logo
A Public Lands Sell-Off Is Struck From the G.O.P. Policy Bill

A Public Lands Sell-Off Is Struck From the G.O.P. Policy Bill

New York Times5 hours ago

Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, said on Saturday evening that he had dropped his contentious plan to sell millions of acres of public lands from the sweeping domestic policy package carrying President Trump's agenda.
Mr. Lee made the announcement on social media after it became clear that the plan faced insurmountable opposition from within his own party. At least four Republican senators from Western states had said they planned to vote for an amendment to strike the proposal from the bill.
The plan had also triggered intense pushback from conservative hunters and outdoorsmen across the American West, who had warned that it threatened the lands where they hunted and fished.
'Over the past several weeks, I've spent a lot of time listening to members of the community, local leaders and stakeholders across the country,' Mr. Lee wrote on X on Saturday. 'While there has been a tremendous amount of misinformation — and in some cases, outright lies — about my bill, many people brought forward sincere concerns.'
The provision would have required the Bureau of Land Management to sell as much as 1.225 million acres of public property in 11 Western states. Proponents had argued that the region has a severe shortage of affordable housing and that developers could build new homes on these tracts.
In his post, Mr. Lee said that, because of the strict rules governing the budgetary process that Republicans are using to pass the bill, he was 'unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to BlackRock, and not to any foreign interests.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'
Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'

Fox News

time36 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump threatens to support a primary challenger against GOP senator for opposing 'big, beautiful bill'

President Donald Trump on Saturday said he is looking for a GOP candidate to mount a primary challenge against Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., after the lawmaker announced he would not support the president's "big, beautiful bill." "Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America," he continued. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Tillis, who is up for re-election in 2026, came out against Trump's spending bill earlier on Saturday over concerns about deep cuts to Medicaid. The senator vowed not to support the measure through a procedural hurdle needed to kick off a marathon of debate and amendment voting that would eventually lead to a vote on the measure's final passage. As he was leaving the Senate GOP's closed-door lunch on Saturday, the North Carolina lawmaker said he has a "great relationship" with his colleagues, but that he could not support the colossal bill. "We just have a disagreement," he said. "And, you know, my colleagues have done the analysis, and they're comfortable with the impact on their states. I respect their choice. It's not a good impact in my state, so I'm not going to vote on the motion to proceed." The Senate cleared the hurdle late Saturday to start debate on the bill by a 51-49 vote. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was another Republican who joined Tillis in voting no. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump wrote on Truth Social. Senate Republicans hold a slim 53-47 majority and can only afford to lose three votes. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said earlier that she would help advance the bill through the first step, but was leaning against voting to pass the bill's final passage unless the legislation was "further changed." Collins and other initial GOP holdouts, Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., voted to at least advance the legislation through the first key procedural hurdle. The latest version of the bill pushed back the provider rate crackdown by one year and also added another $25 billion for a rural hospital stabilization fund over the next five years. During a closed-door lunch earlier this week, Tillis reportedly warned that North Carolina could lose as much as $40 billion in Medicaid funding if the changes were codified. He is also planning to unveil further analysis on the impact of Medicaid cuts on his state that he said no one in the "administration or in this building" has been able to refute. "The president and I have talked, and I just told him that, 'Look, if this works for the country, that's great. And if my other colleagues have done extensive research and concluded it's different in their states, I respect that,'" he said. "We just have a disagreement based on the implementation in our respective states."

Trump Praises Supreme Court for Fixing Birthright Citizenship ‘Scam' Originally Meant for the ‘Babies of Slaves'
Trump Praises Supreme Court for Fixing Birthright Citizenship ‘Scam' Originally Meant for the ‘Babies of Slaves'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Praises Supreme Court for Fixing Birthright Citizenship ‘Scam' Originally Meant for the ‘Babies of Slaves'

