logo
NPR, PBS honchos face tense grilling by GOP lawmakers over biased coverage, taxpayer funding

NPR, PBS honchos face tense grilling by GOP lawmakers over biased coverage, taxpayer funding

Yahoo27-03-2025

The heads of NPR and PBS sat for a high-intensity grilling on Capitol Hill Wednesday as they tried to defend their taxpayer-funded liberal news outlets from the wrath of Republicans.
NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger testified before the DOGE subcommittee on Wednesday about alleged biased content that's put their platforms in GOP crosshairs. DOGE Subcommittee Chair Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., invited Maher and Kerger to testify about what Greene called their "blatantly ideological and partisan coverage" and have them defend the federal funding they receive in a fiery, partisan hearing.
Maher conceded that NPR botched coverage of Hunter Biden's infamous laptop, expressed regret about remarks she made about President Donald Trump before she ran the outlet, and was grilled on bias at her organization, while Kerger's PBS was accused of being "one of the founders of the trans child abuse industry."
Both PBS and NPR have been heavily criticized for political bias and for advancing leftist ideologies like gender ideology, such as a PBS movie called "Real Boy," which, according to PBS, follows a transgender-identifying teen as he "navigates adolescence, sobriety, and physical and emotional ramifications of his changing gender identity."
Npr Chief Admits Dismissing Hunter Biden Laptop Story Was A Mistake
In her opening remarks, Maher said NPR plays an essential role in "delivering unbiased, nonpartisan, fact-based reporting" to Americans. She said NPR is the only "non-paywalled" news outlet with a reporter dedicated to covering veterans' issues, and she believes local public journalism "has never been more important to American families."
Read On The Fox News App
At one point, she claimed she had "never seen any instance of political bias determining editorial decisions," drawing scorn from conservatives online.
Maher said NPR's newsroom should operate with the highest standards and said it was their responsibility to serve Americans across the political spectrum. She told the subcommittee that NPR last year launched an initiative to improve its editorial review process to ensure all content is "fair and comprehensive," and that new editors and analysts have been hired to ensure different voices and issues are heard.
"I believe Americans voted for a transformative administration, and it is our responsibility to cover that transformation fairly with integrity and tenacity," Maher said.
Kerger used her opening statement to insist that PBS is vital to Americans who rely on it for specific news, ranging from coverage of high school sports and local elections to specialized agricultural stories.
"There's nothing more American than PBS. It's a membership organization. Our local service is at the heart of our work. Our job at PBS is to support our stations so that local stations can serve their communities. We've been proudly fulfilling our mission for nearly 60 years, using the public airwaves and other technologies to help educate, engage, and inspire the American people," Kerger said.
"PBS stations provide something that cannot be found on commercial networks. This is because PBS stations are focused on the needs and interests of the viewers they serve," Kerger continued. "Especially in rural areas, PBS stations are the only outlet providing coverage of local events."
Democrats on the DOGE subcommittee invoked characters from Sesame Street and The Muppets to attack Republican efforts to cut funding to public broadcasting.
Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, a member of the "Squad," attempted to take shots at Trump and DOGE chief Elon Musk, asking, "Has Miss Piggy ever been caught trying to funnel billions of dollars in government contracts to herself and to her companies?"
Casar suggested that Republicans are using PBS and NPR as a "scapegoat" to "try to distract from the fact that Trump and Musk are robbing working people," while Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., asked Kerger, "Is Elmo now or has he ever been a member of the Communist Party of the United States?"
Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., blasted the committee for even holding the hearing, accusing the subcommittee of going after "Bird Bird" and sarcastically saying PBS has committed the "sin" of teaching the alphabet to children.
"If shame was still a thing, this hearing would be shameful," Lynch said.
Democrats Invoke Children's Shows In Bizarre Defense Of Pbs, Npr: 'Fire Elon, Save Elmo'
The Democrat's talking points were in sharp contrast to rhetoric from Republicans.
Greene put a spotlight on former longtime NPR editor Uri Berliner's reporting after he penned a 2024 Free Press bombshell that detailed NPR's "absence of viewpoint diversity," criticizing its slanted coverage on significant topics like the origins of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop, and also revealing voter registration records in 2021 showed an astonishing disparity in the Washington NPR newsroom that featured 87 Democrats and zero Republicans.
