Community members express skepticism of EPA decision to lift Flint drinking water emergency order
Aonie GIlcreast raises questions about the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's decision to lift the emergency order on the city's drinking water, as residents gather at Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church on May 20, 2025. | Kyle Davidson
As Flint residents continue to push for accountability and clean water more than a decade since the start of the city's water crisis, attorneys from the ACLU and the NRDC gathered with community advocates at Christ Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church Tuesday night to honor the residents who pushed the city to complete its lead line replacement program.
However, the end of the program does not mean the city's pipes are lead free, and with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Monday decision lifting the emergency order placed on the city's drinking water, Pastor Allen Overton of Concerned Pastors for Social Action said the hosts were conscious of how they used the word celebrate.
'We're here today to celebrate a huge milestone in the case that we brought back in 2016 against the city of Flint and the state of Michigan officials. After more than eight years, the court ordered lead pipe replacement program has been completed, with nearly 11,000 lead pipes removed. That should be the point,' Overton said.
While this milestone is not all of the justice the community deserves, it is a huge achievement, he said.
'This community has been through so much. We were misled by our leaders. We had to take matters into our own hands by collecting water samples, educating ourselves about lead contamination and ultimately suing to force the government to fix the problem that they created. Thanks to the persistence of the people of Flint and our partners, the Natural Resource Defense Council and the ACLU, we are finally at the end of this project,' Overton said.
In April of 2014, the City of Flint switched its water source from Detroit-supplied Lake Huron water to the Flint River but failed to properly treat the water with corrosion control, corroding the pipes and leaching lead into the city's water. Failure to treat the water with proper levels of chlorine also led to outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease, killing 12 and sickening at least 87 people between June 2014 and October 2015.
In March 2016, Flint resident Melissa Mays, alongside the NRDC, the ACLU of Michigan, the NRDC and Concerned Pastors for Social Action filed a suit in federal court to compel the city and the state to comply with federal testing and treatment requirements for lead and to replace all lead pipes within the city. That November, federal judge David M. Lawson ordered city and state officials to provide residents with either a faucet filter or regular door-to-door deliveries of bottled water.
In March 2017, residents secured a settlement agreement with Flint and the state of Michigan, promising to replace all lead lines within the city. While the initial deadline for replacing the lines was set for early 2020, residents repeatedly found themselves back in court, with Lawson in 2024 finding the city in contempt of a previous court order requiring the city to meet certain milestones in replacing lead pipes.
After replacing nearly 11,000 lead lines, ACLU of Michigan Acting Legal Director Bonsitu Kitaba said the city has nearly completed its obligations for the settlement. However, it has not replaced every lead line in the city, with several hundreds of pipes left to replace in vacant homes and some residents declining to have their home checked or their pipes replaced, Kitaba said.
The city is required by law to replace all lead lines in the coming years, with the city committing to replacing any remaining lead lines this year, Kitaba said, encouraging any residents who need their lead lines replaced to call 810-410-1133, or email GetTheLeadOut@cityofflint.com.nrdc
Addie Rolnick, an attorney with the NRDC noted that the settlement requirements will remain until March 2026, meaning the city must continue providing filter cartridges and water test kits until then. After the settlement concludes, the city will still be required to replace all lead pipes and must monitor lead levels in the water and keep them below the state's 12 part per billion threshold under the Michigan Lead and Copper rule.
While taking questions from community members, Rolnick emphasized that there is no safe level of lead in the drinking water, encouraging residents to continue using EPA-certified filters.
As long as there is lead attached to the system, it will continue to impact pipes throughout the city, Mays said.
While Mays, Overton and members of the NRDC and ACLU answered resident's questions, Aonie Gilcreast, 74, said residents were getting mixed messages about their water with the EPA's latest announcement.
'Collectively, we don't really know what to believe. We don't trust the system,' he said.
While Overton clarified that the agency still held some concerns, that issue was a fight for the next day.
'If there's a problem with the EPA and the decision that the EPA has made, then we need to have a conversation with them offline to find out what it is that we can do, if there's something that we can do,' Overton later told attendees, emphasizing that that work would be driven by community members and their relationship with the attorneys.
