So You Bought a Nice New Mattress—Now It's Time to Protect It
How much mattress protection do you really need? Let's talk about mattress protectors and mattress encasements. Courtesy of Leesa; Scooms
All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links.
Here's a hard truth: People are gross. Even the cleanliest among us cannot prevent the things that permeate a mattress nightly, oftentimes without us even knowing. This includes things like dandruff, dead skin, dust mites, sweat, and even in accidental cases, urine and blood. Have the 'ick' yet? Now imagine the worst comes to pass, and you've got to contend with now cleaning your mattress to remove these things as best as you can.
To that end, protecting your mattress shouldn't even be a question. As the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Coughing up the $20 to get a protector in the first place can save you a lot of time and money. But some may want to go the extra mile and cut off a mattress's exposure to the outside world by way of a mattress encasement for the super icky things, like bed bugs and mildew. With that visual in mind, let's go over some scenarios to determine which protective product is most beneficial for you. Mattress Protector: A Little Protection
A mattress protector acts very similar to a fitted sheet. You've got elastic around the side for it to hang onto the mattress, and sometimes extra padding on the top that is supposed to be similar to that of a mattress pad (adds more cushioning to your bed, but not as much as a mattress topper). Getting a waterproof mattress protector is key, especially if you are dealing with spills, accidents, general clumsiness (@ me, spilling my nightcap Baja Blast in bed). The protector keeps water from soaking into the top layer of the bed, preventing stains, smells, and a cleanup headache on your part. The sides of the bed are also guarded against dust and liquid, but the bottom of the mattress remains open. So if things like under-bed dust bunnies or bed bug prevention are top of mind for you, a mattress encasement may be your best move. Mattress Encasement: A Lot of Protection
I've seen plenty of mattress encasements in use at hotels, Airbnbs, VRBOs, or just in the homes of very cautious people. Just like it sounds, a mattress encasement completely covers every inch of the mattress, kind of like a material force field or bubble. This protection will keep out the worst of the worst mattress offenders, like mildew, mold, and the dreaded bed bug. In order for it to really act as a shield against pathogens and bacteria, make sure your encasement is waterproof and made for these circumstances. Otherwise, it's like wrapping your bed up in a top sheet and calling it a day—it's not going to do very much. Mattress encasements are going to act just like mattress protectors in keeping out the other questionable substances, like dead skin cells, bodily fluids, and dust mites. The biggest difference is that you are just getting coverage from every angle. Protect Your Bed
Mattress encasements and protectors are akin to an insurance policy, because they ensure longevity and general cleanliness. Your mattress warranty may not even cover you for spills, stains, or damage from nightly usage—making these mattress accessories even more important in my book. Plus, they're very cheap and easy to use. Just heed my final words: Make sure it's waterproof!
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED . Get best-in-class reporting that's too important to ignore for just $1 per month for 1 year. Includes unlimited digital access and exclusive subscriber-only content. Subscribe Today .
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
CDC vaccine advisory meeting should be postponed amid bias concerns, Cassidy says
Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy on Monday night called for federal health officials to postpone this week's meetings of outside vaccine advisers, citing a small, newly appointed panel and concerns about biases against vaccines. Cassidy's push to delay the meeting comes after multiple efforts from the Louisiana doctor to ensure that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would not stoke uncertainty over vaccine safety. Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, grilled Kennedy on his vaccine views earlier this year before ultimately voting to confirm him as HHS secretary, saying they would keep in close contact about vaccine action. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is convening its Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices on Wednesday and Thursday. The meeting has been scheduled for some time, but Kennedy dismissed the 17 existing members of the committee this month and named eight new appointees two days later. Among the new appointees are Dr. Robert Malone, who has advocated against mRNA vaccines, and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who has questioned vaccine safety. Both have served as paid witnesses in cases against vaccine manufacturers. Other new members include Dr. Retsef Levi, an IT professor of operations management who co-authored a study suggesting a link between Covid-19 vaccines and heart problems, and Dr. Vicky Pebsworth, a nurse aligned with the National Vaccine Information Center, which advocates for vaccine exemptions. 'Although the appointees to ACIP have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology,' Cassidy wrote on X on Monday. 'In particular, some lack experience studying new technologies such as mRNA vaccines, and may even have a preconceived bias against them.' He further said that the meeting should not take place when there is no permanent CDC director. The administration's nominee for that post, Dr. Susan Monarez, is due to appear for her confirmation hearing before the HELP Committee on Wednesday morning, the same day the advisory panel is set to convene. The administration withdrew its first nominee for CDC director, former Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon, in March amid senators' concerns about his vaccine views and the prospect that multiple Republicans would vote against his nomination. Cassidy had expressed reservations earlier this year about voting for Kennedy's nomination, asking the longtime vaccine safety critic during a HELP Committee confirmation hearing whether he would listen to the science on the issue. 'Your past of undermining confidence in vaccines with unfounded or misleading arguments concerns me. Can I trust that that is now in the past? Can data and information change your opinion, or will you only look for data supporting a predetermined conclusion?' he said during closing remarks in Kennedy's January confirmation hearing. The nominee had said earlier in the hearing that 'news reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. I am pro-safety.' Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy, saying in Senate floor remarks that he had secured assurances that the secretary would protect public confidence in vaccination. 'Regarding vaccines, Mr. Kennedy has been insistent that he just wants good science and to ensure safety. But on this topic, the science is good, the science is credible. Vaccines save lives. They are safe. They do not cause autism,' Cassidy said February 4. He went on to say that he recognizes that parents could need reassurances that vaccines are safe but that confidence in the science should not be undermined. 'To this end, Mr. Kennedy and the administration committed that he and I will have an unprecedentedly close collaborative working relationship if he is confirmed. We will meet or speak multiple times a month,' Cassidy said. Yet in his X post on Monday, the senator was stark. 'The meeting should be delayed until the panel is fully staffed with more robust and balanced representation – as required by law – including those with more direct relevant expertise,' he wrote. Spokespeople for HHS and Cassidy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
