WHO adopts landmark pandemic agreement
GENEVA (AFP) — The World Health Organization's member states on Tuesday adopted a landmark Pandemic Agreement on tackling future health crises, after more than three years of negotiations sparked by the shock of COVID-19.
The accord aims to prevent the disjointed responses and international disarray that surrounded the COVID-19 pandemic by improving global coordination and surveillance, and access to vaccines, in any future pandemics.
"With this agreement we're better prepared for a pandemic than any generation in history," WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at the decision-making annual assembly in Geneva.
The text of the agreement was finalized by consensus last month following several rounds of tense negotiations.
The United States pulled out of those talks after US President Donald Trump's decision to start withdrawing his country from the WHO.
"The world is safer today thanks to the leadership, collaboration and commitment of our member states to adopt the historic WHO Pandemic Agreement," Tedros said in a statement.
"The agreement is a victory for public health, science and multilateral action. It will ensure we, collectively, can better protect the world from future pandemic threats," he added.
"Citizens, societies and economies must not be left vulnerable to again suffer losses like those endured during COVID-19."
Path to ratification
COVID-19 killed millions of people, shredded economies and crippled health systems.
The agreement aims to better detect and combat pandemics by focusing on greater international coordination and surveillance, and more equitable access to vaccines and treatments.
The negotiations process grew tense amid disagreements between wealthy and developing countries, with the latter feeling cut off from access to vaccines during the pandemic.
Angolan President Joao Lourenco, speaking for the African Union, told the assembly on Tuesday: "Countries in Africa are rarely the starting point of these crises but always are on the front line and the victims of these crises that cross borders."
The agreement also faced opposition from those who thought it would encroach on state sovereignty.
Countries still have to thrash out the details of the agreement's Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) mechanism.
The PABS mechanism deals with sharing access to pathogens with pandemic potential, and then sharing the benefits derived from them: vaccines, tests and treatments.
Once the PABS system is finalized, the agreement can then be ratified by members, with sixty ratifications required for the treaty to enter into force.
In a video message, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the agreement "a shared commitment to fight future pandemics with greater cooperation while building a healthy planet."
EU health commissioner Oliver Varhelyi called the agreement a "decisive step towards a more effective and cooperative global approach" to preventing and managing pandemics.
Kennedy brands WHO 'moribund'
But US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. branded the WHO bloated and moribund, and urged other countries to consider following suit.
He said the UN health agency was under undue influence from China, gender ideology and the pharmaceutical industry.
"I urge the world's health ministers and the WHO to take our withdrawal from the organization as a wake-up call," Kennedy said in a video statement.
"We've already been in contact with like-minded countries and we encourage others to consider joining us."
French President Emmanuel Macron called the agreement "a victory for the future" and for citizens who will now be "better protected against pandemics."
Via video message, he said that while some believed they could do without science, not only would they "harm the health of all us", but they would be the most in danger from pathogens as they would "not see their return."
While all eyes were on preparing for the next pandemic, Tedros said it was crucial to find out how the last one began.
"The pandemic has ended, but we still don't know how it started," he said.
