Gaza crisis: Indications that Israel breached human rights obligations, EU's diplomatic service says
BRUSSELS: The European Union's diplomatic service said on Friday there were indications that Israel had breached its human rights obligations under the terms of a pact governing its ties with the bloc, according to a document seen by Reuters.
Citing assessments by independent international institutions, the European External Action Service said 'there are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement'.
The report comes after months of deepening concern in European capitals about Israel's operations in Gaza and the humanitarian situation in the enclave.
16 hurt, building hit in Israel after Iran missiles: rescue services, TV
'Israel's continued restrictions to the provision of food, medicines, medical equipment, and other vital supplies affect the entire population of Gaza present on the affected territory,' the document said.
Asked about the EU review, an Israeli official called it 'a one-sided report that exemplifies the double standards the EU uses towards Israel.'
Under the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which came into force in 2000, the EU and Israel agreed that their relationship 'shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles'.
The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, announced in May that the bloc would examine whether Israel was complying with the terms of the pact, after over half of EU members backed the conducting of a review.
The report includes a section dedicated to the situation in Gaza, covering issues related to denial of humanitarian aid, attacks with a significant number of casualties, attacks on hospitals and medical facilities, displacement, and lack of accountability.
The report also looks at the situation in the West Bank, including settler violence.
The document relies on 'facts verified by and assessments made by independent international institutions, and with a focus on most recent events in Gaza and the West Bank,' it said.
Israel has said that it respects international law and that operations in Gaza are necessary to destroy Hamas, the Palestinian group responsible for the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel.
EU foreign ministers are set to discuss the review during a gathering in Brussels on Monday. Member countries remain divided in their approach to Israel.
While some ministers could advocate for moving toward taking action based on the review, no concrete decisions are expected at Monday's session.
Diplomats expect EU officials will reach out to Israel with the outcome of the review in an effort to influence it, and that ministers will return to the subject during a July meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
41 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Oil to open higher as US strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium
LONDON: Oil is likely to rise by $3-5 per barrel when trading resumes on Sunday evening after the U.S. attacked Iran at the weekend, market analysts said, with gains expected to accelerate only if Iran retaliates hard and causes a major oil supply disruption. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. 'An oil price jump is expected,' said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. 'Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium.' Global oil benchmark Brent crude could gain $3 to $5 per barrel when markets open, SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye said in a note. Brent settled at $77.01 a barrel on Friday and U.S. West Texas Intermediate at $73.84. Oil prices settle lower Ole Hansen, analyst at Saxo Bank, said crude could open $4 to $5 dollars higher, with potential for some long positioning being unwound. Crude had settled down on Friday after the U.S. imposed fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice on the U.S. Treasury Department website. Brent has risen 11% while WTI has gained around 10% since the conflict began on June 13 with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear sites and Iranian missiles hitting buildings in Tel Aviv. Currently stable supply conditions and the availability of spare production capacity among other OPEC members have limited oil's gains. Risk premiums have typically faded when no supply disruptions occurred, said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. 'The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions - which would likely result in higher prices - or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium,' he said. A senior Iranian lawmaker said on June 19 that the country could shut the Strait of Hormuz as a way of hitting back against its enemies, though a second member of parliament said this would only happen if Tehran's vital interests were endangered. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. SEB said any closure of the strait or spillover into other regional producers would 'significantly lift' oil prices, but they saw this scenario as a tail risk rather than a base case given China's reliance on Gulf crude. Ajay Parmar, oil and energy transition analytics director at consultancy ICIS, said it was unlikely Iran would be able to enforce a blockage of the strait for too long. 'Most of Iran's oil exports to China pass through this strait and Trump is unlikely to tolerate the inevitable subsequent oil price spike for too long - the diplomatic pressure from the world's two largest economies would also be significant,' he said.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Global reaction to US attack on Iran's nuclear sites