Reps. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, and Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., each pressed Maher on social media posts she made before running NPR and Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said he doesn't even "recognize" NPR anymore.
"I feel like it's propaganda. I feel like there's disinformation every time I listen to NPR," Comer said.
The stakes of the hearing were high, given Trump himself has signaled willingness to cut off the money spigot to the outlets if given the opportunity.
A current NPR employee told Fox News Digital that the hearing failed to land any real body blows.
"Some members enjoy taking a whack at NPR ... I thought they scored some hits, almost all about Maher personally," the NPR employee told Fox News Digital, noting that subcommittee members came off as "pretty reasonable people" aside from personal attacks on Maher.
"People who hate NPR will have plenty of grounds to go after NPR after this," the employee said. "But they could find that before today. I don't think it moves the needle; I think this was a hole that they needed to punch."
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Scolds Npr Ceo Over Personal Views During Fiery Doge Subcommittee Hearing
The Heritage Foundation's Michael Gonzalez, a stanch critic of public media, also testified about the "unforgivable political bias" that he feels comes from PBS and NPR, while Alaska Public Media CEO Ed Ulman served as a pro-public media witness.
"We are essential," Ulman said.
Many of the personal attacks came when Greene blasted Maher for her previous job of overseeing Wikipedia, saying it's a "platform that doesn't tell the truth." Greene then read personal statements that Maher previously made on social media so the "public can understand" her views.
Greene noted Maher had called Trump a "deranged, racist sociopath," has said America is "addicted to White supremacy" – which Greene called "appalling" – and found the terms "boy and girl" to be "erasing language" for non-binary people.
"The federal funding that your outlet receives comes from all American taxpayer dollars. Not just from your viewers who support such statements as these. Let me inform you that your federal funding is also paid for by the other half of the country. The 77 million Americans who voted for President Trump. Someone you called a deranged, racist sociopath," Greene said.
Trump Says He'd Love To Yank Funding For Npr, Pbs, Would Be 'Honored' To See It End
Maher was criticized by conservatives in 2024 when she took over NPR and her old social media posts expressing progressive views were unearthed. But Greene said that many find Maher's "pro-censorship and anti-free speech views more concerning" than her politics.
"The only speech you like seems to be speech that you agree with," Greene said.
"In 2021, you called the First Amendment the No. 1 challenge in American journalism because it makes it hard to crack down on bad information," Greene said, later adding, "Who do you think should be charged with cracking down on so-called bad information? Is it NPR? Is it the government? Is it you?"
Maher then attempted to thank Greene for the opportunity to speak but was quickly cut off.
"Is it up to you and NPR to crack down on bad information or decide the truth? Answer the question," Greene said.
Maher shot back, "Absolutely not. I am a very strong believer in free speech."
Later, Maher conceded that NPR missed the mark in its lack of serious coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story during the 2020 election. At the time, NPR representatives publicly called the story unserious and a distraction.
The laptop, which shed light on Hunter Biden's overseas business practices, his father's possible involvement and contained shocking videos and photos of drug use and lewd acts, was ultimately confirmed to be authentic.
"I do want to say that NPR acknowledges we were mistaken in failing to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story more aggressively and sooner," Maher told Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas.
She later reiterated "we made a mistake" about not covering the laptop in a separate exchange with Rep. Brian Jack, R-Ga. Maher was named CEO of NPR in 2024, so she wasn't with the taxpayer-backed outlet at the time the story first broke.
The NPR employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, was fascinated to hear Maher concede NPR should have done things more aggressively pertaining to the laptop.
"I was struck by that," they said.
The NPR staffer told Fox News Digital that a group internally referred to as "the backstop" has been added to help NPR's editorial review.
Rep. William Timmons, R-S.C., told Maher she was a "radical progressive," wondering if her past liberal views had come up in her job interview for the CEO position. She said no.
"I do believe that we need to have journalists who represent the full breadth of the American society so that we can report well for all Americans," she said.
The hearing came after Trump said on Tuesday he would be "honored" to defund NPR, saying, "It's been very biased. The whole group, I mean, a whole group of them."
Greene echoed that notion during her closing remarks.
"We believe that you can hate us on your own dime," Greene said to conclude the hearing.
Fox News Digital's Peter Pinedo contributed to this report. Original article source: NPR, PBS honchos face tense grilling by GOP lawmakers over biased coverage, taxpayer funding

