Migrants held at Guantanamo now allowed to phone attorneys, filing says
Migrants being held at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay are now being permitted to speak to their attorneys by phone, an official for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said in a court filing.
According to a series of court filings released on Thursday that are part of a lawsuit filed by advocacy groups against the Department of Homeland Security, an ICE official said migrant detainees at Guantanamo are now able to speak with their lawyers, and that DHS is evaluating the "feasibility and necessity" for in-person counsel visits.
MORE: Trump said Guantanamo would hold 'high threat' migrants -- but others have ended up there
The Trump administration, as part of its crackdown on illegal immigration, has been sending to Guantanamo what officials call the most violent "worst of the worst" migrants apprehended on American soil -- although ABC News reported earlier this week that the families of two detainees say their relatives being held there have no criminal record, despite DHC claims.
Juan Agudelo, an Acting Field Office Director for ICE, said in a court filing that there are currently 178 migrant detainees being held at Guantanamo Bay -- all of whom are from Venezuela and have final orders of removal.
Of those detainees, 127 are being held at the facility's "Camp VI" prison complex, while 51 detainees are being housed at the Migrant Operations Center.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., earlier this month, was filed on behalf of threee family members of current detainees and four organizations demanding access to them to provide legal representation.
In one of the declarations, Agudelo said the three detainees from the lawsuit were given access to speak to legal counsel on Feb. 17 at the request of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Two of the detainees from the lawsuit are suspected members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, according Agudelo's declaration.
Migrants held at Guantanamo now allowed to phone attorneys, filing says originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
7 minutes ago
- New York Times
Will the U.S. and Iran meet for more nuclear talks?
Iran appeared to adopt an ambiguous stance on Saturday toward further negotiations with the United States over the future of its nuclear program, calling the talks 'meaningless' while also suggesting that a final decision on whether to participate was still pending. The sixth round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks was scheduled for Sunday in Muscat, the capital of Oman. It was thrown into question by the Israeli airstrikes that began on Friday and continued on Saturday, targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, top military commanders and senior nuclear program officials. 'It is still unclear what decision we will make for Sunday,' Esmaeil Baghaei, a spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, was quoted as saying by Iran's state news media. After the initial round of Israeli attacks on Friday, the state news media said that the Islamic Republic was suspending its participation in the talks 'until further notice.' The senior Iranian figures killed by Israel included Ali Shamkhani, a former secretary of the Supreme National Council, who was overseeing the talks as part of a committee named by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iranian officials described the killing of Mr. Shamkhani as targeting nuclear diplomacy. Mr. Baghaei accused Washington of undermining the talks. The United States 'acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless,' he was quoted as saying, accusing Washington of claiming to want to negotiate while also giving Israel its consent to attack. Although Washington has denied direct involvement, Mr. Baghaei said it was 'unimaginable' for Israel to have carried out such 'adventurous aggression' without a green light from the Americans. 'Basically, the Zionist regime's constant desire was to drag Western countries into conflict and entanglement in the region,' he said. 'It seems that it has succeeded this time as well and has somehow influenced a diplomatic process with this adventure. This actually shows that American policymakers are still heavily affected and influenced by this regime.' President Trump and his administration have repeatedly urged Iran to continue with the dialogue as a means to halt further attacks. 'Iran's leadership will be wise to negotiate at this time,' McCoy Pitt, a senior State Department official, said in a meeting of the United Nations Security Council on Friday focused on the crisis. Mr. Trump has written on social media that even more brutal attacks are in store for Iran if it does not make a deal. Iran has denied seeking to develop nuclear weapons. Leily Nikounazar contributed reporting.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
US should stay out of war in Middle East: Retired colonel
Following Israeli strikes on Iran, one retired military officer told NewsNation, The Hill's sister network, that the U.S. should stay out of the fight. Iran has already vowed retaliation and the U.S. has shifted military assets into the region in case they are needed. Retired Lt. Col. Daniel Davis told NewsNation that the path forward depends on whether Iran chooses to prioritize revenge or regime survival, with revenge being the more dangerous option. 'Iran can bring substantial damage to Israel if they choose to go down the path of revenge, because then they're not going to be concerned about what happens next,' he said. 'They're going to be concerned about how much damage they can cause in the meantime.' Iran could consider the U.S. involved in the attack because it had forewarning and because the country supplies military aid to Israel. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied any U.S. involvement in the initial attack and President Trump has urged Iran to reach a deal on dismantling its nuclear program. 'I will just categorically say that no matter what happens in terms of Israel and Iran, we should not get involved,' Davis said. 'It is not our war to fight.' 'It shouldn't have started at all, and we should not sacrifice American troops, which we surely would do if we get into a fight there,' he said.
