Major airline slashes economy fares on transatlantic travel
Air France is cutting economy ticket prices on transatlantic flights amid weakening demand, according to the airline's chief executive.
Ben Smith acknowledged a "slight softness" in economy-class fares, contrasting with the "relative stability" seen in premium cabins, in an interview with Bloomberg TV.
While the airline hasn't yet adjusted its flight capacity, Smith expressed concern about the potential impact of a broader economic downturn.
He noted that the travel industry is often among the first to feel the effects of economic downturns, describing the current situation as "uncharted territory". The price cuts appear to be a strategic move to maintain full planes despite the softening demand.
Air France confirmed that Smith had made the comments.
Shares of European airline groups have plunged after US President Donald Trump revealed on April 2 his "reciprocal" tariff plan that included an imposition of 20 per cent tariffs on European Union products such as Airbus AIR.PA planes.
The EU is set to launch its first counter-measures against Trump's tariffs next week.
Air France last month launched a new first-class suite as it expands efforts to lure wealthy travellers.
Mr Smith said the new investment aimed to place the company at the top of the European league in airline luxury, signalling a battle with British Airways and Lufthansa.
"A large percentage of the customers are flying for business reasons ... Many of them have the choice of a private jet or flying in first class," Smith said in an interview.
"What is new for us over the last few years is a marked increase in the number of luxury customers that are flying for leisure purposes."
The air travel industry is locked in a battle for high fare-paying customers as it recovers from the pandemic but is split over the value of investing in first class, with many carriers focusing on steady improvements in business-class seating.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
29 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
New EU rules mean Brits will now get LESS compensation if their flight is delayed
Plus, an urgent summer holiday warning has been issued, as thousands of Brits brace for worst flight delays in 25 YEARS PLANE UNFAIR New EU rules mean Brits will now get LESS compensation if their flight is delayed A CHANGE to a European travel rule will mean that Brits will get less compensation if their flight is delayed. Currently, legislation called EU261 means that European air passengers are entitled to compensation if their flight is delayed by over three hours or cancelled. Advertisement 2 Legislation called EU261, means that European air passengers are entitled to compensation if their flight is delayed Credit: Reuters And despite leaving the European Union in 2020, the UK decided to adopt this regulation into law - meaning that British travellers benefit from the same rule as European travellers. The regulation however went under review in Brussels back in April and it has now been decided that the amount of time a flight is delayed by before getting compensation has increased. Currently, Brits can get compensation if their flight is delayed for three hours or more, for short-haul flights under 3,500km. However, the new rules mean this will be increased to four hours - so anything less than this won't be eligible for compensation. Advertisement For longer flights (over 3,500km), airlines will now pay compensation if flights land at least six hours late - up from the current four-hour standard. And how much compensation can be given has changed as well. Under the new rules, €300 (£252.75) compensation will apply for delays of more than four hours, rather than €400. And €500 (£421.25) compensation will apply to delays of more than six hours involving flights of more than 3,500km, rather than €600. Advertisement However, the agreement to extend delay times and cut compensation has been met with some opposition, including from Spain and Germany. Despite this, the Council bypassed discussions with the European Parliament and made its decision legally binding using a process that has not been used in more than a decade. Flight cancelled or delayed? Top tips for handling travel disruptions The European Parliament, however, can still make changes to the new rules. From now, it has four months to respond to the suggested new riles with a proposal that must be backed by a majority of 361 MEPS. Advertisement If approved, the current EU Air Passenger Rights Regulation rules - where passengers can claim between €250 (£210.62) and €600 (£505.50) in compensation if a flight is delayed by at least three hours, if the delay is the fault of the airline - will be scrapped. Other compensation rules will remain unchanged. If the delay or cancellation is due to an 'extraordinary circumstance', compensation will not be paid. These circumstances usually include extreme weather, political instability, security risks or issues with air traffic control. Advertisement Strikes are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances and the same with routine mechanical issues or staff shortages. Whilst this rule covers airlines that are registered in the EU or flights taking off from and EU or Schengen zone country, since Brexit the British government has pretty much copied the rules into UK legislation. This means, that if the new rules are also not opposed by European Parliament, it looks likely that the UK government would also enshrine it into legislation. This week, Brits have also been stranded in Spain as easyJet cancels scores of flights over ATC restrictions. Advertisement Plus, an urgent summer holiday warning has been issued, as thousands of Brits brace for worst flight delays in 25 YEARS.
North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Japanese lunar lander crashes while attempting touchdown on the Moon
Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the Moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. Takeshi Hakamada, ispace chief executive officer and founder, apologised to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for the company. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name Resilience for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the Moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. 'This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Mr Hakamada told reporters. He stressed the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Long the province of governments, the Moon became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than successes along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the Moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the Moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the Moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5ft Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for Nasa. The rover was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than one inch per second.
South Wales Guardian
34 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Japanese lunar lander crashes while attempting touchdown on the Moon
Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the Moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. Takeshi Hakamada, ispace chief executive officer and founder, apologised to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for the company. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name Resilience for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the Moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. 'This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Mr Hakamada told reporters. He stressed the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Long the province of governments, the Moon became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than successes along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the Moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the Moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the Moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5ft Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for Nasa. The rover was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than one inch per second.
