
To stay or to go? Chinese students in the US mull future amid Trump's visa crackdown
SINGAPORE: Like many of his peers from China who have been grappling with increasing pressure and uncertainty in recent weeks over their studies in the United States, Christopher has found himself in limbo.
Speaking to CNA under a pseudonym due to an ongoing clampdown on foreign students, especially those from China at US universities, the 23-year-old international student from Hangzhou shared his account of studying at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, where he has been pursuing his master's in computer science.
'The US is undeniably the world leader in this industry,' said Christopher, adding that American computer science programmes were 'among the best'.
Currently home in China on a three-month summer internship with tech giant Alibaba, he is slated to return to the US for the new school semester beginning in September.
'It's extremely absurd that the US government has taken the most extreme step backwards,' Christopher said.
'Their actions have betrayed everyone who had high hopes and expectations for the country.'
EDUCATION CRACKDOWN
According to official data, nearly 280,000 students from China made up a quarter of all international enrollments in the US last year.
But rising anti-China rhetoric and the looming threat of Trump's sudden policy shifts have reportedly prompted many students and their families to rethink their higher education plans in the US.
The situation escalated to new highs in May, unfolding against the backdrop of rapidly deteriorating Sino-US relations when the Trump administration moved to block Harvard University from enrolling international students and issued new measures targeting Chinese nationals - who made up a fifth of its foreign student intake in 2024.
Beijing has condemned the recent actions, saying it had lodged protests with Washington and 'consistently opposed the politicisation of educational cooperation'.
'The US has unreasonably cancelled Chinese students' visas under the pretext of ideology and national rights,' foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said during a routine press briefing on Friday (May 30), adding that it had also urged the US to be more constructive towards stable bilateral relations.
That same day, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio instructed the immediate start of 'additional vetting of any non-immigrant visa applicant seeking to travel to Harvard University for any purpose'.
The top US diplomat earlier said that Washington would start revoking the visas of Chinese students with links to the ruling Communist Party and those who are studying in critical areas.
The Trump administration has also ordered its missions worldwide to stop scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants.
"SUPER DISRUPTIVE"
Chinese international students are continuing to voice fears and uncertainties over their dreams of enrolling into top US universities following recent actions by President Donald Trump.
Many on social media said they had been reconsidering studying in the US and were looking at alternative plans instead.
'Policies are changing every day,' wrote a user named Bo Lo on Xiaohongshu, who shared that he had been 'back in China for two weeks and feeling really anxious'.
'Should I go back? I'm still undecided on whether to buy a plane ticket to return to the US immediately,' he said, without giving any details on where he is studying in the US.
A Chinese postgraduate student from Beijing who spoke to Reuters said she would defer enrollment for a year if the visa appointment system is not resumed.
"We feel helpless and unable to do anything," said the 24-year-old sociology student, who was identified as Lainey but declined to give her surname for privacy reasons.
"The situation in North America this year is not very good. From applying for my PhD until now, this series of visa policies is not very favourable to us. But we have no choice but to wait."
Global education industry experts like David Weeks, co-founder of Beijing-based international student consultancy Sunrise International, have echoed ongoing concerns from Chinese parents following ongoing developments.
'Their kids got into Harvard and were about to start this amazing journey but now they are being told they may have to transfer overnight,' Weeks told CNA.
'It's super disruptive and disturbing for the families particularly because of the nature of the indictment against Harvard,' he said.
AMERICA'S LOSS, OTHERS' GAIN?
As the Trump administration makes moves to block foreign student enrollments, rival institutions like prestigious universities in Australia, the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong are moving in, experts noted, and have been 'benefiting a lot' in the past year.
Hong Kong, with five universities ranked in the top 100 of the Times Higher Education World University Rankings, said it was seeking to attract top talent following the Harvard ban on enrolling foreign students.
Hong Kong's University of Science and Technology (HKUST) announced an open invitation on May 23 to international undergraduate and postgraduate students at Harvard University, as well as those holding confirmed offers to continue their studies at HKUST.
'We will continue to keep a close eye on the needs of students whose studies have been affected by the shifting global education landscape,' said Hong Kong's Education Bureau, adding that it would consider support measures as part of the city's role as an 'international education hub'.
