The Framework Laptop 13 Proves Upgradable Laptops Are the Future
The Ryzen AI 7 350 is on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus or Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, give or take. It's slightly behind in single-core performance, as measured by Cinebench R24, and a half-step ahead in multi-core. These processors aren't known for being a powerhouse. Rather, the focus is all on efficiency. Here's where the AMD chip is solidly in last place. Battery life on the Framework Laptop 13 is improved from prior models, but it's not as long as what you get on a Snapdragon X or Core Ultra Series 2 PC.
The light battery test I ran on the Laptop 13 lasted roughly 11 hours, looping a local video at max display brightness. That's eight to 10 hours behind some of the competition, showing how much Intel, Qualcomm, and Apple have raised the bar in the past year. For my typical workload, real-time battery life sank to around 7 and a half hours. That's around the same as on the original Framework Laptop 13 I tested in 2021. If battery life is your main concern, it may be worth waiting to see if Framework introduces an Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Mainboard. Peripheral Woes
There are some aspects of the laptop you'll always be stuck with, namely, the chassis. Laptop designs that take full advantage of the more efficient chips in the future should result in thinner laptops without losing performance. We're already seeing this in effect with thinner gaming laptops than ever.
Photograph: Luke Larsen
But it's also worth noting that some of the other components are somewhat outdated as they are right now. The webcam is a good example. In 2021, when this laptop was first designed, 2-MP webcams at 1080p were a good resolution to expect. Many PCs are moving to 1440p or higher, like the recent M4 MacBook Air. Apple has been upgrading the webcam from 720p in 2020 to 1080p in 2022, and now to 12-MP in 2025. The MacBook Air today costs the same as the MacBook Air from 2020.
The lower-resolution screen in the starting configuration is outdated compared to the competition as well. My unit has a higher-resolution 2,880 x 1,920 IPS panel with a 120-Hz refresh rate, which is more than sharp, fast, and color-accurate enough. The matte finish is great for deflecting glare. But that's in a configuration that costs over $1,500. For that price, many laptops offer even sharper OLED panels with significantly higher contrast, and maybe even a touchscreen.
The good news is that there's a strong chance Framework will offer newer components to reflect the current standard. The company sells webcam modules, speaker upgrades, and display kits for older machines, and there's no reason to expect there won't be newer versions soon. But those upgrades will cost extra, and once again, you're putting your faith in Framework to deliver.
Fortunately, the Framework Laptop 13 is still a great starting place, and it'll be many more years before it feels truly outdated. Today, it's more than just a practical answer to the problem of electronic waste. It's a truly one-of-a-kind laptop.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I test streaming devices for a living and I can't wait to see a new Apple TV 4K — here's why
It's been three long years since Apple launched a new set-top box. Although ripe with features and tons of value — in spite of its hefty $129 starting price — the Apple TV 4K still proves that it's one of the best streaming devices. There's still room for improvement, however, especially now that Apple has better processors on the latest iOS and iPadOS devices. With rumors still circulating on a new Apple TV 4K expected in 2025, it's time for this streaming box to get all the love it needs to meet a wide range of standards. Here's all the features and specs an updated Apple TV device needs for greatness. There's one thing I've come to realize that's crucial with these types of products: ultra portability. I've been testing tons of different streaming devices over the past few years, and there's one thing I've come to realize that's crucial with these types of products: ultra portability. While you will, for the most part, be using it at home to bypass a TV's existing interface, it's pretty useful having an on-the-go streaming device with all of the best streaming services signed into your accounts. This means at Airbnbs and hotels, you don't have to worry about singing in and out of the apps you want to use on the TV in your room. For a great example of a powerful, portable streaming device, look no further than the new Roku Streaming Stick Plus, which launched last month. It's the slimmest of its kind and still offers heightened performance despite its smaller size. Apple knows design better than most and while I do like the boxy look of the existing Apple TV 4K, it definitely could use a slimmer profile. The best approach, I think, is to have multiple different kinds of Apple TV devices to fit various needs. Amazon's Fire TV does this very well with a Fire TV Cube and Fire TV Stick that are both vastly different in performance and sizes. Not everyone might agree with this take. But the days of needing a streaming set-top box that looks like a mini PC are long gone. Some people just want convenience and using your iPad or even a MacBook Air to watch content on-the-go isn't always ideal. Both Samsung and LG offer Xbox Game Pass on their individual interfaces; it's time for Apple to follow suit. One of the biggest missing pieces on Apple's streaming box is a broader range of gaming support. Apple Arcade does exist on the platform, but it pales in comparison to the wider net cast by some of the best cloud gaming services. Both Samsung and LG offer Xbox Game Pass on their individual interfaces; it's time for Apple to follow suit. The biggest obstacles here are the older processors and wireless components. This not only includes the device's main CPU, but also the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chips to boot. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple has a new Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chip in the works that "is tightly integrated with its other components." This could give the new Apple TV a huge leg up against its competition, especially if it also manages to leverage one of the newer bionic chips like the A17 Pro or A18. These would not only allow the new device broader gaming capabilities, like playing Death Stranding: Director's Cut right on your Apple TV, but also enhance AI features as well. It also lends credence to the rumors of an Apple tvOS makeover requiring a much stronger chipset. It's about time Apple stepped into the gaming sphere a bit more, and a refreshed streaming device could be its big ticket to get there. Although feature-rich and premium-priced, the Apple TV 4K isn't without several missing pieces. It manages to wrangle Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos support, but still misses the boat on key passthrough settings. It's a major point of contention for the device, and a refresh definitely needs additional codecs and passthrough options to improve the overall soundscape of the device. Problematically, Apple TV 4K is also without multichannel support via HDMI and, surprisingly, lacks the ability to play 24-bit Hi-res music. It's pretty remarkable, especially given that some tracks on Apple Music even support it, meaning you can't even get the most out of the platform you're paying for on one of its most premium hardware products. Another blunder is hands-free voice controls. That sounds absurd in the year 2025, but the Apple TV 4K doesn't support any, and that's rough in the face of cheaper options like the Roku Ultra, Google TV Streamer, and Fire TV Stick HD all having their own well-rounded voice assistants. Apple needs to step its game up when it comes to wider smart home integration. Finally, Apple needs to step its game up when it comes to wider smart home integration. Streaming sticks are fast becoming the hubs for our smarter products, allowing us to control the ecosystem of devices scattered across the home network. While the Apple TV 4K does have a Thread board router for Matter support, it doesn't have functional AI to assist with more complicated automations and voiced controls like you get on Google. Thus, Apple Intelligence is a key feature needed on a newer device. This could bring voice controls and wider home networking capabilities into the mix in one fell swoop.
Tom's Guide
4 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
iOS 19's redesign had me worried — but now I think it will turn out fine
Change can be scary — especially when it's change to something you rely on every day. So I'm guessing that news of the impending iOS overhaul that Apple will announce next week at WWDC 2025 is being anticipated in some quarters like a trip to the dentist. I mean, I'm certainly nervous about what's going to happen to the interface in iOS 19 (or iOS 26, depending on who's doing the rumor-mongering). And the natural inclination to distrust change only becomes heightened when you hear phrases like "the biggest iOS update in a decade" bandied about. There have certainly been tweaks here and there, but the iPhone interface we have now looks a lot like the one we've been using since iOS 7. There's comfort in that, and the idea that it's all about to change later this year can be unsettling. It doesn't help that it's really hard to assess interface updates until you actually get to see them in person. We can talk all about the rumored changes Apple is going to implement in iOS 19 and other software updates getting previewed at WWDC, but until we're actually using the update ourselves, who knows how smooth the transition will be. We won't be entirely clear what Apple plans to do until the iOS 19/iOS 26 preview gets underway as part of the WWDC 2025 keynote on June 9. But I've been spending some time reviewing some of the leaks and rumors out there about the proposed changes. And I'm feeling a lot less worried about the prospects of an interface update as a result. Here's why. Our best looks at potential iOS 19 changes have come from Front Page Tech videos posted by Jon Prosser, though not everyone's convinced some of those screen captures reflect Apple's final plans for its iPhone software. Still, an iOS 19 preview video posted about a month ago seems to be based on the most up-to-date info about Apple's plans, at least as Prossser tells it. Watching the video, a few things stand out, starting with the rounded — though not perfectly circular — icons on the home screen. A lot of visual elements are rounder in the posted designs, particularly widgets and sliders in the Control Center. The animations when you interact with the interface get a refresh — Prosser describes them as more fluid and bouncy — and there's a glass-like shimmer to some elements like the lock screen shortcuts. To me, the most noteworthy iOS 19 interface changes are the translucent menus that pop up on the home screen when you hold and press on an icon. Do that in iOS 18, and you'll see the same pop-up menu, but it's markedly more opaque. And you'll find a lot of elements at the bottom of your iPhone screen like search bars