Holocaust survivor describes ‘sitting and waiting to die' in Bergen-Belsen
A Holocaust survivor has recalled how Bergen-Belsen was 'even worse' than Auchwitz 'because you were brought there just to sit and wait to die'.
Renee Salt told Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that the Nazis had stopped counting people by the time she arrived in Bergen-Belsen as a teenager because people were dying so rapidly.
Her late husband Charles Salt helped liberate the camp and, ahead of Holocaust Memorial Day on Monday, she said: 'We didn't talk about it, we couldn't.'
Mrs Salt, 95, was born in Zdunska Wola, Poland, in 1929 and later lived in a ghetto established there.
In 1944, she was sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau with her parents.
She and her mother were then transported to a warehouse in Hamburg harbour, Germany, where she worked on demolition.
The pair were sent to Bergen-Belsen in March 1945. They were separated during the journey but found each other again inside the camp.
The British Army liberated them on April 15 1945 but her mother died in hospital 12 days later.
Describing her experience, she told Sky News: 'There was nothing to eat, nothing to drink – the water had been cut off already when I got to Bergen-Belsen.
We didn't have the strength to talk any more but her presence alone kept me going
Renee Salt
'The daily counting of the people stopped already because there was no point counting anyone – for every thousand people alive in the morning, there would only be 700 or 800 people alive in the afternoon, that's how quick people were dying, so there was no point counting any more.
'There were no more roll calls, nothing to eat at all, there was nothing – apparently bread stopped being supplied to people two weeks before I got there'.
Mrs Salt said she would not have survived without her mother.
'We didn't have the strength to talk any more but her presence alone kept me going,' she told the programme.
'It was terrible, we saw the corpses, it was so frightening – you never know when your next minute was to die.'
She went on to marry one of the soldiers who liberated Bergen-Belsen.
Her husband 'couldn't talk about Belsen, the tears were running down his face, he couldn't talk about Belsen', she said.
'We didn't talk about it, we couldn't.'
Asked why retelling testimonies like hers is important now, she told the programme: 'Because perhaps we can avert another holocaust from coming.'
Mr Phillips asked her if there is a chance the Holocaust could happen again.
Mrs Salt replied: 'There is a strong possibility, we hope that it will never happen again, we can only hope and pray, that (it) should quieten down.'
The scale of the Holocaust could be forgotten if stories like hers are not shared, she added.
Mrs Salt praised the Holocaust Educational Trust for creating young ambassadors to help pass on testimonies.
' People do forget, but I hope they won't this time,' Mrs Salt said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Remembering D-Day: Veteran, 100, offers first-hand account of D-Day
Tolley Fletcher, at the time a 19-year-old Navy gunner's mate, remembered the rough seas and the treacherous landing troops at Utah Beach had to make in 3- to 4-foot waves, each carrying about 60 pounds of gear on their backs and descending on rope ladders from larger ships onto smaller landing crafts. "I felt for those soldiers," Fletcher, now 100 years old, told USA TODAY. "In my mind, that was the worst part, other than people getting hurt." Fletcher, who joined the Navy at 17 in late December 1941, said he and his shipmates were fortunate to be mostly out of the line of fire. "There was some shelling, not really a lot, and luckily we didn't get hit. "Maybe halfway in, we started seeing lots of bodies in the water," said Fletcher, who now lives in the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, area. "I was asked (later) what we did about it. We didn't do anything about it - we had a job: to escort those troops to the beach." On D-Day, "that's what these guys faced," said Peter Donovan Crean Sr., vice president for education and access at the National World War II Museum in New Orleans. "They knew they were in the presence of history. Soldiers, sailors, Marines - they knew what they were doing was going to go down in history, which also meant they knew the danger involved. "Guys who were 18, 19, 20 years old were faced with the possibility of their death, but they did it anyway." As we mark the 81st anniversary of D-Day, here is a look at what happened on the beaches of Normandy, the men who fought knowing they might not survive to see victory and the way it affected the Allies' fight to defeat fascism, genocide and tyranny. What happened on D-Day? In order to defeat the Nazis in Europe, the Allies knew they'd have to take France, under German occupation since 1940. Operation Overlord saw a mobilization of 2,876,000 Allied troops in Southern England, as well as hundreds of ships and airplanes, in preparation for a ground invasion, the largest the world had seen. Weighing conditions including the weather, disagreements among other military leaders and strategic uncertainty, Eisenhower gave the go-ahead for the operation to begin before dawn on June 5, 1944. If things didn't go well for the Allies, Eisenhower wrote a note accepting responsibility. The following day, nearly 160,000 Allied troops landed along the 50-mile stretch of French shoreline. More than 9,000 Allied troops were killed or wounded, and 100,000 troops would continue the slow, bloody journey to Berlin, the center of German power. Why was it called D-Day? According to the U.S. Army, D-Day was "simply an alliteration, as in H-Hour." Some