CDC vaccine advisory meeting should be postponed amid bias concerns, Cassidy says
FacebookTweetLink Follow Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy on Monday night called for federal health officials to postpone this week's meetings of outside vaccine advisers, citing a small, newly appointed panel and concerns about biases against vaccines. Cassidy's push to delay the meeting comes after multiple efforts from the Louisiana doctor to ensure that US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would not stoke uncertainty over vaccine safety. Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, grilled Kennedy on his vaccine views earlier this year before ultimately voting to confirm him as HHS secretary, saying they would keep in close contact about vaccine action. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is convening its Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices on Wednesday and Thursday. The meeting has been scheduled for some time, but Kennedy dismissed the 17 existing members of the committee this month and named eight new appointees two days later. Among the new appointees are Dr. Robert Malone, who has advocated against mRNA vaccines, and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who has questioned vaccine safety. Both have served as paid witnesses in cases against vaccine manufacturers. Other new members include Dr. Retsef Levi, an IT professor of operations management who co-authored a study suggesting a link between Covid-19 vaccines and heart problems, and Dr. Vicky Pebsworth, a nurse aligned with the National Vaccine Information Center, which advocates for vaccine exemptions. 'Although the appointees to ACIP have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology,' Cassidy wrote on X on Monday. 'In particular, some lack experience studying new technologies such as mRNA vaccines, and may even have a preconceived bias against them.' He further said that the meeting should not take place when there is no permanent CDC director. The administration's nominee for that post, Dr. Susan Monarez, is due to appear for her confirmation hearing before the HELP Committee on Wednesday morning, the same day the advisory panel is set to convene. The administration withdrew its first nominee for CDC director, former Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon, in March amid senators' concerns about his vaccine views and the prospect that multiple Republicans would vote against his nomination. Cassidy had expressed reservations earlier this year about voting for Kennedy's nomination, asking the longtime vaccine safety critic during a HELP Committee confirmation hearing whether he would listen to the science on the issue. 'Your past of undermining confidence in vaccines with unfounded or misleading arguments concerns me. Can I trust that that is now in the past? Can data and information change your opinion, or will you only look for data supporting a predetermined conclusion?' he said during closing remarks in Kennedy's January confirmation hearing. The nominee had said earlier in the hearing that 'news reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. I am pro-safety.' Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy, saying in Senate floor remarks that he had secured assurances that the secretary would protect public confidence in vaccination. 'Regarding vaccines, Mr. Kennedy has been insistent that he just wants good science and to ensure safety. But on this topic, the science is good, the science is credible. Vaccines save lives. They are safe. They do not cause autism,' Cassidy said February 4. He went on to say that he recognizes that parents could need reassurances that vaccines are safe but that confidence in the science should not be undermined. 'To this end, Mr. Kennedy and the administration committed that he and I will have an unprecedentedly close collaborative working relationship if he is confirmed. We will meet or speak multiple times a month,' Cassidy said. Yet in his X post on Monday, the senator was stark. 'The meeting should be delayed until the panel is fully staffed with more robust and balanced representation – as required by law – including those with more direct relevant expertise,' he wrote. Spokespeople for HHS and Cassidy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Newton pediatrician accused of unwanted touching from patient family members
The Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine has suspended the medical license of a Newton pediatrician who is accused of having unwanted physical contact with the female family members of patients. Dr. Benjamin faces indecent assault charge The disciplinary action against Dr. Jonathan A. Benjamin was decided at the board's June 13 meeting. "The Board alleges that Dr. Benjamin engaged in boundary violations," stated a press release after the meeting. Benjamin was given seven days to appeal the decision. Details of the allegations against Benjamin are few. According to records held by Newton District Court, Benjamin is charged with indecent assault and battery on a person over 14. His arraignment is scheduled for July 7. Benjamin has been licensed to practice in the Commonwealth since 1981 and owns his own practice in Newton, according to the board. Patient guardians release statement A guardian of Benjamin's patients, who wished to remain anonymous, released a statement in defense of the doctor. "I have two children, and our family has been cared for by Dr. Benjamin for five years. He has hugged me, held my hands, and kissed me on the cheek many times at appointments - sometimes in front of my husband. He has treated me like family since the first time I walked into his office with my baby. I completely understand how his physical behavior toward the mothers of his patients may make some women feel uncomfortable, but I truly believe his actions are that of a misguided older doctor, and not at all coming from a place of sexual harassment or assault. The courts will consider intent alongside impact, and the public should do the same and not jump to conclusions based on what they read on social media," the person wrote. A request for comment at Benjamin's practice was denied. Benjamin did not return WBZ's requests for comment.
