an increase in funding for the Pentagon and border security, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. At the same time, it slashes funding for social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Further — to Musk's point — it would increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency. In addition to Musk, the bill has received criticism from several other prominent conservatives in Congress. One of the most vocal opponents has been Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wrote on X that 'the spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt.' Other Republican lawmakers have come out in defense of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has said the legislation will deliver 'historic tax relief, ensure our border stays secure, strengthen our military, and produce historic savings.' Meanwhile, Democrats have been united in their opposition. In a statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled the bill 'the GOP Tax Scam' and said it would rip 'healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.'
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Paramount makes drastic decision amid shift in customer behavior
TV giant Paramount (PARA) , which owns networks such as CBS, Nickelodeon, MTV, and Comedy Central, is suffering from a popular consumer trend. The company revealed in its first-quarter earnings report for 2025 that its total company revenue decreased by 6% year-over-year. Specifically, it generated $4.5 billion in TV media revenue, which is 13% lower than what it earned during the same quarter last year. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Paramount flagged that its TV media segment faced a decrease in advertising revenue and subscriber numbers. Related: Spectrum struggles to reverse alarming customer behavior Paramount's struggles come as many consumers across the country have been ditching cable TV for streaming services in an effort to save money, a trend called cord-cutting. Two of the largest cable TV providers in the U.S., Comcast and Spectrum, have lost about 608,000 TV customers during the first quarter of 2025, meaning they faced an average of 6,755 cancellations daily. A recent survey from digital security firm All About Cookies even found that only 46% of Americans still use traditional cable or satellite TV services, and only 14% of cord-cutters regret cutting their cable. Also, 76% of Americans watch shows through paid streaming services, and younger people are less likely to watch cable TV. Amid this drastic change in customer behavior, Paramount has decided to make a harsh change to its workforce. In a memo sent to employees on June 10, Paramount executives revealed that the company will lay off 3.5% of its U.S. employees as it navigates "the continued industry-wide linear declines and dynamic macro-economic environment" and prioritizes its "growing streaming business." "We will be reducing our domestic workforce by 3.5%, with the majority of impacted staff being notified today," said the executives in the memo. "This process may also result in some impacts to our workforce outside the U.S. over time. As always, any changes will be considered in accordance with local legal obligations. We recognize how difficult this is and are very thankful for everyone's hard work and contributions. These changes are necessary to address the environment we are operating in and best position Paramount for success." Related: Comcast hopes to win back fleeing customers with generous offer The move from Paramount comes after Paramount Media Networks CEO Chris McCarthy warned during an earnings call in August last year that the company planned to shrink its U.S. workforce by 15% after identifying $500 million in annual cost savings. "We are primarily focused on two areas: first, redundant functions within marketing and communications; second, streamlining our corporate structure, reducing our headcount in finance, legal, technology, and other support functions," said McCarthy during the call. He said that the layoffs will mostly conclude by the end of 2025. The stern warning followed Paramount's decision to lay off 800 employees in February that year. The company also cut its headcount by 25%, affecting employees in its cable network division, in May 2023. Paramount's competitors have also been making job cuts as customers ditch cable for streaming. Earlier this month, Disney laid off hundreds of employees in its film and TV sectors and multiple corporate departments. More Labor: Amazon CEO gives hard-nosed message to employeesIRS has an alarming solution to a growing problem after layoffsJPMorgan Chase CFO issues stern warning to employees Warner Bros., which owns cable networks such as Cartoon Network, Discovery, and HBO, later followed in Disney's footsteps and laid off about 100 employees in its cable TV sector. Many companies nationwide are trimming their workforce amid macroeconomic uncertainty and changes in customer behavior. So far this year, roughly 145,000 employees have lost their jobs, according to data from Related: Disney CEO offers unexpected response to tariff concerns The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
