Could AI Help the Emmys? Why the TV Community Is ‘Curious, but Not Yet Committed'
As Hollywood explores the potential impact of AI, there've been no shortage of conferences, technology testing and conversations to address this topic. In fact, the Television Academy held a well-attended AI Summit in mid-March, though there was still a lot of hesitation around the elephant in the room.
Earlier this year, the awards conversation featured several high-profile Oscar contenders that utilized technology during production or post-production, including best picture nominees 'The Brutalist' and 'Emilia Pérez,' both of which incorporated AI audio technology from Respeecher.
More from Variety
Emmys Just Aren't Quite Sure What to Do With Eligibility for All of This Season's Guest Stars and Cameos
Bridget Everett on How 'Somebody Somewhere' Was the Best Experience of Her Life: 'It's Like, Now What Am I Gonna Do?'
Alexis Bledel Withdraws From Emmy Race for 'The Handmaid's Tale' Due to New Guest Actor Rules (EXCLUSIVE)
Last month, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced AI guidelines as part of its rules for the 2026 Oscars: 'With regard to Generative Artificial Intelligence and other digital tools used in the making of the film, the tools neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination. The Academy and each branch will judge the achievement, taking into account the degree to which a human was at the heart of the creative authorship when choosing which movie to award.'
Similarly, the Television Academy has Emmy guidelines focused on the human contributions in a submission. 'Emmy rules make clear that submissions must be the work of the submitter, utilizing the tools of their craft,' a TV Academy spokesperson said in a statement to Variety. 'Though there are a few specific guidelines around the use of AI as a tool, the Television Academy continues to monitor it across all categories and will make any updates to our rules and guidelines as needed.'
Speaking generally about AI, Eric Shamlin, CEO of new tech-infused production studio Secret Level and co-chair of the TV Academy's AI Task Force, admits that at this stage, he is seeing 'very little that's actively being used' in production, though there's a lot of testing of AI's potential. 'Everybody's kind of curious, but not yet committed.'
He observes, 'Some of it is kind of early-stage storyboarding or concept development for maybe a new show or a new season. I think in other situations, it's being seen [for certain tasks in] visual effects or post-production. So, I think you're seeing different teams or different parts of the pipeline explore these tools, but I still think there's a lot of just overall kind of hesitation around the tools.'
Shamlin also acknowledges thorny areas that still need to be worked out, such as legal, labor and ethical issues. 'There's still plenty of people that are against AI adoption or just vocally criticizing it, which I also deeply respect, but I do think the overall sentiment has shifted to one of engagement and curiosity and conversation,' he says. 'I want to be firmly on the side of making this a benefit to as many people as possible, and accelerating jobs and expanding jobs, multiplying jobs. But you only do that by engaging with the tools and engaging with the processes and helping guide how they get adopted.'
There are many others in the community that feel the best approach is to talk about the technology and how it may be implemented, though not all employers or publicists want their representatives to discuss this publicly.
'It is time for the industry to reveal itself properly,' says another source in the community, requesting anonymity. 'Then, instead of being seen as a victim of AI, the art of moviemaking will be seen to be at the forefront of absorbing this new technology. Perhaps the studios based in technology companies and the technology companies active in the production of the movies will be the right ones to bring this message to the markets.'
