Antifungal Brand Crystal Flush Explains Why Toe Fungus Is More Common After Retirement (and How to Fight It)
06/23/2025, Los Angeles, CA // PRODIGY: Feature Story //
Retirement brings freedom, but can also bring foot problems you didn't expect. With more time spent barefoot around the house, gardening in damp soil, or enjoying group activities like swimming, golf, or gym workouts, your feet are exposed to more moisture and bacteria than ever. And when toes stay damp or come into contact with communal surfaces, the risk of fungal infection increases quickly.
Fungus thrives in warm, moist environments, especially when nails are already thick, brittle, or slightly damaged. Many retirees don't realize their casual habits—like walking barefoot at home or skipping proper foot care after a long day outdoors—can quietly lead to stubborn infections. Once the fungus takes hold, it can discolor, thicken, and even break the nails of the toes, making it painful to walk and frustrating to treat.
That's why Crystal Flush developed these two incredible products: the Antifungal Serum and Therapeutic Foot Soak. Use the serum daily to deliver maximum-strength protection and kill fungus at the root, thanks to FDA-approved Tolnaftate 1% and seven essential oils. After high-risk activities like gardening or gym sessions, soak your feet in the Foot Soak to draw out bacteria, soothe tired muscles, and restore balance with natural tea tree oil and Epsom salts.
Keep enjoying your well-earned retirement, without letting toe fungus tag along.
The Crystal Flush Antifungal Serum and Therapeutic Foot Soak are available at https://shopcrystalflush.com.
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare provider for diagnosis or treatment of any condition.
Media Contact:
Jason Gonor
888-717-5722
https://shopcrystalflush.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nuvalent Announces Timing of Pivotal Data for TKI Pre-treated Patients with Advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC from ARROS-1 Clinical Trial of Zidesamtinib
Company to host webcast and conference call on June 24, 2025 at 8:00am ET CAMBRIDGE, Mass., June 23, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Nuvalent, Inc. (Nasdaq: NUVL), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on creating precisely targeted therapies for clinically proven kinase targets in cancer, today announced that the company will host a webcast and conference call on Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 8:00 a.m. ET, to discuss pivotal data for zidesamtinib, a novel ROS1-selective inhibitor, in TKI pre-treated patients with advanced ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer from the global ARROS-1 Phase 1/2 clinical trial. Webcast and Conference Call Information To access the call, please dial +1 (800) 836-8184 (domestic) or +1 (646) 357-8785 (international) at least 10 minutes prior to the start time and ask to be joined to the Nuvalent call. Accompanying slides and a live video webcast will be available in the Investors section of the Nuvalent website at A replay and accompanying slides will be archived on the Nuvalent website for 30 days. About Zidesamtinib and the ARROS-1 Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial Zidesamtinib is a novel brain-penetrant ROS1-selective inhibitor created with the aim to overcome limitations observed with currently available ROS1 inhibitors. Zidesamtinib is designed to remain active in tumors that have developed resistance to currently available ROS1 inhibitors, including tumors with treatment-emergent ROS1 mutations such as G2032R. In addition, zidesamtinib is designed for central nervous system (CNS) penetrance to improve treatment options for patients with brain metastases, and to avoid inhibition of the structurally related tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) family. Together, these characteristics have the potential to avoid TRK-related CNS adverse events seen with dual TRK/ROS1 inhibitors and to drive deep, durable responses for patients across all lines of therapy. Zidesamtinib has received breakthrough therapy designation for the treatment of patients with ROS1-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have been previously treated with 2 or more ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and orphan drug designation for ROS1-positive NSCLC. Zidesamtinib is currently being investigated in the ARROS-1 trial (NCT05118789), a first-in-human Phase 1/2 clinical trial for patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC and other solid tumors. The completed Phase 1 portion enrolled ROS1-positive NSCLC patients who previously received at least one ROS1 TKI, or patients with other ROS1-positive solid tumors who had been previously treated. The Phase 1 portion of the trial was designed to evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of zidesamtinib, with additional objectives including determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose, characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile, and evaluation of preliminary anti-tumor activity. The ongoing global, single arm, open label Phase 2 portion is designed with registrational intent for TKI-naïve and TKI pre-treated patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC. About Nuvalent Nuvalent, Inc. (Nasdaq: NUVL) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on creating precisely targeted therapies for patients with cancer, designed to overcome the limitations of existing therapies for clinically proven kinase targets. Leveraging deep expertise in chemistry and structure-based drug design, we develop innovative small molecules that have the potential to overcome resistance, minimize adverse events, address brain metastases, and drive more durable responses. Nuvalent is advancing a robust pipeline with investigational candidates for ROS1-positive, ALK-positive, and HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer, and multiple discovery-stage research programs. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including, without limitation, implied and express statements regarding Nuvalent's strategy, business plans, and focus; the expected timing of data announcements; the clinical development program for zidesamtinib; the design and enrollment of Nuvalent's clinical trials, including for ARROS-1 its intended pivotal registration-directed design the potential of Nuvalent's pipeline programs, including zidesamtinib; Nuvalent's research and development programs for the treatment of cancer; and risks and uncertainties associated with drug development. The words "may," "might," "will," "could," "would," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "aim," "goal," "intend," "believe," "expect," "estimate," "seek," "predict," "future," "project," "potential," "continue," "target" or the negative of these terms and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Drug development and commercialization involve a high degree of risk, and only a small number of research and development programs result in commercialization of a product. You should not place undue reliance on these statements or the scientific data presented. Any forward-looking statements in this press release are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and important factors that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this press release, including, without limitation: risks that Nuvalent may not fully enroll its clinical trials or that enrollment will take longer than expected; unexpected concerns that may arise from additional data, analysis, or results obtained during preclinical studies and clinical trials; the risk that preliminary results of clinical trials may not be predictive of future results from the same or other trials; the risk that results of earlier clinical trials may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials; the risk that data from our clinical trials may not be sufficient to support registration and that Nuvalent may be required to conduct one or more additional studies or trials prior to seeking registration of zidesamtinib; the occurrence of adverse safety events; risks that the FDA may not approve our potential products on the timelines we expect, or at all; risks of unexpected costs, delays, or other unexpected hurdles; risks that Nuvalent may not be able to nominate drug candidates from its discovery programs; the direct or indirect impact of public health emergencies or global geopolitical circumstances on the timing and anticipated timing and results of Nuvalent's clinical trials, strategy, and future operations, including the ARROS-1 trial; the timing and outcome of Nuvalent's planned interactions with regulatory authorities; and risks related to obtaining, maintaining, and protecting Nuvalent's intellectual property. These and other risks and uncertainties are described in greater detail in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in Nuvalent's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, as well as any prior and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent Nuvalent's views only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing its views as of any subsequent date. Nuvalent explicitly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Nuvalent, Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Single Moms Will Bear the Brunt of the Republicans' Budget Cuts
When Mia's son was an infant, she understood the expectations she would need to meet: A poor single mother living in Capistrano Beach, California, she had to care for his welfare and try to maintain a steady income, while also navigating the stigma that accompanied signing up for the federal and state benefits that would help keep her afloat. 'I felt a lot of shame that I couldn't somehow do this by myself, or that I needed to get government help,' she recalled. 'I remember hearing a lot of jokes about single moms raising kids, and the statistics about single moms and what happens to their children.' Mia, who asked to be referred to by her first name to protect her anonymity, feels fortunate to have the support of her extended family in caring for her now 15-year-old son. When her son was a young child, she relied on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, or WIC; today, she participates in Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, previously known as food stamps. Her son has severe asthma and pulmonary issues, meaning that Medicaid covers the inhalers and doctor's appointments that he needs to survive—medical care that she would not be able to afford without this assistance. 'We are in poverty, and I almost feel like I wouldn't be able to leave it because I can't imagine how much I would have to pay, and how I would be able to do that,' she said. As congressional Republicans attempt to reshape the social safety net with a massive bill to extend tax breaks and dramatically slash federal spending, they have largely focused their efforts on tightening work requirements for childless adults, although portions of the measure would also affect parents receiving benefits. Mia is worried about how stricter work requirements will affect her family; in the past, she has had to participate in mandated employment training in order to receive SNAP benefits because a substitute teaching position did not grant her enough hours to meet preexisting requirements. 