"Understanding how it did remains important, both as a scientific imperative and as a moral imperative" for the sake of the millions killed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
5 days ago
- Korea Herald
Watchful of summer COVID-19 resurgence, Korea urges older adults to get vaccinated
The South Korean government is closely monitoring COVID-19 resurgences in regional neighbors including Hong Kong, China and Thailand, amid growing worries that a summer resurgence may hit the country again this year. At a Central Disaster and Safety Countermeasures Headquarters meeting Friday, Director Lee Han-kyung warned of worsening COVID-19 trends abroad. "In regions close to us — Hong Kong, China and Thailand — COVID-19 infections are rising, and this is a cause for concern," Lee said at the meeting. He urged senior citizens aged 65 and above, as well as residents in high-risk facilities, to get vaccinated, stressing that vaccination is key to preventing severe illness and death. According to government data, recent overseas COVID-19 cases are showing a noticeable uptick. In Hong Kong, confirmed cases for the week of May 11 to 17 totaled 977, exceeding the country's previous summer peak of 796. China's rate of positivity COVID-19 test results is steadily climbing toward last year's peak of 21.1 percent, while in Thailand, more than 65,000 new cases were reported in the three weeks following the Songkran holiday in April. Despite the global trend, the number of new COVID-19 cases in Korea remained at around 100 each week over the past month. Currently, South Korea estimates the number of confirmed cases in select hospitals on a weekly basis. Still, the government is taking a proactive stance in consideration that domestic cases last year surged sharply from late July to mid-August. Weekly confirmed cases jumped from 456 in the fourth week of July to over 1,400 by mid-August in 2023. To mitigate potential risks, health authorities have extended the vaccination period for high-risk groups until June 30, two months beyond the initial April 30 deadline. The Korean Medical Association also issued a public advisory, pointing to the seasonal temperature shifts, increased domestic and international travel and a noticeable drop in personal hygiene practices such as hand-washing. It recommended six precautionary measures: maintaining personal hygiene, wearing masks, prompt response to symptoms, testing for high-risk individuals and recent international travelers, getting vaccinated and improving indoor ventilation. Recalling difficulties caused by last summer's surge, the association emphasized that preventive habits such as hand-washing and mask-wearing remain crucial.
Korea Herald
7 days ago
- Korea Herald
US drops COVID-19 vaccine recommendation for healthy kids, pregnant women
The United States has stopped recommending routine COVID-19 vaccinations for pregnant women and healthy children, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a social media post Tuesday, circumventing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's traditional recommendation process. Kennedy, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary and National Institutes of Health director Jay Bhattacharya said in a video that the shots have been removed from the CDC's recommended immunization schedule. The changes come a week after they unveiled tighter requirements for COVID-19 shots, effectively limiting them to older adults and those at risk of developing severe illness. Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices would meet and vote on changes to the immunization schedule or recommendations on who should get vaccines before the director of the CDC made a final call. The committee has not voted on these changes. Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic whose department oversees the CDC, has been remaking the US health system to align with President Donald Trump's goal of dramatically shrinking the federal government. "Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of clinical data to support repeat booster strategy in children," Kennedy said in the video. The CDC, following its panel of outside experts, previously recommended updated COVID-19 vaccines for everyone aged 6 months and older. Insurers said they are reviewing the regulatory guidance to determine their policies, which typically follow the ACIP recommendations. A spokesperson for CVS Health said the company is determining whether changes in health insurance coverage are required as the federal government reassesses COVID-19 vaccine eligibility, while a Blue Cross Blue Shield Association spokesperson said preventative health benefits, including COVID-19 vaccines, are essential in keeping patients healthy. "The recommendation is coming down from the secretary, so the process has just been turned upside down," said William Schaffner, professor of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and a consultant to the ACIP. Schaffner said the CDC's panel was to vote on these issues at a June meeting, where he had expected them to favor more targeted shots instead of a universal vaccine recommendation. "But this seems to be a bit preemptory," he said. Dorit Reiss, professor of law at UC Law San Francisco, said in a Facebook post that going around the advisory committee might hurt the agency in the case of potential litigation. Studies with hundreds of thousands of people around the world show that COVID-19 vaccination before and during pregnancy is safe, effective and beneficial to both the pregnant woman and the baby, according to the CDC's website. But Makary said in the video that there was no evidence that healthy children need routine COVID-19 shots. Most countries have stopped recommending it for children, he added. COVID-19 vaccine-makers Moderna and Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment. Dr. Cody Meissner, a professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth who co-wrote an editorial with Makary during the COVID-19 pandemic against masks for children, said he agreed with the decision. He said he felt the US had been overemphasizing the importance of the COVID-19 vaccine for young children and pregnant women, and that previous recommendations were based on politics, adding that the severity of the illness generated by the virus seems to have lessened over time in young children. (Reuters)
