CATL: World's biggest EV battery maker sees shares jump on debut
The world's largest electric vehicle (EV) battery maker has made its debut on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, in the biggest initial public offering (IPO) so far this year. China's Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Limited (CATL) produces more than a third of all EV batteries sold worldwide and supplies major carmakers including Tesla, Volkswagen and Toyota.The company raised almost HK$35.7bn ( $4.55bn, £3.4bn) from the listing. Its shares jumped by more than 10% at the market open. In January, the US Department of Defense added the battery maker to a list of businesses it says works with China's military. CATL denies this, claiming its inclusion on the list was a "mistake".
The company is already listed on China's Shenzhen Stock Exchange, where it has a valuation of more than 1tn yuan ($138.7bn, £104.3bn). Founded in 2011 in the eastern Chinese city of Ningde, it enjoyed rapid growth thanks to the boom in the country's EV industry. The battery giant employs over 100,000 people and has 13 production plants around the world. CATL is currently building its second European factory in Hungary, after opening a plant in Germany in early 2023. In December, the firm announced a tie-up with Chrysler-owner Stellantis to build a $4.3bn (£3.2bn) EV battery plant in Spain. The facility is set to be in operation by the end of next year.The firm invests heavily in new technology, with six research and development centres around the world. "The innovations that we're seeing from CATL are unbelievable, particularly in the fast charging area", said Tim Buckley founder of the independent Australian think tank Climate Energy Finance. Last month, the company unveiled a new battery that it said can be charged for 323 miles (520km) in just five minutes. CATL is a major supplier to Elon Musk's Tesla, providing lithium iron phosphate batteries for the EV makers Shanghai factory. But US lawmakers have expressed concerns about potential national security risks surrounding the Chinese company. In April, the chair of the House Select Committee on China wrote letters to the chief executives of JPMorgan and Bank of America, asking them to withdraw from working on CATL's Hong Kong listing. Despite scepticism about Chinese firms from Washington, Mr Buckley says the US should be looking to work with Beijing on the advancement of renewable energy."They're rejecting by far the best technology players in the world when it comes to clean tech", he told the BBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Trump plans to save TikTok for a third time
Published: | Updated: President Donald Trump plans to save Tiktok from going dark for a third time. Ahead of a June 19 deadline, the president is expected to sign an executive order staving off enforcement of a law banning the app or forcing its sale, the Wall Street Journal reported. This would be the third extension since Trump took office on January 20th. The extension comes as Trump officials head to London for a Monday meeting with Chinese officials on a trade deal. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will be meeting at the meeting. 'The meeting should go very well. Thank you for your attention to this matter!,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account. He and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone Thursday as both sides try to repair a breakdown in trade negotiations. Earlier this year, the administration had been working on a deal for American investors to take ownership of the popular video app but that deal fell victim to Trump's trade war with China . So, on April 4th, Trump signed an executive order granting a 75-day extension allowing TikTok to operate in the U.S. 'My Administration has been working very hard on a Deal to SAVE TIKTOK, and we have made tremendous progress. The Deal requires more work to ensure all necessary approvals are signed, which is why I am signing an Executive Order to keep TikTok up and running for an additional 75 days,' he announced on Truth Social at the time. Several American companies have expressed interest in having a stake in Tiktok, including Amazon, Wal-Mart, and Oracle. TikTok is one of the most powerful media sources in America today. It has 135.79 million users in America, making it the country with the biggest audience on the map. It also has grown to be one of the largest online shopping marketplaces with millions of dollars in daily sales. Congress passed the TikTok ban in 2024 with overwhelming bipartisan support demanding China lose its control of the popular video service. Lawmakers had national security concerns that an app used by so many Americans was controlled by China and feared the Chinese company that owns, ByteDance, could use it as a way to collect information on Americans. TikTok fought the ban all the way to the Supreme Court, calling it a violation of free speech rights, but the court upheld the law in early 2025. ByteDance didn't agree to terms with any US-based companies and went dark for a few hours on January 19th, the day before President Trump's inauguration. But Trump has fought to keep the social media site operational in the US. After his inauguration, he signed a delay in implementing the ban, then extended it again in April and is preparing for the third extension. Trump sees the app as a way to reach younger voter. He has indicated he'd like to come to a deal. 'We'll probably have to get China's approval. China's never easy,' he said last week. 'I'd like to save TikTok. I mean, TikTok was very good to me.'
