logo
Trump debates bombing Iran in pivotal moment for presidency

Trump debates bombing Iran in pivotal moment for presidency

Washington Post5 hours ago

President Donald Trump faced one of the most monumental decisions of his presidency on Tuesday as he debated whether to join a war against Iran that risked sucking Washington into a new Middle Eastern conflict but also offered the chance to eliminate a rival's nuclear program.
In a string of social media posts across the day, the president said that the United States has 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' warned Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khameini that he was an 'easy target,' and demanded 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' without defining what that would mean. As the day closed and after an 80-minute meeting with top aides in the Situation Room, he spoke to Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu, a White House official said.
The tough language came at a moment of extraordinary weakness for Tehran, whose power is at a low ebb following a year of Israeli attacks against its allies and proxies in the Middle East. Trump has long taken an aggressive approach toward Iran, although he also campaigned on ending global conflicts and as recently as last week continued to seek a new agreement to restrict its nuclear program.
Trump's current posture could rebound in unpredictable ways. If he succeeds in wresting concessions from Iranian leaders to dismantle their nuclear program or destroys it by military force without provoking major retaliation, he could be hailed as a president whose unpredictable approach to foreign policy yields results. Mishandling the situation could pull Washington into a major war, with dangerous and unpredictable consequences for U.S. citizens. And it could also lead to a nuclear-armed Iran, if strikes fail and the government resolves to develop the nuclear weapon that it has long declared it does not seek.
'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff,'' Trump said Tuesday, before meeting with his advisers in the Situation Room for 80 minutes. 'Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.'
Leaders who met with Trump at a Group of Seven summit of like-minded industrial democracies in Canada on Monday said that the U.S. leader had floated the possibility of joining Israeli strikes against Iran — an extraordinary departure after months in which he had pushed for a diplomatic solution to Tehran's nuclear program, sometimes over the objections of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who accompanied Trump to Canada, was calling counterparts on Monday to discuss the situation, but told some of them that the United States did not intend to join the Israeli attack on Iran, according to three officials familiar with the calls who spoke on condition of anonymity to talk frankly about the private discussions.
By Tuesday, those officials said they believed the U.S. position had changed, and that Trump was considering joining the attack.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), long one of the GOP's most vocal Iran hawks, said he spoke to Trump Monday night and believes Trump wants to help Israel to 'finish the job' in destroying the country's nuclear program, including a key facility in Fordo, south of Tehran.
'I think he's very calm, very resolved," Graham said. 'I don't think Israel can finish Fordo without our help, and it's in our interest to make sure this program is destroyed, as much as it's Israel's. And so if there's something you need to do to help Israel, do it.'
Trump was supposed to remain in Canada on Tuesday, but he dashed back to Washington a day early, saying that he needed to be in Washington to monitor the situation in the Middle East.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who met with Trump in Canada, expressed gratitude on Tuesday for Israel's attack on Iran, saying that Israel was doing 'the dirty work … for all of us.'
'We are also affected by this regime,' Merz told Germany's ZDF broadcaster on the sideline of the summit. 'This mullah regime has brought death and destruction to the world.'
While some of Iran's nuclear facilities have been attacked in recent days by Israel, the most significant is the Fordo enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground and inside a mountain. U.S. officials have said the center can be effectively attacked only with massive, 'bunker-busting' bombs, including the GBU-57, a 15-ton round known as the 'massive ordnance penetrator,' or MOP.
The 20-foot-long bomb is carried by the B-2 Spirit, the bat-wing-shaped stealth bomber. The fleet is based at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri and previously has been deployed for global bombing runs in which they rely on aerial refueling to fly to and from targets without stopping.
Should the Pentagon use other kinds of bombs to attack Iran, it could rely on an array of other aircraft, including fighter jets already in the region and B-52s. The Pentagon temporarily relocated some of these aircraft recently to Diego Garcia, an island with a joint U.S.-British military base in the Indian Ocean.
