logo
US migrant detention hits record 59,000 as Trump ramps up arrests

US migrant detention hits record 59,000 as Trump ramps up arrests

The United States is holding a record number of migrants in immigration detention, as President Donald Trump's second administration accelerates mass arrests across the country.
By June 23, 2025, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was detaining around 59,000 people—far above the 41,500-bed limit set by Congress and the highest figure in US immigration history, according to internal data obtained by CBS News.
Just under half of those currently held—about 47%—have no criminal record at all, and fewer than 30% have been convicted of crimes.
In June so far, ICE has averaged 1,200 arrests per day, peaking above 2,000 on two occasions. That's nearly double the average during the early months of Trump's second term, but still short of the 3,000 daily target reportedly set by White House adviser Stephen Miller.
The current detainee count surpasses the previous high of around 55,000 recorded in 2019, during Trump's first term. Two former ICE officials told CBS they had never seen the agency detain so many people at once.
Who is being detained?
According to government figures:
47% of detainees have no criminal record
Fewer than 30% have criminal convictions
Many were arrested in workplace raids or during targeted operations across major cities
While ICE has the authority to detain anyone suspected of immigration violations, the broadening scope of arrests now includes individuals with no prior offences.
Official messaging stresses violent crime
Despite these numbers, Trump administration officials continue to link the detention drive with public safety.
'In LA, what we have been going after is the worst of the worst,' said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in an interview with Fox News. 'They are murderers. They are people who have been perpetuating assault and trafficking human beings.'
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said, 'ICE targets the worst of the worst—including gang members, murderers, and rapists. In President Trump's first 100 days, 75 per cent of ICE arrests were criminal illegal aliens with convictions or pending charges.'
A recent press release from DHS highlighted 11 individuals arrested in Los Angeles—10 of whom had records involving violent or drug-related crimes.
Pressure from the White House for mass arrests
Internal discussions suggest that the White House is pushing for a sharp increase in arrests. Top adviser Stephen Miller and Secretary Noem have reportedly asked ICE to arrest 3,000 individuals a day—three times the average daily arrest rate in Trump's early second term, according to a cable made public earlier this month.
To support this surge, the administration is seeking $147 billion in immigration-related funding over the next decade and has signed contracts to expand detention centre capacity. It has also revived the 287(G) programme, which allows state and local police to enforce immigration laws.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said at a press conference, 'We are committed to aggressively and efficiently removing illegal aliens from the United States, and ensuring our law enforcement officers have the resources necessary to do so. The safety of the American people depends upon it.'
Interior arrests replacing border detentions
With border crossings at historic lows, the focus has shifted from the border to the interior. Data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) shows that ICE made around 65,000 deportations in the first 100 days of Trump's second term, up from a daily average of 759 during President Biden's final year.
The administration has also petitioned the US Supreme Court to overturn a Massachusetts court ruling that requires a 10-day notice before deporting migrants to third countries. The filing follows a dispute over attempts to deport individuals convicted of crimes to South Sudan.
What to do if approached by ICE
Abhisha Parikh, a US-based immigration attorney, posted a list of precautions on Instagram for people approached by ICE:
• Stay calm and don't run
• Ask if you are free to leave—if yes, walk away
• Ask to see badges; ICE officers often wear 'Police' on uniforms
• Remain silent if questioned
• Don't resist or reach for items suddenly
• You can refuse searches of your car, phone or home unless there's a judge's warrant
• Never present false documents or lie
• If undocumented, say you wish to remain silent and want a lawyer
• Don't sign anything before speaking with a legal adviser
Few legal pathways for undocumented
Legal recourse is limited for undocumented Indians in the US, especially those with criminal convictions.
Ajay Sharma, founder of Abhinav Immigration Services told Business Standard, 'There are not many legal pathways for those on illegal status, especially the ones with criminal records. Even those without criminal records who try to file in any permitted category must leave the country once to get new status validated, and the probability of being denied re-entry is still very high.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom sues Fox News for $787 million over Trump call defamation
Newsom sues Fox News for $787 million over Trump call defamation

