UN raises alarm over wave of 'arbitrary' arrests in Libya
The United Nations Support Mission in Libya expressed concern over what it said were arbitrary arrests, including of lawyers and members of the judiciary, calling for their immediate release.
"UNSMIL is alarmed by the wave of arbitrary arrest and detentions across Libya by law enforcement and security actors," it said in a statement late Saturday.
"These actors are using their powers of arrest and detention to target individuals for their alleged political affiliations, to silence perceived dissent and to undermine judicial independence."
Libya has struggled to recover from the chaos that followed the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that overthrew longtime dictator Moamer Kadhafi.
It remains split between a UN-recognised government in Tripoli and a rival authority in the east backed by military strongman Khalifa Haftar.
UNSMIL also expressed concern about the use of filmed confessions, "where individuals are detained and coerced into 'confessing' to alleged crimes with videos published online."
It said the practice was used to "intimidate and humiliate" the individuals, and must be deemed inadmissible.
Among those arrested was Judge Ali al-Sharif, who was subjected to violence during his arrest in Tripoli on March 10, as well as lawyer Mounir al-Orfi, detained in Benghazi since March 12, said the UN.
Two military prosecutors, Mansour Daoub and Mohammed al-Mabrouk al-Kar, have also been held in Tripoli since 2022, UNSMIL said.
The situation "undermines the environment necessary for Libya's democratic transition, and weakens Libyans' trust in law enforcement and security entities that must work to protect and promote the rights of all people in Libya, not undermine them," UNSMIL said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bilawal urges UN to press India for comprehensive dialogue
KARACHI: PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Tuesday urged the United Nations and the international community to push India towards a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where the two countries could address their outstanding issues and achieve peace in the wake of their recent military conflict in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. Bilawal was addressing a press conference at the UN Headquarters in New York on recent regional developments after the military conflict. The address came amid the visit of a high-level team — consisting of three former foreign ministers, two former foreign secretaries, two former ambassadors to the US, and a serving federal minister — for consultations at the United Nations. The team arrived in New York on Sunday FO condemns remarks of Indian leaders Ex-FMs Bilawal, Hina Rabbani Khar and Khurram Dastgir; Senators Sherry Rehman, Musadik Malik, Faisal Sabzwari and Bushra Anjum Butt; and Jalil Abbas Jilani and Tehmina Janjua are members of the delegation. Bilawal said Pakistan's position was to hold a 'comprehensive dialogue' with India that would include the issue of terrorism as well. Bilawal said Pakistan was the country where the 'single largest number of terrorist attacks' occurred and was also the country with the single largest number of victims of terrorism. Bilawal said the Pakistani delegation was concluding its visit to New York and the UN and had appealed to the international community to assist the country in its pursuit of peace. 'Just as the international community played its role in encouraging India to agree to a ceasefire, it should also encourage engaging in a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan so that we can address our issues and achieve peace,' he added. Bilawal said he wanted to use the opportunity to share Pakistan's perspective on the recent military conflict with India in the wake of the Pahalgam attack, as well as the way forward. Reiterating the 'illegal strikes' launched by India as part of its 'Operation Sindoor' 'in violation of the UN Charter, international law', Bilawal said the attacks had targeted civilian infrastructure, places of worship, energy infrastructure and innocent women and children. He said India had used the April 22 terrorist attack in IIOJK's Pahalgam as a premise for the strikes. 'We expressed our sympathy with the victims of terrorism and Pakistan has consistently and unequivocally condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations,' he said, adding that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had immediately expressed Pakistan's willingness to India and the global community to be part of any impartial international investigation. He said India subsequently launched missile strikes into Pakistan in the next two days and the latter 'responded in kind'. 'Due to the intervention of the international community, and I'd like here to particularly mention the role of US President Donald Trump and his team led by Secretary of State [Marco] Rubio, we did manage to achieve a ceasefire,' Bilawal added. 'The military and political leadership of Pakistan and the country are not the caricature that India would like to paint of us,' he said, adding that politicians had fought terrorists on the frontline and paid a heavy cost while the military had confronted them on the battlefield and earned their honours and promotions. He also pointed out that the Financial Action Task Force — the international watchdog against money laundering and financing of terrorism — had endorsed Pakistan's taking measures to combat terror financing. 