logo
NAACP National Convention 2025, Charlotte: Trump will be the first President in 116 years not invited to the event

NAACP National Convention 2025, Charlotte: Trump will be the first President in 116 years not invited to the event

Time of India6 hours ago

The
NAACP
said President Donald Trump will NOT be invited to their national convention next month in Charlotte, North Carolina. This is the first time in 116 years a sitting U.S. president is not invited, as per the reports.
Derrick Johnson, NAACP President, said this is not about politics. He said Trump goes against what the NAACP stands for, which is civil rights. Johnson, 'This has nothing to do with political party, the current president has made clear that his mission is to eliminate civil rights', as per the report by Associated Press.
The White House has not replied to this decision yet. Recently, the NAACP has taken legal action against Trump and his administration. One lawsuit in April was to stop the Department of Education from cutting funds to schools with diversity programs. They said this move blocked fair chances for Black students, as stated by Associated Press.
NAACP's history with U.S. Presidents
The NAACP reminded people that presidents from both parties have always been welcome before. Even when the NAACP disagreed with a president, they still invited them in the past, as per reports.
Another example, Ronald Reagan, also a Republican, came to the NAACP in 1981. He had been criticized earlier for using the term 'welfare queen' in his 1980 campaign, which many thought was racist. But when he spoke, he condemned white hate groups and promised to protect people's rights, as mentioned in the report by Associated Press.
Live Events
The NAACP's decision marks a major break from their usual tradition of engaging with every president, even those they strongly disagreed with. But this time, they believe Trump is actively working against civil rights, as per reports.
FAQs
Q1. Why did the NAACP not invite President Trump to their 2025 convention?
The NAACP said Trump works against civil rights, which goes against their mission, so they chose not to invite him.
Q2. Has the NAACP excluded any other sitting president before?
No, this is the first time in 116 years that a sitting president was not invited to the NAACP convention.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Web of Air Power, Intelligence And U.S. Weapons – How Israel Reached Deep Inside Iran
A Web of Air Power, Intelligence And U.S. Weapons – How Israel Reached Deep Inside Iran

India.com

time16 minutes ago

  • India.com

A Web of Air Power, Intelligence And U.S. Weapons – How Israel Reached Deep Inside Iran

New Delhi: On paper, the odds seem skewed. Israel, a nation of just nine million, is taking on Iran – a regional heavyweight with nearly 90 million people and vastly greater territory. Tel Aviv has built a sophisticated edge with modern weaponry, much of it supplied by the United States and a seasoned intelligence network that reaches far beyond its borders. Israeli jets, equipped with precision-guided munitions, have executed strikes deep inside Iranian territory. Satellite images released on June 15 revealed significant damage to infrastructure above ground in Natanz, one of Iran's key nuclear sites. Israel has claimed near-total control over Tehran's airspace, emphasising that most of Iran's aging fighter jets never even took off. Much of this air dominance stems from Israel's use of U.S.-made aircraft and munitions, including long-range missiles capable of disabling ground-based air defense systems. In one notable operation last October, Israel targeted Iran's S-300 missile defense system from a distance, neutralising a key layer of Iranian protection. Even before air raids began, intelligence agents embedded in Iran reportedly paved the way. Israeli operatives smuggled drones across the border to locate and strike remaining air defense units. These drone strikes, along with the targeted elimination of several Iranian military commanders, crippled Iran's ability to respond quickly. The Arsenal and the Allies Estimates suggest Iran once held the largest arsenal of ballistic missiles in the region, numbering between 2,000 and 3,000. Israel now claims to have destroyed a substantial portion of those, including key production sites and missile launchers. One-third of Iran's surface-to-surface launch systems have reportedly been rendered inoperable. Despite these setbacks, Iran is not out of the game. It still retains short-range air defense missiles that could threaten Israeli aircraft. Military analysts believe Israel, while dominant in the skies for now, has yet to fully neutralise the Iranian threat. Tehran's regional allies have also struggled to offer meaningful resistance. Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza – both long-time beneficiaries of Iranian support – have seen their frontline capabilities severely diminished. However, Yemen's Houthi rebels continue to launch missiles toward Israeli targets, even downing several surveillance drones despite U.S. airstrikes. Beyond the battlefield, Israel relies heavily on Washington. The Iron Dome missile interceptors, bunker-busting bombs and the advanced fighter jets it uses all originate from the United States. Some of these weapons, particularly those capable of reaching deep underground sites like Fordow, are still withheld by Washington. President Donald Trump is reported to have blocked Israeli plans to target Iran's Supreme Leader directly. Even with unmatched air power and intelligence, Israel faces limits. It can disrupt Iran's nuclear ambitions, but fully dismantling them appears out of reach. Changing Iran's leadership remains an even more distant goal. For now, what Israel has achieved is tactical disruption. Whether that translates to strategic success remains to be seen.

