
Labour's tax onslaught is coming for your Sunday lunch
Tucking in to roast lamb for your Sunday lunch may soon become a political statement – a cry of resistance against the progressives' onslaught on all things ovine.
We are certainly a sheep sodden country – they have shaped our most loved landscapes from the Lakes to Devon, Snowdonia to the Peaks, for centuries.
According to the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, there were 21.2 million sheep in the UK in December 2023, a reduction of 5pc on the previous year.
In 2024, the Welsh flock stood at 8.4 million, or a little over 2.6 sheep per person. Even these prodigious numbers are down from their peak – there were over 12 million in the 1990s.
There remain around 70pc more ovines in the principality alone than in the entirety of the United States. If the US enjoyed the same sheep density as Wales, it would harbour over 4.1 billion of the creatures against its actual headcount of around 5 million. If wealth were still measured in terms of sheep, we would remain vastly richer than our American cousins.
But all are not fans of our woolly friends. How many ovines should be allowed to reside on our island is fast turning into a faultline in the culture wars. As so often this started as a fringe issue, but the question is now being debated at the heart of government.
A little over a decade ago, environmental journalist, George Monbiot, in his book Feral railed against the sheepish menace. His beef was that overgrazing ovines were denuding our hills and turning our uplands into desolate wasteland with close to zero biodiversity.
Writing in The Spectator, Monbiot opined, 'The white plague has done more extensive environmental damage than all the building that has ever taken place here… Britain is being shagged by sheep.'
Today, ovinophobia has gone mainstream. The Climate Change Committee (CCC) was set up under the last Labour government in 2008 when Ed Miliband was previously in charge of pushing us towards net zero. Its statutory remit is to make recommendations on how we can reach that sacred goal by 2050 – last month, it issued its seventh carbon budget.
Farming is in the CCC's sights as they claim it is the fourth highest emitting sector in the UK, accounting for 11pc of all greenhouse gases. Agriculture's total emissions are down by 12pc since 1990, but its share of total emissions has gone up by more than 50pc – a consequence of the precipitous decline of British industry.
Nearly half of agricultural emissions are the product of ovine and bovine flatulence, with a further 14pc emanating from livestock waste and manure. So for the green lobby, something must be done about us nasty carnivores. For the Monbiots of this world, lamb eaters are wrecking the environment both on a local and a planetary scale.
The CCC's carbon budget sets out a plan to cut our meat consumption by a quarter and reduce the UK's number of cattle and sheep by 27pc by 2040. But the details are still bleaker news for ardent carnivores.
By 2050, lamb and beef eating is planned to be down by 40pc. The sheep wrecked uplands, or so the thinking goes, can then over time be afforested and returned to their virginal state.
How is this change going to come about? The report is a little hazy about the details. Farmers will indubitably face the brunt of this solemn mission. The imposition of inheritance tax on agricultural land will certainly not be the last rural tax raid.
It is hill farmers, the custodians of our sheep, who will be hit particularly hard. It is their lower value land which will be earmarked for rewilding schemes.
The report is explicit about this, as it expects lowland pastures' stock densities to go up by 10pc. Since this rise comes alongside an overall fall of over a quarter of total livestock numbers, it equates to a truly startling proposed reduction of sheep in our uplands.
But consumers too can expect plenty of government-sponsored nudging. Producers of ready meals will be cajoled to substitute plant-based fakery and lab grown meat for the real thing. Calls for a levy on red meat, along the lines of the sugar tax, will become increasingly vocal. The shopper will be faced with reduced choice and higher prices.
But hill farmers have a potential ace up their sleeves. Britain's Muslims eat much more meat than the national average, and specifically much more lamb and mutton. Muslims make up around 6.5pc of the population of England and Wales, according to the Office for National Statistics.
But they account for 30pc or more of lamb and mutton sales – 60pc of halal consumers eat lamb each week, whilst only 6pc of the general population do.