Best of Variety
What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Emmy Predictions: Sci-Fi Surges, FYC Crunch Pressure, and Comedy Category Shakeups Across 94 Races
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
WWE Money In The Bank 2025 Livestream: Here's How to Watch the Event Online
Variety and Yahoo may earn commission from links in this article. Pricing and availability subject to change. If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, Variety may receive an affiliate commission. The WWE goes 'The City of Champions' with Money In The Bank 2025. This year's pro wrestling event features four matchups — including a title bout for the women's international championship — on Saturday, June 7. Additionally, the event features a tag team match with influencers Logan Paul. Advertisement More from Variety For 2025 in the main event and co-main event, there are two separate headliner high-stakes ladder matches for men and women. On the men's side, six top male wrestlers battle each other for a contract to compete for the world championship. On the women's side, six premiere female wrestlers go at it for a contract for the women's world championship. watch WWE Money IN The Bank 2025 on peacock Want to watch WWE Money In The Bank online? Here's what you need to know. When Is WWE Money In The Bank 2025? Date, Time WWE Money In The Bank takes place at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California on Saturday, June 7. The start time for WWE Money In The Bank is 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT. WWE Money In The Bank 2025: Main Card Check out the Money In The Bank main card below, and stream it on Peacock here. Advertisement Main Card, 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT Solo Sikoa vs. LA Knight vs. Penta vs. Seth Rollins vs. Andrade vs. El Grande Americano (in a ladder match) Alexa Bliss vs. Roxanne Perez vs. Rhea Ripley vs. Giulia vs. Naomi vs. Stephanie Vaquer (in a ladder match) Cody Rhodes and Jey Uso vs. John Cena and Logan Paul (in a tag team match) Lyra Valkyria (champion) vs. Becky Lynch (in a last chance match) — WWE Women's Intercontinental Championship Watch all the action by catching the livestream of WWE Money In The Bank online with Peacock. Purchase the livestream feed starting at $7.99/month for the ad-supported plan, or $79.99/year when you sign up for an annual subscription here. Additionally, you can go ad-free for $13.99/month, or $139.99/year for the annual plan. watch WWE Money IN The Bank 2025 on peacock Later in the week, tune into WWE Raw and WWE Smackdown after Money In The Bank. Best of Variety Sign up for Variety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Something Beautiful with Miley Cyrus' Review: The Star Co-Directs an Album's Worth of Music Videos, Celebrating Her Sexuality…and Herself
It's the rare pop star who doesn't use his or her sexuality in some way. But the current moment, typified by stars like Chappell Roan, Sabrina Carpenter, and Charli XCX, tends to be about showcasing one's sexuality ironically, or with an acid flippancy, or from behind a mask, or with a certain cool stance of meta control. Miley Cyrus never got that memo. In 'Something Beautiful,' a 55-minute visual album made up of music videos, co-directed by Cyrus (with Jacob Bixenman and Brendan Walter), of the 13 tracks from her just-released album, Cyrus struts and pouts and lets it out, she throws her body around like a gymnastic weapon, and in a way she throws her beauty around, as though she were trying to sear the power of her erotic presence into our souls. More from Variety 'Titan: The OceanGate Disaster' Review: Netflix Doc Depicts High-End Deep Sea Exploration With a Lethal Price Tag 'Rosemead' Review: Lucy Liu's Revelatory Turn Is the Reason to See an Otherwise Downbeat Family Drama Michael Imperioli on Jack Kerouac, Buddhism and a Changing New York: 'I Still Love the City to Death' At the Tribeca Festival, where the 'Something Beautiful' visual album premiered tonight, the audience cheered every femme fatale glower, every showgirl flash of writhing flesh, every doffed piece of slinky punk designer clothing. It was clear that Cyrus staged the videos not merely as an orgy of rock-star self-love but as an homage to an era when the flaunting of sexuality was something that people felt less cautious about. She wants to take us back to the age of letting it rip. Miley Cyrus is pre-ironic, and so is her music, which is hooky in a heavily produced big-beat way that's starting to sound as from-another-era as Springsteen's. (To me, that's not an insult.) In the 'Something Beautiful' videos, you feel her trying to elevate her erotic maximalism into a kind of mythology. In 'Easy Lover,' she strips down to her underwear in a soundstage dressing room, then walks onto an empty Hollywood lot wearing light-blue ruffled chaps and a winged jacket, sauntering through that land of make-believe as if to say, 'What you're seeing is just…an image!' (Well, yes.) In 'Golden Burning Sun,' one of the catchier songs on the album, she's photographed in profile, wearing giant sunglasses as she rides a chopper against a stylized orange sky, singing, 'You're the only one, under the golden burning