Israel-Iran war: Donald Trump may consider joining Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites; report claims growing US involvement
Israel-Iran war: Donald Trump may consider joining Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites; report claims growing US involvement

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Israel-Iran war: Donald Trump may consider joining Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites; report claims growing US involvement

US President Donald Trump is weighing the possibility of US involvement in Israel's ongoing strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, multiple officials familiar with the matter told CBS News. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One early Tuesday, Trump made his stance clear. 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate with Iran,' he said, adding that his goal is a permanent solution: 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire.' Later, on Truth Social, Trump doubled down, calling for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' and stating that the US knows 'exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' US defence officials had made arrangements anticipating Trump's potential directive for the US Air Force to support Israeli fighter aircraft with refuelling during their operations over Iran, two sources told CNN. These sources indicated that this consideration partly explains why more than 30 aerial refuelling tankers have been deployed to the region in recent days. Refueling Israeli jets midair would be one of the least aggressive forms of support. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Still, CENTCOM has presented Trump with the possibility of joint US-Israel strikes on nuclear facilities. Vice President JD Vance echoed the urgency, posting on X that Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president.' Trump met with his national security team in the White House Situation Room on Tuesday. Israeli officials, who have been urging US involvement, expressed optimism but said no formal decision from the US had been conveyed yet. While Trump had previously avoided direct military involvement beyond missile defense and intelligence sharing, his recent statements — including 'we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran' — suggest a shift. 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA,' he wrote on Truth Social. After Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday, it claimed Iran was rapidly advancing toward building nuclear weapons. However, a US intelligence report earlier this year said Iran was not pursuing a nuclear bomb, though mounting pressure may be pushing the regime to restart its nuclear program. The International Atomic Energy Agency has reported that Iran has significantly increased its stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium in recent months. Iran continues to insist its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. While President Trump has not confirmed direct US involvement, his recent posts on Truth Social have stirred speculation. Trump's increasingly aggressive tone and use of the term 'we' in reference to military actions have raised questions about the extent of American involvement. And one of the key targets being considered is Iran's Fordo nuclear site, a heavily fortified uranium enrichment facility buried deep under a mountain. According to Brett McGurk, a former US official who served under four presidents, 'Fordo is the crux of this thing.' Destroying it would deal a major blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions, but only the US has the firepower to make that happen. Military experts agree that multiple precision strikes by American B-2 bombers would be needed in a carefully coordinated mission. The New York Times reports that the Pentagon has rehearsed this scenario, which involves dropping a series of bombs "down the same hole" to penetrate Fordo's deep underground structure. Fordo is located nearly 300 feet beneath a mountain and protected by heavy air defenses. It is widely believed to be Iran's most likely site for developing nuclear weapons, as it is where Iran has enriched uranium and expanded its stockpile.

Trump Leaves G-7 Summit Early as Israel-Iran Tension Spikes
Trump Leaves G-7 Summit Early as Israel-Iran Tension Spikes

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Trump Leaves G-7 Summit Early as Israel-Iran Tension Spikes

