Donna Adelson's latest attempt to remove judge from murder trial rejected by 1st DCA
Donna Adelson struck out again in her attempt to have Leon Circuit Judge Stephen Everett booted from her trial.
On Friday, May 9, a three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal rejected Adelson's latest attempt to remove Everett, denying her request for a writ of prohibition.
Her attorneys, Jackie Fulford and Josh Zelman of Tallahassee, filed motions under seal last month with the trial court asking that Everett be disqualified and replaced with a different judge. After Everett denied the motions, Adelson appealed to the 1st DCA.
Adelson, 75, is charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy and solicitation in the 2014 contract killing of her former son-in-law, Dan Markel. The Florida State law professor was fatally shot at his Betton Hills home in the midst of a bitter court battle with his ex-wife, Wendi Adelson, the defendant's daughter.
Her attempts to remove Everett stem from a more recent and still shadowy criminal investigation into allegations involving her and her attorneys. The details of that probe remain under seal — but a few of them surfaced in the appellate court's three-page opinion.
Adelson claimed Everett engaged in improper ex parte communications with the state by reviewing search and seizure warrant applications involving her husband Harvey Adelson's cell phone records and a wiretap of his cell phone. She asserted that as a result, she had a 'reasonable fear' that she wouldn't receive a fair and impartial trial.
But the appellate judges rejected that. The opinion was written by Judge Robert E. Long Jr., with Judges Lori S. Rowe and Ross L. Bilbrey concurring.
'These claims are meritless and facially insufficient,' their opinion says.
The more recent Adelson investigation came to light during an April 30 hearing. Assistant State Attorney Sarah Kathryn Dugan said prosecutors got a 'lead' last fall that led to new evidence in the form of phone conversations that were secretly recorded in February.
She said that while the investigation ended — apparently without any new charges filed — the state intended to use one or two of the conversations at trial.
Zelman said the state intercepted and monitored privileged attorney-client communications. He also said that the allegations that sparked the probe, which came from an informant of some kind, proved 'false.'
Outside the courtroom, Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman declined to reveal any other details about the most recent investigation. However, she disagreed with the defense's characterization of the information used to justify wiretaps.
'My position is that it's not false,' Cappleman said.
The latest investigation came up again Friday, May 9, during another short hearing before Everett, with Adelson appearing by Zoom.
The hearing involved a defense motion to conduct depositions of three key state witnesses, Sgt. Chris Corbitt of Tallahassee Police Department, FBI agent Pat Sanford and Robert Adelson, the defendant's estranged oldest son.
Fulford said the defense was 'stuck' with depositions taken by previous counsel and that the defense wants to depose all three about the murder investigation. The defense also wants to question Corbitt and Sanford about the latest probe.
'In light of the new investigation, specifically as to Mr. Corbitt, the action that he took and the representations that he made in the new investigation certainly call into question what he did in the old investigation in a very material way,' Fulford said. 'Because those representations that were made to your honor and another judge in this case are false, and warrants were issued based on false information.'
Cappleman objected to re-deposing witnesses about the chief murder investigation but indicated she was fine for 'something new.'
Everett ruled that witnesses who were previously deposed may be deposed again. He also said if there are topics that cover new information, the defense is free to depose and instructed the parties to coordinate the depositions.
Contact Jeff Burlew at jburlew@tallahassee.com or 850-599-2180.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Donna Adelson's latest attempt to remove judge from murder trial rejected
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
A parking structure is on fire in downtown Nashville
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A fire broke out in a parking structure of Nashville's main public library early Tuesday, sending a large plume of smoke into the air downtown. A nearby witness heard explosions from the structure but there were no immediate reports of injuries. Eli Gilmore, a Nashville musician who lives in the apartment building next door, said he heard loud explosions begin around 1:15 a.m.
Washington Post
42 minutes ago
- Washington Post
One killed, six hurt in three daylight shootings, D.C. police say
A man was killed and six other people wounded Monday in three daylight shootings in the District, police said. The slaying was the city's third in two days. Monday's killing came during an outbreak of gunfire around noon outside a store on busy Mount Olivet Road NE, Executive Assistant Police Chief Andre Wright said. He gave no information about any specific motive in that or the other two shootings, which all occurred within a two-hour span. But, based on Wright's account, the incident on Mount Olivet resembled a targeted shooting. Three men were standing outside the store in the 1200 block of Mount Olivet, Wright said, when a black sedan pulled up and three men got out. All were dressed in black, he said. They fired at the men in front of the store, he said. Then they got back into the sedan and left. In addition to the man who was killed, the two other men who had been outside the store were both hit. They were taken to hospitals. A woman who later sought hospital treatment was thought by police to have been a fourth person hit in the same incident. Community concern about the attack was understandable, Wright said. But he pledged 'to get to the bottom of this.' Homicides in the District have evoked concerns not only in the city's neighborhoods, but also among federal officials. The level of homicides in D.C. this year is about the same as last year at this time. However, the level of all violent crime this year is substantially less than last year's, according to police statistics. Before Monday's quadruple shooting on Mount Olivet, Wright said, one man was shot around 10 a.m. in the 1700 block of Benning Road NE, and two men were shot about an hour and a half after that, about two blocks away, in the 1500 block of Benning. It was not immediately known whether any of the shootings was connected. But Tom Lynch, a police spokesman, said Monday night that investigators suspected two of them may be linked: the Mount Olivet Road shooting and the second of the Benning Road shootings. All of the three sites are within a mile of each other. At a news briefing on the three incidents, Wright indicated that police viewed personal disputes as underlying many shootings in the District. 'You still have people in the community who fail to understand how to resolve conflicts,' he said, and 'in the heat of argument, 'they introduce a firearm.' On Sunday, in the first of the day's two homicides, Jonathan Fuentes-Ferrufino, 27, of Northwest was found fatally stabbed about 12:30 a.m. in the 4100 block of 7th Street NW, police said, and an arrest was made. In the second, Brandon Tolson, 21, of Northeast was fatally shot just before 3 a.m. in the 1400 block of S Street NW, police said.
