logo
Nearly two centuries on, quiet settles on Afghanistan's British Cemetery

Nearly two centuries on, quiet settles on Afghanistan's British Cemetery

News.com.au14 hours ago

Aynullah Rahimi's family has for decades tended the old cemetery in Kabul reserved for non-Afghans, but since the country's latest war ended and foreigners left in droves, he says few now enter the oasis of quiet in the capital.
Dating back to the Anglo-Afghan wars of the 19th century, the small plot of land in the city centre has interred and memorialised foreign fighters, explorers and devotees of Afghanistan who have died in the country over some 180 years.
In the two decades of war between Western forces and the Taliban that ended in 2021 with the latter's victory, there were a handful of burials and memorials attended by ambassadors and dignitaries at the British Cemetery.
But these days, Rahimi quietly tends to the garden of roses and apricot trees, the calls of caged partridges louder than the rumbling traffic beyond the high stone wall that secludes the cemetery.
"Before the Taliban came to power, many foreigners used to come here to visit every week," he told AFP.
"No one visits here much now, only sometimes a few tourists," he said.
The paint on the walls -- hung with commemorative plaques for the dead of NATO countries who fought the Taliban, as well as journalists who covered the conflict -- has chipped and weathered since the Taliban takeover in 2021, when Western embassies emptied.
Where Kabul was once teeming with Western soldiers, diplomats, journalists and humanitarians, their presence has thinned dramatically.
Adventurers from around the world are increasingly travelling to the country, despite lingering security risks and Taliban-imposed restrictions primarily targeting Afghan women -- including a general ban on women entering Kabul's parks.
For those who know what's behind the wall marked only by a small sign reading "British Cemetery", they can pause in the shade in one of the few green spaces in the city fully open to foreign women.
"This is a historical place," Rahimi said, noting he hasn't had interference by the Taliban authorities.
Those whose countrymen are memorialised there are welcome, he added -- "it's their graveyard".
- The Ritchies -
The last time the cemetery was full of the living, Rahimi said, was the burial of the latest person to be interred there -- Winifred Zoe Ritchie, who died in 2019 at the age of 99.
Ritchie's family brought her body from the United States to Afghanistan to be laid to rest next to her husband, Dwight, who was killed in a car crash in southern Afghanistan 40 years earlier.
The Ritchies had worked and lived in Afghanistan, one of their sons later following in their footsteps -- cementing the family's ties to a country far from their homeland.
The couple's daughter, Joanna Ginter, has memories of her family wandering through markets, flying kites and raising pigeons in Kabul years before the city was engulfed by the first of many conflicts that wracked the country for 40 years.
Their mother's burial "was the first time (we visited) since we were there for my dad's funeral", Ginter told AFP, having travelled back to Kabul with relatives.
"I was very happy to get to go there, even though it was for a funeral."
Her mother's grave marker stands out in light marble among the headstones, wobbly letters next to a long cross -- a rare sight in Afghanistan.
Older gravestones of some of the more than 150 people buried there bear the scars of conflict, names pockmarked into near unrecognisability by weapon fire that breached the wall.
Other than thieves who broke through a fence where the cemetery backs onto a hill dotted with Muslim graves -- "our graveyard", Rahimi calls it -- the caretaker says he is left mostly alone to his watch.
The 56-year-old grew up helping his uncle who raised him tend to the cemetery, taking over its care from his cousin who fled to Britain during the chaotic withdrawal of foreign forces as the Taliban marched into Kabul.
He had in turn taken up the post from his father, who guarded the cemetery and dug some of its graves for around 30 years.
"They also told me to go to England with them, but I refused and said I would stay here, and I have been here ever since," Rahimi said, certain one of his sons would follow in his footsteps.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU's top diplomat warns of long-term Russian aggression
EU's top diplomat warns of long-term Russian aggression

