
From demanding parents to stressed-out students to the pressure to win, high school coaches face more challenges than ever
They're at Bishop Feehan in Attleboro to begin their MIAA certification with the Schmidt-led four-hour 'Fundamentals of Coaching.'
Advertisement
By the time class is dismissed, the coaches will be fully aware of what amounts to a state of crisis in their profession.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
It's not the lousy pay, long hours, and myriad logistical issues that are anything new.
It's this cultural moment, a time when winning has never been more highly prized and the $30 billion business of youth sports, combined with NIL compensation, has never been more transactional.
Raising the degree of difficulty is trying to reach the adolescent brains of a post-COVID student-athlete population that is more stressed, vulnerable, and locked in on social media than ever.
But above all else, it's the increasingly demanding parents concerned with their child's playing time or the team's success that successful longtime coaches agree are the toughest of all the challenges.
Advertisement
Trevor Gagnier, girls' basketball coach at Apponequet the last 15 years, has learned to lay out the program's foundation and expectations to parents and players before the season begins.
'If you don't do that early, that's how you get screwed,' said Gagnier. 'And if someone's telling you, 'No, everything's been perfect for the last 15 years,' well, tell me where he or she's coaching, because that doesn't usually happen.'
Steve Dembowski has been coaching football for 32 years ― at Milton since 2015, and at Swampscott for more than 20 years prior.
When he became a parent of a student-athlete, he realized he needed to engage with parents if he wanted them to be allies rather than foes.
'Something that's really changed, which I think haunts a lot of coaches, is that communication with athletes and their parents is even more important than ever and a lot of coaches still want to be old school ― 'I'm not gonna talk about the team or your kid,' ' said Dembowski. 'That's a mistake now, when you need to be open and honest with families.'
When Milton football coach Steve Dembowski became a parent of a student-athlete, he realized he needed to engage with parents if he wanted them to be allies rather than foes.
Barry Chin/Globe Staff
To be demanding and not demeaning with student-athletes while keeping a team striving for excellence is the standard practice for current coaches.
Adding what it takes to corral parents into a positive force and still maintain the passion is beyond exhausting for some.
'I'm an executive leadership coach, right, but some days I feel like a therapist because of the adult coaches that break down on calls with me because of the stress, the pressure, and the embarrassment of some of these situations that come up within the job,' said J.P. Nerbun, a former youth, high school, college, and semi-pro basketball coach who founded TOC Culture Consulting and is the author of 'The Coach's Guide to Sports Parents.'
Advertisement
Nerbun steers some of the coaches to therapy.
He asks all of them to remember why they're there in the first place.
'The greatest challenge for coaches is to continue to know themselves, to know why they coach, to make sure that they are actually doing the work to become and behave in a way that produces an impact and helps people grow,' he said.
That's a far cry from the 'my way or the highway' coaches who once ruled their roosts.
Those are being weeded out, along with the extreme examples of the bad-apple coaches who grab the wrong kind of headlines for crossing the line from tough to abusive coaching.
More than the X's and O's
When the new breed of 'Ted Lasso'-like coaches understand their mission as well as the mind-sets of students and parents, the odds of a more positive and stable experience for all three legs of the youth sports stool should increase.
Being an expert on the next best thing in the X's and O's of their particular sport is almost an afterthought for coaches these days.
'Even though the game is changing, coaches need to also recognize what is acceptable and what actually works better with the way they're interacting with their players,' said Jason Sacks, CEO of Positive Coaching Alliance, a national organization that trains and supports coaches. 'Sometimes coaches don't see that connection of, 'Hey, you know what? Guess what? Kids are different now. And you know what I need to do? I need to evolve as a coach and be able to meet them where they're at.' '
Advertisement
They're at a place where athletes conditioned to the immediacy of social media want instant results, to know why they're being coached a particular way, and where they're not used to direct feedback and criticism.
'High school kids right now are under a tremendous amount of stress. Whether we think they're 'soft' or not doesn't matter,' said coaching development expert Karen Collins, a former collegiate field hockey and lacrosse athlete and coach and an associate professor at the University of New Hampshire. 'If you can build honest and earnest relationships with athletes where you're transparent and you back up what you say you're going to do, then that has opened up the window for you to be a 'tough coach,' and that's OK.'
She pointed out that parents want what's best for their kids. Most do all they can to support their child's team and coach. It's a small minority who lose perspective.
When they act out in the belief, for example, that their child needs more playing time, their behavior has an outsized impact on coaches.
National data on retention of school coaches is scarce, but if perception and anecdotes add up to reality, then there aren't enough of them. Schmidt said flatly, 'There is a shortage of highly qualified candidates,' and said lately his applicant pool is 'less of the Pacific Ocean, more of the kiddie pool.'
National surveys by the Aspen Institute, of coaches in 2022 and parents of student-athletes in 2024, found that 80 percent of both groups believed there was a shortage of high-caliber coaches.
The percentage of coaches age 55 and older has grown over the last few years, which points to younger coaches leaving the profession.
