Xi Jinping's Russia visit balances symbolism and strategy as Europe watches
A visit to Russia this week by Chinese President
Xi Jinping would add 'symbolic' weight to the camaraderie between the two neighbours, while subsequent developments could be more significant, according to European observers.
Advertisement
They also cautioned, however, that Beijing faced an unsustainable balancing act – strengthening ties with Moscow amid a prolonged
war in Ukraine , while attempting to foster closer relations with Europe.
Xi was set to arrive in Russia on Wednesday for a four-day state visit and hold talks with his Russian counterpart
Vladimir Putin on Thursday.
As arguably the most prominent foreign leader to join Putin as the 'main guest of honour', Xi will also attend the May 9 military parade in Red Square to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
Russian service members rehearse for a military parade on Wednesday in central Moscow. Photo: Reuters
A profound friendship forged in blood and lives during the second world war had become an 'eternal' source of the 'everlasting'
China-Russia friendship , the Chinese leader wrote in a signed article published on Wednesday ahead of his trip.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Step in right direction as US and China ease trade war tensions
Cautious optimism that China and the United States can further de-escalate the trade row Washington started has peaked and may soon be vindicated. It rose when the two sides, meeting in Geneva last month, agreed on a 90-day pause in new sky-high bilateral tariffs to allow for negotiations, fell with more US tech export bans and rose again after last week's phone call between presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. Advertisement Now hopes have received a major boost after top economic and trade officials from each side, meeting in London, reached agreement in principle on a 'framework' to implement the consensus between Xi and Trump. Indeed that is what Trump alluded to yesterday when he said: 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me.' That, however, is easier said than done, as seen by the extent and acrimony of chilled relations between the two sides. The agreement follows two days of trade talks between top officials in London in the first meeting of what is now called the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism. Vice-Premier He Lifeng led the Chinese delegation. China's top trade negotiator, Li Chenggang, said it was hoped progress at the London meeting would be conducive to increasing trust between China and the US. That achievement on its own would be significant bilaterally, regionally and globally. The world will be watching for final approval of the framework from the top level. Expectations have been shaped by official accounts from both sides of the Xi-Trump call regarding sensitive issues. They include restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earths – an issue that has been resolved according to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick – and US visas for Chinese students. Importantly, the talks have gained momentum without serious setbacks, building on foundations laid on neutral ground in the initial talks in Geneva. News of the 'framework' agreement broke the same day the People's Daily published an interview with the founder of multinational Huawei Technologies, Ren Zhengfei, which seemed more than a coincidence. Ren said Americans overestimated the importance of his company, which owed its success to hard work and research over the years. Advertisement The interview was a timely signal that no matter how the US restricted China's tech development, it would not stop China from developing its own core technology.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why China remains world's best chance for peace in Ukraine
The International Organisation for Mediation launched in Hong Kong late last month, counting 32 countries as founding signatories. An institution designed to supplement and actualise Article 33 of the United Nations Charter is something the world increasingly needs as Russia's invasion of Ukraine drags into its fourth year. Advertisement Recent peace talks in Istanbul produced no appreciable progress , while swings on the battlefield have long since given way to a grinding impasse. Neither side appears capable of achieving peace, much less victory on the battlefield. Meanwhile, sanctions, weapons deliveries and rhetorical escalation continue to deepen global fragmentation. However, peace could still be in reach if the thorniest issues are addressed. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed openness to direct negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the same time, Russia's ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia has reiterated Moscow's willingness to support a UN-centred peace initiative for Ukraine, suggesting there is at least an opening. Both parties remain deeply divided. US-led efforts to push the two into accepting a ceasefire have so far failed, and it is little wonder why, given the challenges remaining. Nato does not hold the answer, and neither does the presence of US troops. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has made it clear that deploying US forces to Ukraine in a peacekeeping role is unacceptable. 'Instead, any security guarantee must be backed by capable European and non-European troops,' he told a gathering of transatlantic alliance members in Brussels. Advertisement
South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hey, Nato boss man, keep your hands off the Asia-Pacific region
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has failed to deter or stop Russia from invading and annexing Ukrainian territories, yet it wants to expand into Asia-Pacific to take on China. Most of its European member states – Germany even has slight negative growth this year – is mired in economic slowdown, social malaise and political instability, yet they want to double, more or less, their national defence spending. Where will they find the money? That's why Nato chief Mark Rutte raised a few eyebrows among independent observers, especially those from Asia, when he told an audience in London this week that what happened in the Pacific was Nato's business too. It is? 'We cannot think that there is one theatre, which is the Euro-Atlantic theatre,' he said. 'We have to be conscious of the fact that this is all interconnected with what is happening in the Pacific.' He added, 'They are supporting, as we all know, Russia's war effort against Ukraine', thereby deliberately lumping China with Iran and North Korea. The latter two did offer materials and troops, not China. Well, since everything is connected in this world, Nato could argue the world is its oyster. Rutte is starting to sound like his predecessor Jens Stoltenberg, who had claimed a Nato mandate over the Indo-Pacific reaching the Middle East and Africa! Rutte also claimed that the West's partners in the region, including Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, were 'really worried about what's happening in the Pacific'. Worried enough to do a Cold War redux? That's not clear, especially with the Japanese and South Koreans. Has Rutte taken a poll?
