China and North Korea's Militaries Don't Trust Each Other: US Intel
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
North Korea's deepening security ties with Russia are likely part of Kim Jong Un's effort to "counterbalance" China, according to the latest U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency report.
Pyongyang's "blood-cemented alliance" with Beijing, by contrast, dates back decades but does not extend to meaningful military cooperation. This suggests the two sides "do not trust each other on military issues," says Decker Eveleth, an analyst at the Virginia-based think tank CNA Corporation.
Why It Matters
Vladimir Putin inked a landmark military assistance pact with Kim during the Russian leader's June 2024 visit to Pyongyang. The partnership shifted into top gear late last year with the deployment of North Korean troops to support Russian forces in the ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
North Korea is also the only country with which China maintains a mutual defense treaty, and the People's Liberation Army was instrumental in pushing advancing U.S.-led troops back across the 38th Parallel.
Yet today, the two "have virtually no military cooperation," the DIA said. This stands in contrast to China's increasing military drills and joint patrols with Russia as they step up their challenge to U.S. dominance in the Asia-Pacific.
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese and Russian foreign ministries and the North Korean embassy in Beijing via email for comment.
What To Know
The DIA released its Annual Threat Assessment on Tuesday, a document intended to inform strategic planning and decision-making in Washington.
"North Korea almost certainly is receiving reciprocal military cooperation from Moscow—including SA-22 surface-to-air missile systems and electronic warfare equipment—for providing soldiers and material to support Russia's war against Ukraine," the report says, echoing fears expressed by U.S. and South Korean officials since Pyongyang launched its military adventurism.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (R) wave from an open top limousine as they travel along a street in Pyongyang on June 20, 2019.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (R) wave from an open top limousine as they travel along a street in Pyongyang on June 20, 2019.
Ju Peng/Xinhua via AP
North Korea depends heavily on China, which accounted for a record 98.3 percent of official trade in 2023. Beijing has thus maintained strong influence over the reclusive country, though this influence has shown limitations, such as Kim's determination to expand his United Nations-sanctioned nuclear weapons program.
"North Korea's engagement with Russia likely reflects an attempt to counterbalance China's influence over Pyongyang," the DIA said.
Commenting on this finding, Eveleth wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that while discussions of the two neighbors often characterize them as inseparable, "China and the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] do not trust each other on military issues, but DPRK is happy to buy stuff from the Chinese commercial market."
What People Are Saying
Chinese Foreign Minister Guo Jiakun told reporters on April 28: "Regarding bilateral interactions between Russia and the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea], we've stated our position on multiple occasions. China's position on the Ukraine crisis is consistent and clear."
What Happens Next
While China is likely unsettled by the trajectory of relations between its two nuclear-armed pariah state allies—both due to the reputational cost and the unwanted Western military attention they bring to its backyard—analysts say Chinese President Xi Jinping is willing to stomach this new reality amid his efforts to forge a less U.S.-centric world order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump administration offers some details of how it would control US Steel, but union raises concerns
CALGARY, Alberta (AP) — President Donald Trump would have unique influence over the operations of U.S. Steel under the terms of what the White House calls an 'investment' being made by Japan-based Nippon Steel in the iconic American steelmaker. Administration officials over the past few days provided additional insight into the 'golden share' arrangement that the federal government made as a condition for supporting the deal. The Pittsburgh-based steel maker and Nippon Steel plan $11 billion in new investments by 2028 after indicating that they plan to move forward with the deal under the terms of a national security agreement that has the White House's approval. The White House has described the deal as a 'partnership' and an 'investment' by Nippon Steel in U.S. Steel, although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary in a nearly $15 billion offer it originally made in late 2023. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on social media on Saturday how the 'golden share' to be held by the president would operate, revealing that the White House is willing to insert itself aggressively into a private company's affairs even as it has simultaneously pledged to strip away government regulations so businesses can expand. Under the government's terms, it would be impossible without Trump's consent to relocate U.S. Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, change the name of the company, 'transfer production or jobs outside the United States,' shutter factories, or reincorporate the business overseas, among other powers held by the president. Lutnick also said it would require presidential approval to reduce or delay $14 billion in planned investments. 'The Golden Share held by the United States in U.S. Steel has powerful terms that directly benefit and protect America, Pennsylvania, the great steelworkers of U.S. Steel, and U.S. manufacturers that will have massively expanded access to domestically produced steel,' Lutnick posted on X. That $14 billion figure is higher than what the companies disclosed on Friday when Trump created a pathway for the investment with an executive order based on the terms of the national security agreement being accepted. Lawmakers from Pennsylvania say the higher figure includes the cost of an electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that Nippon Steel wants to build in the U.S., bringing the value of the deal to at least $28 billion. The president has the authority to name one of the corporate board's independent three directors and veto power over the other two choices, according to a person familiar with the terms of the agreement who insisted on anonymity to discuss them. The details of the board structure were first reported by The New York Times. Details of the agreement emerged as Trump was traveling to Alberta in Canada for the Group of Seven summit. Still, the full terms remain somewhat unclear. The companies have not made public the full terms of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel or the national security agreement with the federal government. On Sunday, the United Steelworkers, the labor union representing U.S. Steel employees, posted a letter raising questions about the deal forged by Trump, who during his run for the presidency had pledged to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel. The union said it was 'disappointed' that Trump 'has reversed course' and raised basic questions about the ownership structure of U.S. Steel. 'Neither the government nor the companies have publicly identified what all the terms of the proposed transaction are,' the letter said. 'Our labor agreement expires next year, on September 1, 2026, and the USW and its members are prepared to engage the new owners" of U.S. Steel "to obtain a fair contract.' If Trump has as much control of U.S. Steel as he has claimed, that could put him in the delicate position of negotiating the salary and benefits of unionized steelworkers going into midterm elections. As president, Joe Biden used his authority to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel on his way out of the White House after a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. After he was elected, Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement and ordered another review by the committee. That's when the idea of the 'golden share' emerged as a way to resolve national security concerns and protect American interests in domestic steel production. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel made a series of commitments. It gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest in U.S. Steel, promised to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. ___
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
UK Intelligence Estimates 6,000 North Korean Casualties in Kursk
More than 6,000 North Korean soldiers are believed to have been injured or killed while fighting in Russia's Kursk region in support of Moscow's war on Ukraine, according to estimates by British intelligence, underscoring North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's role as a key ally of President Vladimir Putin in a war now in its fourth year. The number amounts to more than half of the 11,000 North Korean troops initially deployed to the Kursk region, the UK Defence Ministry said in a post on the X social media platform. 'Significant DPRK casualty rates have almost certainly been sustained primarily through large, highly attritional dismounted assaults,' the statement said. DPRK stands for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Alleged Minnesota Assassin Vance Boelter in Custody-Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Vance Luther Boelter, the suspect in the assassination and attempted assassination of two Minnesota lawmakers, is in custody according to The Associated Press. Boelter is accused of the targeted shootings killing Democratic lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband and injuring Minnesota State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife early Saturday morning. Boelter, 57 years old, worked for a security company, Praetorian Guard Security, according to a law enforcement official. The company website says that Boelter served as the director of security patrols and has had training by people in the US military. Cordon tape seals off a crime scene and establishes a police line for further investigations in Los Angeles, California, USA. Minnesota shooting suspect Vance Luther Boelter is seen in his profile picture on LinkedIn. Cordon tape seals off a crime scene and establishes a police line for further investigations in Los Angeles, California, USA. Minnesota shooting suspect Vance Luther Boelter is seen in his profile picture on LinkedIn. Getty/Minnesota Department of Public Safety This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