A green levy on meat sales would vastly disproportionately hit Britain's Muslims. Surely this is an argument a self-proclaimedly progressive government would find it hard to counter. A tax on lamb would be a tax on our minorities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Welsh council leader 'concerned' about impact immigration plan could have on care
Welsh council leader 'concerned' about impact immigration plan could have on care Cllr Huw Thomas said the UK Government's plans to restrict oversees recruitment of care workers is "certainly a matter of concern" Cllr Huw Thomas said he is concerned about the UK Government's immigration plans (Image: Cardiff Council ) The Labour leader of Cardiff Council said he is concerned about UK Government immigration plans that could affect social care in the city. Cllr Huw Thomas spoke about plans to restrict oversees recruitment of care workers at a building topping out ceremony in Grangetown on Friday, June 6. The UK Government said its plan, which is part of the recently published immigration white paper, is aimed at stopping carers from oversees being subject to "shameful levels of abuse and exploitation". However, unions, care agencies and councils have come out in criticism of the move which they say will exacerbate the pressure the care sector is already under. Never miss a Cardiff story and sign up to our newsletter here. When asked how concerned he was about the plans, Cllr Thomas said: "I think it is certainly a matter of concern. "There are migrant workers in the care sector in Cardiff doing incredibly important work in very difficult circumstances. "We want to support them and as a council we are working with trade unions to support that work force. Article continues below "What that's meant over the last couple of years is that the marketplace for domiciliary care... is actually quite resilient in Cardiff. "I think if there would be changes... that are proposed to be introduced, that would weaken the resilience of the delivery of domiciliary care. The leader of Cardiff Council, Cllr Huw Thomas, was speaking at an event in Grangetown (Image: Ted Peskett ) "It is a concern. We are feeding that concern into Government for their consideration." A Cardiff Council official told councillors at a scrutiny committee meeting in February 2023 that the local authority was having issues with recruiting social care staff. An advert posted on the council's Facebook page in May 2025 said it currently has "vacancies in a number of care roles". In a statement published on May 11, the UK Government said some carers seeking work in the UK arrived to find themselves "saddled with debt", being treated unfairly and discovering the jobs they were promised didn't exist. The Welsh Local Government Association (WLGA) has also come out in criticism of the plans. WLGA spokesperson for Health and Social Care, Cllr Charlie McCoubrey, said: "Councils have long struggled to recruit social care workers, especially in rural and coastal areas. "The Welsh Government's Real Living Wage has helped, but international recruitment has been an important part of keeping services going. "These proposals risk shutting off a vital source of social care workers at the very moment local services are under extreme pressure. "Councils are working hard to support people to live with dignity and independence – but this depends on having a workforce in place. "Removing this option without a fully funded plan to grow the domestic workforce is a significant risk. "It will take time and investment to build a resilient, sustainable care workforce. "In the meantime, we fear the consequences will be felt by the people who rely most on support – older people, people with disabilities, and unpaid carers. Article continues below "Workforce planning must reflect the reality on the ground. "Local authorities are uniquely placed to understand the needs of their communities, and their insights must shape national decisions."


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Fury as BA calls Falkland Islands capital by its ARGENTINIAN name in ‘ludicrous and insulting' blunder
Falklands war veterans slammed the error, which BA promised to investigate FALKLANDS FURY Fury as BA calls Falkland Islands capital by its ARGENTINIAN name in 'ludicrous and insulting' blunder BRITISH Airways has been branded disgraceful for using the Argentinian name for the capital of the Falklands Islands on in-flight entertainment screens. The UK's flag carrier airline refers to Port Stanley as Puerto Argentino. Advertisement 3 Port Stanley is the Falkland Islands' only city Credit: Rex 3 255 British military personnel died in the 74-day conflict in 1982 Credit: Getty The British title is relegated to a set of brackets underneath. Ed West, of The Spectator magazine, spotted the blunder and said: 'Curious wording for a British Airways in-flight map.' Last night, BA promised to investigate as the error was described as 'ludicrous' and 'insulting' by Falklands war veterans. Argentina still claims sovereignty but its invading forces lost the 74-day conflict in 1982. Advertisement British forces scrambled halfway around the world to put down General Leopoldo Galtieri's troops after they took Port Stanley in a surprise raid. This Saturday is the 43rd anniversary of Britain's victory. Former head of the Royal Navy, Admiral Lord West, who won the Distinguished Service Cross during the war, said the name error was 'disrespectful' to islanders. He told The Sun: 'It's disgraceful. Advertisement 'The Falklands are a British overseas territory and 99.9 per cent of islanders want to stay British. 'We have said very clearly there will be no discussions about sovereignty. The New British Airways First Class Seat 'For the flag carrier airline to give Port Stanley another name is unforgivable.' Lord West, whose HMS Ardent was sunk by Argentine forces, added: 'I don't know why they would do it. Advertisement 'Everyone on the Falkland Islands calls it Port Stanley. 'They should change it back as soon as possible. 'This is insulting to the population of Port Stanley.' In all, 255 British personnel lost their lives defending the islands. Advertisement In 2017 Argentina's senate voted to rename Port Stanley as Puerto Argentino and celebrate Sovereignty Day there if it is ever recaptured. The in-flight map shows only the names of world capitals and not countries' names. It means BA does not reference the Falklands by its Argentinian name Islas Malvinas. British Airways' parent company, International Airlines Group, is based in Spain. Advertisement A BA spokeswoman said: 'We are grateful this has been brought to our attention. 'We'll be reviewing it with the third party supplier that provides the in-flight map service.'

Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'