Overton later told the Michigan Advance that they had some concerns about the EPA's decision, agreeing with the NRDC that residents should continue to use filters as long as there's any level of lead in the system.
'Because we do have lead that still remains in our system, it would be destructive to tell people that we don't need the filters anymore. So we're going to begin that fight to find out exactly what is going on with that, to make sure that we keep things above board, that our residents are protected [and] taken care of,' Overton said.
'We've been bamboozled by the EPA as well as EGLE. So we want to make sure that what they're saying are the facts, they have the documentation that they've done, all the checklists are checked off, everything's been checked off to make sure that what they're saying is correct and it's best for this community,' he said.
Mays additionally raised concerns about President Donald Trump and his administration's efforts to roll back environmental regulations, including a potential roll back of requirements for all the lead pipes in the nation to be replaced over the next 13 years, accompanied by lower limits for lead in drinking water.
'Flint is an example of right now what's happening in the country. We have people trying to run government as a business, and who are appointing unelected, uneducated people like Elon Musk and [the Department of Government Efficiency] to go in and gut all these regulations,' said Mays, who likened the government initiative's cost-based decision making to the decisions made by Flint's emergency manager, ultimately sparking the water crisis.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's ‘gold standard' politicizes federal science
The first time Donald Trump was president, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed a regulation known as the 'science transparency' rule. The administration liked to call it the 'secret science' rule. 'Transparency' sounds positive, but this rule instead prevented the EPA from using some of the best available science to protect human health. For example, it required the EPA to ignore or downplay studies that established links between exposure to chemicals and health damage if those studies were based on confidential patient information that could not be released to the public. The problem: Many health studies, including those underpinning many U.S. pollution rules, rely on confidential patient information. A U.S. District Court struck down the rule on procedural grounds a few weeks after it was issued. But now, the idea is back. Trump's so-called Restoring Gold Standard Science executive order of May 23, 2025, resurrects many features of the EPA's vacated rule, but it applies them to all federal agencies. To many readers, the executive order might sound reasonable. It mentions 'transparency,' 'reproducibility' and 'uncertainty.' However, the devil is in the details. 'Transparency' implies that scientists should adequately explain all elements of their work, including hypotheses, methods, results and conclusions in a way that helps others see how those conclusions were reached. 'Data transparency' is an expectation that scientists should share all data used in the study so other scientists can recalculate the results. This is also known as 'reproducibility.' Trump's executive order focuses on reproducibility. If there are errors in the data or methods of the original study, then being able to reproduce its results may ensure consistency but not scientific rigor. More important to scientific rigor is 'replicability.' Replicability means different scientists, working with different data and different methods, can arrive at consistent findings. For example, studies of human exposure to a set of pollutants at different locations, and with different populations, that consistently find relationships to health effects, such as illness and premature death, can increase confidence in the findings. Replicability doesn't require releasing confidential health data, as reproducibility would. Instead, it looks for the same results broadly from other sources. The science transparency rule in the first Trump administration was intended to limit the EPA's ability to consider epidemiologic studies like those that established the health harms from exposure to secondhand smoke and to fine particles called PM2.5 in the air. These attempts to create barriers to using valid science echoed tactics used by the tobacco industry from the 1960s well into the 1990s to deny that tobacco use harmed human health. Many large-scale studies that assess how exposure to pollution can harm human health are based on personal data collected according to strict protocols to ensure privacy. Preventing policymakers from considering those findings means they are left to make important decisions about pollution and chemicals without crucial evidence about the health risks. Trump's new executive order also emphasizes 'uncertainty.' In the first Trump administration, the EPA administrator and his hand-picked science advisers, none of whom were epidemiologists, focused on 'uncertainty' in epidemiological studies used to inform decisions on air quality standards. The EPA's scientific integrity policy requires that policymakers 'shall not knowingly misrepresent, exaggerate, or downplay areas of scientific uncertainty associated with policy decisions.' That might sound reasonable. However, in the final 2020 rule for the nation's PM2.5 air quality standard, EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler stated that 'limitations in the science lead to considerable uncertainty' to justify not lowering