China's Xi'an Jiaotong University has appealed for students at Harvard, promising 'streamlined admissions and comprehensive support'.
Osaka University, one of the top-ranked universities in Japan, has offered tuition fee waivers, research grants and help with travel arrangements for students and researchers who wished to transfer from US institutions. Kyoto University and Tokyo University also said they were considering similar schemes.
Weeks told CNA that rival universities like Cambridge and Oxford 'had already benefited from a lot of America's skepticism in the last year'.
The total number of Chinese students enrolled in US Ivy League universities, as well as other top schools, would add up to losses of up to tens of thousands of students, Weeks said.
But even with good intentions, rival top universities outside the US may not have the capacity to take in students from Harvard and other schools who wished to transfer, Weeks said, adding that many Chinese students would also not want to leave Harvard or abandon offers because it was still a top school.
'International students who go to Harvard are some of the best and brightest in the world,' Weeks said.
'These are not students who are willing to accept a university outside of the top five, or even in the group of eight in Australia, outside of the top two or three in Ireland or New Zealand, at least over the Russell Group (universities) in the UK.'
International students, more likely to pay full tuition fees, also remain a lucrative source of income for universities, experts said, also noting that the Trump administration was hitting a major source of revenue for hundreds of schools across the US.
Data released by the Association of International Educators (NAFSA) revealed that more than 1.1 million international students studying in the US in 2024 contributed nearly US$44 billion to the US economy during the academic year.
On the Sina Weibo microblogging site, one Chinese student shared her rough experience over the past week, saying she still remained optimistic about her future and might choose to look to schools in the UK or Singapore instead.
'Everything will be okay, all things considered,' said the Weibo user who went by the name Fan Chang, adding that international students like her from China had 'plenty to offer'.
'We have skills in (fields like) language, mathematics, engineering and sciences so it's really (America's) loss. There are many other great universities in other countries that would readily welcome our talents instead,' she said.
Similarly, Beijing student Lainey told Reuters she was mulling other options elsewhere.
"Although everyone says the US admissions system may be biased against Chinese students, in reality, US schools are indeed the top in terms of academic quality," she said.
"I may also consider (applying to) some places outside the US, such as Europe, as well as Hong Kong and Singapore."
But in Christopher's case, he ultimately plans to stay on to obtain his master's degree even despite ongoing developments.
The recent actions of the Trump administration have, however, also served as an important reminder - 'that (the US) is not as great as it promotes itself to be'.
'As I learnt during my six years studying here, this land does not belong to me, and I will always be a foreigner.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Malaysia to begin VEP enforcement for Singapore vehicles from July 1
The announcement comes eight years after the plan was first mooted in 2017 and implementation of the system was shelved twice, in 2019 and again in 2020. ST PHOTO: CHONG JUN LIANG PUTRAJAYA – Malaysia will begin enforcement action on Singapore-registered vehicles entering the country without a Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) from July 1, Transport Minister Anthony Loke said on June 4. The an nouncement comes eight years after the plan was first mooted in 2017 and implementation of the system was shelved twice, in 2019 and again in 2020. Mr Loke said ample time had been given since May 2024 for foreign-registered, private vehicles to register for the VEP system before entering Malaysia by land from Singapore. If found without a valid VEP, drivers of non-Malaysian registered vehicles will receive a compound fine of RM300 (S$91). 'Foreign vehicle owners issued with a summons for not having a valid VEP must settle the fine before exiting Malaysia,' he told a press conference at the Transport Ministry in Putrajaya. And they must also register for VEP before leaving the country. Mr Loke said 231,018 Singapore -registered private individually owned vehicles have signed up for VEP, with 15 per cent yet to activate the radio frequency identification (RFID) tags. A further 2,660 private company vehicles have been issued the tags. Mr Loke had announced in May 2024 that foreign-registered vehicles entering Malaysia from Singapore must have a VEP tag starting from Oct 1 that year. A similiar VEP system is being planned for foreign-registered vehicles entering from southern Thailand. But on Oct 4, he had said that enforcement action against motorists without a VEP had yet to begin and those without the tag would only be given a warning upon exiting Malaysia, reminding them to apply for the permit. The RFID tag allows Malaysian authorities to identify foreign-registered vehicles on the country's roads and to track if there are any outstanding fines for traffic offences, which must be settled before they exit the country. Lu Wei Hoong is Malaysia correspondent at The Straits Times, specialising in transport and politics. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Higher metals tariffs kick in as deadline for 'best' offers arrives
