Afghanistan welcomes upgraded diplomatic ties with neighbouring Pakistan
Afghanistan has welcomed an upgrade in its diplomatic ties with Pakistan, signalling an easing of tensions between the South Asian neighbours.
Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar on Friday said the charge d'affaires stationed in the Afghan capital, Kabul, would be elevated to the rank of ambassador, with Afghanistan's Taliban government later announcing its representative in Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, would also be upgraded.
A charge d'affaires serves as an embassy's chief of mission in the absence of the ambassador.
'This elevation in diplomatic representation between Afghanistan [and] Pakistan paves the way for enhanced bilateral cooperation in multiple domains,' the Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs posted on X on Saturday.Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is due to visit Pakistan 'in the coming days', the ministry spokesman, Zia Ahmad Takal, said.
Only a handful of countries – including China – have agreed to host Taliban government ambassadors since their return to power in 2021, with no country yet formally recognising the administration.
Pakistan is the fourth country to designate an ambassador to Kabul, after China, the United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan. Russia last month said it would also accredit a Taliban government ambassador, days after removing the group's 'terrorist' designation.
For the past few months, relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have been rocky over security concerns and a campaign by Islamabad to expel tens of thousands of Afghan refugees.
Islamabad says armed groups which launch attacks inside Pakistan use Afghan soil. Kabul denies the allegation, saying such violence is Pakistan's domestic problem to handle.
However, Foreign Minister Dar on Friday said relations between the two nations have improved since he visited Kabul last month. Last week, he also met Muttaqi and their Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, during a trilateral meeting in Beijing.
Following that meeting, China said it will 'continue to assist with improving Afghanistan-Pakistan ties'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Pakistan sweep series against Bangladesh as Haris hits 107 in third T20I
A nerveless century from Mohammad Haris has led Pakistan's chase of 197 runs to win the third T20 international cricket match against Bangladesh and complete a 3-0 series win in Lahore. Having won the first two matches after choosing to bowl first, Pakistan asked the visitors to bat first in the third match on Sunday at Gaddafi Stadium in Pakistan's eastern metropolis. Given a tricky target of 197, Pakistan lost Sahibzada Farhan – their highest scorer in the second T20I – in the first over to Mehidy Hasan Miraz. While the Pakistan of old may have crumbled under the pressure of losing a quick wicket, the new-look side under young captain Salman Agha and freshly-appointed coach Mike Hesson kept up their scoring rate. Saim Ayub and Haris formed a 92-run partnership as they took on the Bangladeshi bowling attack to maintain a high scoring rate and keep the target within sight. Ayub was dismissed in the 10th over by Tanzim Hasan Sakib after scoring 45 runs off 29 balls, but by then, Haris had taken on the role of the main hitter and kept the big shots coming. The wicketkeeper-batter hit seven sixes and eight fours in his 46-ball 107, which kept Bangladesh out of contention for most of Pakistan's innings. He was all smiles as he accepted the Player of the Match award and said that despite not performing well for Pakistan in the recent past, he kept working hard. 'I tried to learn from my mistakes and didn't want to waste this opportunity that I got to play in this series,' he said. Haris added that he batted with the simple plan of 'see ball, play ball' and didn't want to play any unnecessary shots. Earlier, Bangladesh's innings had got off to a swift start when Parvez Hossain Emon and Tanzid Hasan overpowered Pakistan's opening bowlers Ayub and Faheem Ashraf. They set up an opening stand of 110, but the Bangladeshi batting lineup derailed soon after Tanzid's departure in the 11th over. Despite starts from captain Litton Das (22 runs) and Towhid Hridoy (25 runs), the Tigers were unable to maintain the scoring rate set by the openers. A total of 196-6 in 20 overs ensured the home team faced some pressure when they came out to bat, but Pakistan's array of attacking batters disregarded scoreboard pressure and took their team home with 16 balls to spare. Pakistan captain Salman, who was on the pitch with Haris when the winning runs were scored, said he was delighted with his team's consistency. 'We want to test ourselves where things become difficult, and we wanted to chase to put the boys under pressure,' Salman explained after the match. The 3-0 series sweep was Pakistan's first since 2021.
Al Jazeera
15 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
India general admits jet losses in clash with Pakistan: Here's what he said
General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defence staff, has admitted that an unspecified number of fighter jets were shot down during its conflict with Pakistan last month. The acknowledgement of aerial losses by the country's highest ranking general comes weeks after the two South Asian neighbours were engaged in their heaviest fighting in decades, which involved fighter jets and cruise missiles. Indian officials had previously refused to confirm or deny Pakistani claims of downing Indian jets. The conflict was triggered after gunmen killed 26 tourists in India-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam town on April 22. India's first official admission of a loss of fighter jets came during Chauhan's interviews on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore. India carried out strikes on what it called 'terror infrastructure' in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir on May 7 in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack. India blamed armed groups backed by Pakistan for the April 22 attack. An armed group called The Resistance Front (TRF) claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam killings. India accused the TRF of being an offshoot of the Pakistan-based armed group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Pakistan denied involvement, condemning the Pahalgam attack and calling for a neutral investigation. India claimed to have targeted at least six cities in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir on the first day of the conflict. Pakistan initially asserted that it had downed six Indian fighter jets in retaliation. But a senior Pakistan official told Al Jazeera five Indian aircraft were lost in the aerial battle. India did not confirm or deny the Pakistani claims. 'Losses are a part of combat,' Air Marshal AK Bharti, India's director general of air operations, said at a news conference on May 11. The Indian embassy in China called reports of the downing of jets 'disinformation'. After that, tit-for-tat cross-border attacks across the Line of Control (LoC), the de facto border between India- and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, rattled the region, renewing fears of a nuclear war. On May 10, United States President Donald Trump announced that the two countries had reached a ceasefire, potentially averting a 'nuclear disaster'. India and Pakistan have given competing claims on casualties in the fighting, but more than 70 people were killed on both sides. Both India and Pakistan claim Kashmir in full but administer only parts of the Muslim-majority Himalayan territory. Here is what Chauhan said in recent interviews with the Reuters news agency and Bloomberg TV: Chauhan admitted that India suffered air losses on the first day of fighting without giving details. In an interview with Reuters, he said: 'What was important is why did these losses occur and what we'll do after that.' The Indian general said that after the losses, the Indian army 'rectified tactics' and then went back on May 7, 8 and 10 'in large numbers to hit airbases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defences with impunity, carried out precision strikes'. He added that the Indian air force 'flew all types of aircraft with all types of ordnances' on May 10. Islamabad acknowledged that its airbases suffered some minimal losses but denied that it lost any planes. When a Bloomberg reporter asked Chauhan about Pakistan's claims that six Indian jets were downed, Chauhan responded that this information was incorrect. He went on to say: 'What is important is … not the jets being downed but why they were downed.' Some media outlets inferred that his statement appeared to imply that a number of jets were lost in the aerial battle. The general did not provide details about the number of jets downed or specifics about what these rectified tactics were. The Pakistani military said India did not fly its fighter jets in the conflict again after suffering the air losses. Media reports suggested that some attacks were near Pakistan's nuclear sites but the nuclear infrastructure itself was not a target. 'Most of the strikes were delivered with pinpoint accuracy, some even to a metre [3.3ft] to whatever was our selected mean point of impact,' Chauhan said in the interview with Reuters. Chauhan had previously provided assurances that India was not considering using nuclear weapons during the conflict. The chairman of Pakistan's joint chiefs of staff, General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, has done the same for his country. 'I think there's a lot of space before that nuclear threshold is crossed, a lot of signalling before that. I think nothing like that happened. There's a lot of space for conventional operations which has been created, and this will be the new norm,' Chauhan said. The Indian general added that on both sides, the most 'rational people are in uniform' during conflict because they understand the consequences of 'this kind of conflict'. 