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA star Steve Bannon plays outsized role in Trump's Iran decision: Sources

time37 minutes ago

MAGA star Steve Bannon plays outsized role in Trump's Iran decision: Sources

By the time President Donald Trump and MAGA podcaster Steve Bannon sat down for lunch on Thursday, the president had already approved a plan on how the U.S. might attack an Iranian nuclear facility. American diplomats and their family members were being offered military evacuations from Israel, while the military began moving aircraft and ships to the region. The USS Nimitz – an aircraft carrier that can carry some 60 fighter jets – was set to arrive in the Middle East by the weekend with several smaller ships by its side. Officials said the extraordinary show of force would be needed if Trump pulled the trigger on the military option – both to strike Iran's deeply buried nuclear facility and to protect the some 40,000 U.S. troops who Iran and proxy militant groups could target for retaliation. Trump had just emerged from the Situation Room, where sources say he was warned: A U.S. attack on a key Iranian nuclear facility could be risky, even with a massive "bunker-buster" bomb believed to be able to penetrate some 200 feet through hardened earth. The bomb, known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, had only been tested, but never used in a real-life tactical situation, experts say. And the exact nature of the concrete and metal protecting the Iranian nuclear site known as Fordo isn't known, introducing the chance that a US strike would poke a hornet's nest without destroying it. Bannon, who had already spoken with the president by phone ahead of their lunch, thought all of it was a bad idea, according to several people close to him. Sources say he arrived at the White House for his previously scheduled lunch with Trump armed with specific talking points: Israeli intelligence can't be trusted, he planned to say, and the bunker-buster bomb might not work as planned. The precise risk to the U.S. troops in the Middle East, particularly the 2,500 in Iraq, also wasn't clear if Iran retaliated, he would add. A White House official insists that by the time Trump sat down with Bannon for lunch the president had already made a decision to hold off on a strike against Iran. That decision was relayed to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt who then went to the podium, telling reporters the president would decide "whether or not to go" within two weeks. Another senior administration official dismissed the idea that the "bunker-buster" bomb might not work. 'This Administration is supremely confident in its abilities to dismantle Iran's nuclear program. No one should doubt what the U.S. military is capable of doing,' the official said. Still, Bannon's extraordinary access to Trump this week to discuss a major foreign policy decision like Iran is notable considering Bannon holds no official role in the military or at the State Department. Bannon declined to comment on his lunch with Trump, saying only Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'needs to finish what they started.' 'Bannon in a lot of ways has been – day in and day out – delivering a very, very tough and clear message' against military action, said Curt Mills, executive director of The American Conservative, who also opposes military action in Iran. That strategy, Mills said, has been key to countering other Trump loyalists who favor teaming up with Israel for a strike. 'You can call it infantile. You can call it democratic, or both,' Mills told ABC News. 'This is a White House that is responding in real time to its coalition [which is] revolting to show it's disgusted with the potential of war with Iran.' At odds with Bannon's viewpoint on Iran are other influential conservatives. 'Be all in, President Trump, in helping Israel eliminate the nuclear threat,' Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, told Fox News host Sean Hannity this week. 'If we need to provide bombs to Israel, provide bombs. If we need to fly planes with Israel, do joint operations.' According to one U.S. official, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth mostly ceded the discussion to military commanders, including Gen. Erik Kurilla, commander of military forces in the Mideast, and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who have spent considerable time talking with Trump by phone and in person in recent weeks about his options with Iran and the risks involved, which can be extraordinarily complicated. 'Anybody will tell you the biggest threat to the region is a nuclear-armed Iran,' the official said. 'No one wants Iran to have a nuke.' Sean Parnell, chief Pentagon spokesperson, pushed back on the suggestion Hegseth hasn't taken a lead role in the talks, calling it "completely false." He said Hegseth speaks with Trump 'multiple times a day each day,' and attended meetings with the president in the Situation Room. 'Secretary Hegseth is providing the leadership the Department of Defense and our Armed Forces need, and he will continue to work diligently in support of President Trump's peace through strength agenda,' Parnell said. Sources say Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also the president's interim national security adviser, has been another constant presence at the president's side during the discussions along with Trump's Mideast adviser Steve Witkoff. Once seen as one of Trump's most hawkish cabinet members, Rubio espoused a hardline stance on Iran for years and warned last month that the country was now 'a threshold nuclear weapons state.' But since then, sources say, Rubio has become much more closely aligned with MAGA's 'America First,' noninterventionist stance, adding that he is acutely aware of the political repercussions that a direct attack on Iran could bring about. U.S. and Israeli intelligence agree that Iran has been enriching uranium to a dangerously high concentration and could quickly amass enough of it to build several nuclear weapons. But U.S. intelligence also cautions that its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, hasn't given the order to build those devices. The question now is how soon Iran could declare itself a nuclear power after that decision was made. The uncertainty has drawn comparisons in MAGA circles to faulty intelligence in Iraq, which supporters of the movement blame for the lengthy war. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, who has warned on social media of 'warmongers,' told Congress this spring that 'Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.' When asked Friday about that assessment, Trump responded that the intelligence community 'is wrong' and 'she's wrong.' Gabbard later said her testimony was being taken out of context. 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree,' she wrote in a post on Friday. Sources say another factor could have played a role in Trump's decision to hold off on striking Iran for now despite his insistence that Iran was close to a nuclear bomb. A third aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford and its guided-missile destroyers are set to deploy early next week to head toward Europe, according to the Navy. The carrier strike group needs time to travel before it could be in a position to help protect troops in theater should Trump opt to move ahead with the strike two weeks from now. Officials caution that any success Bannon might have in pulling the president back from the brink of war could be brief. When asked on Friday by reporters if he would ask Israel to stop bombing Iran to enable diplomatic negotiations, Trump said probably not. 'If someone is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if someone is losing,' Trump said of the Israelis. 'But we're ready, willing and able and have been speaking to Iran and we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens.'

