Labour's new housing is liable to fill up with asylum seekers
The Government has announced that it will spend £2 billion to build up to 18,000 social and affordable homes – but who will get them? It's part of their plan to build 1.5 million new homes over the course of this Parliament. Many responses to this were sceptical however. It has been suggested that these homes will be used to house asylum seekers.
That is because the Government's Office for Value for Money has concluded that the expensive migrant hotels, which Labour promised to shut down, will need to stay open for several years to come. However, they write in their report, the 1.5 million new homes will help to reduce that.
On the face of it, that might seem sensible. After the election, the Chancellor claimed that £4.6 billion of overspending on migrant hotels was part of a supposed £22 billion black hole. It costs £145 per night to keep an asylum seeker in a hotel, which is partly to blame for spending per asylum seeker soaring from £17,000 in 2020 to £41,000 now.
In contrast, putting them into dispersal accommodation, like houses and flats, costs £14 a night.
However, there were 8,000 more asylum seekers living in hotels at the end of last year than there were at the time of the General Election last July. That has been driven by more asylum seekers appealing their rejected claims, with the initial grant rate for asylum dropping from 75 per cent in 2022 to 47 per cent last year. There has also been an increase in small boat crossings, with more than 5,000 crossing the Channel already this year, a 24 per cent higher rate at this point in the year than last year.
So long as the flow of asylum seekers continues, the migrant hotels will have to stay open. Labour's plan to smash the gangs doesn't seem to be working, leaving the Government scrambling for new ideas, like 'return hubs' in the Balkans. The Italians have already tried this and failed, and, with human rights laws, it seems unlikely it would work for the UK either.
Those who do successfully get asylum often find themselves homeless, with 20,000 in this position by last November. At that point, councils are often required to house them in some of their limited stock of social housing or temporary accommodation.
That means that demand for these new social houses could be overwhelmed just by the number of asylum seekers already here, let alone the mounting numbers coming. In that case, many Nimbys might be justified in opposing new developments, if they will end up primarily benefiting asylum seekers rather than the British people who find themselves unable to get on the property ladder.
There are already calls for the Government to bring in migrant workers to build these homes which, combined with the number of those on skilled worker visas increasingly claiming asylum, creates the absurd possibility of immigrants claiming asylum and ending up living in the very homes they got a visa to build in the first place.
The asylum system is broken. The Government might want to listen to bolder voices in their own party, like Jonathan Brash MP, who has called for them to disapply the ECHR and deport foreign criminals. Only when they can secure our borders and stop the flow of new asylum seekers will it make sense to build more homes. In the meantime, British people will find themselves paying their taxes to build social housing they may never occupy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer doubles down on DWP PIP cuts as major Labour revolt looms
Most of the savings to the welfare bill will be made by restricting access to a key disability benefit - Personal Independence Payments (PIP) - in a move that has caused alarm Keir Starmer has stood by controversial welfare cuts despite facing the biggest revolt of his premiership so far. The Prime Minister insisted "we have got to get the reforms through" as he sidestepped questions over whether there would be any concessions on the plans. It comes as Mr Starmer braces for a massive revolt when Labour MPs are asked to vote on proposals aimed at slashing £5billion from welfare. Most of the savings will be made by restricting access to a key disability benefit - Personal Independence Payments (PIP) - in a move that has caused alarm among charities and campaigners. The government's own internal assessment said the reforms could result in an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, falling into poverty. READ MORE: Disability cut impact could be even worse than expected warns food bank charity Legislation implementing the changes is expected to be introduced in the Commons this week - before MPs are asked to vote on the changes. Well over 100 Labour MPs have called for a delay or suggested they will rebel. Asked whether he was confident he had the numbers to get the reforms through Parliament, Mr Starmer told reporters: "We've got to reform the welfare system. "Everybody agrees with that proposition. So we've got to do that basic reform. It doesn't work for those that need support and help into work and it doesn't work for the taxpayer. "So it's got to be reformed. The principles remain the same, those who can work should work. "Those who need support in to work should have that support in to work which I don't think they are getting at the moment. "Those who are never going to be able to work should be properly supported and protected. And that includes not being reassessed and reassessed. "So they are the principles, we need to do reform and we will be getting on with that reform when the bill comes." Pressed on whether there would be any more concessions to win over rebellious Labour MPs, Mr Starmer added: "Well we have got to get the reforms through and I have been clear about that from start to finish. "The system is not working, it's not working for those that need support, it's not working for taxpayers."