Trump's claim of control over Iran's skies may be an indication that U.S. officials have assessed that most of Iran's air defense have been destroyed by Israel in recent days.
Since Israel launched the attack on Iran late last week, U.S. officials have bolstered their extensive presence in the region but have repeatedly stressed that they are doing so for defensive purposes only. Trump has contradicted that messaging, however, warning Iranians in Tehran, a city of about 10 million people, that they should evacuate.
While the U.S. military had not launched any strikes on Iran as of Tuesday afternoon, defense officials said, it has assisted Israel in other ways, including using Navy destroyers off the coast and fighter jets to shoot down Iranian munitions fired toward Israel.
Gen. Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, the top U.S. commander overseeing operations in the Middle East, who has advocated a hawkish approach toward Tehran, told the House Armed Services Committee last week that he has presented a 'wide array of options' to Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth if they choose to pursue military force against Iran.
Kurilla told lawmakers that the United States 'now stands in a strategic window of opportunity to secure its national interests' in the Middle East – including preventing a nuclear-armed Iran.
Most experts assess that Iran would need a week to produce enough highly enriched uranium for a bomb. But they say that it would take months, up to a year, to turn the uranium into a weapon.
In Canada, while Merz backed Israel, other leaders were less outspoken or spoke in thinly-veiled disagreement.
French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters in Canada on Tuesday that a ceasefire and ongoing negotiations were the only solution. 'I think that people are sovereign, they change their leaders by themselves and all those who have wanted in the past to change regimes through strikes or military operations have made strategic errors,' he said.
Kaja Kallas, the top European Union diplomat, said that EU foreign ministers who held an emergency virtual meeting Tuesday morning were united in their call for de-escalation.
'When it comes to the United States getting involved, then it will definitely drag the region into a broader conflict, and this is in nobody's interest,' Kallas said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a telephone call Monday night, 'emphasized that it is also not in their interest to be drawn into this conflict,' she said.
Elsewhere in the Middle East, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty urged de-escalation and negotiations in phone calls Tuesday with both Araghchi and U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. In Qatar, Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said his government was one of many in the region exerting efforts to 'reach calm that spares the region the repercussions of this dangerous escalation of the Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran.'
Israel continued to pummel Iran Tuesday, using about 60 fighter jets to target 12 missile launch and storage sites, many in western Iran, Israel Defense Forces spokesman Effie Derfin said Tuesday night.
Israel's military also claimed Tuesday to have killed Ali Shadmani, whom it described as Iran's wartime chief of staff. Israel did not present evidence of the assassination, and Iran did not immediately confirm his death. Iran's supreme leader appointed Shadmani to his position four days ago after his predecessor, Gholam Ali Rashid, was killed in Israeli attacks on Friday.
Iranian media reported explosions and heavy air defense fire in Tehran and explosions in the northwestern city of Tabriz on Tuesday. Iranian civilians streamed out of the capital overnight and into Tuesday.
Israeli strikes also appear to have made 'direct impacts' on the underground section of Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment site, the United Nations nuclear watchdog said Tuesday, citing analysis of high resolution satellite imagery. It was the International Atomic Energy Agency's first assessment that the centrifuge halls buried deep underground may have been damaged.
Iran's retaliatory barrages against Israel carried on for a fifth day, triggering Israel's air defenses on an 'hourly basis,' the military official said.
The Iranian attacks have killed 24 people in Israel and injured more than 600, the Israeli government said Tuesday. Iranian authorities said that 224 people had been killed by Israeli strikes as of Sunday, the most recent figures available. They did not differentiate between military and civilian casualties.
Parker reported from Cairo. Susannah George in Doha, Qatar, Ellen Francis in Brussels, Kate Brady in Berlin, Yeganeh Torbati, Joshua Yang, Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv, Abbie Cheeseman and Mohamad El Chamaa in Beirut, Annabelle Timsit in London, Evan Hill in New York, Gerry Shih in Jerusalem, Cat Zakrzewski in Calgary, Alberta, and Abigail Hauslohner, Matt Viser, Natalie Allison and Nilo Tabrizy in Washington contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RIPTA faces 90 layoffs, 20% service cut even with funding in proposed House budget
RIPTA faces 90 layoffs, 20% service cut even with funding in proposed House budget