the standard, the level considered unhealthy. PM2.5 comes largely from fossil fuel combustion in cars, power plants and factories. In contrast, an independent external group of scientific experts, which I was part of as an environmental engineer and former EPA adviser, reviewed the same evidence and came to a very different conclusion. We found clear scientific evidence supporting a more stringent standard for PM2.5. The executive order also requires that science be conducted in a manner that is 'skeptical of its findings and assumptions.' A true skeptic can be swayed to change an inference based on evidence, whereas a denialist holds a fixed view irrespective of evidence. Denialists tend to cherry-pick evidence, set impossible levels of evidence and engage in logical fallacies. The first Trump administration stacked the EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, which advises EPA on setting health-protective air quality standards, with opponents of environmental regulation, including people connected to industries the EPA regulates. The committee then amplified uncertainties. It also shifted the burden of proof in ways inconsistent with the statutory requirement to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety. The current administration has been dismantling science advisory committees in various agencies again and purging key EPA committees of independent experts. According to Trump, 'violations' of his executive order will be determined by a 'senior appointee designated by the agency head.' This means a political appointee accountable to the White House. Thus, science in each federal agency will be politicized. The political appointee is required to 'correct scientific information.' Anyone can file a 'request for correction' regarding a published agency report. During the first Trump administration, chemical companies or their representatives repeatedly filed requests for changes to final EPA toxicity assessments on ethylene oxide and chloroprene. The administration delayed health-protective actions, which were finally addressed during the Biden administration for both chemicals. The request for correction process is intended to correct errors, not to bias assessments to be more favorable to industry and to delay protective actions. While the language of the executive order may seem innocuous based on a casual reading, it risks undermining unbiased science in all federal agencies, subject to political whims. Setting impossible bars for 'transparency' can mean regulators ignore relevant and valid scientific studies. Overemphasizing uncertainties can be used to raise doubt and unduly undermine confidence in robust findings. A politicized process also has the potential to punish federal employees and to ignore external peer reviewers who have the temerity to advance evidence-based findings contrary to White House ideology. Thus, this executive order could be used to deprive the American public of accurate and unbiased information regarding chemicals in the environment. That would prevent the development of effective evidence-based policies necessary for the protection of human health, rather than advancing the best available science. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: H. Christopher Frey, North Carolina State University Read more: EPA must use the best available science − by law − but what does that mean? How to find climate data and science the Trump administration doesn't want you to see EPA's 'secret science' rule will make it harder for the agency to protect public health H. Christopher Frey receives funding from the California Air Resources Board via a research grant to North Carolina State University. He was on leave from NCSU to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from 2021 to 2024. From 2021 to 2022, he served as Deputy Assistant Administrator of Science Policy. From 2022-20224, he served as the senate-confirmed Assistant Administrator of the Office of Research and Development and concurrently served as the EPA Science Advisor. He was a member of the EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee from 2008 to 2012, and chaired CASAC from 2012 to 2015.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Controversial airport watchlist program terminated by DHS amid weaponization concerns
EXCLUSIVE: The Department of Homeland Security is ending the Quiet Skies program, which left some Americans subject to additional screenings at airport security. The department says the agency was overly politicized to either benefit or hurt specific people and ran a bill of roughly $200 million annually. According to DHS, the program kept a watchlist as well as a list of people exempted. The department says Quiet Skies has not prevented any terrorist attacks but will continue to use other methods to assure safe air travel. "It is clear that the Quiet Skies program was used as a political rolodex of the Biden Administration—weaponized against its political foes and exploited to benefit their well-heeled friends. I am calling for a Congressional investigation to unearth further corruption at the expense of the American people and the undermining of US national security," DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. DHS says that the list of exemptions of people who avoid "security policies" included "foreign royal families, political elites, professional athletes, and favored journalists." The program that started in 2010 was seen as a terror prevention method, and it faced escalating scrutiny from the left and right, including groups like the American Civil Liberties Union. "TSA's critical aviation and