President Trump, during a last-minute press conference on Friday, praised the Supreme Court for its 'monumental' decision limiting nationwide injunctions against executive orders, including his order ending birthright citizenship. The president had signed EO 14160 in January, which said citizenship should not be granted automatically to people born in the U.S. That executive order was thwarted soon after it was signed, with multiple federal judges issuing national preliminary injunctions to stop it from being enforced; the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday lifted those injunctions. '[The 14th Amendment] was meant for the babies of slaves,' President Trump said on Friday. 'It wasn't meant for people trying to scam the system and come into the country on a vacation.' President Trump applauded the conservative justices who ruled in his favor, including Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the ruling. The president said he had 'great respect' for Barrett and her ruling was 'brilliantly written.' 'It's been an amazing period of time, this last hour,' the president said. 'There are people elated all over the country.' President Trump's Friday comments echo what he said in January, when he said the Fourteenth Amendment was 'noble' and 'meant for the children of slaves,' but not meant to grant citizenship to everyone born on American soil. He added on Friday that 'some of the worst people' had been exploiting birthright citizenship to bring children into the country illegally. When asked by one reporter if nurses would check the legal status of parents after their children are born, Attorney General Pam Bondi said that is a matter that will be decided by the Supreme Court in October. Trump, moments before his press conference, posted on Truth Social about the legal victory. 'GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,' the president posted. 'It had to do with the babies of slaves (same year!), not the SCAMMING of our Immigration process.' The 6-3 Supreme Court ruling was made along party lines. 'Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them,' Justice Barrett wrote. 'When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted lawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.' The ruling said President Trump's executive order cannot go into effect until 30 days after post Trump Praises Supreme Court for Fixing Birthright Citizenship 'Scam' Originally Meant for the 'Babies of Slaves' appeared first on TheWrap.

NYC, San Francisco and other US cities capping LGBTQ+ Pride month with a mix of party and protest
NYC, San Francisco and other US cities capping LGBTQ+ Pride month with a mix of party and protest

Hamilton Spectator

time42 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

NYC, San Francisco and other US cities capping LGBTQ+ Pride month with a mix of party and protest

NEW YORK (AP) — The monthlong celebration of LGBTQ+ Pride reaches its rainbow-laden crescendo as New York and other major cities around the world host major parades and marches on Sunday. The festivities in Manhattan, home to the nation's oldest and largest Pride celebration, kick off with a march down Fifth Avenue featuring more than 700 participating groups and expected huge crowds. Marchers will wind past the Stonewall Inn , a Greenwich Village gay bar where a 1969 police raid triggered protests and fired up the LGBTQ+ rights movement . The site is now a national monument . In San Francisco, marchers in another of the world's largest Pride events will head down the city's central Market Street, reaching concert stages set up at the Civic Center Plaza. San Francisco's mammoth City Hall is also among the venues hosting a post-march party. Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis and Toronto, Canada are among the other major North American cities hosting Pride parades on Sunday. Several global cities including Tokyo, Paris and Sao Paulo , held their events earlier this month while others come later in the year, including London in July and Rio de Janeiro in November. The first pride march was held in New York City in 1970 to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Stonewall uprising . Pride celebrations are typically a daylong mix of jubilant street parties and political protest, but organizers said this year's iterations will take a more defiant stance than recent years. The festivities come days after the tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark June 26, 2015, ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges that recognized same-sex marriage nationwide. But Republicans, led by President Donald Trump, have sought to roll back LGBTQ+ friendly policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has specifically targeted transgender people, removing them from the military , preventing federal insurance programs from paying for gender-affirmation surgeries for young people and attempting to keep transgender athletes out of girls and women's sports . The theme for the Manhattan event is, appropriately, 'Rise Up: Pride in Protest.' San Francisco's Pride theme is 'Queer Joy is Resistance' while Seattle's is simply 'Louder.' 'This is not a time to be quiet,' Patti Hearn, Seattle Pride's executive director, said in a statement ahead of the event. 'We will stand up. We will speak up. We will get loud.' Among the other headwinds faced by gay rights groups this year is the loss of corporate sponsorship. American companies have pulled back support of Pride events, reflecting a broader walking back of diversity and inclusion efforts amid shifting public sentiment. NYC Pride said earlier this month that about 20% of its corporate sponsors dropped or reduced support, including PepsiCo and Nissan. Organizers of San Francisco Pride said they lost the support of five major corporate donors, including Comcast and Anheuser-Busch.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store