and a revamped dock that will be part of the iPhone's built-in apps. This will all look very familiar if you've ever strapped on an Apple Vision Pro, as the interface changes seem to be inspired by the look of visionOS — the platform for Apple's spatial computing headset. I haven't had a go with the Vision Pro, but my colleague Mark Spoonauer has. And his Apple Vision Pro review notes a lot of the visual elements like translucent panels and streamlined menus that look like they're coming to the iPhone with the new iOS update. If you're in the same Vision Pro-free boat as me, I'd suggest reading this MacRumors post on the visionOS elements likely to make their way to the iPhone. It helps explain how translucent menus, floating navigation bars and more work on the headset and how they might translate to a different device like an iPhone. Having reviewed all that and taken a closer look at some of the iOS 19 redesign mockups, I'm a lot less nervous about what Apple's going to show off at WWDC 2025. In fact, at the risk of being very wrong in public, I'm not prepared to think that the iOS 19 redesign isn't that big of a deal after all. And I mean that in a good way. When I say the iOS 19 interface update won't be a big deal, I'm not talking about the look of the software. From the images we've seen so far, iOS 19 is going to look radically different from the software currently running on the iPhone. And while that certainly is going to take getting used to, it doesn't seem like those interface changes are fundamentally altering how people use their iPhones. Oh, there will be some changes in that regard. It sounds like search menus are being located to the bottom of the screen, at least in apps like Messages and Music. But that's not a bad thing if you like using your phone one-handed or are used to the Safari layout with the search bar already at the bottom of the screen. From what I can tell, it looks like there's a more visually distinct animation when you switch tabs in one of Apple's built-in apps with that tab highlighted more prominently than it is in iOS 18. That sounds like a great change to me, as I appreciate anything that makes it easy to remember where I am in an app at just a glance. There's one visionOS style element in particular that I'm hoping makes the grade in iOS 19 — less cluttered menus. Since you navigate the Vision Pro with your eyes, you need spaced-out menus so that it's clear what exactly you're looking at when you want to select something. I think the iPhone could benefit from that, too, as it might reduce the number of mistaken taps where you select the wrong item from a drop-down menu. Again, changes like that aren't radically reshaping how you use your phone currently — they're fine-tuning the process you already have in place. To me, that will make the iOS 18 to iOS 19 transition a lot easier to manage. I reserve the right to hoot and holler during the WWDC 2025 keynote if I'm wrong and it turns out Apple is trying to reinvent the wheel in terms of the iPhone's interface. But the changes floating around out there right now sound more evolutionary than anything. And that's change we can all get behind.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Scoop: Apple to appeal EU requirement to share info with tech rivals
Apple filed an appeal to the European Commission's specifications around how the company complies with its interoperability requirements, which compel it to share user information with outside developers as part of the Digital Markets Act, per a source familiar with the situation. Why it matters: Apple continues to push back forcefully against requirements imposed by the DMA, which the company has said forces it to give up its intellectual property and compromise user privacy. The deadline to appeal this particular requirement was May 30. How it works: The interoperability requirements are meant to give other device manufacturers and app developers access to Apple features that are normally exclusive to Apple products, including WiFi pairing and notifications on non-Apple smartwatches and headsets. Apple and Meta were the first companies to be hit with DMA fines in April, as Axios first reported. Apple put out a report last December arguing that the DMA's interoperability reports could be abused and expose private user information. What they're saying: "We design our technology to work seamlessly together, so it can deliver the unique experience our users love and expect from our products. The EU's interoperability requirements threaten that foundation, while creating a process that is unreasonable, costly, and stifles innovation," an Apple spokesperson told Axios. "These requirements will also hand data-hungry companies sensitive information, which poses massive privacy and security risks to our EU users." Per the Apple spokesperson, as allowed under the DMA's interoperability requirement, companies including Meta, Google, Garmin and Spotify have requested from Apple user notification content and stored WiFi networks, "giving them the ability to access personal information that even Apple doesn't see." The spokesperson added, "In the end, these deeply flawed rules that only target Apple—and no other company—will severely limit our ability to deliver innovative products and features to Europe, leading to an inferior user experience for our European customers." The other side: Companies that rely on the App Store to distribute their products have welcomed the DMA's requirements of Apple, saying they are long overdue for developers and other businesses to offer customers better features on their apps and devices.