'It has been difficult to try to navigate, because I do work and I have a child, and I'm not exactly clear on when I'm supposed to do these like other hours,' she said. For Mia, single motherhood can occasionally feel like a 'trap.' At her current salary level, she is able to qualify for those Medicaid benefits that allow her son to receive the care he needs for his asthma. If she earned too much to be eligible for Medicaid, however, she would need to spend hundreds of dollars per month on her son's medical needs. It isn't that she wants to live in poverty; she simply does not know how she would support her family on even a middle-class salary. 'If you're trying to get ahead, or you're trying to move out of that poverty, you're on your own,' Mia experiences are indicative of the struggles that single mothers in the United States have faced since the inception of the modern social safety net, a catch-22 of being expected to provide for their children while also feeling as if the supportive resources are insufficient. American social policy has long been heavily influenced by concepts of deservingness. This stemmed in part from the nation's foundational cultural concept of a 'Protestant work ethic'—essentially, the idea that anyone who can work should work, and that individual labor is fundamental to a functioning community. Federal assistance programs and tax policies intended to assist poor Americans are generally tied to income: If a person earns too much, they cannot receive some benefits, but if they do not have a high enough salary, they can be cut off from others. In the case of SNAP and Medicaid, a household with an annual income above a certain amount will no longer qualify for the benefits. Meanwhile, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, or TANF, requires households earn a certain amount to become eligible for cash benefits. With the child tax credit and the earned income tax credit, recipients must earn a certain amount each year in order to receive the full credit. Federal supports for poor families are often crucial for single parents—especially single mothers—in part because single mothers are disproportionately likely to be struggling economically. Analysis by the Center for American Progress found that single mothers earn 56 cents for every dollar made by fathers. Roughly a quarter of single mothers are low-income, and single parents are more likely than married parents to be Black or Hispanic. Single mothers are also more likely than their married counterparts to struggle with food insecurity and are more likely to struggle with their mental health, in part because of the deep psychological stress caused by living in poverty. Mia has been on and off government assistance for years, sometimes because she was working a job that paid her a salary higher than the earning requirements. But the shame and guilt that she felt for needing to rely on these programs sometimes kept her from taking the benefits for which she was eligible. That sentiment changed during the coronavirus pandemic, and she came to terms with the fact that she needs the assistance. 'I need just a little bit of support to keep things in balance because I go into debt, or I'm using money I didn't have. So I worked through my own feelings of shame and embarrassment,' she said. Single parents tended to struggle financially during the height of the pandemic, with one study finding that single parents faced higher rates of poverty, unemployment, food insecurity, and stress compared to two-parent families. That was alleviated in part by a temporary, pandemic-era program: In 2021, the poverty rate for single mothers and for children in general was slashed dramatically, largely due to the expanded version of the child tax credit that was briefly in place for six months of that year. This change, along with many of the enhanced benefits for low-income families implemented during the pandemic, was permitted by Congress to expire. In general, social safety net programs, including non-cash benefits and tax credits, have been crucial to lowering poverty rates. Nick Gwyn, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, noted that without these benefits, single mothers would likely see even higher poverty rates. But despite their effectiveness, he continued, they have not been a universal balm. 'They're obviously also still much more likely to live in poverty, and there are a number of things that could be done to help single moms that we're not doing,' Gwyn most social safety net programs are generally oriented toward low-income families of any kind, TANF was explicitly designed to assist single mothers. That program has roots in 'Mothers' Pensions,' an early-twentieth-century policy that was targeted specifically toward low-income widows. These policies, administered by individual states, formed the basis of the New Deal–era Aid to Dependent Children, the first federal program that offered cash assistance to primarily white poor single mothers. In the latter half of the twentieth century, perceptions about who single mothers were, and the expectations about how they should behave and be treated, began to transform. In 1962, Congress updated the Aid to Dependent Children program to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children, or AFDC, expanding eligibility requirements that made it easier for nonwhite women to participate in the program. Meanwhile, women began entering the workforce in substantial numbers—including married women—which helped shift public perspectives on whether a single mother could and should be working. 