Prison officers told to wear body armour in high-security jails after attacks
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said prison officers would be told to wear body armour in settings at the highest categories of prisons in England and Wales, telling MPs it would apply to close supervision centres, separation centres and segregation units.
It came as shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick repeated his warning that a prison officer could be killed unless stronger action is taken.
The incident at HMP Long Lartin on Saturday was the latest in a series of attacks on prison officers in recent months. The staff member at the prison near Evesham, Worcestershire, had to undergo emergency surgery after being stabbed by an inmate and is now said to be in a stable condition.
Meanwhile in May, Southport triple killer Axel Rudakubana was accused of throwing boiling water at a prison officer through a cell door at HMP Belmarsh, causing minor injuries.
A month previously, Manchester bomb plotter Hashem Abedi was moved to Belmarsh from HMP Frankland after allegedly throwing boiling cooking oil at three prison officers. Abedi was previously found guilty of attacking a prison officer in 2020.
Ms Mahmood asked Jonathan Hall KC to lead an independent review into events at Frankland in County Durham, which will examine whether current protection for prison officers is sufficient. He will also evaluate whether separation centres, which are in place to manage the most dangerous prisoners, are fit for purpose.
A prisoner officer at HMP Long Lartin in Worcestershire was stabbed on Saturday (Jacob King/PA)
She told MPs on Tuesday: 'Today, I can announce I will mandate its use in close supervision centres, separation centres and segregation units in the high security estate.
'This is my initial response to the review, but I will set out further action on body armour in due course.
'When Jonathan Hall's independent review into the Frankland attack reports, I will take any further steps necessary to protect our brave staff.'
Mr Jenrick told MPs he still fears for prison officers' safety, as he hit out at Rudakubana having access to 'treats' such as Pringles and Maltesers.
He said: 'Brave prison officers are under attack if the Government doesn't act now. I'm warning once again that an officer will be killed on the Justice Secretary's watch.
After the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana allegedly attacked an officer with boiling water, he is now bingeing on treats like Maltesers and Pringles.
'When will the Justice Secretary strip Rudakubana and monsters like him of these privileges and put them in solitary confinement, and when will she finally have the backs of all our brave prison officers by giving each and every one of them the protection that they need in the form of high-collar, stab-proof vests, not just a privileged view in the most limited circumstances?'
Ms Mahmood said: 'Let me just give the shadow minister a much-needed education here because he appears not to know that under the Tory government, violence on staff in our prisons soared and experienced officers left in droves because of it.
'That is inheritance that I have received and that is the mess that this Government is clearing up. He will know I have already acted on suspending the use of self-cook facilities, I've got Jonathan Hall looking into the HMP Frankland attack, I've made the announcement on body armour, and I won't hesitate to take any further action, but unlike him I won't make, and I quote 'headline-grabbing measures', just for the sake of a headline.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
GMB's Susanna Reid calls out troll with 'brilliant' six-word reply
Good Morning Britain star Susanna Reid had a 'brilliant' six-word response for a troll on social media Good Morning Britain's Susanna Reid had the perfect six-word retort to a Twitter, now X, troll who targeted her on Wednesday night. Earlier this week, Susanna, 54, was praised by viewers for her fierce grilling of Robert Jenrick during a fiery interview. The shadow Lord Chancellor and Shadow Secretary of State for Justice made headlines after footage of him challenging TFL commuters over fare evasion went viral. In one tense moment captured on film, a man on an escalator hinted he was armed with a blade to deter Jenrick from questioning him further. Despite the politician's efforts to steer the conversation back to fare evasion during Monday's Good Morning Britain, Susanna zoned in on the alarming revelation of a knife-carrying passenger, reports the Manchester Evening News. After that hard-hitting interview, one social media critic took aim at Susanna, scornfully asking on Twitter, now X: "When was the last time you got The Tube, Susanna? You, literally, have no clue what it's like." To which Susanna responded in a six-word response: "I am currently on the tube." This comeback drew support from Susanna's followers, with one saying: "Brilliant