'No plans' from Trump administration to send undocumented Irish to Guantanamo Bay
THERE ARE NO plans from the Trump administration to send Irish people residing illegally in the US to the country's facility in Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
It comes after reports from
local media in the US
last night said the Trump Administration was preparing to send hundreds of Europeans living illegally in the country to the facility.
A spokesperson for the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs told
The Journal
that while it is aware of the reports from US media, it is 'our understanding that there are no plans to deport EU citizens to Guantanamo Bay'.
The Washington Post
reported yesterday that residents from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Poland, Turkey and Ukraine may be detained at Guantanamo Bay.
The Irish foreign affairs department said it has engaged with EU partners and American authorities on the issue. A spokesperson for US Department of Homeland Security labelled the reports 'fake news'.
Advertisement
Commenting on the reports, which said that there would not be any engagement between the US and its European allies on the issue, White House Press Secretary
Karoline Leavitt said on X
: 'This story is Fake News. Not happening.'
Legal sources working with Irish immigrants in the US said today they had no knowledge of the plans. US President Donald Trump's election campaign was supported by a wave of anti-immigrant sentiment sweeping America.
He pledged to carry out 'the largest deportation operation in history', with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials cracking down on visa overstayers and people living in the US illegally.
ICE's tactics have led to
riots and protests in Los Angeles in California in recent days
.
The Journal
reported last month that undocumented Irish immigrants in the US are
not attending routine meeting with immigration officials over deportation fears
.
Legal sources have said there is no longer flexibility from ICE officials in dealing with or appealing cases. Its actions have been very visible, with military jets used to ostentatiously deport handcuffed people to foreign jails or Guantanamo Bay.
With reporting by Andrew Walsh
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Ireland to take soundings over EU joining UK-led sanctions against far-right Israeli ministers
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has already criticised one of the two men – the Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, leader of the National Religious Party-Religious Zionism. He and the Israeli security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are to be sanctioned by the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. The move has angered Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court in connection with alleged war crimes. Norway was previously involved with Ireland in a co-ordinated move to recognise a Palestinian state, which included diplomatic contact with Spain, Belgium, Malta and Slovenia last year. Ireland will explore possible sanctions from as early as next week, when Mr Martin attends a conference on a two-state solution, convened in New York by co-hosts France and Saudi Arabia. Sources said the contacts in New York could then potentially feed into discussion at an EU summit in Brussels the following week. EU high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas has been monitoring the move of the UK-led bloc, none of which are EU members. An Irish government source said: 'We have pushed for such sanctions at EU level, including at the recent meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council on May 20, but it requires unanimity and that isn't there for sanctioning these individuals at this point.' Mr Martin is also pursuing the suspension of the EU-Israel trade agreement, which would have a paralysing effect on Israeli exports. He told the Dáil earlier this month: 'I believe the agreement should now be suspended, pending a review,' adding that Ireland and Spain had first called for scrutiny of the deal under its human rights provisions. Mr Martin said he was aware of 'reprehensible' comments from Mr Smotrich. He said Mr Smotrich had been 'speaking openly about conquering Gaza, and, with God's help, pushing the population south and into third countries'. 'So this is a senior minister of the Israeli government articulating in no uncertain terms what the agenda is – and it is absolutely reprehensible,' the Taoiseach added. 'It is also absolutely unacceptable that innocent people were abducted and remain hostages so long after October 7, 2023.' He said it was 'wholly unacceptable' to contemplate the mass displacement of people in Gaza, or to talk of permanent occupation. 'Not only is it an affront to decency and to international law, but history tells us that it offers no solution.'
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Israel says it strikes Iran amid nuclear tensions
Israel said that it struck Iran, and Iranian media said explosions were heard in Tehran as tensions mounted over US efforts to win Iran's agreement to halt production of material for an atomic bomb. Israel said it was declaring a state of emergency in anticipation of a missile and drone strike by Tehran. An Israeli military official said Israel was striking "dozens" of nuclear and military targets. The official said Iran had enough material to make 15 nuclear bombs within days. "Following the preemptive strike by the State of Israel against Iran, a missile and UAV (drone) attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate timeframe," Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. Two US officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said Israel had begun carrying out strikes on Iran and there was no US assistance or involvement in the operation. CNN reported that US President Donald Trump was convening a cabinet meeting. Crude oil prices jumped more than $3 a barrel on the news. Iran's state TV said several explosions were heard in Tehran and the country's air defence system was on full alert. US and Iranian officials were scheduled to hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's escalating uranium enrichment programme in Oman, according to officials from both countries and their Omani mediators. But the talks have appeared to be deadlocked. Mr Trump said yesterday an Israeli strike on Iran "could very well happen" but reiterated his hopes for a peaceful resolution. US intelligence had indicated that Israel was making preparations for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, and US officials said on condition of anonymity that Israel could attack in the coming days. Israel has long discussed striking its longtime foe Iran in an effort to block Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. The US military is planning for the full range of contingencies in the Middle East, including the possibility that it might have to help evacuate American civilians, a US official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Cianan Brennan: Why didn't government admit its error with biometric public services cards?
Six years ago, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) went mano-a-mano with the government of the day over the infamous public services card, and ended up in a long legal war of attrition. That battle involved a simple question: Could the card be used as a catch-all portal for citizens accessing the State's services, regardless of their wishes? That particular spat was more than a little unedifying, ending up in a wholesale climbdown on the part of the Department of Social Protection in December 2021. However, yesterday's decision by the commission to fine the department €550,000 and order it to suspend the biometric processing of the public's data via the card should be even more seismic. €550,000 is five times the amount of the next-largest fine for breach of GDPR by a public body, and more than half of the maximum allowable. Puzzling defence of the indefensible Six years is a long time, however, and the world is a different place now. This time round, the State may be more willing to take its punishment from its own regulator. That in itself would be borderline farcical. The government — former social protection minister Regina Doherty being probably the most noteworthy culprit — argued for years that the card did not carry biometric data, despite it being plainly obvious to anyone with common sense that it did — in this case, a photo used for facial matching. Why did the State spend hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible? The answer may be because it couldn't afford not to. Why did it do so? Because it couldn't afford not to. Having stated until it was blue in the face that black was indeed white, to change tack in any way would have been legally disastrous. Why the government of the day couldn't just hold its hands up and admit fault in the first place, rather than spending hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible, we may never definitively know. However, we can speculate. The card is deeply ingrained in Irish society now, but that wasn't the case to quite the same extent in 2019. Furthermore, back then GDPR was brand new. It was so new that the initial investigation into the public service card was carried out under Ireland's previous Data Protection Act. Under that act, the commission had far fewer teeth to impose fines. GDPR is now a firmly embedded, if not universally beloved, EU policy. Maybe in 2019 it was felt the time wasn't right for the government to eat crow on its ambitious biometric card venture. Range of views in data protection community Those we polled yesterday across Ireland's niche data protection community had different views as to whether or not the Government, in the guise of the Department of Social Protection, will go the legal route once more. One said: The circumstances have changed. The data protection and GDPR landscape is much clearer now than it was under the old act. 'It seems more likely than not that this is one that won't be challenged, at least not in court.' However, there was little consensus. 'For years, they [the department] have been shouting that there is no biometric data on the card. Now this decision from the regulator is unequivocal that there is. Can they really back down from that? Would that be in character?' a second expert asked. DPC will defend its decision 'very robustly' Should the Government press the nuclear button once more and appeal the decision to the courts, deciding commissioner Dale Sutherland has made it clear that 'we will very robustly defend our decision'. He said: We are well used to this. It is a feature of our system. There are other puzzling aspects to yesterday's decision, not least the sheer length of time it took. The biometrics investigation had been set in train even before the 2019 decision, which dealt specifically with whether or not the government had the right to make the card mandatory for public services such as passport applications, yet it was only officially commenced in July of 2021. It then took four more years to complete, during which time the card has become ever more embedded in Irish society. That is surely an inordinate amount of time to take over a key investigation concerning personal data. 'This was a complex inquiry with complex issues,' Mr Sutherland said. 'The resources these inquiries take are just extraordinary. This one took a bit of time,' he added, while allowing 'it's probably a bit longer than we would have liked'. Digital Rights Ireland, whose initial complaint spurred the investigations back in 2017, professed itself 'concerned' at the length of time it had taken to finalise the probe. A spokesperson added that the decision 'leaves the Government in a very serious situation', given it has spent 'hundreds of millions of euro on an illegal public service card project'. Mr Sutherland stressed, however, that 'the important thing is that it [the investigation] is done now'. Asked whether the world had moved on in the last six years, he said: 'The principles haven't.'
