The asteroid hits and near-misses you never hear about
A large asteroid known as 2024 YR4 has grabbed headlines this week as scientists first raised its chances of hitting earth, then lowered them.
The latest estimate says the object has a 0.28% chance of hitting Earth in 2032, significantly lower than the 3.1% chance earlier in the week.
Scientists say it is now more likely to smash into the Moon, with Nasa estimating the probability of that happening at 1%.
But in the time since 2024 YR4 was first spotted through a telescope in the desert in Chile two months ago, tens of other objects have passed closer to Earth than the Moon, which in astronomical terms sounds like a near miss.
It is likely that others, albeit much smaller, have hit us or burned up in the atmosphere but gone unnoticed.
This is the story of the asteroids that you never hear about – the fly-bys, the near-misses and the direct hits.
The vast majority are harmless. But some carry the most valuable clues for unlocking mysteries in our universe, information we are desperate to get our hands on.
Asteroids, also sometimes called minor planets, are rocky pieces left over from the formation of our solar system about 4.6 billion years ago.
Rocks routinely orbit close to Earth, pushed by the gravity of other planets.
For most of human history, it has been impossible to know how close we have come to being struck by a large asteroid.
Serious monitoring of objects near Earth only started in the late 20th century, explains Professor Mark Boslough from the University of New Mexico. "Before that we were blissfully oblivious to them," he says.
We now know that quite large objects - 40m across or more - pass between Earth and the Moon several times a year. That's the same size of asteroid that exploded over Siberia in 1908 injuring people and damaging buildings over 200 square miles.
The most serious near-miss, and the closest comparison with YR4, was an asteroid called Apophis which was first spotted in 2004 and measured 375 meters across, or around the size of a cruise ship.
Professor Patrick Michel from French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) tracked Apophis and recalls it was considered the most hazardous asteroid ever detected.
It took until 2013 to get enough observations to understand that it was not going to hit Earth.
But he says there was one big difference with YR4. "We didn't know what to do. We discovered something, we determined an impact probability, and then thought, who do we call?" he says. Scientists and governments had no idea how to respond, he says.
A large asteroid strike could be catastrophic if it hits an area where humans live.
We don't know exactly how big YR4 is yet, but if it is at the top end of estimates, about 90m across, it would likely remain substantially intact rather than break up as it enters the Earth's atmosphere.
"The surviving asteroid mass could create a crater. Structures in the immediate vicinity would likely be destroyed and people within the local region (dozens of kilometers) would be at risk of serious injury," explains Professor Kathryn Kunamoto from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Some people could die.
But since Apophis, there have been huge advances in what is called planetary defence.
Prof Michel is part of the international Space Mission Planning Advisory Group.
Its delegates advise governments on how to respond to an asteroid threat and run rehearsal exercise for direct hits. There is one going on right now.
If the asteroid was on course for a town or city, Dr Boslough compares the response to preparations made for a major hurricane, including evacuations and measures to protect infrastructure.
The Space Mission Planning Advisory Group will meet again in April to decide what to do about YR4.
By then most scientists expect the risk to have almost entirely gone, as their calculations of its trajectory become more precise.
We do have options beyond "taking a hit", as Dr Kumamoto puts it.
Nasa and the European Space Agency have developed technologies to nudge dangerous asteroids off course.
Nasa's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) successfully slammed a spacecraft into the asteroid Dimorphos to change its path.
However scientists are sceptical if that would work in the case of YR4 due to uncertainty about what it is made of and the short window of time to successfully deflect it.
And what about the asteroids that do hit Earth? An awkward truth for scientists is that a direct strike on land far from humans is the ideal scenario for asteroids.
That gives them actual pieces from distant objects within of our solar system, as well as insights into Earth's impact history.
Nearly 50,000 asteroids have been found in Antarctica. The most famous, called ALH 84001, is believed to have originated on Mars and contains minerals with vital evidence about the planet's history, suggesting it was warm and had water on its surface billions of years ago.
In 2023 scientists detected an asteroid called 33 Polyhymnia which could have an element denser than anything found on Earth.