US forces attacked three Iranian nuclear sites, prompting a wide range of international reactions — from Israel praising President Donald Trump's decision, to the United Nations urging de-escalation, while Iran and several other nations strongly condemned the strikes. Pakistan condemns US strikes on Iran Pakistan condemned the United States for launching strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling the move a violation of international law and warning it could further destabilise the region. 🔊PR No.1️⃣8️⃣2️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣ Pakistan Condemns the US Attacks on the Nuclear Facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 🔗⬇️ — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) June 22, 2025 The US attacks come on the 10th day of the Israel-Iran war, sparked by Israel's wave of strikes in Iran on June 13th, escalating fears of broader regional escalation. Islamabad expressed grave concern over the rising tensions and urged all parties to refrain from further aggression. Read: Netanyahu seeks support for Iran strikes as Trump mulls US attack 'within two weeks' 'These attacks violate all norms of international law. Iran has the legitimate right to defend itself under the UN Charter,' Pakistan's Foreign Office said in a statement. Terming the situation 'deeply disturbing,' the statement warned that the 'unprecedented escalation of violence' could have far-reaching implications beyond the Middle East. Iranian FM Abbas Araqchi: "The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations. The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Every member of the UN must be alarmed by this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour. Following the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people." Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu: "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history... History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons." Maryam Rajavi, head of the National Council of Resistance of Iran in Paris: "Now [Iranian Supreme Leader Ali] Khamenei must go. The Iranian people welcome the end of the war and are calling for peace and freedom." "Khamenei is responsible for an unpatriotic project that, beyond the loss of countless lives, has cost the Iranian people at least $2 trillion — and now, it has all gone up in smoke." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen: "Iran must never acquire the bomb." "With tensions in the Middle East reaching a new peak, stability must be the priority. Respect for international law is essential." "This is the time for Iran to commit to a credible diplomatic path. The negotiating table is the only route to resolve this crisis." Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chair of Russia's Security Council: "Trump, who entered office branding himself a peacemaker, has now launched a new war for the United States." "With this kind of outcome, Trump will not be winning the Nobel Peace Prize." French FM Jean-Noël Barrot, on X: "France remains convinced that a lasting resolution to this issue requires a negotiated settlement within the framework of the Non-Proliferation Treaty." British PM Keir Starmer: "Iran's nuclear programme poses a serious threat to international security. Iran must never be permitted to develop a nuclear weapon, and the United States has taken action to address that threat. The situation in the Middle East remains highly volatile, and regional stability is of utmost importance. We urge Iran to return to the negotiating table and pursue a diplomatic solution to end this crisis." UN Secretary-General António Guterres: "This marks a dangerous escalation in a region already on the brink—and represents a direct threat to international peace and security. The risk that this conflict could spiral out of control is growing, with potentially catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world. I urge Member States to de-escalate and uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and international law." United Arab Emirates FM, via state news agency: The United Arab Emirates expressed deep concern over the ongoing regional tensions and the targeting of Iranian nuclear facilities. It called for an immediate halt to the escalation to prevent dangerous repercussions and a descent into further instability. The Ministry urged the United Nations and the Security Council to take responsibility by working actively to resolve longstanding regional issues, which it said now pose an increasing threat to both regional and global security and stability. Qatari FM, on X: The State of Qatar expressed regret over the worsening situation following the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities and said it is closely monitoring developments with deep concern. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs warned that the current levels of tension in the region could lead to catastrophic consequences at both the regional and international levels. Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba, to reporters: "It is vital that there is a swift de-escalation of the conflict. We are monitoring the situation closely and with serious concern." Italian FM Antonia Tajani, on state broadcaster Rai: "We now hope that, following this attack—which caused substantial damage to nuclear weapons production and posed a threat to the entire region—de-escalation can begin, and Iran can return to the negotiating table." New Zealand FM Winston Peters: "We acknowledge the developments over the past 24 hours, including President Trump's announcement of US strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. The continuation of military action in the Middle East is deeply troubling. It is essential to avoid further escalation. New Zealand strongly supports diplomatic efforts and urges all parties to return to the negotiating table. Diplomacy offers a more lasting solution than continued military engagement." Australian Government Spokesperson, in a statement: "We have consistently stated that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes pose a threat to international peace and security. We note the US President's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region remains highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy." Mexican FM, on X: The Ministry urgently called for diplomatic dialogue to promote peace between the parties involved in the Middle East conflict. In line with Mexico's constitutional principles of foreign policy and its long-standing pacifist stance, it reiterated its appeal for a de-escalation of tensions in the region. Venezuelan FM Yvan Gil, on Telegram: "Venezuela condemns the US military aggression against Iran and demands the immediate cessation of hostilities. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela strongly and unequivocally condemns the airstrikes carried out by US forces on nuclear facilities in Iran." Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel: "We strongly condemn the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, which represents a dangerous escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. This act of aggression seriously violates the UN Charter and international law, and thrusts humanity into a crisis with potentially irreversible consequences."
