What are the main US military bases in the Middle East?
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks to U.S. troops, next to a banner reading, \"Peace Through Strength\", during a visit to Al Udeid Air Base in Doha, Qatar, May 15, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo
What are the main US military bases in the Middle East?
U.S. forces have struck Iran's key nuclear sites, drawing threats from Tehran to retaliate, with U.S. military installations in the region a potential target.
Following are significant U.S. facilities in the Middle East:
BAHRAIN:
Home to the headquarters of the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, whose area of responsibility includes the Gulf, Red Sea, Arabian Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean.
QATAR:
The 24-hectare Al Udeid Air Base, in the desert outside the capital Doha, is the forward headquarters for U.S. Central Command, which directs U.S. military operations in a huge swathe of territory stretching from Egypt in the west to Kazakhstan in the east. The Middle East's largest U.S. base houses around 10,000 troops.
KUWAIT:
Several sprawling military installations include Camp Arifjan, the forward headquarters of U.S. Army Central and the Ali Al Salem Air Base, roughly 40 kilometers from the Iraqi border and known as "The Rock" for its isolated, rugged environment. Camp Buehring was established during the 2003 Iraq War and is a staging post for U.S. Army units deploying into Iraq and Syria, according to the U.S. Army website.
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES:
The Al Dhafra Air Base, situated south of UAE capital Abu Dhabi and shared with the UAE Air Force, is a critical U.S. Air Force hub that has supported key missions against the Islamic State, as well as reconnaissance deployments across the region, according to the U.S. Air Force Central Command.
Dubai's Jebel Ali Port, while not a formal military base, is the U.S. Navy's largest port of call in the Middle East that regularly hosts U.S. aircraft carriers and other vessels.
IRAQ:
The U.S. maintains a presence at Ain Al Asad Air Base in western Anbar province, supporting Iraqi security forces and contributing to the NATO mission, according to the White House. Iranian missile strikes targeted the base in 2020, in retaliation for the U.S. killing of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani.
Situated in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region of northern Iraq, Erbil Air Base serves as a hub for U.S. and coalition forces conducting training exercises and battle drills. The base supports U.S. military efforts by providing a secure location for training, intelligence sharing, and logistical coordination in northern Iraq, according to the congressional report.
SAUDI ARABIA:
U.S. soldiers in Saudi Arabia -- which numbered 2,321 in 2024 according to a White House letter -- operate in coordination with the Saudi government, providing air and missile defense capabilities and support the operation of U.S. military aircraft.
Some are stationed roughly 60 kilometres south of Riyadh, at Prince Sultan Air Base, which supports U.S. Army air defense assets including Patriot missile batteries and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense systems.
JORDAN:
Located in Azraq, 100 kilometres northeast of the capital Amman, the Muwaffaq al Salti Air Base hosts the U.S. Air Forces Central's 332nd Air Expeditionary Wing, which engages in missions across the Levant, according to a 2024 report in the library of Congress. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
an hour ago
- International Business Times
First Satellite Images of Fordow Nuclear Site after US Bunker Buster Bombs Strike Show Devastating Damage
The first satellite images from Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment site show that a part of the mountain shielding the facility was entirely destroyed by U.S. bunker buster bomb strikes on Saturday. Possible impact points and debris was visible after President Trump's surprise overnight assault using B-2 stealth bombers, images taken by Maxar Technologies show. Sections of the previously brown mountainside now appear gray, with the landscape significantly changed due to the detonation of 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs, each weighing not less than 30,000 pounds. The chilling images also reveal a haze of light gray smoke lingering above the site, located around 100 miles south of Iran's capital Tehran. Wiped Out Completely Other high-resolution satellite images indicate that Iran had sealed the tunnel entrances at the Fordow facility ahead of the strike. A network of roads leads to the site, with earlier images showing numerous vehicles gathered near the access points. The Fordow facility sustained "major damage," a second site in Esfahan was also heavily hit, and the Natanz nuclear facility was completely destroyed, according to sources cited by the Jerusalem Post on Sunday. As of now, Tehran has not released an official assessment of the damage. According to Iranian state television, the Fordow facility was reportedly evacuated some time prior to the attack. "The enriched uranium reserves had been transferred from the nuclear centers and there are no materials left there that, if targeted, would cause radiation and be harmful to our compatriots," Hassan Abedini, deputy political head of Iran's state broadcaster, said following the attack, according to Reuters. Total Devastation Military sources say that since Fordow is located deep beneath a mountain near the city of Qom, the strategy used by the U.S. and Israel was aimed at triggering a collapse or ground subsidence over the facility. Spanning roughly 54,000 square feet, the site housed around 3,000 centrifuges. Heather Williams from the Center for Strategic and International Studies gave a detailed explanation saying that Israel did not possess the necessary firepower to destroy Fordow on its own in the short term, which led to the request for the U.S. to deploy the GBU-57 bomb using B-2 bombers. The GBU-57 is a 30,000-pound bunker-busting bomb capable of penetrating up to 200 feet underground before detonating. Originally developed in the early 2000s, the weapon is designed to break through layers of rock or concrete before its warhead goes off.