Indian Express

time26 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Newsom sues Fox News for $787 million over Trump call defamation

Fox News is set to defend itself against California Governor Gavin Newsom's $787 million defamation lawsuit, labeling it a 'frivolous publicity stunt' aimed at stifling critical speech. Newsom alleges that Fox News knowingly spread false claims about a phone call he had with President Donald Trump during an immigration enforcement period. The network's segment, featuring host Jesse Watters, claimed Newsom lied about the timing of their conversation, prompting the governor to seek damages for alleged damage to his reputation. The complaint, filed on Friday in Delaware Superior Court, says Fox News acted with 'actual malice' by airing a misleading segment that accused Newsom of lying about the timing of his last conversation with Trump. The amount of damages sought is the same as the $787.5 million Fox paid in 2023 to settle a separate defamation case with Dominion Voting Systems. Newsom, a Democrat, said he spoke with Trump late on June 6 or early June 7 after federal immigration raids led to protests in Los Angeles. Days later, Trump sent National Guard troops and 700 Marines to California without consulting the governor. On June 10, Trump told reporters he had spoken to Newsom 'a day ago,' which Newsom denies. He says there was no further contact after the initial call. Despite this, Fox News aired a segment on 10 June in which host Jesse Watters said, 'Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him?' according to the lawsuit. The show also included a banner on screen saying 'Gavin Lied About Trump's Call.' According to the complaint, this was part of an effort to damage Newsom's reputation and support Trump. The lawsuit argues that the claims were 'calculated to provoke outrage and cause Governor Newsom significant harm,' by reducing support for his policies and political future. Newsom is also seeking compensatory damages and has said, according to The New York Times, he would drop the case if Fox issued a retraction and Watters apologised on air. Fox News did not immediately respond to a request for comment, Reuters reported. Newsom's office also did not comment. To win the case, Newsom will need to prove Fox acted with 'actual malice' that it either knew the information was false or showed reckless disregard for the truth. This legal standard comes from a 1964 US Supreme Court decision, New York Times vs Sullivan. President Trump has also brought defamation claims in recent years. He reached a $15 million settlement with ABC last December after a report wrongly said he was found liable for rape in a civil trial. He also sued CBS for $20 billion over how it edited a '60 Minutes' interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. A mediator has reportedly suggested CBS parent company Paramount pay $20 million to settle.

China, US Confirm Details of Trade Deal Framework
China, US Confirm Details of Trade Deal Framework

The Wire

time28 minutes ago

  • The Wire

China, US Confirm Details of Trade Deal Framework

The US will lift 'restrictive measures against China', and the latter will 'approve applications for the export control items', per China. The US will lift 'restrictive measures against China', and the latter will 'approve applications for the export control items', per China. Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support . China's commerce ministry on Friday (June 27) announced that Beijing and Washington had confirmed the details of a trade deal framework that the two countries had agreed upon earlier this month following talks in London. According to the statement from the ministry, Washington will lift "restrictive measures against China", and Beijing will "review and approve applications for the export control items". Late Thursday, US President Donald Trump announced that the United States and China had signed a trade agreement and that he expects to soon reach a deal with India. "We just signed with China the other day," Trump said. Advertisement Meanwhile, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told Bloomberg TV that the deal was "signed and sealed" two days earlier. No details about the agreement were provided by either Lutnick or Trump. "The president likes to close these deals himself," Lutnick said. Advertisement Also on Thursday, a White House official announced that the US had reached an agreement with China on how to expedite shipments of rare earth materials to the US. What do we know about US-China trade talks? The announcement by the US and China follows initial talks in Geneva in early May, which led both sides to postpone massive tariff hikes that threatened to halt much of the trade between the two countries. Later talks in London set a framework for negotiations, and the deal Trump and the Chinese commerce ministry mentioned appeared to formalise that agreement. Ensuring the supply of rare earth elements – essential for products including electric vehicles, hard drives and national defence equipment – has been a top priority for Washington in talks with Beijing. In early April, China – which dominates global production of these elements – began requiring export licenses, a move widely viewed as a response to Trump's tariffs. Shares in Europe and Asia rose as investors assessed signs of easing trade tensions between the US and China. Chinese foreign minister to visit EU, Germany, France next week On Friday, Beijing also announced that Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi will travel to Europe next week to meet with his counterparts from the European Union, Germany and France. China's top diplomat will meet with his EU counterpart, Kaja Kallas, at the bloc's headquarters in Brussels for a "China-EU high-level strategic dialogue", said foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun. In Germany, Wang will discuss diplomacy and security with foreign minister Johann Wadephul, and in France, he will meet with minister for Europe and foreign affairs Jean-Noel Barrot. While in Brussels, Wang will also meet with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever and Deputy Prime Minister and foreign minister Maxime Prevot. This article was originally published on DW. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Donald Trump may name a ‘shadow' Fed Chair by September; what happens to Jerome Powell? Analysts decode
Donald Trump may name a ‘shadow' Fed Chair by September; what happens to Jerome Powell? Analysts decode