This superheavy element would be something entirely new to our planet. 33 Polyhymnia is at least 170 million kilometers away, but it's an indication of the incredible potential of asteroids for our understanding of science.
Now that the chances are higher that YR4 will hit the Moon, some scientists are getting excited about that.
An impact could give real-world answers to questions they have only been able to simulate using computers.
"To have even one data point of a real example would be incredibly powerful," says Prof Gareth Collins from Imperial College London.
"How much material comes out when the asteroid hits? How fast does it go? How far does that travel?" he asks.
It would help them test the scenarios they have modelled about asteroid impacts on Earth, helping create better predictions.
YR4 has reminded us that we live on a planet vulnerable to collisions with something the solar system is full of – rocks.
Scientists warn against complacency, saying it is a matter of when, not if, a large asteroid will threaten human life on Earth, although most expect that to be in the coming centuries rather than decades.
In the meantime, our ability to monitor space keeps improving. Later this year the largest digital camera ever built will begin working at the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile, able to capture the night sky in incredible detail.
And the closer and longer we look, the more asteroids spinning close to Earth we are likely to spot.
UN monitors asteroid with a tiny chance of hitting Earth
The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs was not alone
Asteroid contains building blocks of life, say scientists
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASA says no decision yet on whether next Boeing Starliner flight will carry crew
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The earliest Boeing's Starliner spacecraft could fly again is early 2026, NASA said on Friday, as it evaluates whether to put humans on board one year after propulsion system issues on the capsule forced its debut crew to stay on the International Space Station for roughly nine months.


Scientific American
43 minutes ago
- Scientific American
The Trump-Musk Fight Could Have Huge Consequences for U.S. Space Programs
For several hours yesterday, an explosively escalating social media confrontation between arguably the world's richest man, Elon Musk, and the world's most powerful, President Donald Trump, shook U.S. spaceflight to its core. The pair had been bosom-buddy allies ever since Musk's fateful endorsement of Trump last July—an event that helped propel Trump to an electoral victory and his second presidential term. But on May 28 Musk announced his departure from his official role overseeing the U.S. DOGE Service. And on May 31 the White House announced that it was withdrawing Trump's nomination of Musk's close associate Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Musk abruptly went on the attack against the Trump administration, criticizing the budget-busting One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now navigating through Congress, as ' a disgusting abomination.' Things got worse from there as the blowup descended deeper into threats and insults. On June 5 Trump suggested on his own social-media platform, Truth Social, that he could terminate U.S. government contracts with Musk's companies, such as SpaceX and Tesla. Less than an hour later, the conflict suddenly grew more personal, with Musk taking to X, the social media platform he owns, to accuse Trump —without evidence—of being incriminated by as-yet-unreleased government documents related to the illegal activities of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Musk upped the ante further in follow-up posts in which he endorsed a suggestion for impeaching Trump and, separately, declared in a now deleted post that because of the president's threat, SpaceX 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' (Some five hours after his decommissioning comment, tempers had apparently cooled enough for Musk to walk back the remark in another X post: 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.') Dragon is a crucial workhorse of U.S. human spaceflight. It's the main way NASA's astronauts get to and from the International Space Station (ISS) and also a key component of a contract between NASA and SpaceX to safely deorbit the ISS in 2031. If Dragon were to be no longer be available, NASA would, in the near term, have to rely on either Russian Soyuz vehicles or on Boeing's glitch-plagued Starliner spacecraft for its crew transport—and the space agency's plans for deorbiting the ISS would essentially go back to the drawing board. More broadly, NASA uses SpaceX rockets to launch many of its science missions, and the company is contracted to ferry astronauts to and from the surface of the moon as part of the space agency's Artemis III mission. Trump's and Musk's retaliatory tit for tat also raises the disconcerting possibility of disrupting other SpaceX-centric parts of U.S. space plans, many of which are seen as critical for national security. Thanks to its wildly successful reusable Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets, the company presently provides the vast majority of space launches for the Department of Defense. And SpaceX's constellation of more than 7,000 Starlink communications satellites has become vitally important to war fighters in the ongoing conflict between Russia and U.S.