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact
Ottawa will seek to introduce legislation to its parliament this autumn to approve Britain's entry to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The UK joined the bloc in 2024, but Canada is yet to formally endorse its membership – meaning British exports to the country are not covered by the reduction in tariffs outlined in the pact. Following a bilateral meeting between the Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart in Ottawa's Parliament Hill on Sunday, Downing Street said the move would bring 'huge benefits' to UK businesses. Ahead of the @G7, Prime Minister @Keir_Starmer and I are meeting in Ottawa to discuss how Canada and the United Kingdom can work more closely together — to expand trade, create more opportunities for our workers and businesses, and strengthen transatlantic security. — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) June 15, 2025 The two leaders will also look to work through sticking points in a rollover British-Canadian trade deal after negotiations were suspended under the previous Tory government amid disputes over beef and cheese. Number 10 said a 'joint taskforce' would be set up to 'turbocharge progress on other areas of mutual benefit, including technology and artificial intelligence – in support of shared growth and our national security'. 'The taskforce will also look to make progress on the wider UK-Canada Free Trade Agreement,' Downing Street said. Mr Carney's office said they had also agreed on a partnership to strengthen collaboration on AI safety between the Canadian AI Safety Institute and the UK AI Security Institute. UK-Canada trade talks snagged before the election last year amid concerns among Canadian farmers over a UK ban on hormone-treated beef and import levies hiked on British cheese. But Downing Street said on Sunday that the Government's 'red lines' on food standards, which remain in place under its recently-agreed trade deal with the US, would not shift. The Government has reached economic agreements with India, the US and the EU in recent months and is looking to pursue further deals with other allies to mitigate the threat of Donald Trump's tariffs. The talks between Sir Keir and Mr Carney, which followed a private dinner on Saturday evening and a pint in an Ottawa pub where the pair watched a game of ice hockey, are a clear show of support from the UK premier ahead of the G7 summit in Kananaskis next week. Fantastic to find a British pint in Ottawa. Meeting Brits abroad, while delivering for people back home. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 15, 2025 The Prime Minister will be walking a diplomatic tightrope in the coming days as he seeks to strengthen bilateral relations with Canada while keeping the US president, who has repeatedly threatened to annex the country, on side. In warm words at the top of Sunday's meeting, Sir Keir appeared to issue a veiled challenge to Mr Trump's call to turn the nation into a '51st state'. 'For years, we've worked together as Commonwealth members, as independent, democratic sovereign countries, working alongside each other on issues of security, defence, trade, the economy, you name it,' he said. 'We think alike, we work alike, and I think that's not just a reflection on the past. I think it is very much needed in the here and now and how I think we can forge our future together as we go forward.' Mr Carney said the UK and Canada shared a 'foundation of prosperity' which would be built on in the future, including through developments in AI. 'It is a great pleasure, and I think entirely appropriate that my first official bilateral in Canada with a head of government is with Prime Minister Starmer,' he said. 'Canada and the United Kingdom, of course, share history – we share values, we share governance. 'We are a parliament inspired by the Westminster tradition, but it's much, much more than a heritage. 'This is a foundation of prosperity for all our citizens going forward, and a prosperity based on those shared values, expressed through the future – artificial intelligence, critical minerals, new partnerships in security and defence, but all in pursuit of sustainable prosperity for our citizens. 'And if I may, just on a personal level, I've learned a lot from the Prime Minister over the years. I'm a great admirer of his and the values that he's bringing to bear, to his government and… internationally.' Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney (PA) Sir Keir will fly from Ottawa to Kananaskis in the Canadian mountains for talks with counterparts from the world's leading economies. Spiralling conflict in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine will be top of the agenda in the talks between the UK, Canada, the US, France, Italy, Japan and Germany. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend. Number 10 said the Prime Minister would use the trip to urge 'restraint and de-escalation' after Iran launched retaliatory strikes on Israel overnight. 'In these dangerous times, I am determined to forge a unique path to secure and renew Britain in an era of global instability,' he said. Sir Keir is also expected to meet Mr Trump, with whom he said he is in the 'final stages' of completing a US-UK trade deal, at the G7 summit. The Prime Minister told reporters on Saturday he had a 'good relationship' with the US president and 'that's important'. 'I've been saying, for probably the best part of six months now, we're in a new era of defence and security, a new era for trade and the economy,' he said. 'And I think it's really important for Britain to play a leading part in that, and that's what I'll be doing at the G7, talking to all of our partners in a constructive way. 'And I'm very pleased that I have developed good relations with all the G7 leaders to the point where… I have a very good relations with all of them.'
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
UK Government advises against all travel to Israel as tensions with Iran escalate
The Foreign Office issued the urgent guidance on Sunday, saying people should avoid all travel to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Brits have been warned not to travel to Israel as violence in the region continues amid growing tensions between Israel and Iran. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Officer issued the urgent travel advice on Sunday to advise "against all travel to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories". David Lammy has said that the safety of British nationals "remains our top priority". Israel and Iran exchanged fire overnight, after Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK was sending more RAF jets to the region amid the increasing hostilities. The FCDO also warned that anyone travelling against the advice could find their travel insurance invalid. Sir Keir Starmer continued in diplomatic discussions about the conflict, in a call with the president of the UAE on Sunday. According to a readout of his conversation with His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan issued by Downing Street, "they discussed the grave situation in the Middle East". "The Prime Minister reiterated that his priority is diplomacy and dialogue, in order to de-escalate as quickly as possible," it added. Earlier on Sunday, Rachel Reeves said that sending more jets to the region "does not mean" the UK is at war. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. The Chancellor also didn't rule out the UK "potentially" offering more support to Israel in the future, but declined to comment on "what might happen in the future". Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: "No, it does not mean that we are at war. "And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. "It's a precautionary move." Meanwhile, oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is "no complacency" from the Treasury on the issue and "we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government". Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could "potentially" support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: "We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. "I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies." Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: "What we've done in the past (...) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. "So a defensive activity." She added: "I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (...) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation." It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the "right thing" to do. He told the BBC: "We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat."