International Business Times
an hour ago
- International Business Times
Iran Votes to Close Strait of Hormuz that Could Put One-Fifth of World's Oil Supply at Risk and Trigger Sharp Rise in Global Crude Prices
Iran's parliament has voted to close down the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime route that handles around 20 percent of the world's daily oil supply, which could halt around $1 billion worth of oil exports each day and could trigger a sharp rise in global oil prices. The decision will be implemented once it receives final approval from Iran's Supreme Council. The Supreme Council must take a final decision by the end of tonight, Iran's state-run Press TV reported. Email Kosari, a commander in Iran's Revolutionary Guards, said on Sunday that Iran's major escalation in response to the U.S. strikes on its nuclear sites "will be done whenever necessary." Iran to Stop Oil Supply The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Gulf of Oman to the Persian Gulf, is one of the most strategically important maritime passages in the world — measuring only 20 miles across at its narrowest point. The actual navigable shipping lanes within the strait are even more restricted, with less than two miles of clearance in each direction, making them especially susceptible to attacks or blockades. The strait's shallow depth makes it especially susceptible to underwater mines, while its limited width leaves ships exposed to potential attacks from land-based missiles, patrol boats, or helicopters. Although Iran lacks the legal authority to restrict maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, any attempt by its navy to do so would likely provoke a forceful reaction. The U.S. Fifth Fleet, along with other Western naval forces, maintains a constant presence in the region. The strait is flanked by Iran on the north and bordered by Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south. A major portion of the oil exported by key producers in the region — including Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE — passes through this narrow and vital passage. Asia to Suffer the Most Asia is likely to suffer the most from any shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, as countries like China, India, Japan, and South Korea rely heavily on it for the majority of their oil imports. China — the largest buyer of Iranian oil and a key ally that has often used its veto at the UN Security Council to shield Tehran from sanctions or resolutions — would be especially impacted by any closure. At the same time, closing the strait would also deal a serious blow to Iran's own economy. Iran previously disrupted shipping in the Persian Gulf in April last year when it detained a Israel-linked container ship near the Strait of Hormuz, accusing the MSC Aries of breaching maritime laws. Earlier in April 2023, Iran also seized a tanker that was going to the U.S., alleging that it had struck another vessel. In May 2022, two Greek tankers were seized and held for six months — widely interpreted as a retaliatory move following the confiscation of Iranian oil by Greek and U.S. authorities from a separate ship. In earlier incidents, Yemen's Houthi rebels interfered with maritime traffic through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects to the Red Sea on the opposite side of the Arabian Peninsula. Using missiles and drones, the Houthis managed to cut down shipping activity through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden by about 70 percent in June compared to the average traffic seen in 2022 and 2023, according to Clarkson Research Services Ltd, a division of the world's largest shipbroking firm.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US lawmakers call for Congress to review Trump's Iran actions
FILE PHOTO: U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) looks on, after President Donald Trump delivered remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo WASHINGTON - Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent U.S. involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict. With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the U.S. attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Trump's actions could pass both chambers. U.S. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House. "This is the U.S. jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' "Face the Nation" program. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism from lawmakers. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune were both notified of the U.S. military action ahead of time, according to sources familiar with the matter. Members of Congress are expected to be briefed on Tuesday. Thune's office declined to comment on Kaine's measure. The attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday divided Trump's populist MAGA movement, with some leaders rallying behind the president and others calling for an end to hostilities after so-called U.S. "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on U.S. soil. "I represent part of the coalition that elected President Trump. We were tired of endless wars," Massie told CBS. "We were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies and our infrastructure first." Massie and Kaine each said there was no urgency requiring Trump to act unilaterally. "There was no imminent threat to the United States," Massie said. "We haven't been briefed." Intelligence reports and analysts have reached different conclusions on how close Iran was to building a nuclear bomb. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday that the U.S. had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months. U.S. officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. Iran claims its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and focused on energy production and medical research. But its program, which began in the late 1950s with U.S. support, has fallen under suspicion in recent years, with Tehran ramping up enrichment to 60%, just below the weapons-grade of 90%, and restricting the access of international inspectors to its sites. Trump vowed on Sunday to support Massie's primary challenger in the 2026 midterm elections, saying the Kentucky congressman's criticism of the Iran attack and opposition to Trump's legislative efforts proved he was not aligned with the party's new base. "MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," Trump posted to Truth Social. REPUBLICANS VOICE DIFFERING VIEWS Another Trump loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also criticized Trump's decision on Sunday, but insisted she was not being disloyal. "I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," the Georgia Republican wrote on X. Other Trump allies pushed back on claims that his actions against Iran violated the U.S. Constitution and a federal law that restricts unilateral action by a president to conditions involving an attack on the United States. "He had all the authority he needs under the Constitution. They are wrong," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally who has long been a leading voice on U.S. foreign policy matters in Congress. "If you don't like what the president does in terms of war, you can cut off the funding," the South Carolina Republican told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. The attacks on Iran generally drew accolades from Republican lawmakers who declared that the operation set back Iran's ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. "The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do," Johnson said in a post on X late Saturday. "The Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act." The U.S. Constitution divides war powers in the federal government by making the president the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but leaving sole authority to declare war to Congress. The balance has shifted, with Congress relinquishing the use of military power to presidents of both parties in recent years. But Democrats said it was too early to tell whether the mission had succeeded, warning that Iran could have moved its nuclear material to other sites far from U.S. targets. "The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after, and then we're left with Americans bearing the consequences for decades," Khanna told CBS. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