Daily Record
28 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Scottish city to transform its skyline to become UK's 'mini New York'
Glasgow is set to grow taller with plans for new skyscrapers in Charing Cross, Anderston Quay, Trongate and Cowcaddens. Glasgow's skyline could soon rival that of New York as city chiefs unveil bold plans to welcome high-rise development and reshape the urban horizon. Already arranged in a grid pattern reminiscent of the Big Apple, Scotland's largest city now appears ready to grow upwards as confidently as it has grown outwards. A newly published Tall Building Designs Guide from Glasgow City Council pinpoints four strategic areas, Charing Cross, Anderston Quay, Trongate and Cowcaddens, as front-runners for future skyscraper schemes, Express reports. The move marks a decisive break from previous decades, when building heights were curbed well below those seen in comparable European cities. By relaxing those limits, planners hope to bring fresh energy, investment and people into the heart of Glasgow. At present, the city's tallest building is Buchanan Wharf in Tradeston, which rises to 80 metres and also holds the title of Scotland's tallest building. Yet even that landmark is dwarfed by the UK's loftiest structures, such as The Shard in London, soaring to nearly 310 metres, and Deansgate Square South Tower in Manchester at 201 metres. The tallest structure in Glasgow overall remains the Science Centre's Glasgow Tower, a 127-metre needle that can rotate a full 360 degrees, the highest fully revolving tower anywhere in the world. Council leaders say the new guidance reflects a 'significant' shift in strategy, aimed squarely at addressing the city's relatively low centre-city population density, which they argue has long hampered economic momentum. 'Glasgow is unique among Scottish cities in having the scope to build upwards,' officers note in the report. 'Shaped by this Tall Buildings guidance, it is confidently expected the city skyline will change, building towards the kind of city-centre population density that is commonplace in European cities, and the comparable lack of which is an acknowledged barrier to growth in the UK.' The document also presses for more mixed-use projects, encouraging developers to weave retail and leisure venues into ground floors to boost daytime buzz and evening footfall alike. Councillors on the City Administration Committee are due to vote on final approval soon, a decision likely to set the tone for Glasgow's skyline for decades. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Councillor Ruairi Kelly, convener for development and land use, framed the guidance as a cornerstone of wider ambitions to expand both population and prosperity. 'Tall buildings will play a significant role in our ambition to grow the city centre population, and encouraging major construction projects will be a boost for the local economy and employment,' he said. 'Having clear parameters of what we will support, and where, will give clarity to residents and assurances to those who wish to invest and develop in our city. "Glasgow is very much open for business, and if we want to see a thriving city, then we need to build it.'
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Trump vs Musk feud will prove a historic turning point
Lovers' spat – or acrimonious divorce? With two individuals so volatile as Donald Trump and Elon Musk, it is impossible to tell where their 'relationship', such as it now is, will go. We know they were once close – a bromance, indeed, where Mr Musk declared he loved Mr Trump 'as much as any straight man can love another man '. The president was never quite so gushing about his friend in return, but only a few days ago, during a farewell in the Oval Office, during which Mr Musk was gifted an outsize golden key, he described Mr Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it.' Now? Not so much. Mr Musk has called Mr Trump's signature 'Big, Beautiful Bill' an 'abomination', made lurid reference to the president appearing in as-yet unreleased Epstein files, and backed replacing him with JD Vance. The president, never the most resilient or easy-going of men, responded in kind, threatening to cancel contracts with Mr Musk's companies, scrapping the electric vehicle mandate (important for Mr Musk's Tesla operations) and accusing the former 'First Buddy' of suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome'. There are a few signs, glimpsed, naturally, on Mr Musk's social media platform X, formerly Twitter, that these two giant egos might be persuaded to kiss and make up, metaphorically, and Mr Musk is sounding a little more emollient than on Thursday. But Mr Trump, who's been through a couple of actual divorces, may need more wooing. Even if the personal insults stop, Mr Musk is unlikely to change his mind about the Big, Beautiful Bill, and President Trump will continue to press for it and the tax cuts it contains for vital electoral reasons as much as any (spurious) economic justification. Much the same may be said for their now open differences on tariffs, where Mr Musk rightly warns they spell recession for America – if not the world – later in the year. One thing seems certain, though: it will never be glad, confident morning in America for Maga again. What it means for the Trump administration is, very simply, that it can no longer be sure of the kind of generous and unconditional financial and media support Mr Musk provided in the 2024 presidential campaign. At best, from the point of view of the White House, Mr Musk will attend to his business interests – including the urgent task of reviving Tesla, whose share price has slumped in line with Mr Musk's reputation in recent weeks. He will, on this assumption, give up on politics and maintain a stance of studied neutrality. That feels unlikely, given Mr Musk's ownership of X. At worst, then, instead of Mr Musk spending $250m helping loyal Maga candidates get elected to back Mr Trump in next year's Congressional midterm elections, he will spend serious money on swing states and districts with the aim of wrecking the president's key economic policies. No doubt X will now tone away from pro-Trump sentiment. The midterms were always going to be dicey for Mr Trump, whose hold on the Senate is weak even now. And it's perfectly possible that Mr Musk's interventions would make matters worse for the Trump partisans. After all, Mr Musk's $1m prize lottery in the key state of Pennsylvania might have delivered that state to Mr Trump, and the Musk-backed America PAC (political action committee) many more voters than that. Mr Musk certainly thinks he won the last election for his former best friend: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude.' There are no heroes in this story. Neither the world's richest person nor the most powerful man on Earth has shown much interest in improving the state of the world. They are both impetuous and puerile. America has known some earthy types at the top of politics and business, and plenty of gamblers and chancers. But never before has the world been entertained, if that's the word, by such a breathtaking display of such man-baby behaviour. Even by their own standards, it has been a depressing spectacle. The only good that might come from it is that both men emerge weaker, and President Trump will at last find himself challenged by a more confident and assertive legislature – one that joins with the independent judiciary to restrain his dictatorial tendencies. So let us hope there will be no Trump-Musk reconciliation, the marriage is dissolved and their infantile hatred continues to run deep.
