Gary superintendent speaks against House Bill 1136 at council meeting
The superintendent of the Gary Community School Corp. presented the district's reasons for opposing House Bill 1136 at the city council's meeting Tuesday. Gary Common Council members have expressed concerns with the bill since it was introduced.
'We just exited a seven-year takeover,' Superintendent Yvonne Stokes said Tuesday evening. 'We've tried to make our students and community feel the change. We believe in change, … and we are doing what it takes to support our students.'
House Bill 1136 — filed by Rep. Jake Teshka, R-North Liberty — calls for a school district to dissolve if more than half its students in the legal settlement area attend school elsewhere by the fall 2024 student count data. GCS is one of five school districts targeted, including Indianapolis Public Schools.
If legislation is passed, nine Gary schools would turn into charter schools, including Jacques Marquette Elementary School, Gary Middle School and West Side Leadership Academy. Gary has eight charter schools, two of which operate as dropout recovery schools.
Councilman Darren Washington, D-at large, said GCS staff were invited to give insight on how the bill, if passed, will impact the district. Washington authored a resolution against the bill, which was unanimously passed at the council's Jan. 21 meeting.
'House Bill 1136 does not provide the Gary Community School Corp. with the ample time to demonstrate recovery efforts to rebuild its enrollment,' Washington read from the resolution on Jan. 21. 'The Indiana State Legislature should allow the Gary Community School Corp. a monitored seven-year grace period to present evidence showing continued increase in enrollment and significant advancement in academics …'
On Tuesday, Washington called the state legislation 'extremely unfair,' especially as GCS comes out of state control. Washington and other council members, including Parliamentarian Linda Barnes Caldwell, D-5th, have encouraged constituents to voice their concerns to state legislators.
In October, the state looked at GCS' enrollment, Stokes said, and found that about 12,000 students live within the district's boundaries, but only about 4,000 students attend GCS. The count only reflects two months of attendance this school year, Stokes said, adding that the district has had hundreds of other students enroll since.
House Bill 1136 targets schools with the lowest scores on standardized tests, Stokes told the council.
Stokes also said she isn't against charter schools, but she wants parents to still have an option to send their children to public schools. The superintendent also read a statement that she released in January following the introduction of House Bill 1136.
'It has only been six — now seven — months since the Gary Community School Corp. was released from a seven-year state over,' Stokes read Tuesday. 'During this seven-year time period, there was an exodus of thousands of students from the district. Since local control was re-instated, we have been laser-focused on increasing enrollment and maintaining financial solvency, while enhancing curriculum and improving the overall educational experience for children.'
Chelsea Whittington, GCS chief of public and community relations, said the district is working to recruit students, and it's been focused on financial stability, academics, professional development and having qualified instructors at its facilities.
Whittington said the district is welcoming to new families and continues to communicate what's being done as best as they can.
Both Stokes and Whittington thanked the council for their interest in House Bill 1136 and continued to encourage constituents to speak out against the legislation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Sen. Warren asks for contingency plans on national security after Trump and Musk's social media fallout
Sen. Elizabeth Warren is asking Secretary of State Marco Rubio for information on the Trump administration's contingency plans if billionaire Elon Musk breaches his companies' current contracts with the U.S. amid the ongoing public fallout between him and President Trump. In a letter to Rubio as acting national security adviser and obtained by CBS News, Warren said Mr. Trump and Musk's public disagreements about the upcoming reconciliation bill that escalated into a public online spat could "have serious implications for U.S. national security." The Massachusetts Democrat mentioned Mr. Trump's proposal to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies, which the world's richest man followed with a threat that SpaceX would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Musk has since walked back his threat. "No petty social media fight between the president and a billionaire should jeopardize U.S. national security," Warren said. In addition to contingency plans for SpaceX, the senator asked for information regarding the impact on U.S. agencies' satellite communications if Musk's Starlink is turned off. Additionally, she asked Rubio to provide any analysis that the Trump administration has conducted "of its authorities and options under the Defense Production Act to address vendor lock, monopolies, or contractor refusal to meet national security needs." She asked to receive answers to her questions by June 14, whether through a classified briefing or preferably a public response that can be released to Congress and the public, the letter said. Warren has been a vocal opponent of Musk and his involvement in the Trump administration. Last week, she released a report that outlines instances her office has found of Musk benefiting from it. Musk's rocket company has received tens of billions of dollars from the federal government over the last decade, including $3.8 billion in the 2024 fiscal year alone, according to federal records. The bulk of those federal grants are from NASA, which has paid SpaceX billions over the last decade to ferry astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. The agency has also awarded SpaceX upwards of $2 billion in recent years to design and build a lunar lander, as part of NASA's Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon for the first time in a half-century. While the public spat appears to have cooled somewhat, Mr. Trump told NBC News' Kristen Welker in a phone interview on Saturday that he has no plans to make up with the mega-billionaire. "I'm too busy doing other things," Trump continued. "You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him." When asked by a reporter Friday if he's still considering rolling back subsidies to Musk as a money-saving move, Mr. Trump suggested he was open to it. "He's got a lot of money, he gets a lot of subsidy. So we'll take a look at that," the president said on Air Force One. "Only if it's fair for him and for the country. I would certainly think about it, but it has to be fair." This isn't the first time the president has needled Musk over his companies' federal subsidies. In a 2022 feud, Mr. Trump claimed Musk would be "worthless" without hefty subsidies for "electric cars that don't drive long enough" and "rocketships to nowhere." The two mended their relationship then and Musk spent hundreds of millions to help elect Mr. Trump in 2024. The billionaire went on to lead the Trump White House's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency until last week. contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Anti-Trump ‘NO KINGS' protests planned for Seattle this weekend