believe the first "D" also stands for "day," a code designation, while the French say the "D" stands for "disembarkation." The Army's website says that "the more poetic insist D-Day is short for 'day of decision.'" Asked in 1964, Eisenhower instructed his assistant Brig. Gen. Robert Schultz, to answer. Schultz wrote that "any amphibious operation has a 'departed date'; therefore the shortened term 'D-Day' is used." What happened after D-Day? D-Day was not the only decisive battle of the European theater, Crean said. "It was a crucial battle but there were more ahead," he said. "They had 700 miles of tough road ahead to get to Berlin." The Battle of the Bulge, waged over 41 days in December 1944 and January 1945, required 700,000 Allied troops. "It was a tough slog for another 11 months," Crean said. Victory in Europe - V-E Day - would come on May 8, 1945, nearly a year after D-Day. The war wouldn't end until the Japanese surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945. How many World War II veterans remain in the U.S.? There are about 66,000 surviving World War II veterans in the United States, Crean said, and while that may sound like a lot, it's a tiny fraction of the 16.4 million who served their country in the conflict. "So to be able to talk to and thank one veteran now is a gift for any of us," Crean said. The National World War II Museum's mission "is more critical than ever ... so more people will understand what they did and continue to be inspired by their sacrifices," added Crean, a retired colonel with 30 years' service in the Army. The museum has had oral historians travel the country to record more than 12,000 personal stories from World War II veterans. They've conducted extensive interviews with veterans, Holocaust survivors and homefront workers and, using artificial intelligence, created a way for visitors to have "conversations" with them and ask questions to learn about the war effort. And they offer virtual programming, teacher training and a student leadership award. Fletcher, the Navy gunner's mate, said he's uncomfortable with the idea of being considered a hero. Asked about his role in history, he said, "I really didn't think about it then, and I don't think about it now, though it's been impressed upon me quite a bit. "When I think about what I went through, and what all the Army and the other men who were mixed up in really tough situations, it makes me feel a little bit guilty."
Scotsman
3 days ago
- Scotsman
Why we should always be inspired by the heroes of D-Day
After radio reports about the D-Day Landing, Anne Frank wrote in her famous diary: 'Hope is revived within us' Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... June 6, 1944, is a date that will live forever in the annals of human history. As Lieutenant Colonel Stuart Crawford writes, D-Day remains to this day the largest seaborne assault in history. Thousands of Allied troops were killed and thousands more were wounded, but the Nazis' days were numbered. After listening to radio reports about the landings while hiding in Amsterdam, the then 14-year-old Anne Frank wrote in her famous diary of a 'great commotion in the Secret Annexe!' 'Hope is revived within us. It gives us fresh courage, and makes us strong again,' she added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Land craft, barrage balloons and ships at Omaha beach shortly after the invasion in June 1944 (Picture: Three Lions) | Getty Images Heartbreakingly, she and her family were arrested just two months later and she died in Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in February the following year, just one victim out of tens of millions who lost their lives in the Holocaust and the wars of conquest launched by Hitler's foul tyranny.
The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
Furtwängler: Symphony No 2 album review – conductor's own massive work has real curiosity value
Wilhelm Furtwängler may have become one of the greatest conductors of the first half of the 20th century, but as a teenager his musical aspirations were focused firmly on becoming a composer. That ambition faded in his 20s and 30s as his success as a conductor increased, and it wasn't until the 1930s, when he was in his late 40s, that Fürtwängler returned to composition, perhaps as an escape from the ever worsening political situation in Germany and Austria, and the pressures that the Nazis placed upon him. From then until his death in 1954, he produced a succession of large-scale works, the most significant of which were three symphonies. The Second Symphony, which Fürtwängler began in January 1945, immediately after taking refuge from the Nazis in Switzerland, is the most massive of them and regarded as his finest achievement; Neeme Järvi's performance with the Estonian orchestra, which, while recognising the work's massiveness, never seems unnecessarily slow, lasts 74 minutes. Yet it's a strange, problematic work, easier to admire than to like, and built from an amalgam of Romantic voices from Schumann to Richard Strauss with Bruckner and Brahms featuring most prominently. From moment to moment the music is pleasant enough, but without ever becoming truly memorable; themes tend to move in predictable, stepwise fashion and developments are worked out at pedantic length. Järvi's recording joins versions by Barenboim, Jochum and Fürtwängler himself already in the catalogue; if it's a work that carries real curiosity value, it's one that few are likely to want to hear very often. This article includes content hosted on We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as the provider may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. Listen on Apple Music (above) or Spotify