Susanna" and throwing in a thumbs-up and tearful laughter emoji, another chiming in with: "Touché" while another added: "Love a good take down." Only days ago, Susanna pressed Jenrick on not immediately notifying the authorities upon learning someone might be armed on the underground, expressing her frustration by declaring: "Somebody told you that they were carrying a knife on the London Underground and you didn't report it to the police." Her anxiety intensified when she said: "I travel on the tube, my kids travel on the tube, and someone has just told you, a former shadow minister, someone who is concerned about policing and obeying the law, you're worried about fare-dodging, I'm worried about people carrying knives, and you didn't report it to the police?". Jenrick stood by his choice not to inform the authorities, asserting: "It's not about me." Susanna, however, was unimpressed and rebuked him, stating: "I don't want to be disrespectful to you, you made it all about you." She wrapped up her argument with a critical observation about the footage: "The video was literally all about you — it's you walking around tube stations, confronting people. "So to say that you didn't report what was said to you because you're saying you didn't want to make it all about you is disingenuous." Good Morning Britain airs weekdays from 6am on ITV and ITV X.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Our two-tier justice system is turning Lucy Connolly into a martyr
Court of Appeal judges may believe that they were right to deny early release to Lucy Connolly, the 42-year-old Northamptonshire childminder who is serving 31 months in prison for an offensive tweet about asylum seekers. But even if they maintain that her sentence was just, I think they would have been wise to let her out anyway – for a simple and pragmatic reason. Keeping her locked up is eroding public faith in the justice system. Because, almost every single day now, we read of criminals being convicted of what seem like far worse crimes than hers – and yet somehow avoiding jail. Indeed, some of them manage to avoid it more than once. In 2022, a paedophile in South Shields admitted three charges of 'making indecent images of children' (as the law calls it), as well as one charge of possessing extreme pornography (which involved bestiality). As the judge at the time noted, however, 'You identify as transgender and that has caused issues for you and anxiety for you in how you would cope with that if you were sent immediately to prison.' Well, I suppose it would, although why we're meant to worry about prison being unpleasant for paedophiles, I'm not sure. But at any rate, he wasn't sent to prison. And nor was he sent there this week, when he was hauled back to court after breaching a sexual harm prevention order. On this occasion, the judge (a different one this time) said: 'You would undoubtedly be at risk of physical or sexual assault in custody because of your presentation in a male prison.' These words are of course wonderfully kind and compassionate. But, just for a moment, let's set aside questions of 'identity', and ask: which do we think is the worse crime? Writing something horrible on the internet about asylum hotels? Or downloading images of children being sexually abused – thus boosting the market for such images, and ensuring that more children will be sexually abused in future? Now, I haven't conducted a nationwide opinion poll on the above question. But I'm fairly confident that I can guess what the result would be. And I'm equally confident that I'm not alone in remembering the name 'Lucy Connolly' every time I read about some thug or pervert sauntering off with a suspended sentence. I don't for a moment deny that what Mrs Connolly wrote was awful. Nor do I deny that she broke the law. Yet our two-tier justice system is contriving to turn her into a martyr. So, even if the powers that be have no sympathy for her, they should at least look after their own interests. Which means letting her out.
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
What James Cleverly gets wrong about net zero
The Conservatives were nearly wiped out at last July's general election, and the party is currently trailing Nigel Farage's Reform in the polls. You might think then that the handful of remaining 'big beasts' on the Tory benches would decide to try and work together. Instead, a split appears to be emerging in the party over net zero. James Cleverly took a thinly-veiled swipe at Kemi Badenoch's green policy in a speech to the Conservative Environment Network (CEN) last night. In one of her first major policy interventions as leader, Badenoch abandoned the Conservatives' support for the country reaching net zero emissions by 2050. But Cleverly has now argued that the party should not give up on the climate agenda. In his speech, he took aim at what he called 'neo-luddites' on the right who seem scared of using green technologies to protect the environment:
