logo
‘We'll just make our own films': Disability rights advocates in spotlight at Hot Docs

‘We'll just make our own films': Disability rights advocates in spotlight at Hot Docs

Reid Davenport says he began making documentaries to confront the ableism he faced every day.
When a college adviser discouraged him from applying for a study abroad program in Florence because the city wasn't wheelchair accessible, Davenport responded by picking up a camera. The resulting film, 2013's 'Wheelchair Diaries,' explored the lack of accessibility in Europe.
'It feels good to take pain and turn it into art. It's cathartic and relieves some of the difficult memories,' says Davenport, who has cerebral palsy.
The New York-based filmmaker now counts himself among a growing wave of creators challenging how people with disabilities are seen and spoken about in media.
That shift is especially apparent at this year's Hot Docs festival, where stories about disability rights are in the spotlight. Programming director Heather Haynes says the festival received a record number of submissions centering voices of people with disabilities.
Among the highlights is the international premiere of Davenport's 'Life After,' which delves into the complexities of assisted suicide from a disability-rights lens, examining Canada's medical assistance in dying (MAID) program.
'Disabled people have been the subject of documentaries since the inception of documentaries, but those documentaries have literally subjugated them,' says Davenport.
'I think there's a groundswell of disabled people who want to take the narrative back and are sick of talking about the physicalities of their disabilities, and would rather talk about the unnecessary ableism they face that is embedded in society.'
Other standouts are Shoshannah Stern's 'Marlee Matlin: Not Alone Anymore,' a portrait of the Oscar-winning Deaf actress and her trailblazing journey, and the international premiere of Nyle DiMarco and Davis Guggenheim's 'Deaf President Now!,' which revisits a 1988 student-led protest in Washington, D.C. that became a landmark moment for accessibility rights in the U.S.
Homegrown selections include Lulu Wei's short 'A Stop Gap Measure,' which follows Toronto disability activist Luke Anderson on his fight to make Canada more accessible.
Programmers and filmmakers say there is a larger shift in the documentary world that's fuelled by increased access, emerging support programs and long-overdue recognition of those who've been left out of the frame.
Elspeth Arbow, a key programmer behind this year's Hot Docs slate, notes much of that momentum can be traced back to 2020, when the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis by a police officer sparked a cultural reckoning around race, power and representation.
'There was certainly this swell of interest in supporting equity-deserving groups or people that have been systematically disadvantaged or kept out of able-bodied, hegemonic, white-led organizations. A lot of that has fallen away over the past five years, but a lot of it has stayed, too,' Arbow says.
The New Brunswick native cites the CBC's AccessCBC program and the National Screen Institute's Disabled Producers Lab as recent Canadian initiatives offering mentorship and financial support to disabled creators.
Arbow, who lives with cystic fibrosis and has had two double lung transplants, is operations manager of the Disability Screen Office, a non-profit that launched in 2022 with the goal of eliminating accessibility barriers in the Canadian screen industry.
She notes that people with disabilities have long been portrayed on screen through a lens of 'spectacle and voyeurism,' but the community has now reached a 'tipping point,' no longer willing to accept those narratives.
'Now that people are listening to disabled folks, we can say, 'The representation we have is really not very good. And if you call us disrespectful or unappreciative, we'll just make our own films,'' Arbow says.
Anderson credits the 2020 documentary 'Crip Camp' as a galvanizing moment. Helmed by James LeBrecht and Nicole Newnham, the film traces the origins of the disability rights movement and, according to Anderson, helped bring much-needed attention to the fight for inclusion.
'A Stop Gap Measure' chronicles Anderson's creation of the StopGap Foundation, a non-profit that installs brightly colored ramps for single-step storefronts across Canada to raise awareness about the need for a barrier-free society.
'The disability community isn't going to settle for HR policies that are discriminatory, built-in environments that say that we don't belong or attitudinal spaces that aren't inclusive,' says Anderson, who has used a wheelchair since a mountain biking injury in 2002.
'We're tired of not being heard or seen. And there's a real close-knit community of disability activists who are really motivated to speak up.'
During Elections
Get campaign news, insight, analysis and commentary delivered to your inbox during Canada's 2025 election.
In 'Life After,' Davenport interviews Canadian Michal Kaliszan, who, after losing his mother and struggling with limited care options due to his spinal muscular atrophy, considers MAID.
Davenport says his film is truly about how 'radically under-supported' disabled people are in modern society.
'I think every disabled person experiences ableism, and it's so acute that we have a disproportionate amount of disabled people who either commit suicide or seek suicide,' he says.
'One of the old tenets of disability studies is that disabled people aren't impaired by their bodies, but they're impaired by society's reactions to their bodies. That's all you really need to know.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 24, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Edmonton Oilers take home ice to new level to open Stanley Cup Final
Edmonton Oilers take home ice to new level to open Stanley Cup Final