'I found both sides displaying a lot of rationality in their thoughts as well as actions. So why should we assume that in the nuclear domain there will be irrationality on someone else's part?' The Indian chief of defence staff said that while Pakistan enjoys a close alliance with China, there was no sign that Beijing helped Islamabad during the conflict. China sits on India's northern and eastern borders and controls a barely inhabited northeastern zone in Kashmir called Aksai Chin. 'We didn't find any unusual activity in the operational or tactical depth of our northern borders, and things were generally all right,' Chauhan said. When Chauhan was asked whether China provided Pakistan with intelligence information such as satellite imagery, the Indian general responded by saying that such information is commercially available and Pakistan could have obtained it from China or other sources. However, Chauhan said 'almost 80 percent of the equipment' in Pakistan has been procured from China in the past few years. From 2020 to 2025, China supplied 81 percent of Pakistan's arms imports, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Chinese jets got a boost after media reports said Pakistan used Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighter jets in the air battle. The Chinese government did not officially confirm that the J-10C jets were used to down Indian jets, but China Central Television, a state broadcaster, posted on social media on May 17 that the jets achieved actual combat results for the first time. Chauhan said that while hostilities have ceased, India would 'respond precisely and decisively should there be any further terror attacks emanating from Pakistan'. He added that this will be a new normal for India. 'So that has its own dynamics as far [as] the armed forces are concerned. It will require us to be prepared 24/7.' The president of the main opposition Indian National Congress party said Chauhan's admission warrants a review of India's defence preparedness. 'There are some very important questions which need to be asked. These can only be asked if a Special Session of the Parliament is immediately convened,' Mallikarjun Kharge wrote in an X post on Saturday. Referring to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he added: 'The Modi Govt has misled the nation. The fog of war is now clearing.' 'We salute [the Indian military's] resolute courage and bravery,' Kharge said. 'However, a comprehensive strategic review is the need of the hour.' The Congress party has called the Pahalgam attack a 'security and intelligence failure' and sought accountability, given that India-administered Kashmir is directly governed from New Delhi.
Al Jazeera
19 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Bangladesh top court lifts ban on country's largest Muslim party
Bangladesh has restored the registration of the country's largest Muslim party, more than a decade after it was banned by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's government. Sunday's Supreme Court decision means the Jamaat-e-Islami party can now be formally listed with the Election Commission, paving the way for its participation in the next general election, which the interim government has promised to hold by June next year. Jamaat-e-Islami lawyer Shishir Monir said the ruling would allow a 'democratic, inclusive and multiparty system' in the Muslim-majority country of 170 million people. 'We hope that Bangladeshis, regardless of their ethnicity or religious identity, will vote for Jamaat and that the parliament will be vibrant with constructive debates,' Monir told journalists. The party had appealed for a review of a 2013 high court order cancelling its registration after Hasina's government was ousted in August by a student-led nationwide uprising. Hasina, 77, fled to India and is now being tried in absentia over her crackdown last year, described by prosecutors as a 'systematic attack' on protesters, which according to the United Nations, killed up to 1,400 people. The Supreme Court decision on Jamaat-e-Islami came after it overturned a conviction against ATM Azharul Islam, one of the party's key leaders, on Tuesday. Islam was sentenced to death in 2014 for rape, murder and genocide during Bangladesh's 1971 war of independence from Pakistan. Jamaat-e-Islami supported Pakistan during the war, a role that still sparks anger among many Bangladeshis today. 'We, as individuals or as a party, are not beyond making mistakes,' Jamaat-e-Islami leader Shafiqur Rahman said after Islam's conviction was overturned without specifying what he was referring to. 'We seek your pardon if we have done anything wrong,' he said. The party's members were rivals of Hasina's father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of the Awami League, who would become Bangladesh's founding president. Hasina banned Jamaat-e-Islami during her tenure and cracked down on its leaders. In May, Bangladesh's interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, banned the Awami League, pending the outcome of legal proceedings over its crackdown on last year's mass protests.