This week in Trumponomics: Waiting for the bomb
This week in Trumponomics: Waiting for the bomb

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This week in Trumponomics: Waiting for the bomb

President Trump has a binary decision to make: Whether to join Israel's attacks on Iran or abstain. But the consequences, either way, will likely be unpredictable, messy, and possibly momentous. Markets have been blasé about the widening Middle East war that erupted on June 13 when Israel attacked Iranian nuclear weapon facilities and other targets. Stocks have barely flinched. Oil prices have drifted up, but at $75 per barrel, they're nowhere near crisis levels. The calm may be deceptive. 'The potential for major downside market surprise is more elevated than many would have it,' Terry Haines, founder of Pangaea Policy, wrote in a June 19 analysis. "Market volatility almost certainly will be larger and longer in duration than the usual geopolitical event that is contained quickly.' Trump started out talking tough about Iran's predicament, posting on social media on June 17 that he expected 'unconditional surrender' from the ruling mullahs. But Trump is clearly riven. His whole 'America first' governing theme is based on avoiding foreign entanglements, not embracing them. He calls himself a 'man of peace' and prides himself on negotiating savvy, not swordsmanship. The standoff has led to an increasingly familiar Trump tactic: delay. Trump now says he'll decide by July 4 or so whether to aid Israel in its quest to destroy Iran's nuclear program and prevent it from getting atomic weapons. During its first week of bombing, Israel was able to knock out much of Iran's air defense network, destroy many missile launchers, damage some nuclear facilities, and assassinate a number of Iranian military leaders. It's a humiliation for a nation with nine times the population of Israel and a fanatical regime that says the destruction of Israel is a foundational Israel apparently can't do, however, is destroy the Fordow nuclear complex, which is buried at least 250 feet beneath a mountain 60 miles south of Tehran. The only conventional weapon with a good shot of reaching that deep is the US GBU-57 'massive ordnance penetrator' bomb, which is so big that only American bomber jets can carry it. So Trump has to decide whether to unleash a wave of B-2 bombers over Iran with the mission to demolish the Fordow complex. Armchair generals might see this as a simple one-and-done job. It's anything but. Iran would likely retaliate, threatening some 40,000 American service members stationed in the Middle East and possibly seeking to close the Hormuz Strait, a way station for 20% of the world's petroleum. Trump needs a couple of weeks to think it over. But he's also seeking a way to get Iran to agree to limit its nuclear program through negotiations, which would fulfill his 'man of peace' declaration and avert a US war with Iran that could leave Americans dead and badly mar Trump's presidency. This explains some of Trump's manic-sounding social media posts regarding Iran. Bellicose Trump threatened to assassinate Iranian leader Ali Khameini, saying, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'supreme leader' is hiding. He is an easy target.' He also said 'everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran,' as if American weapons were about to obliterate a megacity as densely populated as New York. Yet, Reasonable Trump has been urging Iran to accept a deal he's been working on since he took office in January. A Trump deal is only necessary because Trump scuttled the last deal with Iran, which former President Barack Obama finalized in 2015. Under that deal, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear weapons development in exchange for relief from punishing economic sanctions. Trump withdrew the United States from that deal, saying it was too soft on Iran. But he never got a better deal. The Obama deal was imperfect, to be sure. But all of Iran's recent progress on nuclear weapons came after Trump pulled out in 2018, and Iran may now be within weeks or months of building a nuke it could launch at Israel. Trump may now think Iran is in a can't-win position. Israel represents not just the threat of force, but actual force that degrades Iranian capabilities each day. That lets Trump play the good cop, whose supposed nuclear deal offers a way for Iran to escape Israeli pummeling. And with the massive ordnance penetrator in his back pocket, Trump can threaten even worse punishment than Israel is delivering. But Iran still might not cave. It could relocate much of its nuclear material and gird for the destruction of Fordow. Some analysts estimate Iran could reconstitute its nuclear program within a year or two, especially if it forswears any cooperation with weapons monitors or nonproliferation regimes. Iran could also try to snooker Trump into a sweetheart deal, hoping he'll grasp at anything he can claim as a victory. If nothing much changes by the end of Trump's two-week decision window, will dropping the big bomb be Trump's default position? Not necessarily. Trump could simply delay a decision by another two weeks or find some other formulation for basically doing nothing. Delay, in fact, is becoming Trump's go-to tactic. Trump has thrice delayed the date by which social media platform TikTok must sell itself to a non-Chinese buyer or go dark in the United States. Congress passed a law requiring that last year, but it did give the president the leeway of postponing enforcement, and Trump has taken advantage of it. The new deadline is Sept. 17. Trump also delayed the 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of nations reaching, in some cases, into the high double digits. Trump postponed those until July 9, saying that he expected to negotiate dozens of trade deals by then that would obviate the need for tariffs. As the deadline draws near, however, there have been hardly any announced deals. A buoyant stock markets suggest that investors think Trump will delay those tariffs yet again. But Trump also risks losing credibility with his counterparts if he always delays and never makes good on his threats. If Trump doesn't get the job done with Iran, the Islamic theocracy could hobble along as a wounded but dangerous combatant willing to take bigger risks. Trump will look like a bluffer who brags about a giant bomb he's afraid to use. He might discover that keeping America out of foreign wars doesn't make the nation better off, after all. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.