'It wasn't until married mothers started working that we started thinking single mothers should be working [as well], even though single mothers always had worked at higher rates than married mothers,' said Jane Waldfogel, a professor at Columbia University's School of Social Work. By the 1980s, the perspective on single mothers had transformed from considering them as objects of charity to worrying that they were draining resources without contributing work. Black single mothers were disproportionately likely to be low-income, and the public perception of single mothers was influenced by racial bias. This trend was embodied by President Ronald Reagan's denunciation of the 'welfare queen,' a Black mother reliant on federal assistance who was not working. Critics accused the AFDC of discouraging marriage, in part because the program was specifically targeted for households without a male parental figure. When President Bill Clinton and the Republican-led Congress tackled 'welfare reform' in 1996, AFDC was replaced by a dramatically restructured program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Unlike AFDC, two-parent households could qualify for TANF, without requiring that one of those parents be unemployed or disabled. With its explicit goals of encouraging 'personal responsibility' through work requirements, reducing dependence on government benefits, and encouraging the formation of two-parent households, the creation of TANF indicated a desire to prevent the freeloading that many politicians presumed was occurring with the AFDC. 'It eliminated that entitlement to support, so there was no longer this federal guarantee of supporting mothers and children in poverty,' said Heather Hahn, associate vice president for management in the Family and Financial Well-Being Division at the Urban Institute, about the creation of TANF. 'It had originally been on the community, and then it was the responsibility of the federal government, and now here it is shifting back to individual responsibility.' Despite the emphasis on 'work opportunity' in the creation of TANF, Hahn continued, 'in the details of what's happening, it's really working to reinforce these racial and gender and class roles.' Although it remains the only direct cash-assistance program for low-income Americans, the amount of the block grants to states provided through TANF has not changed since it was first implemented in 1997. It also has restrictive work requirements that make it impossible for parents earning over a certain threshold to obtain the benefits. Some experts have argued that an enhanced child tax credit could bolster low-income households more effectively than TANF. The 2021 expansion—which increased the credit amount, distributed it on a monthly basis, and fully extended it to low-income households—lifted millions of children out of poverty. However, the current version of the credit is not available to all families—and because it is not fully refundable, households too poor to file income taxes are unable to receive the full credit. The Republican bill would increase the child tax credit amount and index it to inflation but would not expand eligibility to the poorest households. A recent analysis by the Columbia Center on Poverty and Social Policy found that 65 percent of children with a single female parent would be ineligible for the full credit under the House bill. Waldfogel argued that the emphasis on work in implementing social safety net policies has hindered single mothers who may be unable to obtain jobs. 'The reason for the single mothers who are not currently working or not currently working full time—it's not because of lack of effort or lack of interest, it's because they've got responsibilities that conflict, or they've got some kind of health limitations, or they have trouble landing a job, or they have trouble getting enough work hours,' said Waldfogel, who authored the recent book Child Benefits: A Smart Investment for America's Future. 'Yet the benefit system treats them as if there's an issue with lack of effort, and we have to be concerned about work incentives and all of that. And if we had a more universal safety net, if we had universal child benefits, that wouldn't be an issue.'With Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill, another segment of the population has emerged as the primary target of cuts to assistance programs: childless adults without disabilities. The bill—which GOP lawmakers are attempting to pass through a process known as 'budget reconciliation,' allowing them to avoid the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate—would make dramatic cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, in large part by tightening work requirements for these 'able-bodied adults without dependents.' Although the Senate and House versions of the reconciliation measure differ in some respects, there are some key through lines in both. Both versions would require able-bodied childless adults between ages 19 and 64 to be working at least 80 hours per month to be enrolled in Medicaid, with redetermination of eligibility every six months. This policy could result in millions losing their coverage, with one recent study estimating that the cuts could also lead to thousands of preventable deaths. Josh McCabe, director of social policy at the Niskanen Center, noted that work requirements for social assistance programs are popular with the public, particularly 'when they think there are no competing priorities, and it's within someone's ability to work.' It could also signal a shift in public perception of deservingness: Unlike the Clinton-era welfare reform, the most explicit targets of the reconciliation measure are not single-parent households but able-bodied adults without dependents. 'With the reconciliation bill, there's no one left to go after except childless men,' said McCabe. 