Mint

time33 minutes ago

  • Mint

Donald Trump may name a ‘shadow' Fed Chair by September; what happens to Jerome Powell? Analysts decode

US President Donald Trump has said that he will announce a successor to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell as early as this summer even as the Fed chair's tenure is set to be over next May. A Wall Street Journal report on Wednesday said that Trump could name the next Fed chair by September or October, or as early as this summer. With Powell having nearly 11 months left until the end of his term, Trump remains frustrated as he continues to criticise the Fed chair's move of not cutting interest rates despite muted inflation. However, announcing the name of the next Fed chair this far in advance would be a surprising development in the 111-year history of the US. Donald Trump may name a 'shadow' Fed chair At the White House on Wednesday, National Economic Council head Kevin Hassett said that the next Fed chair is not going to be Jerome Powell. "I think the President will choose the person that he likes, and it's not going to be Jay Powell," Hassett said. Hasset, along with three others — former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, current Fed Governor Christopher Waller, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — are among the top contenders for the post of the American central bank's head, according to reports. Also Read | Trump considers naming next Fed chair early in bid to undermine Powell The person, if Trump goes ahead with the appointment right now, could act as a 'shadow' Fed chair — an idea Scott Bessent first floated in 2024 before he became the Treasury Secretary. What happens to Jerome Powell? Some analysts see Trump's naming of the next Fed chief as an effort to influence monetary policy through a "shadow" Fed chair even before Powell leaves office in May 2026. According to former Fed officials and academics cited by Fed, the move could also mean that the economic uncertantly that has prevailed after Trump took office could intensify. 'It's an absolutely horrible idea,' Alan Blinder, who served as the No. 2 official at the Fed during the mid-1990s, was quoted as saying by CNN. A shadow Fed chair may mean that markets could be put in an uncertain position if two powerful voices say the opposite about the monetary policy, he said. 'If they're not singing from the same playbook, which seems likely, this is just going to cause confusion in markets,' Blinder told CNN. Greg Valliere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, made similar comments, according to the report of the news outlet. 'This is a terrible idea, sure to annoy and confuse financial markets if there are two Fed Chairs,' he said. RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas warned that naming a shadow Fed chair this early could cause a spike in interest rates — undermining the very goal that Trump is trying to achieve. 'Undermining Powell is in no one's best interest as it will almost certainly translate to a weaker dollar and rising rates,' he was quoted as saying by CNN. White House denies reports The White House on Thursday dismissed reports of Donald Trump naming a Fed chair so soon to replace Jerome Powell next year. 'No decisions are imminent, although the president has the right to change his mind,' AFP quoted a White House official as saying. 'The president has many good options to nominate as the next Federal Reserve chairman,' the official added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store