The Advertiser

time2 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

EU's top diplomat warns of long-term Russian aggression

Russia poses a direct threat to the European Union through acts of sabotage and cyberattacks, but its massive military spending suggests that President Vladimir Putin also plans to use his armed forces elsewhere in the future, the EU's top diplomat warns. "Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Wednesday, listing a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables. Kallas noted that Russia was already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and in 2025 would invest more "on defence than its own health care, education and social policy combined". "This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it," Kallas told EU MPs in Strasbourg, France. "Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has said Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year. He believes Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a NATO ally by the end of the decade. The acts of sabotage and cyberattacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said. But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test NATO's Article 5 security guarantee - the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32. In 2021, NATO allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyberattacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken. With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position. Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service, Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions towards the West and NATO. "We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West," Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9. Russia poses a direct threat to the European Union through acts of sabotage and cyberattacks, but its massive military spending suggests that President Vladimir Putin also plans to use his armed forces elsewhere in the future, the EU's top diplomat warns. "Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Wednesday, listing a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables. Kallas noted that Russia was already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and in 2025 would invest more "on defence than its own health care, education and social policy combined". "This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it," Kallas told EU MPs in Strasbourg, France. "Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has said Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year. He believes Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a NATO ally by the end of the decade. The acts of sabotage and cyberattacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said. But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test NATO's Article 5 security guarantee - the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32. In 2021, NATO allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyberattacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken. With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position. Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service, Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions towards the West and NATO. "We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West," Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9. Russia poses a direct threat to the European Union through acts of sabotage and cyberattacks, but its massive military spending suggests that President Vladimir Putin also plans to use his armed forces elsewhere in the future, the EU's top diplomat warns. "Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Wednesday, listing a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables. Kallas noted that Russia was already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and in 2025 would invest more "on defence than its own health care, education and social policy combined". "This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it," Kallas told EU MPs in Strasbourg, France. "Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has said Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year. He believes Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a NATO ally by the end of the decade. The acts of sabotage and cyberattacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said. But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test NATO's Article 5 security guarantee - the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32. In 2021, NATO allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyberattacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken. With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position. Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service, Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions towards the West and NATO. "We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West," Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9. Russia poses a direct threat to the European Union through acts of sabotage and cyberattacks, but its massive military spending suggests that President Vladimir Putin also plans to use his armed forces elsewhere in the future, the EU's top diplomat warns. "Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Wednesday, listing a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables. Kallas noted that Russia was already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and in 2025 would invest more "on defence than its own health care, education and social policy combined". "This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it," Kallas told EU MPs in Strasbourg, France. "Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has said Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year. He believes Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a NATO ally by the end of the decade. The acts of sabotage and cyberattacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said. But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test NATO's Article 5 security guarantee - the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32. In 2021, NATO allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyberattacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken. With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position. Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service, Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions towards the West and NATO. "We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West," Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9.

‘Crucial' for Albanese to attend NATO in order to secure Trump meeting
‘Crucial' for Albanese to attend NATO in order to secure Trump meeting

Sky News AU

time5 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Crucial' for Albanese to attend NATO in order to secure Trump meeting

Former LNP candidate Maggie Forrest urges Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to attend the NATO Summit in a bid to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump. 'I do think that Albanese should go to NATO to pursue a meeting with President Trump,' Ms Forrest told Sky News host Paul Murray. 'While an in-person meeting between the two of them should've happened a long time ago given how crucial Australia's strategic partnership with America is and especially with AUKUS under review … it's crucial for the Prime Minister to travel to NATO to secure a meeting with President Trump.'

‘Date night disaster': Albanese's G7 snub branded a ‘foreign affairs failure'
‘Date night disaster': Albanese's G7 snub branded a ‘foreign affairs failure'

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Date night disaster': Albanese's G7 snub branded a ‘foreign affairs failure'

GXO Strategies Director Cameron Milner says the G7 forum was a 'date night disaster' and a 'foreign affairs failure' for the Prime Minister. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is considering a snap visit to The Hague for the NATO summit in an attempt to secure a long-anticipated face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump. Mr Albanese has been scrambling to re-establish direct dialogue with the Trump administration on key issues, including the AUKUS defence pact and trade tariffs. 'What an absolute embarrassment for Albo to have gone all the way to Canada for a 20-minute meeting as a sidebar and then been snubbed,' Mr Milner told Sky News host Andrew Bolt.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store