ITR filing deadline extended for FY 2024-25: Here's what income taxpayers need to do
Income Tax Return (ITR) Filing Deadline Extended: The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), via its press release dated 27th May 2025, has extended the due date for filing ITR for Assessment Year 2025–26 from 31st July 2025 to 15th September 2025.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The extension is attributed to system development and integration necessitated by:
Structural changes and content revision in the recently notified ITR forms, aimed at simplifying taxpayer compliance and enhancing transparency and enabling accurate reporting, and
Availability of TDS credits to start reflecting early June, thereby limiting the effective window for tax filing.
This initiative is aligned with the government's broader effort to modernize and digitize the tax administration system. Significant investments are being made in technology and automation to improve the overall taxpayer experience.
A Glimpse into the Future of Tax Filing
It raises the expectation — a future where the ITR forms are fully pre-filled, requiring taxpayers to simply review, amend if needed, and file with a click.
This extension is a welcome move in that direction, bringing hope for simpler, faster, and more accurate return filing processes.
Do Pay Taxes Due
Despite the extended filing due date, taxpayers are strongly advised to:
Compile their income details early,
Calculate their tax liabilities, and
Discharge any balance tax liability promptly.
This is crucial to avoid penal interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, which continues to accrue until the month in which the tax is paid.
Section 234B Overview
Applicable when advance tax provisions apply.
If the net tax liability (after TDS/TCS) exceeds ₹10,000 and taxes paid before the end of the financial year are less than 90% of the total tax due, interest under Section 234B is levied.
Senior citizens without income from business or profession are exempt from advance tax provisions.
A formal notification for the extension is expected to be issued shortly.
(By Kuldip Kumar, Partner at Mainstay Tax Advisors)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Received Form 16/16A? Here's What You Must Do Before Filing ITR 2025
Last Updated: Incorrect TDS reporting can lead to tax mismatches, refund delays, or notices from the Income Tax Department. ITR Filing 2025: The Income Tax Return (ITR) filing season is underway following the reinstatement of form utilities. Salaried taxpayers are advised to await their Form 16 or Form 16A, the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) certificates that enable them to calculate their tax liabilities for the financial year. These are issued by employers. Understanding Form 16 and Form 16A is crucial for both deductors and taxpayers. These forms serve as vital proof of TDS and are essential for accurate and efficient ITR filing. Follow these tips: Collect a Valid Form 16/16A: Obtain Form 16 or 16A from your employer or deductor. Ensure it is generated from TRACES; no substitutes are acceptable. Verify TDS Details: Cross-check the TDS information in Form 26AS or the Annual Information Statement (AIS) against your Form 16/16A to ensure accuracy. Avoid ITR Filing Errors: Accurate forms and verified data prevent notices from the Income Tax Department and ensure timely refunds. 'E- Filing Made Easy"Form 16/16A – The Starting Point of Your ITR Journey 🔷Deductors: Ensure Form 16/16A is generated only from TRACES for authenticity.🔷Taxpayers: Always cross-check TDS with your Form 26AS/AIS before filing. Correct forms help avoid mismatches and build… — Income Tax India (@IncomeTaxIndia) June 6, 2025 Match PAN Count: Verify the number of reported PANs against the previous year's data. File corrections for any discrepancies. File Correct and Complete Reports: Accurate reporting is crucial for deductees' tax credits. Errors can delay or impact their refunds or liabilities. Use TRACES Website Only: Generate Form 16/16A exclusively from the TRACES portal. This ensures accurate reflection of deductee details in their ITR. Incorrect TDS reporting can lead to tax mismatches, refund delays, or notices from the Income Tax Department. Adhering to the official TRACES process, whether deducting or receiving TDS, ensures transparency and streamlines the e-filing process.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Hyd IT employees in the dock for fake political donation claims
Hyderabad: The income tax department has uncovered a massive pattern of dubious political donation claims allegedly made by salaried professionals and business owners, primarily from the IT sector, aiming to illegally claim refunds under section 80GGC of the Income Tax Act. Over 400 tech employees in Hyderabad have now been served notices for allegedly declaring inflated or bogus donations to political parties—some even claiming to have donated sums equal to or exceeding their annual salaries. What began as isolated cases has now snowballed into one of the largest personal tax deduction scams under the guise of political funding, placing Hyderabad alongside metros like Mumbai, Delhi, and Bengaluru in a fast-widening national probe. In a single financial year, individuals across India reportedly claimed over ₹10,000 crore as deductions under section 80GGC, which allows tax breaks for donations made to political parties. While the provision is legal and has no upper limit, officials say the absence of safeguards has opened the door to large-scale misuse. Many of the flagged claims, particularly in Hyderabad, were made in the name of registered political parties and registered unrecognised political parties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Upon reconciliation, tax officials found that several individuals had declared donation amounts that were double or more than what the political parties actually received, raising serious questions about the authenticity of the transactions. "This is not just tax evasion—it's identity laundering using political donations," said a senior official. "We are not