President Donald Trump's hasty exit from the Group of Seven conference in Canada deepened questions about his promise to bring peace to an increasingly violent world and added fresh evidence of his skepticism toward the institutions that have long underpinned US diplomacy. The president said he was departing the meeting of some of the world's most powerful leaders in the Canadian Rockies because of the unfolding tensions in the Middle East, where Israel is bombarding Iran's nuclear and military sites. That fanned speculation the US may be preparing to join Israel in its attacks. In past crises, the Group of Seven was the very forum where US presidents corralled support for a coordinated response. That was the case when Russia invaded Ukraine and the G-7 was the venue through which allies organized support for Kyiv. Trump has often said if he'd been president, the war on Ukraine never would have happened and Hamas would not have attacked Israel. He backed out of the Obama-era nuclear accord with Iran and framed a new agreement as a simple task. Five months into his presidency, however, Trump's self-confidence has repeatedly collided with the reality of a complex and difficult world. The Russia-Ukraine conflict remains unresolved and the two countries' leaders won't even get to the negotiating table as Trump wants. And on Monday, he frustrated fellow allies by dismissing pressure to impose tougher sanctions on Russia. Earlier: Trump Set to Depart G-7 Early as Israel-Iran Tension Spikes Trump has also struggled to contain Israel's military and Iran's nuclear ambitions. After publicly calling on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avoid an attack that could scuttle nuclear talks with Iran, Trump has sought to align himself behind a campaign he had advised against. By Monday, American officials were offering different messages, with Trump warning Iranians to evacuate Tehran while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the president still believed a nuclear accord could be struck. 'Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign,' Trump wrote on social media, adding that 'everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' The summit also underscored Trump's failure to strongarm other nations into trade deals. Rather than new accords with allies like Japan or Canada at the conference, Trump signed documents reiterating his lone agreement with the UK. Even those papers – which blew out of the folder Trump presented to reporters, scattering on the ground – left unresolved critical questions about how the US would impose metals tariffs. 'Perhaps he feels like he needs to look like events aren't overtaking the president of the United States,' Justin Logan, the director of defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, said as Trump headed to the summit. 'The best evidence we have is that events have overtaken the president of the United States.' Late Monday, the Group of Seven leaders pushed for a de-escalation in the Middle East but didn't call for an immediate end to the conflict between Israel and Iran in a statement that also affirmed Israel's right to defend itself. It wasn't the first time Trump had abruptly departed from such a gathering. The last time Canada hosted the G-7 in 2018, Trump backed out of a joint communique after clashing with then Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and left early to prepare for a meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. He did it again in 2019, when he scrapped a press conference at the end of a NATO summit. That came after another dust-up with Trudeau, who had been caught on video joking about Trump. Trump used those early exits for leverage or to register displeasure. Throughout Monday, the president — who was awake late into the previous night posting on social media — flashed signs of annoyance during the highly scripted meeting. He swiped at longtime ally Tucker Carlson over criticism of his support for Israel's campaign and bristled at a reporter's question about whether he would travel to the Middle East, responding 'we have a thing called the telephone.' The president's decision to stay for a leaders dinner prompted questions about his decision to depart. White House aides have long maintained Trump can monitor world events from anywhere, whether it be Washington or his golf courses. Still, the developments in the Middle East are undeniably serious. Israel and Iran's clash is their most serious escalation yet, threatening to bring more death to the region while also disrupting vital trade and energy flows. Investor reaction was mixed, with US futures falling 0.4%, gold rising and oil swinging between gains and losses following Trump's comments about evacuating Tehran. Monday's display reinforced longstanding concerns among US partners. Allies are increasingly unsure whether they can trust Trump to stick to his word and are buying time. They engage with the president and resist antagonizing him while also acknowledging that the world has changed. During a session on the global economic outlook, members tried to impress on Trump that the main challenge now was G-7 members working against each other to China's benefit, according to a German official who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. Trump remained mostly quiet. Carney presented a map which divided the world into regions in blue — representing the West — and red — representing China. The point was that the red zones have become much bigger. In parallel, they are looking to diversify trade relations away from the US, to strengthen security ties among themselves and figuring out how to help Ukraine's position as US aid wanes. At a press conference Sunday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Canada and the European Union were looking to sign deeper security and defense partnerships. Carney later sent a social media post echoing that. Trump's decision to leave the summit early showed he had a different view. Two delegations said they had learned of it through the media, according to people familiar with the matter. Canada, the summit's host country, was informed through official channels before the public announcement, another person said. 'Between partners, allies and friends, when some problem comes, what we need is to talk and we are here in this very crucial moment to talk,' von der Leyen said. With assistance from Arne Delfs, Ellen Milligan, Ania Nussbaum, Brian Platt and Jorge Valero. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store