Hamilton Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Two Virginia Democrats are battling Tuesday to be their party's nominee for attorney general. Yet, the name mentioned most in their campaigns is not that of their opponent, but rather a man who lives just over the Arlington Memorial Bridge: President Donald Trump. The barrage of changes Trump has wrought to American culture in the first few months of his second White House residency has ignited the campaigns of Virginia Democrats Jay Jones and Shannon Taylor as they appeal unrelentingly to the most devout swaths of their base ahead of down-ballot primary elections. The primary will also determine the party's nominations this year for lieutenant governor and some contested seats in the House of Delegates. In one of only two states electing governors in November — the other is New Jersey — the caustic anti-Trump rhetoric could be a hint of what voters nationwide will hear from Democrats in next year's midterm elections, when the stakes will be higher. Virginia's nominees for governor have been settled by default. Democrat Abigail Spanberger became her party's nominee after running unopposed, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears was the only contender who gathered enough signatures to be on the ballot. The other statewide races are for attorney general and lieutenant governor, and Democrats in both contests seem to be vying to top each other with anti-Trump rhetoric and caustic ads. Republicans are not hosting statewide primaries this year, so only Democrats will pick a nominee for lieutenant governor. It's a part-time position that pays about $36,000 a year but is often a stepping stone to higher office. Six Democrats want the job , and most of them have pushed ad after ad on the airwaves and online about their commitment to taking on Trump if elected to the mostly ceremonial role. In the contest for attorney general, Jones and Taylor are competing in much the same way. Turnout is likely to be sluggish, which means firing up base voters is widely seen as the way to go. The last time a left-wing candidate for governor ran unopposed, roughly 142,000 Democrats voted for an attorney general nominee compared with more than 485,000 this past election cycle. Still, the AG's race has been spicy, more so when the candidates' criticism isn't directed at each other. Jones and Taylor have lambasted the White House and argued that the administration's actions should be litigated in court. When they are not lamenting Trump, their attacks are directed toward incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares, who is seeking reelection. In their respective campaigns, the Democrats argue that Miyares submits to the president by not suing him. They say that sets him apart from more progressive attorneys general across the United States, who are going to court over such things as birthright citizenship and elections . Their main message: A Democrat will take the White House to trial when Miyares won't — and saving democracy starts there. 'The job is to protect Virginians, to fight for them, to work for them, to keep us safe,' Jones said while campaigning in June in Falls Church, Virginia, adding, 'I don't understand why he is not going after them.' Last month, Taylor told a room full of Democratic voters that Miyares would enable Trump's overreaches in Virginia, and potentially double down on institutions that don't comply with the president. Either way, 'the result is the same for Virginians: getting hurt,' she said. In a wide-ranging interview in May, Miyares said he identifies as a balls-and-strikes Republican. The former Virginia Beach state delegate, elected top prosecutor in 2021, worked to reduce violent crime. He sought settlements from Big Pharma. When he felt President Joe Biden's administration overstepped, he went to court . But as Trump was ushered into office for a second term, Miyares entered new political terrain. Unlike most other states, Virginians will elect their attorney general this November, nearly a year after the country voted for the president and his consequential agenda. Miyares has waded into the political arena. He often spars on social media with progressive prosecutors throughout Virginia for being too lenient in prosecuting criminal cases. Still, Miyares rebuffed the notion that suing Trump is his top concern. He said the Democrats looking to replace him fail to understand the nature of his position. The attorney general touted meaningful work his office has shouldered: holding listening sessions for crime victims, designating resources to support law enforcement and beefing up his office's prosecutions of child support cases. He flashed his law enforcement badge, tucked within a leather wallet, and described the emblem as a guidepost for being an effective people's prosecutor. 'They seem very obsessed with Donald Trump, whereas I'm obsessed with how am I going to keep Virginians safe?' Miyares said. ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