only looking at individuals but also at the network of entities that enabled these fraudulent claims," he said. Cheques in, cash out The modus operandi appears both simple and deceptive. In numerous cases, individuals reportedly issued cheques to shell entities posing as political parties and later received the money back in cash. These transactions were then falsely reported as political donations in tax returns—entitling the individual to a deduction and, in many cases, a significant tax refund. In some instances, software employees were found to have issued cheques to known third party entities and then claimed those as political donations in their IT returns. In Hyderabad alone, during a Feb 2025 probe (reported by TOI), the income tax department unearthed a ₹110 crore refund racket involving employees from 36 software companies. Many had claimed inflated political donations and received refunds based on falsified documentation. Unusual donation patterns According to internal data, there has been a 10-fold increase in 80GGC claims between 2016–17 and 2021–22. A growing number of these declarations showed individuals claiming political donations worth 10–100% of their total income—a pattern that the department now flags as a critical risk indicator. In Telangana and Andhra Pradesh alone, 400 high-risk cases have been identified between FY 2023–24 and 2024–25. Some Hyderabad tech employees received notices after declaring donations exceeding ₹10 lakh. Officials have flagged 30 entities, including shell firms and little-known outfits, for allegedly facilitating these inflated claims. 6.5L taxpayers under lens Nationwide, 6.5 lakh individuals, mostly salaried professionals and small business owners, are under the scanner for making suspicious claims under Section 80GGC. The top 10%, based on the donation-to-income ratio, have been placed under special audit scrutiny. To encourage voluntary compliance, the IT department has extended the returns correction window from two to four years. In Telangana, helpdesks have been set up in tech firms, and outreach programmes have been launched across 100 companies to educate employees about the risks of fake donation claims, including penalties, prosecution, and refund recovery. So far, 15% of those flagged in earlier phases have updated their returns and corrected their donation claims. Tax officials are now urging others to do the same before enforcement action begins. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Delhi High Court to decide if taxman can revive tax notices dating back to 1996 for foreign assets
The Delhi High Court will soon to decide whether the tax department can retrospectively reopen old tax notices involving foreign assets—even if those notices were time-barred under earlier rules. A division bench led by Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tejas Karia was hearing a batch of petitions on 30 May – filed by companies such as UK Paints (Overseas) Ltd, BJN Holdings (India) Ltd, and KS Dhingra – challenging these reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. It referred the matter to a larger bench for a final decision. The notices were issued between 2014 and 2021, covering assessment years that stretch back decades. At the centre of the case is a 2012 amendment to the Income Tax Act that extended the reassessment period from six years to 16 years for cases involving foreign assets. After the amendment, which was aimed at tackling black money and undisclosed foreign assets, the department started issuing reassessment notices for older cases, some dating back to 1997. Taxpayers challenged these notices in court, leading to conflicting legal interpretations. For example, in the Brahm Datt case (Delhi High Court, 2018) the court ruled that the extended time limit couldn't apply to cases that were already closed under the earlier six-year rule. However, in the latest hearing, the Delhi High Court observed, 'The view expressed in Brahm Datt may require reconsideration by a larger bench,' and referred the matter to a larger bench. Taxation experts said that if the court allowed retrospective application, the tax department could reopen cases against high-net-worth individuals, business promoters and professionals, imposing significant compliance burdens. Some notices may date as far back as 1996, making it difficult for taxpayers to gather and produce old documents to defend themselves. 'A judgement favouring the tax department could unnecessarily trigger a significant wave of reassessment notices, especially targeting high-net-worth individuals, business promoters and professionals with offshore holdings or trusts,' said Hardeep Sachdeva, senior partner at AZB & Partners. 'If empowered by the extended limitation period with judicial backing, the department may feel emboldened to reopen cases as far back as 1996-97, which will certainly be very unproductive,' Sachdeva added. Amit Maheshwari, tax partner at AKM Global, tax and consulting firm, said, 'If the larger bench rules in favour of the tax department, taxpayers' biggest hurdle will be contesting these cases on their merits and gathering the necessary documents—which could be especially difficult given the time that's passed — more than 15 years in some cases." Taxation lawyers also warned that a ruling in favour of retrospective reopening could undermine the credibility of voluntary disclosure schemes for foreign assets, such as the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015. These schemes were designed to encourage taxpayers to come clean without fear of prosecution. A retrospective reopening could discourage participation in future initiatives. 'A decision allowing retrospective reopening may undermine the credibility of voluntary disclosure schemes such as the one provided by the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015,' said Rahul Charkha, partner at Economic Laws Practice. 'Taxpayers use such schemes to regularise past non-disclosures with immunity from prosecution. If old assessments are reopened despite such schemes, it might deter future participation in similar initiatives," he added.