The Brief Major anti-Trump protests, dubbed "NO KINGS," are planned across the U.S. on June 14, targeting perceived authoritarianism and corruption by the Trump administration, coinciding with Trump's military parade in D.C. In Seattle, protests will occur at University of Washington's Red Square and Cal Anderson Park, with similar events in other Washington cities like Everett, Tacoma, and Olympia. The protests follow recent tensions in Los Angeles over ICE activity, where violence erupted, and President Trump deployed National Guard troops without California's governor's authorization, leading to a lawsuit. SEATTLE - Major anti-President Trump protests are being held this Saturday across the U.S., including in Seattle and around Washington. Called "NO KINGS," local demonstrations are taking aim at "increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption" they assert have been perpetrated by the Trump administration. A national day of action is scheduled for Saturday, June 14 — President Trump's birthday — and will run counter to Trump's military parade planned in Washington, D.C. What they're saying "In America, we don't put up with would-be kings. NO KINGS is a national day of action and mass mobilization in response to increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption from Trump and his allies," reads a statement from NO KINGS organizers. "We've watched as they've cracked down on free speech, detained people for their political views, threatened to deport American citizens, and defied the courts. They've done this all while continuing to serve and enrich their billionaire allies." In Seattle, two separate protests are planned for 12:00–3:00 p.m. One will be at University of Washington's Red Square, the other at Cal Anderson Park in the Capitol Hill neighborhood. Similar protests are scheduled in Everett, Tacoma, Olympia and all across the state, including Vancouver and Spokane. The protests come on the heels of large-scale demonstrations against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in Los Angeles. Videos circulating social media show people throwing rocks at law enforcement vehicles and setting them on fire. Tensions further escalated when President Trump deployed 300 National Guard troopers without authorization from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, then threatened to have him arrested. Newsom has since sued the Trump administration. It is not known if National Guard troops will be deployed to Seattle, as well, given the escalation between protesters and police at the 'MayDay USA' event at Cal Anderson Park last month. The Source Information in this WA Gov. Ferguson activates National Guard in search for Travis Decker Former Army squadmate shares insight into Travis Decker's military past Man shot, killed at his 21st birthday party in Kent, WA Miles Hudson found guilty on 2 counts of reckless driving in Seattle Seattle man charged with string of burglaries at the homes of NFL and MLB stars Rochester dog training facility owner accused of killing employee during video shoot To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter. Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Investigating the Biden Coverup
Now that the press has decided President Biden's decline in office is news fit to print, the public deserves a better sense of what it was really like in the White House during Mr. Biden's four-year slide. If they don't overreach, Republicans can answer the question while reminding voters how irresponsible it was for Democrats to try to keep their man in power until age 86. Rep. James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, is seeking testimony by several top advisers to Mr. Biden, including Ron Klain, his first White House chief of staff. 'These five former senior advisers were eyewitnesses to President Biden's condition and operations within the Biden White House,' Mr. Comer says. This is appropriate oversight. Yet it isn't helpful that President Trump last week ordered his counsel, in consultation with Attorney General Pam Bondi, to conduct what could become a criminal probe. This could be an excuse for Mr. Biden's aides to clam up. The public interest is in hearing their honest recollections of history's first President in his early 80s. Perhaps they have some lessons, since ambitious politicians are staying active for much longer. Mr. Trump's memo ordering his investigation strongly suggests that piles of Mr. Biden's executive orders and criminal pardons might be legally null and void, since they were 'signed using a mechanical signature pen, often called an autopen,' possibly without Mr. Biden's knowledge. 'The real question—who ran the autopen, OK?' Mr. Trump said. 'Because the things that were signed were signed illegally, in my opinion.' Mr. Biden responded in a statement. 'I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.' Many Presidents have used autopen devices for decades to save time and give correspondents the thrill of opening a letter with an ink signature. 'Neither the Constitution nor any statute prescribes the method by which executive clemency shall be exercised or evidenced,' the solicitor general opined in a 1929 memo, adding that a facsimile signature or even none is fine. In 2005 the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel advised it is permissible to use an autopen on legislation passed by Congress. 'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves,' it said. President Obama was visiting Europe in 2011 when he remotely 'signed' an extension of the Patriot Act, minutes before the law was set to expire. Given that background, the relevant question is Mr. Biden's mental state regarding the dotted lines that a robot might have signed. The 2005 memo emphasized it wasn't calling into doubt the general understanding 'that the President cannot delegate the decision to approve and sign a bill.' This is a relatively low bar, not a pop quiz of the policy details. When Congress passes thousand-page bills, most of the lawmakers voting yes don't bother to read them, and the President isn't going to either. Both branches rely on trusted advisers. Even a President who is ill, exhausted or badly advised can meet the basic threshold of deciding to do something, or not, as long as his aides aren't going behind his back. One risk for Republicans, and not a small one, is that looking backward at the Biden era will appear to be another round of political vengeance—the kind that backfired on Democrats when they tried it against Mr. Trump. Learning more about how the White House covered up Mr. Biden's decline matters, but raising American incomes matters more.