The US tariff rate on most imported steel and aluminium will double on Wednesday (Jun 4) as President Donald Trump ratchets up a global trade war on the same day he expects trading partners to deliver their "best offer" in bids to avoid punishing import tax rates on other goods from taking effect in early July. Trump late on Tuesday signed an executive proclamation that puts into effect from Wednesday his surprise announcement last week that he was taking the tariffs on steel and aluminium imports that had been in place since March to 50 per cent from 25 per cent. "We started at 25 and then after studying the data more, realised that it was a big help, but more help is needed. And so that is why the 50 is starting tomorrow," White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said in explaining the move at a steel industry conference in Washington on Tuesday. The increase comes into effect at 12.01am (12.01pm Singapore time). The increase applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far that has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the US during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs. The rate for steel and aluminium imports from the UK - which does not rank among the top exporters of either metal to the US - will remain at 25 per cent until at least Jul 9. About a quarter of all steel used in the US is imported, and Census Bureau data shows the increased levies will hit the closest US trading partners - Canada and Mexico - especially hard. They rank No 1 and 3, respectively, in steel shipment volumes to the US. Canada is even more exposed to the aluminium levies as the top exporter to the US by far at roughly twice the rest of the top 10 exporters' volumes combined. The US gets about half of its aluminium from foreign sources. The unexpected increase in the levies jolted the market for both metals this week, especially for aluminium, which has seen price premiums more than double so far this year. With little current capacity to increase domestic production, import volumes are likely to be unaffected unless the price increases undercut demand. "BEST OFFER" DUE DATE Wednesday is also when the White House would like trading partners to submit their proposals for deals that might help them avoid Trump's hefty "Liberation Day" tariffs from taking effect in five weeks. Administration officials have been in active talks with a number of countries since Trump announced a pause on those tariffs on Apr 9, but to date only the UK deal has come to fruition. Even that agreement, which provided the basis for the carve out from the metals tariffs, is more of a preliminary framework for more talks. With just weeks remaining, the Trump team is eager to bring more deals over the line. Reuters reported on Monday that the US Trade Representative was asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of US industrial and agricultural products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers. In turn, the letter promises answers "within days" with an indication of a "landing zone," including what tariff rates countries can be expected to be saddled with after a 90-day pause on the tariffs expires on Jul 8. At issue for most trading partners is whether they retain the current baseline rate of 10 per cent on most exports to the US after that date, or something sharply higher in many cases. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed the report on Tuesday, saying: 'USTR sent this letter to all of our trading partners just to give them a friendly reminder that the deadline is coming up." Other items requested by the Trump administration include any commitments on digital trade and economic security, along with country-specific commitments, according to the letter.


AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
China tells US envoy Washington must get ties back on 'right track', World News
BEIJING — The US should create the necessary conditions for bilateral relations to get back onto "the right track", China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the US ambassador to Beijing on Tuesday (June 3), according to a ministry statement. After trade talks last month in Geneva, China has "conscientiously and strictly" implemented the consensus reached by both sides, but it is "regrettable that the US recently introduced a series of 'negative' measures", which China firmly opposes, Wang told Ambassador David Perdue. Bilateral relations are at a critical juncture, and dialogue and co-operation are "the only correct choice," Wang said. Perdue said in an X post after the meeting that he had emphasised US President Donald Trump's priorities on trade, fentanyl, and illegal immigration, adding that "communication is vital" to US-China relations. Trump on Friday accused China of violating a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions, and the US has ordered curbs on chip design software and other shipments to China. The Geneva truce to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Senior US officials have said this week that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would speak soon to iron out trade issues, including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions on exports of certain minerals. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a regular news briefing on Tuesday the Trump administration "is actively monitoring China's compliance with the Geneva trade agreement", and added that "there will be a leader to leader talk very soon". [[nid:717873]]