'Insofar as folks are paying attention to the trope about men staying at home playing video games all day, retargeting them for cuts, it in a way insulates single mothers who in the past may have borne the brunt.' But parents would not be unaffected: The House measure would impose new SNAP work requirements for households with children above the age of 7, while the Senate bill would do the same for families with children above age 10. Moreover, the measure would push more of the cost of SNAP onto states, which could result in states cutting benefits. The Senate bill would also impose new Medicaid work requirements not just for able-bodied adults without dependents but for the parents of children above age 14 as well. This would affect parents such as Mia, as adults with teenage children would need to prove that they were working, participating in a work training program, or receiving education to obtain the benefits. 'We see this deliberate addition of administrative burden to the safety net now, which is designed to reduce the number of people who can access the benefits that they're eligible for, so that it will reduce the government spending,' said Hahn. Both the House and Senate versions of the bill would also make changes to the earned income tax credit, or EITC, requiring households to apply for 'precertification' for each qualifying child to determine whether they are eligible for the credit. Although congressional Republicans are aiming to reduce the number of duplicative claims, experts worry that adding more paperwork could discourage eligible households from claiming the credit, and could gum up the works for the overburdened IRS amid cuts to the agency. During President George W. Bush's first term, a similar program had resulted in fewer eligible families receiving the credit, which some research has shown has a significant effect in cutting poverty. The additional administrative burden could be particularly difficult for working single moms, said Kris Cox, director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'Single moms with low incomes don't have a lot of excess time, and don't have a lot of excess capacity to provide new documentation,' said Cox. 'So the bill is asking families who have the least resources in terms of leisure time and extra capacity to jump through an additional hoop in order to get the credit for which they are eligible.' To Mia, the conversations in Washington that will eventually determine her fate have left her feeling like she won't be able to ever get ahead, despite having played by the rules laid out before her. 'You're not allowed to take baby steps forward,' she said. 'As soon as you take one step forward … you're out of that zone, and you're no longer supported.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bystander captures unbelievable video of moment when road buckles and sends driver airborne: 'The road exploded'
As extreme heat blanketed much of the United States, a bystander captured on video the moment when a roadway buckled and became a ramp that sent a car flying, Fox 13 Tampa Bay reported. "The road exploded and rose over 18 inches, sending a car airborne," Albert Blackwell explained, per Storyful. The heat wave, which hit the eastern two-thirds of the continental U.S., set daily temperature highs from Utah to Michigan, according to The Weather Channel. Temperatures in some regions soared into the triple digits, while humidity also remained high. The video of the road buckling in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, illustrated the severity of the heat, with an estimated 190 million Americans experiencing temperatures in excess of 90 degrees Fahrenheit, per Fox 13. Like most materials, concrete and asphalt expand as they warm, which can cause roads to buckle under extreme heat, according to Pennsylvania State University. While concrete mixtures vary based on the materials used, on average, 100 feet of concrete expands roughly 0.7 inches for every 100 degrees Fahrenheit it warms, per Penn State. While buckling streets create hazardous conditions, other aspects of extreme heat pose much greater risks to human health. From 2000 to 2019, roughly 500,000 people died every year from heat-related causes, a study published in The Lancet Planetary Health found. Tragically, this figure is likely to get worse, as heat-trapping pollution continues to drive global temperatures higher. According to the World Health Organization, the number of people exposed to major heat waves grew by 125 million from 2000 to 2016. While it is not possible to directly connect any extreme weather event to human causes, experts have long established that the release of planet-heating pollution from the burning of fuels such as gas and coal has caused global temperatures to rise. How often do you worry about your energy bills? Every day A few times a week A few times a month Only when I pay it Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. This, in turn, has increased the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, from heat waves to floods. According to the City of Cape Girardeau, the road captured on video was not the only one to buckle in the heat, and officials warned of more to come. "With more high temperatures expected this week, the city may experience more street buckling due to the heat," officials said in a Facebook post. "Please drive carefully and be mindful of city workers who will be out repairing streets. Stay safe out there!" While rising global temperatures might seem like too big of an issue for any of us to do anything about, there are plenty of actions large and small that we all can take to reduce the amount of planet-heating pollution for which we and our families are responsible. For example, you can significantly reduce your environmental impact by installing solar panels, driving an electric vehicle, growing your own food, or replacing your gas-powered lawn tools with electric ones. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