Edmonton Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Edmonton Oilers take home ice to new level to open Stanley Cup Final

Article content There is going to be a little extra home in the home ice for Connor McDavid & Co. when the puck drops on the Stanley Cup Finals against the Florida Panthers on Wednesday (8 p.m., CBC, Sportsnet). While the Edmonton Oilers hold the advantage thanks to a three-point difference in the standings, a new initiative by Rogers called This is Our Ice aims to bring a little slice of home to hockey's biggest stage.

Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo ‘poster boy'?
Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo ‘poster boy'?

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Weinstein retrial nears end as lawyers argue: sexual predator or #MeToo ‘poster boy'?

Harvey Weinstein appears for his retrial at a Manhattan court, Wednesday, May 21, 2025, in New York. (AP Photo/Pamela Smith, Pool) NEW YORK — Harvey Weinstein 's lawyer portrayed him as the falsely accused 'original sinner' of the #MeToo era, while a prosecutor told jurors at his sex crimes retrial Tuesday that the former movie mogul preyed on less-powerful women he thought would never speak up. The two sides took very different tones in their closing arguments, which are due to conclude Wednesday. Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, veered into folksy jokes and theatricality — sometimes re-enacting witnesses' behavior — as he contended that his client engaged in a 'courting game,' not crimes. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg, as direct as Aidala was discursive, urged jurors to focus on Weinstein's accusers and their days of grueling testimony. 'This was not a 'courting game,' as Mr. Aidala wants you to believe. This was not a 'transaction,'' she told jurors. 'This was never about 'fooling around.' It was about rape.' The majority-female jury is expected to start deliberations at some point Wednesday, inheriting a case that was seen as a #MeToo watershed when Weinstein was convicted five years ago. It ended up being retried, and reshaped, because an appeals court overturned the 2020 verdict. Weinstein, the former Hollywood honcho-turned-#MeToo outcast, has pleaded not guilty to raping a woman in 2013 and forcing oral sex on two others, separately, in 2006. Aidala argued that everything that happened between the ex-producer and his accusers was a consensual, if 'transactional,' exchange of favors. The attorney accused prosecutors of 'trying to police the bedroom' and zeroing in on the man seen as 'the poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement.' 'They tried to do it five years ago, and now there's a redo, and they're trying to do it again,' he told jurors. His hours-long summation touched on matters from the acclaimed, Weinstein-co-produced 1994 film 'Pulp Fiction' to his own marriage and his grandmother's Italian gravy, at times playing for — and getting — laughs from jurors and Weinstein. Aidala depicted the former studio boss as a self-made New Yorker, while painting Weinstein's accusers as troubled and canny 'women with broken dreams' who plied him for movie opportunities and other perks, kept engaging with him for years and then turned on him to cash in on his #MeToo undoing. All three received compensation through legal processes separate from the criminal trial. Blumberg countered that Weinstein interpreted a sexual 'no' as a cue to 'push a little bit more, and if they still say no, just take it anyway.' She argued that his accusers stayed in friendly contact with Weinstein because they were trying to work in entertainment, and they feared their careers would be squashed if they crossed him. 'He chose people who he thought would be the perfect victims, who he could rape and keep silent,' the prosecutor said. 'He underestimated them.' Weinstein had a decades-long run as one of the movie industry's most influential people. In 2017, allegations of sexual assault and harassment tanked his career and catalyzed the #MeToo movement, which seeks accountability for sexual misconduct. He was subsequently convicted of sex crimes and sentenced to prison in New York and California. His California appeal hasn't been decided. Since the New York retrial opened April 23, prosecutors have brought in more than two dozen witnesses. The prosecution centered on Weinstein's three accusers, who each faced days of questions. In often graphic and sometimes tearful testimony, the women said the Oscar-winning producer used his showbiz stature as a hook to prey on them. Jessica Mann, who accused Weinstein of rape, was a hairstylist hoping to make it as an actor when she met him. The sexual assault accusers also were trying to build careers in entertainment: Miriam Haley was a production assistant and producer, and Kaja Sokola was a teenage model who wanted to get into acting. Prosecutors added Sokola's allegations to the case for the retrial. But some other accusers from the first trial weren't part of the second. The appeals court said it was prejudicial to include their accusations, which never resulted in charges. Weinstein, 73, decided not to testify. His attorneys presented a few witnesses to cast doubts on certain aspects of the accusers' accounts. But Weinstein's defense also relied heavily on questioning prosecution witnesses — even surprising Sokola with her own private journal — to try to undermine their credibility. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named. Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press

