
Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in effort to cut Planned Parenthood funding
lk
WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on June 26 sided with South Carolina in its effort to deprive Planned Parenthood of public funding, a decision that is likely to prompt other GOP-led states to take similar action against a health care organization under attack for providing abortion services.
The court's ruling -- over the dissent of the three liberal justices -- that Medicaid patients can't sue over their right to choose their doctor could also limit care options beyond the controversial realm of reproductive care.
The Trump administration had backed South Carolina, after the Justice Department reevaluated its position following the change in administrations.
And anti-abortion groups are pushing Trump and the GOP-controlled Congress to impose a national ban on Planned Parenthood's participation in Medicaid. The organization has said that would have "catastrophic consequences," potentially causing the closure of nearly 200 health centers in 24 states including half the centers that provide abortions.
One third of Planned Parenthood's revenue comes from state and federal government funding, including Medicaid, to provide health services, according to the nonpartisan health research organization KFF.
Defunding Planned Parenthood is longtime GOP goal
Republicans have long sought to defund Planned Parenthood because it performs abortions.
Medicaid, which is funded primarily through federal dollars and operated by states to provide health carefor low-income residents, already prohibits coverage of abortion in most cases.
But South Carolina argues that the money Planned Parenthood gets from the government for providing birth control, cancer screenings, physical exams, testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases and other health services 'frees up their other funds to provide more abortions.'
The state's Republican governor, Henry McMaster, signed an executive order in 2018 to cut off Medicaid funding. His order was blocked in court.
That was before the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to an abortion in 2022, prompting South Carolina to ban abortions after the fetus reachesaround six weeks' gestation.
Lower court blocked South Carolina from defunding Planned Parenthood
Nearly half of Planned Parenthood patients nationwide get their health care through Medicaid, although that share is lower in South Carolina, which has tighter eligibility rules than most states, according to the organization.
The federal Medicaid Act says eligible people may receive health care 'from any institution, agency, community pharmacy, or person, qualified to perform the service or services required.'
The Supreme Court was asked to review a lower court's decision that the language clearly allows a Medicaid patient to sue if a state blocks a qualified provider from the program.
In this case, the patient was Julie Edwards, a Medicaid recipient whoprefers to go to Planned Parenthood for her reproductive health care because they treat her 'without judgment.' Edwards also said she's had trouble finding doctors willing to see Medicaid recipients.
South Carolina says Medicaid patients have many other options, including 140 federally qualified health clinics and pregnancy centers.
But the American Public Health Association and other health groups told the court more than half of South Carolina's counties don't have enough health services to meet demand and nearly 2 in 5 are considered 'contraceptive deserts.'
Planned Parenthood 'fills the gaps where South Carolina's providers are scarcest ‒ women's health and preventative care ‒ lessening the burden on other parts of the state's healthcare system,' various health care policy experts, advocates and providers in South Carolina told the Supreme Court.
Without Medicaid reimbursements, the organization maynot be able to continuedelivering services 'in the same manner we have been' and may need to reduce hours at its South Carolina clinics, the organization said in a filing.
But Dr. Katherine Farris, chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said before Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic was argued that, regardless of the outcome, their 'doors will stay open.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
At odds over Trump's tax bill, some Senate Republicans turn on chamber's referee
By Bo Erickson and David Morgan WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Struggling to agree on a path forward for President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, some U.S. Senate Republicans on Thursday turned their anger on the referee charged with ensuring that lawmakers follow their own rules. That pushback came in response to Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough's ruling that some Medicaid policies Republicans are trying to include in the bill do not align with the special budget process the party is using to bypass the chamber's regular vote threshold, which requires 60 of the 100 senators to agree on legislation. "THE SENATE PARLIAMENTARIAN SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP,' Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville posted online, "This is a perfect example of why Americans hate THE SWAMP." Tuberville, a first-term senator who is running for Alabama governor, and Senator Roger Marshall of Kansas joined a vocal group of House of Representatives Republicans calling for the ouster of MacDonough, the first woman to hold this role since it was formalized in 1935. Theirs is a minority view. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune for months has said his party will abide by the parliamentarian's guidance. MacDonough's office did not respond to a request for comment. This is not the first time members of the current Republican congressional majority have attempted to ignore Congress's nonpartisan arbiters. A growing number of Republican senators have ignored the cost estimates of the bill from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which estimated a price tag with interest costs around $3 trillion. The bill's hefty cost has exposed divides within the party, with some hardline deficit hawks demanding deep cuts to social programs including Medicaid to try to limit the bill's cost, and others warning that those cuts could imperil their narrow majorities in the 2026 midterm elections. MacDonough, a former lawyer, joined the Senate parliamentarian's office in 1999, serving as the head parliamentarian for the last 13 years. MacDonough's critics have dismissed her as "unelected," but it was Congress more than 50 years ago that established the parliamentarian as the referee for the special process known as "budget reconciliation" that bypasses the normal Senate filibuster rule. BYPASSING THE PARTISAN DIVIDE Republicans are pursuing this route -- which they relied on to pass Trump's tax cuts in 2017 during his first term -- because of their narrow majorities in both chambers. Democrats also used the process to pass legislation under President Joe Biden. Some Republicans suggested that MacDonough's ruling had political motives, noting that she was appointed by a Democratic majority leader in 2012. In this position, the parliamentarian is not weighing the merits of the policies, but rather if they fit into the budget reconciliation rules and precedent. MacDonough in 2021 blocked Democratic efforts to pass minimum wage and immigration provisions in the special budget process. This is not the first time this year the parliamentarian has weighed in on the Republicans' tax and budget bill, but the Medicaid and healthcare provisions that she advised on Thursday were seen as opportunities for Republicans to save money in the package that is forecast to add to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Other Senate Republicans are standing by the process and MacDonough. 'I consider the parliamentarian to be a straight shooter. So I don't think there's anything more than it not meeting the standard,' Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, told reporters. 'Nah, never overrule the parliamentarian," Senator John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, told reporters on Thursday. Senate Republicans are allowed to tweak these provisions to try to fit the specific budget process precedents and rules, or they could abandon these provisions entirely. Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the budget committee's top Democrat, pledged his party will continue "to make the case against every provision in this Big, Beautiful Betrayal of a bill that violates Senate rules and hurts families and workers." Firing a Senate parliamentarian is not without precedent. In 2001 during President George W. Bush's administration, Senate Republican leaders with an evenly divided chamber dismissed the parliamentarian after rulings on the party's budget and tax legislation regarding natural disaster funding.

Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Former Supreme Court Justice Kennedy says ‘democracy is at risk'
Former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy warned Thursday that acrimonious political discourse and threats to judges are eroding the ability of the United States to serve as an example of democracy worldwide. 'Many in the rest of the world look to the United States to see what democracy is, to see what democracy ought to be,' Kennedy said during an online forum about threats to the rule of law. 'If they see a hostile, fractious discourse, if they see a discourse that uses identity politics rather than to talk about issues, democracy is at risk. Freedom is at risk.' Kennedy, who stepped down from the court in 2018, avoided specifics during his 10-minute speech as part of a series of presentations by current and former judges. However, the Reagan appointee's remarks appeared to be triggered at least in part by strident attacks President Donald Trump has mounted against judges, including some whom he appointed during his first term, who have ruled against the administration's policies on immigration, firings of federal workers and his implementation of broad-based tariffs. In March, Trump attacked U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg as a 'radical left lunatic' after he attempted to block the administration from deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members under a wartime presidential power Trump invoked. Trump also called for Boasberg, an Obama appointee, to be impeached. Last month, Trump issued a social media post denouncing 'USA-hating' judges as 'monsters who want our country to go to hell.' The extreme rhetoric has come alongside a spike in threats against judges, although administration spokespeople have said the president opposes any threats and the Justice Department will prosecute them. 'Judges must have protection for themselves and their families,' Kennedy said. 'Our families are often included in threats.' Some other participants were more explicit in calling out Trump's salvos at the courts. While also not mentioning Trump by name, U.S. District Judge Esther Salas invoked the president's statements more directly, arguing they are akin to attacks on judges that have caused other countries to slide into authoritarianism. 'Judges are rogue. Sound familiar? Judges are corrupt. Sound familiar? Judges are monsters. … Judges hate America,' Salas said. 'We are seeing the spreading of disinformation coming from the top down.' Salas, whose son was killed and her husband wounded by a disgruntled litigant at their New Jersey home in 2020, said the U.S. Marshals Service has tracked more than 400 threats against judges so far this year. 'We're going to break records — and not in a good way,' said the judge, an Obama appointee. In his remarks Thursday, one day before his former Supreme Court colleagues are set to deliver their final rulings of the current term, Kennedy did offer some indirect praise for Trump. The retired justice repeatedly said he welcomed the ceasefire in fighting between Israel and Iran — a deal brokered by the White House. 'The world is celebrating what looks like, what we hope might be, peace for a period of time in the Middle East,' Kennedy said. 'Peace is what gives us the opportunity to make democracy stronger, to make freedom more attainable, to make freedom greater for ourselves and the rest of the world. We must always say no to tyranny and yes to truth.'
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marquette poll shows steady increase in support for marijuana legalization in Wisconsin
A new Marquette University Law School poll shows steady support in Wisconsin for marijuana legalization. Two-thirds of voters in the survey said marijuana should be made legal in Wisconsin. Support has grown slightly among voters since 2019, according to previous Marquette polls, and now hovers in the mid-60% range. Democrats who support marijuana legalization have long pointed to that popularity and argued Wisconsin loses tax revenue to neighboring states where marijuana is legal. Marijuana legalization hasn't gained much momentum in the Capitol this year. Some Republicans have supported a restrictive medical-use program, but legislation to create it hasn't been introduced this session. The poll, released on June 25, surveyed 873 registered voters in Wisconsin between June 13 and 19. Half of the sample answered some policy questions while half answered others. The margin of error was 4.7 percentage points. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Marquette poll shows support for marijuana legalization in Wisconsin