logo
Are Blacks and American Jews still political allies?

Are Blacks and American Jews still political allies?

The Hill6 hours ago

We need to talk about antisemitism. And by 'we,' I mean Black people.
With news of Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, there is a pulsing, bright racial line in American political debate. The divide is tied to the tensions between Jews and the heavily Muslim population in the Middle East.
In Tuesday's New York City Democratic mayoral primary, many Jewish groups have lined up in opposition to Zohran Mamdani, an outspoken critic of Israel's war against Hamas. A Ugandan immigrant, born to Indian parents, Mamdani openly rails against what he calls Israel's 'genocide' against Palestinians. Mamdani vows to 'arrest' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot in New York City during his mayoralty.
Mamdani's political rise is based on strong support from progressive white voters, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Latino voters, as well as his fellow Muslims and Black voters under 45.
The idea of Black New Yorkers giving support to Mamdani because of his opposition to Israel is, well, bizarre.
Does that mean liberals of color who are not Jews support Hamas? Hamas's Muslim fundamentalism is diametrically opposed to the principled history of the Black civil rights struggle.
Is the American left similarly willing to oppose Israel's war on Iran without considering Iran's long history of funding murderous terrorist groups?
As the author of history books on the U.S. civil rights movement, trust me when I say the pillars elevating that cause remain clear: The belief in equal rights for everyone under law, including voting rights, respect for religious rights and free speech.
Hamas and Iran have never stood for any of that. Look at their lack of support for women's rights. And forget about gay rights. Ask Salman Rushdie, the author living under death threats, about support for artistic freedom from those locked into Muslim orthodoxy.
But that history is being short-circuited by gut-level empathy. It comes from people of color identifying with Palestinians, a people of color being dominated by superior military firepower and wealth held by the largely white leaders of Israel. This is certainly the case with some younger Black Americans, who did not live through the 20th-century civil rights struggle and now see 55,000 Palestinians and at least 250 humanitarian aid workers killed due to Israel's attacks on Gaza.
Meanwhile, President Trump has used allegations of antisemitism as a pretext to silence his left-wing critics on college campuses. In March, the administration canceled millions of dollars in funding to Columbia University, accusing the school of 'inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.'
ICE agents detained Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia protest leader and foreign national, on charges that he had promoted antisemitism. But when a judge found the charge weak, prosecutors shifted to alleged errors in his application for U.S. residency. The judge ordered Khalil released on Friday.
Trump's flimsy pretext of combating antisemitism to wage a war on universities has stirred opposition — most of all to his refusal to push back against Israel's aggression in Gaza. Add to that Trump's slams on diversity efforts — a federal judge ruled last week that his administration's pattern of cuts to research grants showed 'government racial discrimination.'
But note well that Black, Latino and Asian American students are largely not organizing the angry campus protests against Israel. It is mostly Arab American and international students at the front of the protests, who are most often the source of Jewish students feeling ostracized, even threatened.
Fear of being charged with antisemitism has also kept many Black and Latino members of Congress out of the debate over U.S. support for Israel, despite legitimate questions from people of all colors around the world about Israel's handling of Palestinians and Iran. Criticism of Israeli policy is not necessarily based on antisemitism.
The lack of congressional debate is directly tied to the two Black Democrats — Missouri's Cori Bush and New York's Jamaal Bowman — who openly criticized Israeli policies. Pro-Israel groups supported candidates against them in their Democratic primaries, and both lost in 2024.
Another factor is that in national politics, Jewish voters remain strong Democrats. In the 2024 presidential race, 79 percent of Jewish voters supported Vice President Kamala Harris, according to NBC News exit polls.
Trump famously told Jewish voters in a speech last year, 'You have a big protector in me.' He preemptively blamed Jews for any chance he might lose, saying that 'the Jewish people would really have a lot to do with' him losing the election.
But Trump's claim to be an ally of American Jews requires blinders. With Trump leading the GOP since 2016, a UMass-Amherst poll from 2022 found that two-thirds of Republicans endorse some form of the tenets of the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory, which holds that Jews are trying to diminish the white working class by bringing in dark-skinned immigrants.
For decades before Trump's rise, there existed a deep vein of antisemitism in conservative politics. Pat Buchanan, once a GOP presidential contender, famously said in 1990 that Capitol Hill was 'Israeli-occupied territory.'
Now there is a very real problem with Trump's disingenuous use of claims about antisemitism to further his right-wing agenda.
A cynic, especially a Black cynic, could be forgiven for thinking Trump pretends to care about protecting Jews as a pretext for pursuing an agenda that is antithetical to Jewish values.
Juan Williams is senior political analyst for Fox News Channel and a prize-winning civil rights historian. He is the author of the new book 'New Prize for These Eyes: The Rise of America's Second Civil Rights Movement.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-Clinton official applauds Trump's 'courageous' Iran call, doubts Harris would've had the nerve
Ex-Clinton official applauds Trump's 'courageous' Iran call, doubts Harris would've had the nerve