-allied Ukraine. SpaceX is also contracted to build a massive constellation of spy satellites for the DOD and is considered a leading candidate for launching space-based interceptors envisioned as part of Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile-defense plan. Among the avalanche of reactions to the incendiary spectacle unfolding in real time, one of the most extreme was from Trump's influential former adviser Steve Bannon, who called on the president to seize and nationalize SpaceX. And in an interview with the New York Times, Bannon, without evidence, accused Musk, a naturalized U.S. citizen, of being an 'illegal alien' who 'should be deported from the country immediately.' NASA, for its part, attempted to stay above the fray via a carefully worded late-afternoon statement from the space agency's press secretary Bethany Stevens: 'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' Stevens wrote. 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.' The response from the stock market was, in its own way, much less muted. SpaceX is not a publicly traded company. But Musk's electric car company Tesla is. And it experienced a massive sell-off at the end of June 5's trading day: Tesla's share price fell down by 14 percent, losing the company a whopping $152 billion of its market value. Today a rumored détente phone conversation between the two men has apparently been called off, and Trump has reportedly said he now intends to sell the Tesla he purchased in March in what was then a gesture of support for Musk. But there are some signs the rift may yet heal: Musk has yet to be deported; SpaceX has not been shut down; Tesla's stock price is surging back from its momentary heavy losses; and it seems NASA astronauts won't be stranded on Earth or on the ISS for the time being. Even so, the entire sordid episode—and the possibility of further messy clashes between Trump and Musk unfolding in public—highlights a fundamental vulnerability at the heart of the nation's deep reliance on SpaceX for access to space. Outsourcing huge swaths of civil and military space programs to a disruptively innovative private company effectively controlled by a single individual certainly has its rewards—but no shortage of risks, too.


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
In the Feud Between Trump and Musk, NASA Has a Lot to Lose
The SpaceX CEO threatened to pull his Dragon spacecraft, flaunting an incredible amount of leverage. In the heat of the moment, Elon Musk threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft and then he took it back. In doing so, however, the rocket billionaire dragged NASA into his messy breakup with Donald Trump, with the agency's access to orbit now at stake. Musk and Trump parted ways earlier this week, and their breakup has been very messy. Shortly after leaving the administration, Musk began criticizing the budget bill passed by Republicans in the U.S. House, instigating a public feud between the president and the billionaire oligarch. The childish back-and-forth was entertaining, until it wasn't. 'SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk threatened on X. He later took another X user's advice to 'cool off,' and wrote, 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Although short-lived, the threat put the International Space Station (ISS) at risk. NASA relies heavily on SpaceX's Dragon to transport its astronauts and cargo supplies to the orbiting lab, having weaned itself from hitching rides aboard Russia's Soyuz spacecraft. SpaceX's closest alternative, Boeing, failed miserably at proving its vehicle's capability to reach the ISS safely. Without Dragon, NASA would lose its access to low Earth orbit and not be able to operate the space station at the same capacity. It's not clear how serious Musk was in his threat, but it was a serious display of leverage on his part. SpaceX is no doubt a leader in the industry, and canceling its government contracts would hurt the national space program, which has come to rely on the private sector in recent years. In response to Musk's clear advantage, Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist, called on the president to nationalize SpaceX under a 1950 law known as the Defense Production Act, according to The Wall Street Journal. During his show, War Room Live, Bannon urged the use of the Korean War-era law which grants the president powers to prioritize national defense. The plan might seem outrageous now, but the current administration is unpredictable. Trump has yet to respond to Bannon's call. If he doesn't move to nationalize SpaceX, Trump could also sacrifice NASA for the sake of proving a point against his now opponent, Musk. On Thursday, Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to SpaceX. Aside from Dragon, NASA also plans on using SpaceX's Starship rocket to launch astronauts to the Moon as part of the Artemis program. The agency has already invested $4 billion into the rocket's development, and canceling its contract with SpaceX would leave it without a viable alternative. In short, NASA needs SpaceX and canceling the company's government contracts would affect the national space program as a whole. At this point, it comes down to how much Trump is willing to sacrifice in order to gain the upper hand in his ongoing feud with Musk while NASA is caught in the middle.