
Man who assaulted his wife in hotel after he saw a love heart emoji on her phone receives suspended sentence
The man, who is aged in his 50s and cannot be named for legal reasons, pleaded guilty to a charge under Section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997 on 17 June, 2023.
The court heard that the couple were staying at a hotel for a weekend away. They had dinner and drinks and were socialising with other guests at the hotel. At some point during the evening, the court heard the defendant saw a love-heart emoji on his wife's phone, which made him suspicious of an extramarital affair.
The court was told a row broke out later in their hotel room and, during the course of the dispute, the defendant struck his wife on the arm a number of times. He then held her down on the bed and briefly placed a pillow over her face. No serious injuries were caused as a result of the assault.
The case had been adjourned in March for a probation report, which Judge William Aylmer said he had considered.
Judge Aylmer said he had to assess where the offence lay on the spectrum of seriousness. He identified several aggravating factors, including that the assault occurred within an intimate relationship, that the victim was vulnerable and had been subdued on the bed, and that the defendant had abused a position of trust as her husband.
The judge said the defendant had exploited his wife as a vulnerable and defenceless victim, and that the use of the pillow - albeit briefly - constituted the use of a weapon in the context of the assault.
He also noted that the woman had alleged the defendant threatened to kill her or cause serious injury, though the man denied making any such threats.
However, Judge Aylmer also took into account several mitigating factors outlined by defence solicitor Michael Hennessey. He noted that the defendant had acted impulsively under the suspicion of an extramarital affair, while no serious injuries had resulted and he had no relevant previous convictions.
The man had also pleaded guilty at an early stage and had since referred himself to and completed the MOVE (Men Overcoming Violence) programme. The court also heard that he has not come to Garda attention since the assault two years ago.
Taking these factors into consideration, Judge Aylmer set a headline sentence of 10 months in custody, which he reduced to seven months due to the mitigating factors.
He imposed a seven-month custodial sentence, suspended in full for 12 months, on condition that the defendant remains under probation supervision during that period and does not come to Garda attention.
He noted that the couple are working through their difficulties and that the victim accepted her partner had completed the MOVE programme voluntarily. He also observed that the man's wife does not currently benefit from a protection order.
The judge said he was satisfied, based on the probation service report, that the defendant is continuing to engage with supports to address his difficulty in managing emotions within intimate relationships.
Recognisance was fixed as a formality, and the defendant signed a bond.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Dublin Live
2 hours ago
- Dublin Live
Annie McCarrick suspect 'arrested after brother gave vital tip to gardai'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Gardai decided to arrest the suspect for the murder of Annie McCarrick after his own brother gave them information on the case, sources have said. Three days after the suspect was released without charge, sources have told us information a brother living overseas gave to detectives was a main catalyst for Thursday's dramatic arrest. Sources tell us the brother, who has been experiencing serious health problems in recent years, voluntarily spoke to detectives who travelled to the country he is living in earlier this year. He gave a statement to detectives from Irishtown Garda Station – where the probe into the 1993 murder of the 26-year-old American is based. It's understood that the statement included details of the suspect's alibi for the day in March of that year that New York native Ms McCarrick was last seen in the Sandymount area of the city where she had a flat. Sources tell us the information weakened that alibi – and was one of the main reasons for the arrest. "The brother did not rat him out, but what he said was important," a source said. "When it was analysed, it was decided that there was now a basis for the arrest." The suspect, who is a millionaire businessman in his 60s, was arrested by gardai from Irishtown Station on Thursday morning – around the same time officers sealed off and took control of a house in Clondalkin, south west Dublin as part of the murder inquiry. Gardai stress the current residents of the house are not connected in anyway with Ms McCarrick, or the investigation into her murder. The suspect was detained for 24 hours before being released without charge on Friday afternoon. Gardai say the investigation is ongoing. That includes an invasive search around the house in Clondalkin. Sources tell us the search is likely to continue for several days. They added that the original house is not the centre of the Garda probe. Instead, Garda Technical Bureau experts as well as officers from Irishtown are concentrating on the garden area. Officers are investigating if Ms McCarrick's remains were buried there – many years before the current residents moved in. On Friday, gardai brought in PSNI cadaver dog Fern to carry out a search of the property. Fern is one of three cadaver dogs used by the PSNI that are occasionally lent to gardai as they don't have their own. The same dog