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RIPTA faces 90 layoffs, 20% service cut even with funding in proposed House budget

Even with $15 million in new funding proposed by lawmakers, the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority would need to cut up to 20% of bus trips and lay off 90 employees to balance its budget next year, according to a consultant hired to find efficiencies in the system. The study identified ways RIPTA could generate between $2 million to $5 million in new revenue or savings, not enough to plug the agency's estimated $18 million budget gap. "There are no efficiencies that can be found that would completely close the budget gap that we are facing and prevent service reductions," RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand wrote in a letter to House leaders on June 16. "This will mean a reduction to the fixed route workforce by approximately 90 employees to get the service inline with financial resources." Such cuts to service will likely lead to "additional losses in terms of fare revenues," long-term loss of federal funds and loss of ridership due to diminished network effects and "inability to connect between routes," the study said. The options for raising more revenue identified in the "efficiency study" include an increase to RIPTA's standard $2 fare. Although the memo sent to lawmakers doesn't say how big the fare hike consultants studied would be, it was estimated to raise between $1 million to $2 million, depending on if it were extended to all routes. The study found that RIPTA could save up to $1 million by using federal reimbursement to pay for finance and procurement positions for capital projects. It also recommended shifting resources from rural routes to "low income and reverse commute services." And it said RIPTA's advertising revenue, which is roughly middle-of-the-pack for peer transit agencies, could possibly be boosted to make another $900,000 per year. "We are continuing to work as hard as we can to complete the study and I believe we are nearing the final scenarios. I'm providing this information as a heads up as I don't want to catch anyone off guard," Durand wrote to lawmakers. "In no way should these findings diminish the investments that the House is proposing for RIPTA." The study found RIPTA's operating costs are "in line with peer average" and its administrative costs are "below" average. RIPTA, like most transit agencies across the country, saw ridership crash during the COVID pandemic. Loss of fare revenue was plugged with federal aid, but since that assistance from Washington was exhausted this year, RIPTA has been facing a $33 million deficit for the year beginning July 1. As unpleasant as laying off 90 employees sounds, RIPTA was looking at up to 300 layoffs at the start of the year. Having to trim the workforce would also be a bitter pill for RIPTA to swallow after it raised pay recently to recruit new drivers and fix a shortage that was forcing the cancellation of trips. Gov. Dan McKee provided no additional funding for RIPTA in his budget proposal. The House rewrite of his budget unveiled June 10 included $15 million in recurring revenue for RIPTA in a proposed increase in the gas tax. Along with the funding, the budget mandates that RIPTA not cut the RIde Anywhere paratransit pilot program, which cost around $500,000 in its first year. The House passed the $14.4 billion state budget on June 17. It now moves to the state Senate. Liza Burkin, organizer of the Save RIPTA campaign and Providence Streets Coalition, said the latest consultant's report showed that there is no major inefficiency at the agency that can be fixed to close the budget gap. "Failing to fund RIPTA's $18M shortfall will initiate a chain reaction of route cancellations, fare hikes and job layoffs that will in turn lead to lower ridership and increases economic hardship," Burkin said. "This will ensure we will never achieve a robust system that affordably and sustainably gets people where they want to go." This story has been updated with new information. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Consultant: To balance budget, RIPTA needs to lay off staff, cut service

AG Neronha wants to give the 6-10 settlement money to the RI Foundation. The GOP says it's illegal.
AG Neronha wants to give the 6-10 settlement money to the RI Foundation. The GOP says it's illegal.

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AG Neronha wants to give the 6-10 settlement money to the RI Foundation. The GOP says it's illegal.