'It's become too easy for wannabe hegemons to use the wolf whistle of terrorism to justify illegal actions and violent actions in Muslim countries and communities,' Bilawal said, adding that terrorism could not be confronted by India while using it as a political tool to demonise Muslims within, in IIOJK and Pakistan. Despite that, he said Pakistan would still like to cooperate with India in combatting terrorism and the fate of the region's people could not be left in the hands of non-state actors and terrorists for them to decide that two nuclear-armed powers go to war. In addition, he said the most recent front opened by India was the weaponisation of water, adding that the violation of the Indus Waters Treaty must be condemned across the board and the precedent must not be allowed to be set. He said the threat to cut Pakistan's water supply was a violation of the UN Charter and any action on it would be seen as an act of war by Pakistan. He said Trump had a unique opportunity to deliver on his commitment to peace, enjoying good relations with both countries. He added the delegation would be beginning its engagements in Washington DC from tomorrow and encourages US lawmakers and government officials to play their role in facilitating the peace process. The Pakistani delegation is scheduled to arrive in Washington today, where it plans to engage with Rubio, other senior officials, lawmakers, and think tanks till June 6. The team will also visit London and Brussels. The visit coincides with the arrival of an Indian delegation in Washington on June 3, led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor. Earlier, the team met officials from the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) officials to brief them on Pakistan's stance. Bilawal, while addressing the OIC Permanent Representatives, 'categorically rejected India's attempt to link Pakistan to the Pahalgam incident without any credible investigation or evidence', according to a press release by Pakistan's Mission to the UN. He highlighted that the blame was 'used as a pretext for unlawful military actions, including cross-border strikes, which targeted civilians and civilian infrastructure'. During his meeting with the OIC envoys, PPP chairman expressed concern at India's move to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, which Pakistan considered 'a blatant act of weaponising water and a violation of international and treaty obligations'. 'He [Bilawal] made it plainly clear that we cannot allow this to become a new normal,' the statement read. It continued that the PPP chairman stressed that 'due to India's belligerent aggression, the world has become a less safe place, with real and present implications for peace and security in South Asia'. The former foreign minister went on to thank the OIC for its efforts and role aimed at mediation to de-escalate tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, highlighting that the 'only path to peace is dialogue, engagement and diplomacy'. 'He [Bilawal] reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to peace, restraint, and diplomacy, and called for the restoration of the Indus Waters Treaty, full respect for the ceasefire, and the resumption of a comprehensive dialogue with India, with the resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute at its core,' the statement read. Meanwhile, the permanent representatives of the OIC countries expressed their 'appreciation for Pakistan's transparent and timely briefing and reaffirmed their solidarity with Pakistan and the people of Jammu and Kashmir'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Far-right leader Wilders quits Dutch coalition over immigration row
Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders speaks to the media following his decision to leave the governing coalition, in The Hague, Netherlands, June 3, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article The Dutch government collapsed on Tuesday, most likely ushering in a snap election, after anti-Muslim politician Geert Wilders quit the right-wing coalition, accusing other parties of failing to back his tougher immigration policies. But Prime Minister Dick Schoof, an independent, accused the political maverick of irresponsibility, and the other coalition parties denied failing to support Wilders, saying they had been awaiting proposals from his PVV party's own migration minister. PVV ministers will quit the cabinet, leaving the others to continue as a caretaker administration until an election unlikely to be held before October. Frustration with migration and the high cost of living is boosting the far right and widening divisions in Europe, just as it needs unity to deal effectively with a hostile Russia and an unpredictable and combative US president in the form of Donald Trump. "I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible," Schoof said after an emergency cabinet meeting triggered by Wilders' decision. "We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us," he added, before handing his resignation to King Willem-Alexander. The prospect of a new election is likely to delay a decision on boosting defence spending and means the Netherlands will have only a caretaker government when it hosts a summit of the transatlantic NATO alliance this month. Election may months away Wilders said he had