Advertisement
Nipmuc AD Chris Schmidt said, 'There there is a shortage of highly qualified [coaching] candidates,' and added lately his applicant pool is 'less of the Pacific Ocean, more of the kiddie pool.'
Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff
And while 80 percent of the coaches surveyed reported feeling satisfied, the percentage was nearly matched by moderately, very, and extremely stressful experiences. As an academic paper published in 'Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators' pointed out last July, the coaches survey pointed to parents as 'key contributors' to that stress. Seventeen percent of school coaches reported that parents often or always criticize their performance, with barely more than half the coaches hearing appreciation.
'We hear about the problem parents all the time and so we exacerbate the problem, but it's those problems that are running coaches out of the profession, there's no doubt,' said Collins. 'I think if we took a step back and thought about, why are the parents so angry? It's because it's this same transactional thing ― they're worried about the potential for their child.'
'It's hard enough to find coaches'
Tim Brillo is in his 15th year as AD at Ludlow and was a longtime coach of the girls' basketball team.
Like Schmidt, he's
one of the 20-plus certified instructors of the MIAA coaches certification clinic, which began in 1998 and is held 20 to 30 times throughout the year. Coaches hired prior to Aug. 1, 1998, do not have to take the course, and all first serving as a coach after July 1, 2005, must complete it, along with an approved first-aid course.
'In my conversations, coaches were run out by a group of parents simply because their kid wasn't getting playing time, and recently it was, 'We need to change the coach because it's the coach's fault,' ' said Brillo. 'It's hard enough to find coaches. Then, when you finally do find somebody that's willing to do it, there's these outside pressures and expectations on you from parents.'
Advertisement
Mastering that coach-athlete-parent triangle takes up most of the morning in Attleboro.
There's also a section devoted to a long list of managerial concerns, such as an emergency care plan, field and dugout conditions, strength and conditioning, rules and regulations, and legal liability.
One breakout group delves into, 'Why did you get into coaching?'
Responses ranged from wanting to influence kids in a positive direction, love of the game, and those impacted by wonderful or awful coaches.
'Anyone talk about winning?' Schmidt asked.
No hands.
'Of course we want to be successful, that's OK, but is that your focus? If your answer is yes, that's a problem,' said Schmidt.
When the class ended, Corey Flynn, Winchester's assistant ultimate Frisbee coach, said he thought the course hit all the right notes.
Flynn hadn't always appreciated the magnitude of a coach's job.
'We have about 60 players who are attached to like 100-plus family members, and then with various school administrators involved, you rapidly become the center of about 200 people that have very direct contact with you on a regular basis,' said Flynn. 'That's probably the thing that I was shocked by. I was like, 'Oh, this will be great. I'm going to show up, I'm going to coach kids,' and I didn't understand it's going to be a much bigger responsibility than that.'
The responsibilities can feel daunting, said Flynn.
Luckily, he has a solid foundation in order to not be overwhelmed.
'Most coaches are lying if they don't have days like, 'This train has left the station and I'm on it and I can't get off,' but the good news is that generally kids are awesome,' he said. 'You do it because it fulfills you and it helps amplify other people and all that stuff. That's so worth it.
'And most days you feel that side of it.'
Michael Silverman can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colorado's Rick George Reacts to House Settlement Approval
Colorado's Rick George Reacts to House Settlement Approval originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Colorado athletic director Rick George has been at work in anticipation of the House settlement for 'nearly a year'. In a letter to the fanbase and other concerned parties, he outlined the three primary aspects of the ruling by Judge Claudia Wilken that most directly affects the athletic programs at Colorado. Advertisement Revenue Sharing The $20.5 million per university revenue sharing was something that had been discussed for some time now. Each program will have the ability to pay players directly within a revenue share that is proportional to the revenue that sport generates. George stipulated that each student athlete will have an opportunity to participate in the revenue sharing to some degree, if they so choose. In an interesting admission, George maintains that while universities are not required to spend that full $20.5M, CU intends to 'fully meet the $20.5 million dollar responsibility'. Third Party NIL In addition to revenue sharing, individual student-athletes will still have the ability to enter into NIL agreements with businesses separate from the university's revenue sharing. This is a good time to mention Shedeur Sanders' NIL valuation vs brand deals as an example. A significant portion of his earnings from 2024 specifically dealt with brands like Gatorade, Beats by Dre, and KFC. This provision allows for higher-profile earners like perhaps someone like Texas QB Arch Manning to supplement his earning potential with outside business deals. As of now, Colorado doesn't have a high-end seven figure earner. Advertisement Roster Limits Roster limits might be an interesting aspect to track. Scholarship limits have now been replaced by roster limits. Scholarship limits created a bit of a grey area. 'Our approach is to be mindful of our responsibilities as outlined by the settlement and mandated by Title IX,' George said. As for potentially 'grandfathering roster spots that have been removed, CU will explore those on a case-by-case basis. Related: Lil Wayne Sends Clear Message to Deion Sanders in Tha Carter VI Future Positioning Deion Sanders has been the most vocal of the CU head coaches when it comes to what they offer prospective student-athletes and what they don't. 