Rhode Island House Republicans believe state law prohibits Attorney General Peter Neronha from channeling the proceeds of the Routes 6 and 10 interchange contaminated soil lawsuit to a nonprofit for children's health initiatives. The House GOP caucus, although badly outnumbered in the General Assembly, plans to introduce an amendment to the state budget that would claw back $11 million from the settlement with Barletta Heavy Division and redirect it to a variety of other charitable causes. The core of the Republican argument that Neronha has overstepped his authority rests on a section of state law dealing with the attorney general's office, last amended in 2023, that creates an account where legal fees recovered in settlements are deposited to help pay "for staff and other operational expenses of the department." "All settlement proceeds" that are not put in that account "shall be deposited" into the state's general fund, it says. 'The law is crystal clear. In fact, I don't think the Attorney General even argues that point," Rep. Brian Newberry, R-North Smithfield, said in a news release. "Instead his public defense of his conduct is that the assembly cannot usurp his power and thus he is free to ignore the statute entirely, a statute that was passed incidentally at his request to help him resolve a dispute with the Governor over staffing a few years ago." Rep. George Nardone, R-Coventry, commended Neronha for winning the settlement money, but said he saw "no provision in Rhode Island law that authorizes him to redirect those funds to a private foundation." The Barletta settlement, announced May 21, resolved a state criminal case over contaminated highway fill that Neronha brought against the Massachusetts-based contractor after it had already settled a federal civil suit two years ago. Under the terms of the court-approved settlement, $10 million will go to the Rhode Island Foundation to be awarded as grants that address the "health needs of children residing in Providence," particularly those living near the 6-10 interchange and who are in need of dental care. The attorney general's office will be part of the committee that advises the Rhode Island Foundation on how the settlement money should be awarded to achieve the goal of promoting child health. Of the remaining money, $750,000 will go to the attorney general's office and $250,000 to the Department of Environmental Management, which investigated the case. Neronha's office did not respond to a Journal question about the settlement law in May, but on June 16 called the GOP budget amendment a "stunt" that, unlike his settlement, sought to tackle glaring deficiencies in child health. "Rhode Island faces many challenges. My office attempts to tackle any and all of those challenges within the confines of our authority ... Meanwhile others, like Rep. Newberry and Rep. Nardone, remained silent and have done nothing," Neronha wrote in response to the GOP. "Bottom line: directing funds from the resolution of a criminal case brought by this office and authorized by a court to solve severe and unmet oral health challenges for Providence children is well within the authority of my office," he added. Gov. Dan McKee, who has sparred repeatedly with Neronha in recent years, and General Assembly leaders who would have been able to spend the settlement money if it were sent to the general fund, have been silent on the legality of sending it to the Rhode Island Foundation. "I don't know a lot about it," House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi told reporters June 10 when asked whether the settlement was legal. "I'm not challenging it at this time, and I do accept it right as this moment, the answer is yes. And there's nothing in the budget or nothing planned by House leadership to take any action. Quite frankly, I don't know if we can, and I haven't had a chance to study, to look at it." McKee's office has not responded to multiple inquiries about the settlement since May. The state House of Representatives is slated to take up the state budget Tuesday, June 17. Republican budget amendments traditionally have an extremely low success rate and typically serve to raise public awareness of issues more than change the law. If the GOP amendment were successful, it would redirect the settlement money evenly between the Economic Progress Institute, Rhode Island Kids Count, Arthur E. Coia Scholarship & Education Fund at the Laborers' International Union of North America, Women's Fund of Rhode Island, Progreso Latino, United Way of Rhode Island, The Rhode Island Dental Association, The Rhode Island Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Save The Bay, Crossroads Rhode Island and Sojourner House. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Can RI AG Neronha give the 6-10 soil case money to the RI Foundation?

Karman Line Annexation: Preliminary Special Election results
Karman Line Annexation: Preliminary Special Election results

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Karman Line Annexation: Preliminary Special Election results

(COLORADO SPRINGS) — Unofficial results from the June 17 Special Election will begin dropping at 7 p.m., and FOX21 News is your election headquarters. The single question on the ballot is asking voters whether to approve or reject an ordinance annexing 1,876.24 acres west of Schriever Space Force Base, known as the Karman Line. PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Special election to decide Karman Line annexation fate The annexation vote has caused pushback from various community members, with a petition even being submitted for the annexation to be reconsidered after it was initially approved by the City Council in December. Locals have previously expressed concerns about water, emergency services, and uncontrolled growth, among others. Supporters of the ordinance, including some current and former City Council members, say the approval of the annexation would mean more housing availability near Schriever SFB, and with it, the alleviation of housing shortages. The land is currently vacant and agricultural. If approved, developers hope to build 6,500 homes, and the project would take around 20 years to complete. Ordinance 25-16 'Karman Line Annexation' Votes For 13,878 Against 61,900 Total 75,778 This article will be updated as results come in, and you can tune in to FOX21 News at 9 and 10 p.m. for the latest. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store