Fox News

time26 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Ex-Clinton official applauds Trump's 'courageous' Iran call, doubts Harris would've had the nerve

A former Clinton-era National Security Council staffer broke with his party and heaped praise on President Donald Trump's successful strikes on Iran over the weekend, while remarking former Vice President Kamala Harris would have likely lacked the "courage" to execute such a mission if she were commander-in-chief. "I am not a fan of many of Donald Trump's actions, but I will speak openly and honestly when he takes bold steps defending America's interests, as he did tonight," Jamie Metzl, founder of the international social group One Shared World, posted to X on Saturday evening. Metzl served on former President Bill Clinton's National Security Counci and was former President Joe Biden's deputy staff director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and he heaped praise on Trump repeatedly on X over the weekend, while also taking a shot at Harris' lack of "courage and fortitude." "But I'm not a blind tribalist and am perfectly comfortable praising President Trump for bold and courageous actions in support of America's core national interests, as he took last night," Metzl posted to X on Sunday morning. "Although I believe electing Kamala Harris would have been better for our democracy, society, and economy, as well as for helping the most vulnerable people in the United States and around the world, I also believe VP Harris would not have had the courage or fortitude to take such an essential step as the president took last night," he added. Metzl continued in his X messages that "Iran has been at war with the United States for 46 years," and was aiming to build a nuclear weapon with the intention of wielding it over the U.S and its allies. "Iran has been at war with the United States for 46 years. Its regime has murdered thousands of American citizens. Its slogan 'death to America' was not window dressing but core ideology. It was racing toward a nuclear weapon with every intention of using it to threaten America, our allies, and the Middle East region as a whole. No actions like this come without risks, and I imagine the story will get more complicated over time, but that's why these types of decisions are complicated," he wrote. Fox News Digital reached out to Harris' office regarding Metzl's post, but did not immediately receive a reply. Metzl's comments are among a cacophony of Democratic elected officials and traditional anti-MAGA voices who have come out to praise Trump since the successful attack on Iran, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer." "The destruction of Iran's nuclear program is essential to ultimate peace in the Middle East. This is not a Democratic or Republican issue — dealing with the Iranian threat is central to America's national security. The world is safer because of the actions of our brave service members. I'm praying for the safety of our service members in the region," New Jersey Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer said in a statement over the weekend, for example. "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS," Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman wrote on X on Saturday. "Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." While New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a frequent Trump critic, wrote in an opinion piece that Trump made a "courageous and correct decision that deserves respect, no matter how one feels about this president," while fellow Times columnist David French also said it was the "right decision" on social media. Other Democrats and frequent Trump critics, such as New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, have slammed Trump over the strikes, arguing they bypassed Congress. Trump announced the Saturday evening strikes on Iran in a Truth Social post that was not preceded by media leaks or speculation that strikes were imminent. The unexpected social media post was followed just hours later by a brief Trump address to the nation while flanked by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance. "A short time ago, the U.S. military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan," Trump said from the White House late on Saturday in an address to the nation regarding the strikes. "Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success." The strikes "obliterated" Iranian nuclear facilities and backed the nation into a corner to make a peace deal, Trump said. This mission was also celebrated by Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine as one that was cloaked in secrecy and intentionally deceptive to confuse the enemy. "It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security. Our B-2s went in and out of… these nuclear sites, in and out and back, without the world knowing at all," Hegseth said. "In that way, it was historic." The operation included the longest B-2 spirit bomber mission since 2001, the second-longest B-2 mission ever flown and the largest B-2 operational strike in U.S. history, Hegseth and Caine said during the Sunday press conference. Operation Midnight Hammer followed Israel launching preemptive strikes on Iran on June 12 after months of attempted and stalled nuclear negotiations and subsequent heightened concern that Iran was advancing its nuclear program. Netanyahu declared soon afterward that the strikes were necessary to "roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival."