Weinstein lawyer brands accusers ‘women with broken dreams'
Weinstein lawyer brands accusers ‘women with broken dreams'

CTV News

time4 hours ago

  • CTV News

Weinstein lawyer brands accusers ‘women with broken dreams'

Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan for his retrial on Friday, May 30, 2025 in New York. (Jefferson Siegel/The New York Times via AP, Pool) NEW YORK — The lawyer defending fallen Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein from rape and sexual assault charges called those testifying against his client 'women with broken dreams' as he made his final pitch to jurors. A New York state appeals court had thrown out Weinstein's 2020 convictions after irregularities in the presentation of witnesses at his original trial, forcing two victims of his alleged abuse to testify a second time. 'If there is a doubt about their case, you gotta throw it out. These are the people they want you to believe, they're all women with broken dreams,' defense attorney Arthur Aidala said of the women who testified against Weinstein at this trial. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg fired back saying that 'we are here because (Weinstein) raped three people -- that's why we are here.' Her closing argument will continue Wednesday. Judge Curtis Farber will then give instructions to the jury, who will deliberate on a verdict . Weinstein, the producer of box-office hits 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Shakespeare in Love,' has never acknowledged wrongdoing. The cinema magnate, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, has been on trial again since April 15 in a scruffy Manhattan courtroom. He is serving a 16-year prison sentence after being convicted in California of raping and assaulting a European actress more than a decade ago. Two of the accusers in this case -- onetime production assistant Miriam Haley and then-aspiring actress Jessica Mann -- testified at Weinstein's original trial. Their accounts helped galvanize the #MeToo movement nearly a decade ago, but the case is being re-prosecuted at a new trial in New York. His 2020 convictions on charges relating to Haley and Mann, and his 23-year prison term, were overturned last year by the New York Court of Appeals. The tribunal ruled that the way witnesses were handled in the original trial was unlawful. 'He didn't listen' Some 20 years after the earliest incidents were alleged to have taken place, Aidala sought to cast doubt on the credibility of the accusers. He said it was not a question of whether his client engaged in sexual relations with the three women, but if those encounters were consensual. He described the encounters as 'transactional' and 'casting couch' scenarios involving young women who used their beauty and charm to make an older man open doors for them. Prosecutor Blumberg countered that 'this is not a transaction, it was never about fooling around, it was about rape.' But Aidala insisted Weinstein was the one who was used, countering prosecutors who portrayed Weinstein as an all-powerful Hollywood figure. Aidala loudly reeled off metaphors to explain his version of events, seeking to win over the jury with jokes. He mimicked the victims to highlight inconsistencies, likening one of them to a child caught in a lie. The veteran defense attorney stressed that victims continued to associate with Weinstein after the alleged assaults, something they did not dispute, explaining that they feared jeopardizing their careers. Blumberg said 'they knew it was necessary to stay on his side. They feared his retaliation, they buried (their) trauma as if nothing had happened.' During the trial, the three victims testified that their sexual encounters with Weinstein were not consensual. The retrial also heard new evidence from Kaja Sokola, a Polish former model who testified that Weinstein first sexually assaulted her when she was a minor at age 16. She said one occasion Weinstein pushed her onto a bed and forced her to have sex. 'I told him to stop,' she said, 'but he didn't listen.' Weinstein has appeared daily in a wheelchair, physically subdued, but laughing and joking with his legal team. This time, hearings have received less media attention, taking place in the shadow of the highly anticipated trial of hip-hop mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs, on trial blocks away at federal court on charges of sex trafficking and racketeering.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store