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Pardon Power Is Helping Trump Realize His Dreams
More than any previous president, Donald Trump has systematically deployed his authority to grant pardons to reward loyalists, assure appointees and associates that they can violate the law with impunity and reduce prosecutorial pressure on allies to testify against him. Legal scholars are outspoken in their criticism of Trump's use of the pardon power. Rachel Barkow, a law professor at N.Y.U., described Trump's goals by email: The use of the pardon power is part of his effort to put the country on an authoritarian path. Instead of administering the pardon power evenhandedly with a regular process that is available equally to all, he is rewarding his partisan allies. It is the carrot for supporters, and he uses the stick of weaponizing prosecutions and investigations against his partisan enemies. Of the more than 1,600 pardons and commutations Trump has issued, only a tiny fraction fit the traditional purpose of addressing a miscarriage of justice, excessive sentencing for nonviolent crimes and prosecutorial overreach. Trump, Barkow wrote, is clearly sending a message that he will support people who support him — that's why Ed Martin, the current pardon attorney, tweeted 'No MAGA left behind.' Trump is trying to create a narrative that prosecutors are unfairly weaponizing the law by targeting people with financial fraud and corruption charges, which is what he says happened to him. In the vast majority of cases so far, Trump granted pardons to those who have committed crimes in support of his claim that the 2020 election was stolen — the Jan. 6 insurrectionists — and to a smaller number of those convicted of the kind of crimes Democrats accuse the president of committing, especially bribery and financial fraud. Frank Bowman III, a law professor emeritus at the University of Missouri and former special counsel to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, argued in an email that: No president before Trump has simply abandoned the principle that pardons are to be used for the public good, either to achieve just outcomes in individual cases, to remedy defects in criminal justice policy, or to heal the wounds of domestic unrest or civil or foreign wars by extending mercy to the defeated or forgiveness to those who broke the law in opposing the nation's will. Bowman shares Barkow's view that Trump is intent on acquiring authoritarian powers: 'Trump's abuses of the pardon power are merely one component of an integrated program of destroying legal constraints on Trump's drive for absolute political power and even greater personal wealth.' In an essay published in Slate in April, 'The Biggest Political Scandal of Trump's Term Has Gone Completely Ignored,' Bowman argued that Trump's twin ambitions are to be a dictator and to become ever more fabulously wealthy. Thus, in addition to using state power to crush his perceived enemies, he wants to be able to accept or extort political favors, both monetary and intangible, that keep him in office and centralize authority in his person. As part of this strategy, Bowman continued, Trump is now openly deploying pardons as a reward for political favors — huge financial contributions in the case of Trevor Milton, and questionable testimony against political enemies in the cases of Jason Galanis and Devon Archer. These cases, in Bowman's view, should be understood as merely one component of a coordinated effort to neuter both criminal and civil mechanisms for detecting, regulating, and punishing financial crime and public corruption — or at least financial crime and public corruption committed by Trump and his allies. Bowman wrote in his email that Trump's pardons generally fit into the following categories: Pardons 'dangled,' to use the phrase from Watergate, and later awarded, to associates who could implicate Trump in conduct either impeachable or criminally prosecutable. This class of pardons was employed at the end of Trump I and included pardons to Steve Bannon, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone and Michael Flynn. Pardons to Trump's violent supporters from Jan. 6. Pardons granted as rewards either for financial contributions to Trump or his political operations or for political support of other kinds by the defendant or his family. 'Pre-emptive self-exoneration' or 'refining criminality pardons: Trump has issued multiple pardons to defendants convicted of bribery and high-value financial crimes, notably fraud and crypto. When explanations are forthcoming, they tend to be either that the defendants were railroaded by deep state liberal prosecutors or that the crimes were not so much crimes as technical violations of excessive government constraints on benign business practices. Many of the law professors I contacted for this column cited two other hallmarks of Trump's pardons. First, many of the crimes that Trump expunges are similar to the crimes Democrats accuse him of. Second, Trump is signaling through his pardons that appointees who break the law in furtherance of his agenda will themselves be pardoned if indicted and convicted — or to forestall indictments in the first place. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