New York governor seeks to build the state's first new nuclear power plant in decades

time31 minutes ago

New York governor seeks to build the state's first new nuclear power plant in decades

NEW YORK -- New York's governor on Monday proposed the construction of the state's first new nuclear power plant in decades. Gov. Kathy Hochul directed the state's power authority to develop an advanced, 'zero-emission' facility in upstate New York that she hopes will help create a clean, reliable and affordable electric grid for the state. She said the state power authority will seek to develop 'at least' one new nuclear energy facility with a combined capacity of no less than one gigawatt of electricity. That would increase the state's total nuclear capacity to about 4.3 gigawatts. The Democrat said the state needs to secure its 'energy independence' if it wants to continue to attract large manufacturers that create good-paying jobs as it deactivates aging fossil fuel power plants. 'We're going to get it done,' Hochul said, speaking at the Niagara County Power Project in Lewiston. 'This historic initiative will lay the foundation for the next generation of prosperity.' The governor said the state hasn't decided on a potential location, but that upstate communities appear receptive, given the potential for creating 1,600 construction jobs and 1,200 permanent jobs once the facility is operational. 'Everybody is raising their hand right now,' Hochul said. 'It's going to be hard to decide.' Among those likely in the running is the Nine Mile Point nuclear plant in Oswego. Hochul's administration has been supportive of Maryland power company Constellation's bid to build a new nuclear reactor at the two-reactor facility. American utilities have been broadly reluctant to launch new nuclear plants due to high cost overruns and delays on recent high-profile projects. Georgia Power Company completed the first two new nuclear reactors in the country in a generation last year. But Units 3 and 4 at Plant Vogtle in Waynesboro, Georgia, cost nearly $35 billion and were powered up some seven years later than initially hoped. Last month, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the nation's largest public power company, applied to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to develop what it bills as a next-generation nuclear power plant at its Clinch River site in Oak Ridge. The federally owned utility provides electricity to seven states and operates three traditional, large nuclear power plants, providing about 40% of the Tennessee Valley's power. New York currently has three active nuclear plants, all located upstate along Lake Ontario and owned by Constellation. The Nine Mile Point, Robert Emmett Ginna and James A. FitzPatrick plants provide about 3.3 gigawatts of power, or roughly 20% of the state's electricity, according to Hochul's office. The last nuclear power plant built in the state was Unit 2 at Nine Mile Point in 1989. At its peak, nuclear power provided about 5.4 gigawatts, or roughly one-third of the state's electrical supply, according to the advocacy group Nuclear New York. The New York Power Authority previously operated two nuclear plants, including the Indian Point Power Plant, which shut down in 2021. That facility was located along the Hudson River some 25 miles (40 kilometers) north of New York City in Buchanan. The other facility, once operated by the state, was the FitzPatrick plant, which the power authority sold in 2000 and is now run by Constellation.

Trump knocks ‘sleazebag' journalists over Iran strikes: ‘Everyone knows' sites ‘totally destroyed'
Trump knocks ‘sleazebag' journalists over Iran strikes: ‘Everyone knows' sites ‘totally destroyed'

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump knocks ‘sleazebag' journalists over Iran strikes: ‘Everyone knows' sites ‘totally destroyed'

President Trump on Monday lashed out at the media as journalists reported on the uncertainty around the extent of destruction at Iranian nuclear facilities targeted by U.S. strikes over the weekend. Trump blasted reporters and executives at CNN, ABC News and NBC News in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes. Multiple news outlets have reported on the damage to the Iranian facilities and the question of whether the sites were completely destroyed, as the president had previously said. 'The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it. Only the Fake News would say anything different in order to try and demean, as much as possible — And even they say they were 'pretty well destroyed!'' Trump posted. 'It never ends with the sleazebags in the Media, and that's why their Ratings are at an ALL TIME LOW — ZERO CREDIBILITY!' he added. Trump's post came as he met in the Situation Room with members of his national security team after Iran fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar. The U.S. on Saturday struck three Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump described the targets in an address to the nation as 'completely and totally obliterated,' something he reiterated in a social media post late Sunday. But experts have acknowledged it would take time to determine the extent of the damage from U.S. strikes, and some reports raised the possibility that Iran moved some of its enriched uranium away from those sites ahead of the attack. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday. The New York Times reported there was evidence Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the Fordow site in recent days, citing two Israeli officials. The Times also cited text messages from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency indicating Iran had moved its uranium stockpile.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store