![[Lisa Jarvis] MAHA pushes unneeded glucose tracking](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F05%2F21%2Fnews-p.v1.20250521.9c4234673c8a420285e80c4b5df5c45b_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
21-05-2025
- Korea Herald
[Lisa Jarvis] MAHA pushes unneeded glucose tracking
Casey Means, a Stanford-trained physician and wellness influencer nominated by US President Donald Trump for surgeon general, is convinced the US is experiencing an epidemic of metabolic dysfunction — a crisis silently unfolding inside the cells of millions of Americans. One solution, she says, is giving people a close-up view of that crisis. Coincidentally, Levels, a company she co-founded, sells a system that allows people to continuously track their blood glucose levels in real time. She claims this information can help people home in on food and lifestyle choices that will improve their metabolic health. It's a philosophy that other "Make America Healthy Again" movement members have pushed. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. extolled glucose monitoring devices as only costing '$80 a month, and they've been shown to be extraordinarily effective in helping people lose weight and avoid diabetes.' Meanwhile, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary told senators at his confirmation hearing that glucose monitors should not require a prescription. He similarly talked up their promise to address obesity and prevent diabetes. There's just one problem: These claims aren't backed by science. They promise to lead Americans down a path to wellness but, without more evidence, could amount to a waste of our health care dollars. 'What is the utility there? The answer is zero,' says David Nathan, a Harvard Medical School professor who has led some of the most important studies on diabetes prevention. 'This, to me, is a scam.' In an information-rich age where our smartwatches can tell us the quality of our sleep, the number of steps we've taken, oxygen levels in our blood, heart rate and more, you might ask: Why not track blood sugar? More data is not always better. It doesn't always tell us something meaningful and, worse, could even cause harm by creating unnecessary anxiety or leading us to draw the wrong conclusions about our health. Continuous glucose monitoring, or CGM, has allowed people with Type 1 diabetes to better manage their blood sugar, which, in turn, can lead to fewer serious health complications like blindness, kidney failure and even death. People with Type 2 diabetes have also used CGM to prevent dangerous fluctuations in blood sugar, but the data is mixed on the long-term benefits. And then there's CGM in people who don't have diabetes. Levels is one of several companies that charge anywhere from $199 to more than $400 per month for CGM, which is often paired with diet coaching. 'I believe CGM is the most powerful technology for generating the data and awareness to rectify our Bad Energy crisis in the Western world,' Means wrote in a blog post on her company's website. Tracking glucose can 'alert us to early dysfunction, coach us on how to eat and live in a way that promotes Good Energy in our unique bodies, and promote accountability.' In reality, the data supporting constantly monitoring blood sugar in people who don't have diabetes, and even in those with prediabetes, is virtually nonexistent, Nathan says. One 2024 review of the literature on CGM in healthy people found scant evidence of its utility. The authors found the research gaps so significant that they concluded any commercial products claiming to offer a benefit 'be labeled as misleading.' Means, meanwhile, has argued that CGM offers important information about our metabolic health. 'An extra-large spike after a meal is a clear sign that the meal had too much refined grain or refined sugar and is creating a big stress of food energy for your cells to deal with,' she wrote on the company's website. But blood glucose is influenced by so much more than the last thing you ate, says Nicola Guess, a dietician and diabetes researcher at the University of Oxford. That includes whether you just finished a vigorous workout, slept poorly the night before, your stress levels, what other foods you ate recently or alongside a particular fruit or vegetable — even a woman's menstrual cycle. Moreover, doctors don't even have enough data to tell patients what a 'healthy' glucose fluctuation looks like in people without diabetes. We don't know, for example, if a spike after a meal is harmless if it comes back down soon after, or even what 'soon' would mean, says Nicole Spartano, a diabetes researcher at Boston University. 'I do worry that people have this technology and are making changes to their diet that do not truly improve their health,' Spartano says. 'For example, you could eat hot dogs (with no bun) for every meal, and your glucose data would look perfect. Very few people would suggest that is a good diet.' Similarly, there's little evidence that blood sugar tracking can prompt people to make long-term changes in their habits, which is the foundational tenet of companies like Levels. Studies of evidence-backed lifestyle interventions show that many can elicit short-term benefits. It's the long haul that people struggle with. The influx of companies pushing CGM has prompted a more intense study of its value in healthy or prediabetic people. But we're still years away from definitive answers. The MAHA movement likes to say it's about following 'gold-standard science.' For people with diabetes, blood sugar tracking is part of gold-standard care. But for everyone else? So far, there's nothing to suggest this would be a wise way to spend our money.