found the remains of Tina Satchwell, 45, buried under the stairs of her home in Youghal, Co Cork in October 2023 – more than six years after she was last seen alive. Her husband Richard, 58, murdered her at the house in March 2017 – before burying her there. He was last month convicted of Tina's murder – and Fern played a key role in bringing him to justice. Satchwell is now serving a life sentence – and is likely to spend more than 20 years behind bars. Sources have told us that the McCarrick suspect knew her and had an infatuation with her before she disappeared in 1993. He has been interviewed by gardai at least twice – but as a witness and who had an alibi. But gardai always viewed him as a person of interest in the mystery and he became a suspect when the case was upgraded to murder in March 2023 – the 30th anniversary of her disappearance. The man knew Annie, had an infatuation with her and had allegedly stalked and assaulted her. He is believed to have moved in her social circles before the student and restaurant worker vanished. We revealed last week that gardai have now interviewed around 100 people who worked with or knew Ms McCarrick before her disappearance. Officers have again appealed for the public's help in solving the mystery of what happened to Ms McCarrick. Her case was treated as a missing person's inquiry until it was upgraded to murder. Investigators believe there are people out there who know what happened to Ms McCarrick – and may have been afraid to come forward in the past. The force said in a statement: "An Garda Síochána appeal to anyone with information, no matter how small or insignificant that they might believe it to be, to contact the investigation team. Gardaí also appeal to anyone that may have previously come forward but who felt that they could not provide Gardaí with all of the relevant information they had in relation to this matter, to please make contact with An Garda Síochána again. "With the passage of time they may now be in a position to speak further with the investigation team. Any information will be welcomed by the investigation team, and will be treated in the strictest confidence. "The investigation team can be contacted at Irishtown Garda Station on 01 666 9600 or anyone who wishes to provide information confidentially should contact the Garda Confidential Line: 1800 666 111." Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Woman went without food for days as husband refuses to give money for essentials, court told
A woman who said she went days without food on one occasion, as her husband refuses to give her money for essentials, has been granted a protection order against him. The woman told Dublin District Family Court on Friday that she is 'completely dependent' on her husband as she has a disability. Asked by Judge Gerard Furlong if she was entitled to social welfare payments, the woman, originally from Africa, said she did not believe she was. She told him her husband of more than two decades 'threatens and bullies' her in front of her four adult children. READ MORE 'My husband has always been controlling and often aggressive towards me. He has hit and pushed me around many times over the years,' she said in a sworn statement. She said her husband regularly threatens her and is 'sending me out of the house at midnight'. She told the judge her husband has stopped providing money for living expenses and 'refuses to give me money to eat'. 'In December, after I had not had any food for four days, I took his wallet to try and take some money for food and essentials. He became very angry and violent towards me, hitting me in the back and pushing me,' she said. After attending her local Garda station, and being told by gardaí that the man must provide money for essentials, she said her husband agreed to give her money, 'but has now stopped again'. Having recently asked for money for food, the woman claimed her husband offered €50 to cover the subsequent two weeks, which she told him was not enough to survive on. 'He then refused to give me any money at all and ended up pushing me around. I cannot take this any more,' she said. Granting a protection order, the judge advised the woman to seek support and advice from Women's Aid. He said she had the option of lodging a maintenance summons. 'This is a long time that this is going on,' he said, noting that the woman had previously been granted a protection order. He advised the woman to contact gardaí if further incidents arise, saying that her being put out of the house at midnight was 'putting your safety at risk'. In a separate case heard on Friday, a woman in her 80s was granted a protection order against her daughter who, she told the court, was 'tormenting me all the time'. The woman told Judge Furlong her daughter, aged in her 40s, is a 'chronic drug addict' and 'violent'. 'She has been terrorising me and threatening to hurt me,' the woman said in a sworn statement. Applying for a protection order, she said she no longer wished to have any contact with her daughter as she is 'afraid of her because of her violent mood swings'. 'She said she would hurt me if I didn't give her money,' the woman said. Hours before her attendance at Dublin District Family Court, the woman said her daughter came to her house and 'wanted to smoke drugs' there. 'I told her to get out and she got aggressive and refused to leave,' she said. The woman said she called gardaí, who attended the incident, but that she remained 'scared to go home'. Judge Furlong granted the protection order until a full hearing is held and told the woman to call An Garda Síochána if her daughter puts her in fear for her safety.


Irish Examiner
12 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Life Hack: The signs of some common scams you should know about
Unfortunately, online scams have become a persistant problem of modern life. While you may think yourself savvy, others in your life may fall for 'obvious' scams, and other more sophisticated techniques may catch you unawares. If you or someone you know have been the victim of a scam, you should report it to your local Garda station, and use the online reporting service of the website or forum on which you were scammed, if applicable. Bring copies of all emails, account details, and any other relevant information you may have to the gardaí. Retailer Chums has shared some of the biggest scams that impact Irish people and the signs to know that show someone has fallen victim to a scam. Unexpected messages Fake bank alerts, unfamiliar login notifications, or missed delivery notifications about parcels you didn't order can often try to lead you into giving personal details or making a small payment. These phishing scams can use your data to create false accounts or make larger payment withdrawals using your bank details. Always contact the bank or business directly to confirm if the message is legitimate. Contest wins Have you received a 'you're a winner' message for a competition you don't remember entering? This is most likely a scam designed to steal your personal information or social media login details. If you receive a notification like this, check your previous emails and/or messages to confirm if you actually entered a competition — and if you can't find a record of entering, it is best to ignore these messages. Browser pop-ups Most internet users are familiar with pop-ups warning of computer infections and slow performances, or, again, competition wins. It is best to ignore browser pop-ups. Clearing your cache, history, and cookies will help remove them and you can take your device to a trusted device repair shop if the issue persists. Unusual online adverts Spotted an advert with a deal that's too good to be true? It probably is. Online ads that offer products at unusually low price could be promoting fake websites designed to steal your payment information. Instead, look for products on trusted and familiar sites, and always ensure you are ordering from the official site – not a dupe or scam site. 'Mammy' texting from an unknown number Some scammers will play on emotions, particularly the urge to help friends and family in trouble. Often, scammers will send feigned messages of distress asking for financial help, including some sophisticated scams that involve cloning voices and deepfake videos. Before replying, check that the messages are legitimate by contacting that person on their usual number, on social media, or through another loved one. Unusual links If you see a friend or family member sharing a strange link on social media, either in a post or direct message, their account may have been hacked. Never click on the link and instead contact them directly through a different channel, such. Send a text message or make a phone call, to confirm if they sent the link. Flag these messages or posts to the social media platform too. Putting on the pressure Scammers often use urgency to pressure their targets into making immediate decisions, hoping to prevent them from thinking clearly. Legitimate businesses and organisations will never rush you. If a business or caller is trying to pressure you, tell them you will call them back and end the call. Contact a trusted person or organisation to confirm if the caller is legitimate. Generic greetings in emails Any email that does not attempt to use your name is something to be suspicious of, especially if they are trying to make claims about your banking or services. Scammers will often use titles and address you as 'Sir' or 'Madam' instead of using your name. Legitimate organisations, especially your bank or service providers, will typically know your name. Never give away your personal information to these individuals, and if they cannot confirm your identity contact the organisation they are claiming to be directly, and check if the call is genuine. Attempts to isolate you If you're contacted by a scammer, and when you try to speak to someone else, such as a friend or family member, scammers will typically try to keep you on the phone or prevent you from discussing the situation with others. This is a major red flag. Never hesitate to consult with a trusted friend or family member before making any decisions, and feel confident in ending calls and contacting the organisation they claim to be directly, using a number or email from their official website. Read More Life Hack: How to avoid injuring yourself while doing DIY jobs at home