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil vows to fight on after release
Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil speaks to media after being released from immigration custody in Jena, Louisiana, U.S. June 20, 2025. Photo:REUTERS Listen to article Mahmoud Khalil vowed to resume pro-Palestinian activism as he returned to New York a day after he was released on bail from a jail for immigrants, even as US President Donald Trump's administration said it will continue its efforts to deport the recent Columbia University graduate. He arrived at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey on Saturday afternoon to cheers and ululations from friends and supporters. Khalil, 30, was reunited with his wife, a US citizen, and greeted at the airport by US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New York. Shortly after returning to the New York City area and reuniting with his wife and child, Mahmoud Khalil delivered the following message: 'I will continue to protest with everyone of you. Not only if they threaten me with detention. Even if they would kill me I would still speak… — BreakThrough News (@BTnewsroom) June 21, 2025 "Not only if they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine again," Khalil said, holding a bouquet of flowers. "I just want to go back and just continue the work that I was already doing, advocating for Palestinian rights, speech that should actually be celebrated rather than punished." Khalil, who recently graduated from Columbia University in Manhattan, was a prominent figure in the pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel student protest movement that swept campuses last year. Federal immigration agents arrested him in the lobby of his Columbia apartment building on March 8, making him the first target of Trump's effort to deport international students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views. Read: Pro-Palestinian activist Khalil walks free after US judge orders release Ocasio-Cortez, speaking alongside Khalil at the airport, condemned the Trump administration for what she called "persecution based on political speech". "Being taken is wrong. It is illegal," she said. "It is an affront to every American." Free Palestine!" Khalil said with a raised fist as he left the airport. Khalil was born and raised in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria and became a U.S. lawful permanent resident last year. Nonetheless, citing an obscure part of federal immigration law that has not been invoked in more than 20 years, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had determined that Khalil and several other foreign pro-Palestinian students at US schools must be deported because their presence here could harm the government's foreign policy interests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly conflates their criticism of the Israeli government, one of the United States' closest allies, with antisemitism. Earlier this month, US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey ruled that the government could not detain or deport Khalil based on Rubio's determination, finding the Trump administration was violating Khalil's constitutional right to free speech. On Friday, he ordered the Trump administration to release Khalil on bail while he continues to fight the government's deportation efforts and his lawsuit accusing the government of wrongful detention. A spokesperson for Trump said in a statement after the ruling that Khalil should be deported for "conduct detrimental to American foreign policy interests" and for omitting or incorrectly describing his employment history on his application for form to become a permanent resident. Khalil has said his application form was correct and the allegations of omission are spurious. Mahmoud Khalil upon his return: 'The genocide is still happening in Gaza…the US government is funding this genocide and Columbia University is investing in this genocide. This is why I was protesting, and why I will continue to protest with every one of you…not only if they… — Meghnad Bose (@MeghnadBose93) June 21, 2025 Also on Friday, an immigration court in Louisiana ruled that Khalil must be deported. He will now challenge the decision in the immigration court, which is run by the Department of Justice rather than the government's judicial branch, through the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Trump administration appealed Farbiarz's rulings on Friday evening to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Previously, Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil walked out of a Louisiana immigrant detention center on Friday, hours after a judge ordered his release, a major victory for rights groups that challenged what they called the Trump administration's unlawful targeting of a pro-Palestinian activist. "Although justice prevailed," he said upon his release in the rural town of Jena, "it's long, very long overdue. And this shouldn't have taken three months."