had no option but to quit the coalition. "I proposed a plan to close the borders for asylum seekers, to send them away, to shut asylum shelters. I demanded coalition partners sign up to that, which they didn't. That left me no choice but to withdraw my support for this government," he told reporters. "I signed up for the strictest asylum policies, not for the demise of the Netherlands." He said he would lead the PVV into a new election and hoped to be the next prime minister. An election is now likely at the end of October or in November, said political scientist Joep van Lit at Radboud University in Nijmegen. Even then, the fractured political landscape means formation of a new government may take months. It remains to be seen whether right-wing voters will see the turn of events as Wilders' failure to turn his proposals into reality, or rather decide that he needs a bigger mandate to get his way, van Lit said. Simon Otjes, assistant professor in Dutch politics at Leiden University, said the PVV must have calculated that the next election would be seen as a referendum on immigration policy, "because they know they would win that". Amsterdam resident Michelle ten Berge hoped that "with the new election we will choose ... a government that's more moderate". But florist Ron van den Hoogenband, in The Hague, said he expected Wilders to emerge the winner and take control of parliament "so he can do like Trump is doing and other European countries where the extreme right is taking over". Immigration a divisive issue Wilders won the last election in November 2023 with an unexpectedly high 23% of the vote. Opinion polls put his party at around 20% now, roughly on a par with the Labour/Green combination that is currently the second-largest grouping in parliament. Wilders had last week demanded immediate support for a 10-point plan that included closing the borders to asylum seekers, sending back refugees from Syria and shutting down asylum shelters. He also proposed expelling migrants convicted of serious crimes and boosting border controls. Migration has been a divisive issue in Dutch politics for years. The previous government, led by current NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, also collapsed after failing to reach a deal on restricting immigration. Wilders, a provocative politician who was convicted of discrimination against Moroccans in 2016, was not part of the latest government himself. He only managed to strike a coalition deal with three other conservative parties last year after agreeing not to become prime minister. Instead, the cabinet was led by the unelected Schoof, a career civil servant.
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
UN sees ‘alarming' surge in Afghan families deported from Iran
KABUL: The UN on Tuesday voiced concern over a surge in Afghan families deported from Iran, recording a more than two-fold increase in May from the previous month, as the rise in returnees squeeze's Afghanistan's resources. Afghanistan's border points with Iran regularly see a steady stream of Afghans returning forcibly or voluntarily after crossing into the neighbouring country, often seeking work. But in May, there was 'sharp rise in the forced return of Afghan nationals' from Iran, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) said in a statement. 'Particularly alarming is a significant surge in the number of families being deported – a new and concerning trend, as returnees deported in previous months were predominantly single young men,' it added. The IOM said 15,675 Afghan families had crossed the border from Iran in May compared to 6,879 in April. Islamabad says more than 100,000 Afghans left Pakistan in April The number of Afghan families without legal documentation in Iran returning to Afghanistan last month was three times higher than in May last year, it added. According to the IOM, Iranian officials issued a public statement in late May ordering Afghans without documentation to remain in Iran to leave by July 6, 'potentially affecting up to 4 million people'. Already since January this year, more than 450,000 Afghans have returned from Iran, the IOM said. Iran, which shares a 900-kilometre (560-mile) border with Afghanistan, hosts one of the largest refugee populations in the world, including millions of Afghans who arrived over the past 40 years after fleeing conflict. The spike in returns comes as Afghans have also been pressured to leave Pakistan in droves, with a campaign by Islamabad expelling more than 180,000 Afghans since April. The influx across both borders threatens to strain Afghanistan's already 'fragile reception and reintegration systems', according to the IOM, in a country still recovering from decades of conflict. More than one million Afghans have returned from Pakistan since late 2023, when Islamabad launched the first phase of a plan to remove Afghans amid tensions with the Taliban authorities who swept to power in 2021, particularly over security concerns. Many Afghans had lived in Pakistan for decades after fleeing successive wars and crises. The Taliban authorities – still unrecognised by any other country – have consistently called for Afghans to be allowed a 'dignified' return to Afghanistan. The IOM on Tuesday again called for 'all countries to immediately suspend the forced return of Afghans, regardless of their immigration status, until safe, voluntary, and dignified return conditions are in place'.
