
Killer of Met sergeant Matt Ratana loses conviction and sentence appeal bids
De Zoysa, 27, was told he would die behind bars in July 2023 after being convicted of Sgt Ratana's murder the previous month.
Sgt Ratana died in hospital after being struck by two bullets in a holding cell in Croydon, south London, in September 2020.
At a hearing on Thursday, De Zoysa's barristers told the Court of Appeal that he should be allowed to challenge his conviction and sentence, on the grounds that he was wrongly deemed fit to plead and stand trial, and that his sentence should not have been a whole life order.
In a ruling, Dame Victoria Sharp, Mr Justice Goss and Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb dismissed the appeal bids.
Dame Victoria said: 'All applications will be refused, for reasons which we will give in writing.'
The judge added that the written reasons for their decision will come at a later date.
New Zealand-born Sgt Ratana was hit in the chest by the first of three shots discharged within three seconds, with a second striking the 54-year-old in the thigh before De Zoysa was wrestled to the ground by other officers.
A third round hit the cell wall at Croydon's Windmill Road custody centre, before De Zoysa fired a fourth shot while on the cell floor 16 seconds later, which hit an artery in his own neck and caused brain damage.
De Zoysa, formerly of Banstead, Surrey, claimed diminished responsibility but was found guilty after the jury decided he pulled the antique weapon's trigger deliberately to fire homemade bullets, and had not suffered an autistic meltdown.
Before his trial, two High Court judges ruled that De Zoysa was fit to enter pleas, despite his injuries.
One judge was told that the former University College London student was given a whiteboard and pen to communicate with medical experts due to speech difficulties.
He also had part of his skull removed during life-saving emergency medical treatment, and suffers weakness in his right arm and leg due to his injuries.
Imran Khan KC, representing De Zoysa, who has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, said in written submissions: 'The judge fell into error in finding that the applicant was fit to plead (and) to be tried. He was not.'
Referring to the sentence, he said in court: 'This case, looking at it in the round, is not one which by any stretch of the imagination falls anywhere near the evil end of the spectrum and therefore we say it should not have been a whole life order.'
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), opposed the appeal bids, but were not required to make submissions in court.
De Zoysa was arrested in London Road, Norbury, in the early hours of September 25 2020.
At his trial at Northampton Crown Court, jurors were shown CCTV footage of the former tax office data analyst, firing a legally bought revolver while handcuffed in a holding cell.
A bag containing seven bullets and cannabis were found during a search of De Zoysa's clothing and body, but officers did not discover a .41-calibre revolver loaded with six rounds.
As he was being transported to a police station in Windmill Road, Croydon, in a police van, De Zoysa 'retrieved' the weapon from a holster under his left arm while handcuffed.
CCTV evidence suggested he managed to get hold of the gun with his right hand around 16 minutes before the shooting and then took advantage of a vent at the back of his overcoat to hide the weapon until the incident.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
BBC confirms corporation will not appeal Gerry Adams libel ruling after it adds update to online article
It comes after the broadcaster updated an online article at the heart of the controversy, urging readers to be aware of the outcome of the case which found that the former Sinn Fein leader had been defamed. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a Spotlight episode which aired in 2016 and the accompanying online article based on the programme. In a high-profile case, a jury concluded the content defamed Mr Adams (76) by featuring an anonymous source who alleged he sanctioned the 2006 murder of British agent Denis Donaldson who was also a high-ranking Sinn Fein official. This evening the BBC said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' The verdict was delivered in the High Court in Dublin last month along with the decision to award the successful claimant €100,000 (£84,000). Jurors determined that the allegation — which Mr Adams has always denied — in the programme and online story was damaging to Mr Adams' reputation. The jury concluded that the BBC did not act in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way. The corporation was then ordered to pay Mr Adams' legal costs. The combined bill for both parties is estimated to be between €3-5m (£2.5-4.2m), according to sources with knowledge of the case. Speaking tonight, Mr Adams said the decision should be accompanied with 'a substantial reform' of the BBC's internal journalistic processes along with an acknowledgement that 'it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland'. 'It must also become more accountable to the public,' he continued in a statement. 'There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.' The offending online article remains on the BBC News website, however an update has been added. The update, alongside a link to reporting of the defamation case, states: 'In 2017 Gerry Adams commenced defamation proceedings in the Republic of Ireland against the BBC in respect of the article below and the BBC programme 'Spy in the IRA' upon which the article is based. 'In May 2025 a jury in the High Court in Dublin, Ireland, found in favour of Mr Adams and awarded him €100,000 (£84,000) in damages. 'A link to the BBC's reporting of the outcome of Gerry Adams' libel case, which should be read in conjunction with this update, is here.' It comes after the Taoiseach promised that defamation laws in the Republic will be changed as quickly as the Irish Government can achieve it. Earlier this week Micheal Martin praised the BBC reporter at the centre of the case, Jennifer O'Leary, as 'first-class'. 'I think the defamation laws need to be changed — we're going to change them,' he said. The Taoiseach vowed that the Government in Dublin would pass the legislation 'as quickly as we can' adding: 'I think we do need to get it through to create a balanced environment for commentary and for investigative journalism'. BBC NI director Adam Smyth previously warned of 'profound' implications of libel action as he expressed disappointment over the outcome. 'As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it's hard to see how anyone's could — and they warned that today's decision could hinder freedom of expression,' he said after the verdict. Meanwhile Ms O'Leary insisted she had entered the witness box with 'nothing to hide, only sources to protect' as she thanked them for trusting her. The BBC's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award and initially said it was taking time to consider an appeal.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Paedophile NHS anaesthetist, 37, who took indecent photos of unconscious patients including girl, five, loses bid to shorten jail sentence
An anaesthetist who took indecent photos of a five-year-old girl while she lay unconscious has lost a bid to shorten his sentence. Edward Finn committed 'about as egregious breach of trust as can be imagined' when he captured the pictures of four female victims. The 37-year-old made indecent images of a five-year-old girl and an adult patient after he anaesthetised them. And he also took photos of his wife while she was asleep, as well as a three-year-old daughter of a family friend. Finn was sentenced in June 2024 to eight years in jail with an extended licence of four years after pleading guilty at Nottingham Crown Court. He subsequently challenged the length of his sentence - though the Court of Appeal in London has now dismissed this. Mr Justice Johnson, sitting with Lord Justice Fraser and Judge Martin Picton, said Finn's offences took place between 2014 and 2023. He was caught after his wife found images of naked children on an old iPad, in a folder labelled 'hidden', the judge said. Further investigations into all of Finn's devices revealed thousands of indecent images of children, including more than a hundred in the most serious category, and images of an adult and a child taken during the course of his work. Finn, from Cotgrave in Nottinghamshire, told officers he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder after a girl he was treating had died. He also tried to take his own life before he was arrested and charged, the court heard. Andrew Wesley, for Finn, said at the appeal hearing on Friday that the sentence was too long because of 'the mathematics' of how it was reached. But the judges dismissed the appeal, with Mr Justice Johnson adding: 'This was about as egregious a breach of trust as can be imagined.' He continued: 'We conclude that the sentence imposed was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive. 'We therefore dismiss the appeal.'


Belfast Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
BBC confirms corporation will not appeal Gerry Adams libel ruling
Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. In a statement on Friday evening, the BBC said: "We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. "We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences."