Takeaways From the NYC Mayoral Democratic Primary Debate
A crowded field of Democrats took to the debate stage on June 4 to vie for their party's nomination to lead New York City as mayor.
The party has been rocked by since-withdrawn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners
Jun. 6—For now, the Ohio Senate is going along on an Ohio House plan to make county coroners appointed by county commissioners instead of being elected by county voters. But, while the Senate didn't change the House's proposal in its initial draft of the state's two-year operating budget, Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, told reporters that there's still a chance the Senate could eliminate the House's proposal when it amends the budget next week. McColley said he put a request out for those in his caucus with strong feelings on the matter to weigh in. "If members feel strongly that it should go back to the way that it is under current law, then there's a possibility to see an amendment here in the omnibus," McColley told this news outlet. "We didn't see a lot of members — we saw some — but we didn't see a lot of members asking for it to be changed back." The Senate is expected to make those amendments on Wednesday or Thursday of next week. The change could be consequential in counties where county commissioners and the coroner are different political parties. In Montgomery County, for example, the elected coroner is a Republican while Democrats hold two of the three seats on the county commission. The House's primary advocate for the change, county commissioner-turned-lawmaker Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, has framed the change as necessary to solve a scarcity issue. "It's really hard to find folks that want to serve as a coroner at all, it's even harder to find folks who are willing to be the coroner and want to run a political campaign to do so," Stewart said in April. But the proposed change is opposed by Ohio State Coroners Association, whose Executive Director David Corey told this outlet that he's still hopeful that former coroners in the Ohio Senate, like Sen. Matt Huffman, R-Tipp City, will help the Senate reverse course. "Commissioners already have the authority to appoint a physician to be coroner if no one runs," Corey said. "So they already have this authority — so why subject this as a blanket on everyone?" Corey noted that commissioners also already have the authority to contract out with different county coroner offices if there's no elected coroner and the commission cannot find an in-county physician that wants to be appointed. "We don't really know what (problem) the House is trying and the Senate are trying to fix ... other than chipping away at other elected officials," Corey said. Corey said the idea is "wrought with potential problems," and speculated that coroners appointed by commissioners might be more beholden to those officials than they are to the public. He said appointees could also be fired at will, which would make it harder for a coroner to stand up to the commission in budget negotiations or other high-stakes situations. "We just think it's a horrible precedent," Corey said. Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, whose home county of Cuyahoga is one of two counties in the state where the position is already appointed following a local vote, told this outlet that she didn't like the sound of applying the idea to every coroner in the state. "You want the coroner to feel like they can have a lot of pressure on them," Antonio said. "If they're appointed, then it's almost like they have an affiliation to the person that appointed them." She said this could lead to undue influence. "I think we, probably in the long run, would be better off continuing to have them be elected," Antonio said. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Build-up to a blow-up: Inside the Trump-Musk meltdown
This account of the crumbling ties between the president and Musk is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions. Loading While the relationship had been losing steam over the past several months as Musk clashed with Trump officials, people close to both men said the disagreement over Isaacman accelerated the breakup. Musk had been planning to exit the White House relatively quietly – before Isaacman's ouster left him feeling humiliated. Now the two men, who seemed inseparable at one point, are on opposite sides. Musk suggested Trump should be impeached. Trump has threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. And in recent days, Trump has been telling people close to him that he believes Musk is acting 'crazy' and must be doing drugs. For Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more to him than the head of NASA, because of its critical importance to SpaceX, his rocket business. So it was of great personal benefit to Musk when Trump chose Isaacman – who has flown to space twice with SpaceX – to oversee the agency. Isaacman's donations to Democrats had not always been a problem. While Trump privately told advisers that he was surprised to learn of them, he and his team had been briefed about them during the presidential transition, before Isaacman's nomination, according to two people with knowledge of the events. But by last Friday, when Trump went through the file containing details of the donations, he clearly had changed his mind. Musk barely mounted a defence of his friend. He was anxious about doing so with other people around, including Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office, who had clashed with Musk over other staffing matters. Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president at some point after the gathering, privately. But Musk never got a chance to make his case. In the hours after the Oval Office farewell, Trump decided he would withdraw Isaacman from consideration. Musk was stunned by how fast it all happened. Musk's allies have argued privately that Isaacman's recent donations to Democrats were not ideological and made at the encouragement of Senator Mark Kelly, a former astronaut. A spokesperson for the Democratic senator for Arizona declined to comment. Loading As Musk dealt with the fallout from the tanked nomination, he spent part of the weekend outside Missoula, Montana, as a guest at 'Symposium' – an event for tech executives, investors and startup founders thrown by Founders Fund, the venture capital firm founded by Peter Thiel. He mingled with guests at Paws Up, a high-end resort with glamping tents and luxury cabins set on 15,000 hectares of a historic cattle ranch. There, he had a wide-ranging conversation with Thiel, who could sense no coming feud with the president, according to a person familiar with the talks. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI who has been openly feuding with Musk, also attended, though the two men did not speak. For Musk, the goings-on in Washington were still top of mind. After spending a day in Montana, he turned his attention in earnest to assailing the top domestic priority of Trump: the Republican bill making its way through Congress that would slash taxes and steer more money to the military and immigration enforcement. Privately and publicly, Musk stewed over the bill, believing that its spending would erase the supposed savings of his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and add to the federal deficit. Some Republican lawmakers had tried to assuage Musk's fears. On Monday, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson walked the billionaire through the bill and said that Congress would try to codify the work done by DOGE. After the call, Johnson told associates that he felt Musk was uninformed about the legislation and the congressional process, but that he had been able reason with the world's richest man, according to a person familiar with the conversation. On Monday evening, Musk still had concerns. He hinted at them on his social platform X, reposting a chart apparently showing the yearly increase in the national debt. 'Scary,' Musk wrote as a caption. Trump did not respond to Musk's criticisms of the bill and maintained a light public schedule. The Trump-Musk alliance fully ruptured Thursday, six days after the two men put on the collegial display in the Oval Office. Musk, who had largely focused his attacks on Republicans in Congress, had started directing more ire at the president. So when Trump was asked about Musk's comments during a meeting with Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, the president finally let loose. He said he was 'disappointed' in Musk, downplayed the billionaire's financial support for his presidential campaign and posited that Musk developed 'Trump derangement syndrome' after leaving the White House. Musk fired back in real time. Using X, he unleashed a torrent of attacks. He claimed there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender, and indicated his support for the president's impeachment. He also said Trump's tariffs would cause a recession by the end of the year. Loading Later, Trump, using his own social media platform, threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Musk's companies. By Thursday evening, Musk signalled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. White House officials said Trump had no plans to call Musk. 'President Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party, and the vast majority of the country approves of his job performance as president,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. 'Inflation is down, consumer confidence and wages are up, the jobs report beat expectations for the third month in a row, the border is secure and America is hotter than ever before.' A spokesperson for Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Loading Musk, his allies and even some White House officials now pin the blame on Gor, believing he sabotaged Isaacman as Musk was on his way out. But some close Trump allies say Gor was being unfairly criticised for a decision that ultimately rests with the president. Gor and Musk had clashed several times early in Trump's second term, including at two Cabinet meetings, when Musk questioned how swiftly Gor was moving to fill the top ranks of agencies. Musk's and Gor's teams often disagreed over personnel and the amount of power that should be given to aides at DOGE. But Gor's title – director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office – does not convey the scope of his influence in the president's orbit. Gor founded a pro-Trump super political action committee during the 2024 presidential election, and co-founded a publishing house with Donald Trump jr that has published books by the president and his allies. The president's aides and allies quickly jumped to Gor's defence on Friday. 'Sergio Gor is a vital member of the team, and he has helped President Trump put together an administration that is second to none,' Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement. As for Musk? White House officials said on Friday that Trump was considering selling the bright red Tesla he got in March as a show of support for Musk.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Build-up to a blow-up: Inside the Trump-Musk meltdown
This account of the crumbling ties between the president and Musk is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions. Loading While the relationship had been losing steam over the past several months as Musk clashed with Trump officials, people close to both men said the disagreement over Isaacman accelerated the breakup. Musk had been planning to exit the White House relatively quietly – before Isaacman's ouster left him feeling humiliated. Now the two men, who seemed inseparable at one point, are on opposite sides. Musk suggested Trump should be impeached. Trump has threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's companies. And in recent days, Trump has been telling people close to him that he believes Musk is acting 'crazy' and must be doing drugs. For Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more to him than the head of NASA, because of its critical importance to SpaceX, his rocket business. So it was of great personal benefit to Musk when Trump chose Isaacman – who has flown to space twice with SpaceX – to oversee the agency. Isaacman's donations to Democrats had not always been a problem. While Trump privately told advisers that he was surprised to learn of them, he and his team had been briefed about them during the presidential transition, before Isaacman's nomination, according to two people with knowledge of the events. But by last Friday, when Trump went through the file containing details of the donations, he clearly had changed his mind. Musk barely mounted a defence of his friend. He was anxious about doing so with other people around, including Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office, who had clashed with Musk over other staffing matters. Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president at some point after the gathering, privately. But Musk never got a chance to make his case. In the hours after the Oval Office farewell, Trump decided he would withdraw Isaacman from consideration. Musk was stunned by how fast it all happened. Musk's allies have argued privately that Isaacman's recent donations to Democrats were not ideological and made at the encouragement of Senator Mark Kelly, a former astronaut. A spokesperson for the Democratic senator for Arizona declined to comment. Loading As Musk dealt with the fallout from the tanked nomination, he spent part of the weekend outside Missoula, Montana, as a guest at 'Symposium' – an event for tech executives, investors and startup founders thrown by Founders Fund, the venture capital firm founded by Peter Thiel. He mingled with guests at Paws Up, a high-end resort with glamping tents and luxury cabins set on 15,000 hectares of a historic cattle ranch. There, he had a wide-ranging conversation with Thiel, who could sense no coming feud with the president, according to a person familiar with the talks. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI who has been openly feuding with Musk, also attended, though the two men did not speak. For Musk, the goings-on in Washington were still top of mind. After spending a day in Montana, he turned his attention in earnest to assailing the top domestic priority of Trump: the Republican bill making its way through Congress that would slash taxes and steer more money to the military and immigration enforcement. Privately and publicly, Musk stewed over the bill, believing that its spending would erase the supposed savings of his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and add to the federal deficit. Some Republican lawmakers had tried to assuage Musk's fears. On Monday, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson walked the billionaire through the bill and said that Congress would try to codify the work done by DOGE. After the call, Johnson told associates that he felt Musk was uninformed about the legislation and the congressional process, but that he had been able reason with the world's richest man, according to a person familiar with the conversation. On Monday evening, Musk still had concerns. He hinted at them on his social platform X, reposting a chart apparently showing the yearly increase in the national debt. 'Scary,' Musk wrote as a caption. Trump did not respond to Musk's criticisms of the bill and maintained a light public schedule. The Trump-Musk alliance fully ruptured Thursday, six days after the two men put on the collegial display in the Oval Office. Musk, who had largely focused his attacks on Republicans in Congress, had started directing more ire at the president. So when Trump was asked about Musk's comments during a meeting with Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, the president finally let loose. He said he was 'disappointed' in Musk, downplayed the billionaire's financial support for his presidential campaign and posited that Musk developed 'Trump derangement syndrome' after leaving the White House. Musk fired back in real time. Using X, he unleashed a torrent of attacks. He claimed there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender, and indicated his support for the president's impeachment. He also said Trump's tariffs would cause a recession by the end of the year. Loading Later, Trump, using his own social media platform, threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Musk's companies. By Thursday evening, Musk signalled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. White House officials said Trump had no plans to call Musk. 'President Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party, and the vast majority of the country approves of his job performance as president,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. 'Inflation is down, consumer confidence and wages are up, the jobs report beat expectations for the third month in a row, the border is secure and America is hotter than ever before.' A spokesperson for Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Loading Musk, his allies and even some White House officials now pin the blame on Gor, believing he sabotaged Isaacman as Musk was on his way out. But some close Trump allies say Gor was being unfairly criticised for a decision that ultimately rests with the president. Gor and Musk had clashed several times early in Trump's second term, including at two Cabinet meetings, when Musk questioned how swiftly Gor was moving to fill the top ranks of agencies. Musk's and Gor's teams often disagreed over personnel and the amount of power that should be given to aides at DOGE. But Gor's title – director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office – does not convey the scope of his influence in the president's orbit. Gor founded a pro-Trump super political action committee during the 2024 presidential election, and co-founded a publishing house with Donald Trump jr that has published books by the president and his allies. The president's aides and allies quickly jumped to Gor's defence on Friday. 'Sergio Gor is a vital member of the team, and he has helped President Trump put together an administration that is second to none,' Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement. As for Musk? White House officials said on Friday that Trump was considering selling the bright red Tesla he got in March as a show of support for Musk.
