Supreme Court OKs Trump's mass firing of new federal workers, blocking S.F. judge's rehire order
The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected challenges to the Trump administration's mass firing of new federal workers.
By a 7-2 vote, the justices set aside a ruling by U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco, who ordered the administration to "immediately" rehire 16,000 probationary employees across six departments of the government.
In a brief order, the high court said the judge improperly based his ruling on complaints from nine nonprofit groups who said they would be affected by the cutbacks in staffing.
"But under established law, those allegations are presently insufficient to support the organizations' standing," the court said.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson said they would have denied the administration's appeal. The decision is the third in the past week to overturn a judge's ruling at the behest of the Trump administration.
Trump's lawyers argued that judges do not have the authority to second-guess the management of federal agencies.
Read more: Supreme Court upholds Trump's war power to deport Venezuelan gang members
"This Court should not allow a single district court to ... seize control over reviewing federal personnel decisions," then-acting Solicitor Gen. Sarah Harris said in her appeal.
The mass layoffs ordered by the Trump administration have mostly gone unchallenged in the courts because of the civil service laws.
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 gave federal employees the right to file complaints with administrative agencies inside the government. But the Supreme Court said that meant they may not sue directly before an independent federal judge.
As a result, several lawsuits brought by employees unions were dismissed in February.
But on March 13, Alsup ordered the government to "immediately" rehire 16,000 probation employees who were dismissed in February.
He relied on a different theory. He said a group of nonprofits that represent veterans, farmers, outdoor advocates and others had standing to sue because the staff cutbacks would hurt them.
And he said Trump's Office of Personnel Management violated the law by ordering the mass firing of probationary employees.
His order told the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Defense, Energy, Interior and the Treasury they must reinstate their fired employees.
When the 9th Circuit Court refused to lift that order, Trump's lawyers filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Hunt for Father Accused of Killing Three Daughters
Hunt for Father Accused of Killing Three Daughters, Sean 'Diddy' Combs is asking for a mistrial, President Trump appeared at a Ultimate Fighting Championship match in New Jersey. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk
President Trump said he assumes his relationship with Elon Musk has ended and that he has no desire to repair it after the pair publicly fell out last week. "I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken," Trump said of the billionaire in a phone call with NBC News' Kristen Welker. The big picture: Trump's comments also came with a warning to Musk when the president said the Tesla CEO could face "serious consequences" should he fund Democratic candidates in the next election running against Republicans who vote for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The billionaire, who contributed more than $290 million to Republicans in the 2024 election but has since said he'd cut back on political spending, posted last week that politicians "who betrayed the American people" should be fired in November. Trump declined to elaborate on what the consequences would be for Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that it would be a "big mistake" for Musk to go after Republicans who vote for the bill. Driving the news: Trump said he has no plans to speak to the Tesla CEO during the Saturday phone interview with Welker. Asked if he thought his relationship with Musk was over, Trump said he "would assume so." He accused the once-close administration ally of being "disrespectful to the office of the President." Catch up quick: The alliance between Trump and the former chainsaw-wielding face of DOGE exploded last week as Musk continuously campaigned against the massive tax-and-spending package, blasting it as a "disgusting abomination." Speaking to reporters during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Thursday, Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk, who he claimed was very familiar with the inner workings of the legislation. While Trump talked, Musk fired back in real-time on X, claiming in one post that Trump would have lost the election without him. Zoom in: In one post that appears to have been deleted, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files." Trump told NBC that it's "old news."


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Ex-DHS official warns Trump deploying National Guard could increase tensions
CNN national security analyst and former DHS official Juliette Kayyem warns that Trump's National Guard deployment is highly unusual and could escalate tensions rather than ease unrest.