sun.' For all the independent spirit that defined 'Flowers,' and at a moment when Sabrina Carpenter's 'Manchild' is being touted as a potential iconic summer hit, Miley Cyrus's ardent anthems can sound as old-school devotional as something from the 1980s. And, in fact, there's an '80s nostalgia hanging over the entire visual album. It's very 'Flashdance' meets Lita Ford. There is much windblown hair, and the video for 'Walk of Fame' opens on a rhythm track highly reminiscent of Bronski Beat's 'Smalltown Boy,' as we see Miley, in a little silver dress, strutting in the middle of the night along the abandoned but highly lit-up-by-street-lights-and-store-windows Hollywood Boulevard. You keep expecting Mia Goth to show up with a knife, but Cyrus is the only one there, and does she ever work it, bending and writhing over those stars on the Walk of Fame. Here, as in several of the other videos, I kept feeling as if one of those cliché fashion photographers must be hovering off-camera, saying, 'Yes, that's it! Show me what you got!' And then we arrive at 'Every Girl You've Ever Loved,' which feels like the climax to the visual album. It's set in an empty warehouse loft, with light shooting through propeller fans (very Adrian Lyne), and with Miley, in her primal assertion of feminine power, joined by Naomi Campbell, the two of them obliterating the need for anyone else. (The only dude in these videos is someone who shows up in the last one, looking like a Calvin Klein model as shot by Kenneth Anger.) At the premiere, a journalist sitting next to me said, 'There's no narrative here at all.' Given that 'Something Beautiful' was presented as a Tribeca Festival event, I think what she was hoping to see was a visual album that tried for something along the lines of Beyoncé's 'Lemonade.' 'Something Beautiful' is very much not that. Yet if the videos, with their confectionary nod to the eros of celebrity, lack any semblance of a storytelling through line, I wouldn't say that means they have no narrative. They tell the story of Miley Cyrus's relationship to sexuality and stardom. As an adult pop star, she has always borne a striking resemblance to the Faye Dunaway of the early '70s, but she's like Faye Dunaway without the mystery. Yet in 'Something Beautiful,' with the songs used as catwalk tracks, you see how Miley Cyrus, in elevating her erotic aura, is trying to be a performer of mystery — to let her beauty singe our eyeballs, to let it vibrate into the cosmos. Yet it's all a little insular. The final song, the video of which plays over the end credits, is called 'Give Me Love,' and it feels like the whole film could have been called that. We're the audience for Miley Cyrus's sex-power rapture. But we're also the mirror she's looking into. Best of Variety The Best Albums of the Decade
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lena Waithe Dropped Over $35,000 for a Special Piece of 'The Mary Tyler Moore' Set: 'I Will Cherish This'
On Wednesday. June 4, Doyle's Auctions held an auction for "The Collection of Mary Tyler Moore" One of the big sales of the auction was a gold-painted "M" that sat on the wall of Mary Richards' apartment in The Mary Tyler Moore Show The Emmy-winner says it's an "honor" to own the special piece after purchasing it for $35, 200Lena Waithe has purchased a special piece of television history. The Emmy Award winner has purchased the gold-painted "M" that adorned Mary Richards' apartment wall on The Mary Tyler Moore Show. The sale took place on Wednesday, June 4, at Doyle's "The Collection of Mary Tyler Moore" auction. The humble prop was the highlight of the auction, receiving a ton of interest due to its prominence in the background of a beloved sitcom, which aired from 1970 to 1977. Original estimates had the piece going for anywhere from $5,000 to 8,000. The piece far exceeded expectations, opening at $14,000 and ultimately selling for a stunning $35,200. In a statement about the sale, Waithe shares, "I will cherish this piece of television history for the rest of my life. I feel honored to have custody of it until it's time to pass it along to someone else." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Other Mary Tyler Moore items garnered impressive sales. A colorful portrait of Moore by Peter Max sold for $15,360. Original Al Hirschfeld drawings capturing Moore's roles in The Dick Van Dyke Show ($6,080) and The Mary Tyler Moore Show ($7,680) also exceeded expectations. Moore began leading The Mary Tyler Moore Show in 1970, not long after her starring role on The Dick Van Dyke Show. The show was produced by her company, MTM Enterprises, which was behind many successful TV series. Her TV alter ego, Mary Richards, was not that different from the real Moore, the late actress once told PEOPLE in 1974. 'I never went the actors' studio route. I'm not an actress who can create a character. I play me. I'm scared that if I tamper with it I might ruin it,' she shared, noting her single girl character happened, in part, because she didn't want to play married again, and CBS didn't want her character to be divorced. She ended up with eight Emmy nominations and four wins for her work on the series. Read the original article on People