security vetting functions will be maintained, and the Trump Administration will return TSA to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety and security of traveling public. This includes restoring the integrity, privacy, and equal application of the law for all Americans," Noem continued. In 2018, the ACLU asked the Transportation Security Administration for more information about the program. "The TSA is engaging in covert surveillance of travelers and raising a host of disturbing questions in the process. While the program's existence is now public, the TSA has kept nearly everything else about the program secret," Hugh Handeyside, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a 2018 news release. "Travelers deserve to know how this surveillance is being implemented, what its consequences are for Americans, and for how long the TSA is retaining the information it gathers. What we've seen so far is troubling, which is why we're demanding that the TSA hand over records it's been hiding from the public. This is a much needed step towards transparency and accountability for an agency with a track record of using unreliable and unscientific techniques, such as 'behavior detection,' to screen and monitor travelers who have done nothing wrong," he added. DHS pointed out a specific situation in which William Shaheen, the husband of New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, was removed from the list after reaching out to the former head of TSA during the Biden administration in 2023, according to CBS News. DHS said that he "traveled with a known or suspected terrorist" three times. The senator's office confirmed to CBS News she had reached out to TSA after her husband dealt with intense security obstacles while flying, but was unaware of any specific lists her husband was or was not on. The outlet reported that he was flying with an attorney was subject of the terrorism flag. The department also cited Tulsi Gabbard's past placement on the Silent Partner Quiet Skies list. Fox News Digital reached out to Shaheen's office for comment.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Controversial airport watchlist program terminated by DHS amid political concerns
EXCLUSIVE: The Department of Homeland Security is ending the Quiet Skies program, which left some Americans subject to additional screenings at airport security. The department says the agency was overly politicized to either benefit or hurt specific people and ran a bill of roughly $200 million annually. According to DHS, the program kept a watchlist as well as a list of people exempted. The department says Quiet Skies has not prevented any terrorist attacks but will continue to use other methods to assure safe air travel. "It is clear that the Quiet Skies program was used as a political rolodex of the Biden Administration—weaponized against its political foes and exploited to benefit their well-heeled friends. I am calling for a Congressional investigation to unearth further corruption at the expense of the American people and the undermining of US national security," DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. DHS says that the list of exemptions of people who avoid "security policies" included "foreign royal families, political elites, professional athletes, and favored journalists." The program that started in 2010 was seen as a terror prevention method, and it faced escalating scrutiny from the left and right, including groups like the American Civil Liberties Union. "TSA's critical aviation and security vetting functions will be maintained, and the Trump Administration will return TSA to its true mission of being laser-focused on the safety and security of traveling public. This includes restoring the integrity, privacy, and equal application of the law for all Americans," Noem continued. In 2018, the ACLU asked the Transportation Security Administration for more information about the program. "The TSA is engaging in covert surveillance of travelers and raising a host of disturbing questions in the process. While the program's existence is now public, the TSA has kept nearly everything else about the program secret," Hugh Handeyside, senior staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a 2018 news release. "Travelers deserve to know how this surveillance is being implemented, what its consequences are for Americans, and for how long the TSA is retaining the information it gathers. What we've seen so far is troubling, which is why we're demanding that the TSA hand over records it's been hiding from the public. This is a much needed step towards transparency and accountability for an agency with a track record of using unreliable and unscientific techniques, such as 'behavior detection,' to screen and monitor travelers who have done nothing wrong," he added. DHS pointed out a specific situation in which William Shaheen, the husband of New Hampshire Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, was removed from the list after reaching out to the former head of TSA during the Biden administration in 2023, according to CBS News. DHS said that he "traveled with a known or suspected terrorist" three times. The senator's office confirmed to CBS News she had reached out to TSA after her husband dealt with intense security obstacles while flying, but was unaware of any specific lists her husband was or was not on. The outlet reported that he was flying with an attorney was subject of the terrorism flag. The department also cited Tulsi Gabbard's past placement on the Silent Partner Quiet Skies list. Fox News Digital reached out to Shaheen's office for comment.