How long will Streeting hold out against the most militant union in the land?
Militant trade union action has become far less commonplace than it used to be. But one organisation remains as hard line as ever: the British Medical Association (BMA). It sent out ballot papers this week to junior doctors urging them to back strike action in support of a 25 per cent pay demand. Now known as 'resident' medics, they are threatening months of disruption despite seeing their pay jump by 29 per cent in just three years.
During a recent protracted dispute they stopped work 11 times and forced the cancellation of an estimated 1.5 million appointments. It is unconscionable that the BMA is now prepared to inflict further misery on the public, most of whom have not seen anything like the pay rises enjoyed by its members. The doctors profess to cherish the NHS, yet by their actions they cut away at its ability to cope with financial and population pressures.
When appointments are cancelled or operations postponed, patients have to go back to square one, often involving another trip to a GP for their treatment to be rescheduled. How many drop out at that point? The backlog of cases remains above seven million with no chance of a significant reduction if there is another dispute. The public, who might have had some sympathy for the doctors in the past, have evidently lost patience judging by recent opinion polls.
Labour has made a rod for its own back by giving inflation-busting pay rises to others in the public sector. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, made much of the Tory failure to settle this dispute when he was in opposition. Now the boot is on the other foot. How long will he hold out against the most militant union in the land?
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Harvard isn't Harvard anymore': The crucible of free speech lacking the freedom it once had
Harvard graduates have a lot to say. In a sign of the times, now isn't the time to say it. That much was clear when I sought student opinion at the gates of America's oldest university. There is a reluctance to talk about Trump. "He needs to come back to this country," said a Harvard dad of his son, politely declining an interview on the youngster's behalf. The young man, British, falls into the category of international student - a vulnerable species, currently, in America's elite university system. For him, saying the 'wrong' thing carries the risk of an exclusion order to go with his graduation certificate. Dad knows best. It is the modern reality at the gates of Harvard - this iconic seat of learning and crucible of free speech and ideas isn't as free as it was. For now, at least. Read more: It's fair to say Harvard had other things on its mind this week, with Thursday's 'commencement' day and graduation parades winding their route through surrounding streets in a 'town and gown' spectacle. There were bagpipes and brass bands to lead students in their crowning moment. It was an emotional thank you and goodbye to Harvard, with a celebration soundtrack of music and 'mwah'. And yet, there was a political undercurrent. There has to be, when a US institution is at war with its president. Some students wore a white flower on their lapel as a symbol of solidarity with Harvard's international students. In giving his speech at the podium, Harvard president Alan Garber was given a standing ovation when he noted that graduates hail from "around the world, just as it should be". As graduates and families gathered in Harvard Yard, the university's defiance against Trump was playing out simultaneously in court, where the latest hearing took place on government efforts to stop the enrolment of foreign students. Leo Gerden, a 22 year-old student from Sweden, was graduating in economics and government. We chatted while he stiffened himself with a Starbucks for the celebrations ahead. What were his thoughts, as someone fitting the profile picked on by the government of his host country? "I feel like the entire Harvard is under attack, because without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard anymore," he said. "He's trying to crush us, but we have shown over the last couple of weeks that he won't do that easily. The uncertainty itself is going to cause a lot of harm. "People are definitely reconsidering their plans right now, whether it was coming to America, going to any university, because they might be next on Trump's target list." The distraction is widely shared across campus, so is the sentiment - not that it'll trouble the White House. Places like Harvard don't lean Trump, and he'll lose few votes in this fight. It is a conflict to shape the future of US education - it's politics, but it's much more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Second group of Hong Kong democrats freed after 4 years in jail
HONG KONG (Reuters) -Four people jailed in the landmark Hong Kong national security trial of "47 democrats" accused of conspiracy to commit subversion were freed on Friday after more than four years behind bars, the second group to be released in a month. Among those freed was long-time political and LGBTQ activist Jimmy Sham, who also led one of Hong Kong's largest pro-democracy groups, the Civil Human Rights Front, which disbanded in 2021. CHRF was one of the largest pro-democracy groups in the former British colony and helped to organise million-strong marches during anti-government protests in 2019 that turned violent at times and had a big impact on business and tourism. The others who were released were Kinda Li, Roy Tam and Henry Wong. At the end of April, former pro-democracy lawmakers Claudia Mo, Kwok Ka-ki, Jeremy Tam and Gary Fan were released from three separate prisons across Hong Kong around dawn. Since large and sustained pro-democracy protests erupted in Hong Kong for most of 2019, China has cracked down on the democratic opposition as well as liberal civil society and media outlets under sweeping national security laws. The 47 pro-democracy campaigners were arrested and charged in early 2021 with conspiracy to commit subversion under a Beijing-imposed national law which carried sentences of up to life in prison. Forty-five of these were convicted following a marathon trial, with sentences of up to 10 years. Only two were acquitted. The democrats were found guilty of organising an unofficial "primary election" in 2020 to select candidates for a legislative election. Prosecutors accused the activists of plotting to paralyse the government by engaging in potentially disruptive acts had they been elected. Some Western governments including the U.S. called the trial politically motivated and had demanded the democrats be freed. Hong Kong and Beijing, however, say all are equal under the national security laws and the democrats received a fair trial. (Reporting By Joyce Zhou and Tyrone Siu; Writing by Anne Marie Roantree; Editing by Michael Perry)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House opens doors to Anna Wintour despite Melania Trump feud
Donald Trump has opened the White House to Anna Wintour despite her long-running feud with his wife Melania. The Vogue editor-in-chief met Susie Wiles, Mr Trump's chief of staff, in Washington DC on Thursday to discuss tariff relief for the fashion industry. However, there is tension between Wintour and Mrs Trump because Vogue never featured her on its cover during her time as first lady, unlike several of her predecessors. She did, though, appear on the magazine's front page in Feb 2005 when it covered her marriage to Mr Trump. At her meeting with Ms Wiles, Wintour claimed that fashion was 'already one of the most heavily tariffed industries in the US', and argued further duties would place it at a 'disproportionate advantage'. It is unclear whether the first lady was at the White House during Wintour's visit, but by and large her stays in Washington DC have been brief in favour of her homes at Trump Tower in New York or Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida. According to Amy Odell, a biographer of Wintour, Vogue made two attempts to photograph Mrs Trump during her husband's first term, but she refused both because it would not guarantee her a spot on the cover. When Wintour visited Mr Trump in New York in 2016 following his first election win, Mrs Trump is said to have been so 'offended' that she was not informed beforehand that she 'didn't even say hello'. Mrs Trump, a former model, apparently believed she was resented by figures at the magazine, according to a book by her former confidant Stephanie Winston Wolkoff. 'I don't give a f--- about Vogue or any other magazine. They would never put me on the cover. All these people are so mad,' she is reported to have said. When Mrs Trump's official portrait was released in January, Vogue ran an opinion column declaring she looked 'more like a freelance magician than a public servant'. Jill Biden, Mrs Trump's immediate predecessor as first lady, was featured on the front of the magazine last year during the presidential race, and in 2021 with the caption: 'A first lady for all of us'. Michelle Obama made the cover twice – in 2009, shortly after Barack Obama's inauguration, and in 2016 as they prepared to leave the White House – while Hillary Clinton appeared in 1999. First ladies Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush, both of them married to Republican presidents, were featured on the inside pages of Vogue but never on the front. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