Israel says it hit Iran nuclear research facility, killed top commanders as both trade strikes
Israel says it hit Iran nuclear research facility, killed top commanders as both trade strikes

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Israel says it hit Iran nuclear research facility, killed top commanders as both trade strikes

Israel on Saturday said it struck an Iranian nuclear facility in Isfahan and killed two top commanders as the clash between the two Middle Eastern countries expands and President Trump weighs direct intervention. Israeli Air Force fighter jets later in the day also moved to strike military infrastructure in southwestern Iran, according to an Israeli military statement. Saeed Izadi, leader of the Palestine Corps of the Quds Force and Behnam Shahriyari, commander of the Quds Force's Weapons Transfer Unit in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were pronounced dead by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) early Saturday. Israeli officials in a social media post said Izadi was 'one of the main orchestrators' of the Oct. 7, 2023 attack from Hamas. The IDF said Shahriyari was responsible for weapons transfer from Iran to proxies across the Middle East. Israeli officials said he was killed while traveling in western Iran. 'His elimination represents a severe blow to the ability of the terrorist organizations surrounding Israel to regroup and strengthen after being heavily damaged by the IDF during the war,' the IDF wrote. The IRGC has not confirmed the deaths but Akbar Salehi, Isfahan province's deputy governor for security affairs, did confirm damage to their nuclear site in Isfahan, per The Associated Press. Israeli forces, Salehi said, struck the site twice within 24 hours, crippling two centrifuge production sites as a part of their objective to eliminate Iran's nuclear development programs. Iran fired 40 drones overnight on Friday that were intercepted by Israel according to the IDF. 'We've been able to take out a large amount of their launchers, creating a bottleneck — we're making it harder for them to fire toward Israel,' an Israeli military official told AP on the condition of anonymity. 'Having said all that, I want to say the Iranian regime obviously still has capabilities.' The escalation of tensions comes as Trump still weighs his options on U.S. involvement, but has warned Iran not to attack American troops. Citizens are also being evacuated in Israel, per US officials. ''Operation Exodus'' is helping US citizens evacuate Israel. We can't part the Red Sea, but are parting the 'Red Tape' to help people who wish to leave,' U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee wrote in a Saturday post on X. Foreign leaders gathered in Geneva to seek to assist in quelling the violence in the region via diplomacy on Friday, however, talks quickly reached a stalemate as Iranian leaders pushed for consequences on Israel. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again and once aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters. The United Nations issued a Friday release after the meetings in Geneva condemning Israeli attacks while denouncing the strikes as a violation of international law. Israel first hit Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13, prompting tensions to escalate in the region as US nuclear talks with Iran collapsed. Iran's Health Ministry spokesman Hossein Kermanpour said in an online interview with NewsNation, The Hill's sister station, on Friday that since strikes began, over 3,000 Iranians have been injured, 90 percent of whom are civilians. He said at least 400 people have been killed. The spokesperson added that the youngest injured is a 4-year-old boy, and the youngest victim is a two-month-old baby. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store