'We want players interested in the NFL not the NIL.' Coach Prime has often said they don't promise anything but an opportunity to play football and earn a quality education. Prime has maintained if players handle business on the field and in the classroom, the money part will take care of itself. Now that Brian Seeley will head up the College Sports Commission following the settlement, programs now have a structure and blueprint to follow. Hopefully leading to a governed system with oversight. Advertisement Related: Deion Sanders' Cryptic Three-Word Message Comes After Publicizing Health Setbacks Fan or Community involvement George also made sure to include how fans and local businesses can contribute to funding a better program under these new guidelines. Anyone can contribute to the 'Buff Club' directly and any interested businesses are encouraged to contact the CU NIL Department to explore additional ways to enhance their brand through deals. Revenue sharing with the players will start on July 1. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
EA Sports to Use Pay-for-Play Incentives for College Teams
EA Sports to Use Pay-for-Play Incentives for College Teams originally appeared on Athlon Sports. If you're tired of watching your favorite college team struggle financially in the NIL era, here's your chance to help by simply picking them in College Football 26. Advertisement EA Sports is rewriting the NIL playbook. For the first time ever, schools will be paid based on how often they're used in the game. Gone are the static royalty tiers. Now, fan engagement equals real revenue. Here's how it works: Every time someone plays a game with their favorite FBS team, it counts toward that school's share of the royalty pool. The more your squad is played, the more money your university makes. 'This percentage of games played will become the final allocation percentage for each school that will be applied to the total gross royalties,' one FOIA document reads. Take a hypothetical $5 million royalty pool. If 1% of College Football 26 games are played using Colorado, that's a $50,000 payout to the Buffaloes, just for being popular. Advertisement This pivot marks a huge departure from the 2024 model, which paid schools based on their finishes in the AP Top 25 over the last decade. Under that system, elite Tier 1 schools earned close to $100,000. Tier 4 schools? Just $9,987. Now, even underdog programs like Akron or Coastal Carolina can cash in if fans show up for them in-game. With more than 1.7 billion streams of College Football 25, the potential is massive. And schools aren't the only winners. Players who appeared in last year's edition earned $600. This year? Up to $3,000 per athlete, thanks to dual deals from EA and Pathway Sports. While players don't get royalties based on gameplay, schools do, which could loop back into NIL funds for star players. In College Football 26, fans directly shape the NIL landscape. Every pick matters. Every game counts. And for once, your favorite team's financial future might be in your hands, literally, on the sticks. Advertisement Related: Michigan Running Back's Groundbreaking NIL Deal Redefines College Football Related: Kentucky Basketball Beats Cap Proposal With NIL Power Play This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the NCAA House Ruling Could Reshape UNC Basketball
How the NCAA House Ruling Could Reshape UNC Basketball originally appeared on Athlon Sports. It was only recently that North Carolina basketball made headlines for its jaw-dropping $14 million NIL investment. This was a bold, unapologetic declaration that the Tar Heels were all-in on winning in the new era of college athletics. Advertisement Now, the rules have changed. With the formal approval of the House v. NCAA settlement on Friday night, UNC's strategy may be headed for a sudden and dramatic shift. The landmark decision not only ends years of litigation over athlete compensation but institutes a new framework that directly impacts how powerhouse programs like North Carolina do business. At the heart of it: a $20.5 million revenue-sharing cap that schools must now work within to fund all sports. And while outside NIL deals will still be allowed, the days of uncapped internal payouts, like the $14 million reportedly earmarked for Tar Heel hoops are likely numbered. So what does this mean for Carolina? Advertisement First, the math gets tighter. With football still a major university priority under new leadership, including front office veteran Bill Belichick, UNC will need to divvy up its share of the revenue cap carefully. Allocating most of it to men's basketball risks starving its football program at a time when it's chasing relevance in a competitive ACC landscape. Second, scrutiny rises. Under the new model, all NIL deals over $600 must pass through a clearinghouse to ensure they reflect fair market value and serve a legitimate business purpose. That oversight will test the creativity and legality of every booster-backed opportunity. Still, don't count UNC out. The Tar Heels boast a national brand, an NBA pipeline, and a roster of former players turned moguls ready to support current athletes through legitimate NIL opportunities. Those advantages don't disappear under the House ruling, they just need to be leveraged with precision. UNC head coach Hubert Davis in discussion with a referee.© Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports With a top-15 recruiting class inbound, transfers like 7-foot Arizona product Henri Veesaar, and international guard Luka Bogavac joining the fold, UNC remains a destination. But sustaining that momentum under tighter financial and regulatory conditions will require smarter spending, shrewder deals, and a more integrated athletic department than ever before. Advertisement The College Sports Commission, helmed by former MLB executive Bryan Seeley will enforce the new cap and audit programs that exceed it. That means every dollar spent in Chapel Hill now comes with risk. The Tar Heels helped define college basketball's past. Whether they can dominate its future will depend not just on their talent—but on their ability to adapt. Related: Former Top NBA Pick Speaks Out on NIL's Impact on Culture Related: EA Sports to Use Pay-for-Play Incentives for College Teams This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.