High Court grants bail on Indian citizen charged with CBT
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court today granted bail to an Indian citizen facing criminal breach of trust (CBT) charges, setting bail at RM50,000 in two local sureties and ordered his passport to be impounded.
This came after Judge K. Muniandy granted 57-year-old Rajinder Singh's application to revise a Sessions Court ruling which denied him bail after he was charged earlier this week.
Sessions Court judge Zulqarnain Hassan had denied Rajinder bail for the non-bailable offence under Section 409 of the Penal Code.
Rajinder, the director of Vantage Trading Partners, was accused of committing CBT on his company's funds amounting to RM141,486.12, and using the money without consent or ratification of a general meeting at Ilham Tower, Jalan Binjai on Oct 13 and Nov 26, 2021.
During proceedings today, Rajinder's lawyer, Daniel Annamalai said the Sessions Court had denied his client bail because he is a foreigner with the risk of absconding.
Rajinder, clad in plainclothes in the dock, said he had just arrived from the hospital where he was treated for his chronic diseases.
He told the judge that he had been operating his business in Malaysia for the past seven to eight years and possessed an employment pass.
In a rebuttal, deputy public prosecutor Izalina Abdullah said at the earlier Sessions Court's proceedings, the prosecution had offered a RM70,000 bail but it was refused by Zulqarnain.
"As we know, the court can use its discretion to allow bail. If this court allows it, we suggest the same sum in two sureties.
"Additionally, we ask for the applicant (accused) to surrender his passport to the court," she said.
Daniel described the RM70,000 bail as steep and asked for RM40,000 instead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
24 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'No mechanism for victims to remove revenge porn' - Lawyers' group
GEORGE TOWN: Existing laws aimed at protecting people, especially children, from sexual exploitation are insufficient to tackle the rise of revenge and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated pornography, said a lawyers' group. Jasmine Wong, president of the Association of Women Lawyers (AWL), said laws, such as the Sexual Offences Against Children Act and the Penal Code provisions that criminalise child sexual abuse material, focused on punishment after the fact. She said Malaysia lacked a mechanism for victims to swiftly demand the removal of harmful content, such as the United States' new "Take it Down" Act. Wong said Malaysia's Online Safety Bill 2024, passed last December and awaiting to be gazetted, expanded the government's regulatory powers over child sexual abuse material and cyberbullying. "However, it does not address the rapid spread of deepfake or AI-generated sexual abuse content, leaving a critical gap in protection. "The current laws are reactive and rely heavily on criminal prosecution, which is often slow and emotionally draining for survivors. "There is no legal right for minors or their guardians to request the immediate takedown of non-consensual explicit images, forcing survivors to endure prolonged trauma and public stigma," she told the New Straits Times. Earlier this year, a teenager in Johor was arrested for producing and selling deepfake sexual images of his female classmates. He is being investigated under Section 292 of the Penal Code for distributing obscene material and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act for sharing offensive content. Wong said a central takedown platform, possibly under the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), could improve coordination and response times. She added that social media companies should adopt the best practices in the US' "Take it Down" Act, which sets timelines for content removal or risk penalties under MCMC's licensing regime. "AI developers must build safeguards to detect and prevent the misuse of AI-generated content, and schools and educators play a vital role in addressing digital abuse promptly and educating students on safe online behaviour. "Digital literacy campaigns and parental guidance are essential to equip children with the skills and support needed to navigate the online world safely." AWL vice-president Denise Lim said the "Take it Down" Act has been hailed by advocates and victims' families as a powerful tool to protect dignity and privacy in the digital age. "Malaysia needs urgent legal reform that reflects the realities of digital sexual abuse, combining punitive measures with proactive protections for victims. "Effective enforcement, swift takedown procedures, and multi-sector collaboration are key to safeguarding young people in an increasingly online world," she said. Lim added that as digital sexual abuse evolved, so must laws meant to combat it.
New Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Majuperak plots growth in renewable energy, housing and tourism after strategic reset
KUALA LUMPUR: Majuperak Holdings Bhd is charting its next phase of growth on the back of a three-year transformation plan, said group chief executive officer Muhammad Yazurin Sallij. After a year of restructuring, the Perak state-linked company returned to the black in the first quarter of 2025 (Q1) with a net profit of RM1.45 million, buoyed largely on one-off land sales and dividend gains. Muhammad Yazurin Sallij said the company is now focused on delivering organic growth, anchored by a series of initiatives in property development, renewable energy and tourism. "We look forward to a strengthened second half of 2025, primarily driven by the Taman Tasik Ardea development, which is a key revenue and profit contributor," he told Business Times, adding that it will serve as a central pillar of Majuperak's recurring income strategy. A significant portion of Majuperak's Q1 earnings came from non-recurring items including a RM5 million land disposal and RM697,000 in dividend income. At the same time, operating cash flow remained negative while receivables more than doubled, suggesting potential pressure on collections or the structuring of recent deals. Still, Muhammad Yazurin maintains that the group is on firmer footing following its 2024 reset. "We are transforming into a leaner, performance-driven organisation with enhanced governance and a sharper mandate aligned to state priorities," he said. Majuperak's expansion into renewable energy via its subsidiary Majuperak Energy Resources Sdn Bhd forms part of its long-term strategy though the segment's current scale remains modest. The unit posted a segment profit of RM672,000 in Q1, reversing a RM60,000 loss a year earlier, according to the company's latest unaudited financial report. Looking ahead, Muhammad Yazurin said initiatives such as commercial solar rooftops, electric vehicle charging hubs and solar street lighting are set to launch this year. He added larger-scale solar projects involving Shizen International Inc, MK Land Holdings Bhd and Gamuda Bhd are expected to start contributing revenue from 2026. Tourism, another strategic pillar, is being scaled with developments at Teluk Batik Resort and Gua Tempurung. The group aims to replicate the success of Tasik Cermin, which reportedly drew 1.2 million visitors. On the commercial front, Majuperak has converted the former Silveritage Galleria into Bazar Ipoh with 94 per cent occupancy and plans to expand programming through a one-stop centre for Perak-made products. In property development, several new housing schemes are in the pipeline, including the RM64.6 million Trong Bakti project slated for the fourth quarter and the RM48 million Changkat Rembian development set for early 2026. The group's pivot toward affordable housing in Perak, including ongoing developments in Batu Gajah, Langkap, Chemor and Ulu Kinta, is expected to form the backbone of its earnings base. However, the segment remains vulnerable to market conditions particularly in terms of demand absorption and rising construction costs. "The group has taken steps to strengthen our board, improve governance and restore financial discipline. We are determined to uplift our current status and continue delivering value to shareholders," said Muhammad Yazurin. On Friday, Majuperak shares rose one sen or 7.69 per cent to close at 14 sen, with 25,800 units traded. This valued the company at RM39.82 million. Year-to-date, it has fallen 28.2 per cent from 19.5 sen on Jan 2.
New Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Rivers as the New Frontlines of Geopolitics
We are used to thinking of power grids, trade routes, and semiconductor fabs as the terrain of 21st-century power competition. But now add rivers—yes, rivers—to that list. Not just as lifelines of civilisation, but as instruments of national leverage. What's unfolding high on the Tibetan plateau, in a canyon deeper than the Grand Canyon and barely touched by modernity, is a tectonic shift—both literal and geopolitical. China's proposed mega-dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo—known downstream as the Brahmaputra—isn't just an engineering feat. It's a declaration. At $137 billion and 60,000 megawatts, it will dwarf even the Three Gorges Dam. But its real power isn't electrical—it's geopolitical. This isn't just about energy. It's about sovereignty, security, and survival in an age where climate instability and great power rivalry are converging. China's Hydro-Imperium: Controlling the Source The dam sits in Tibet, the "Water Tower of Asia," source of major rivers that sustain over a billion people across 10 countries. For Beijing, it's part green transition, part strategic assertion. At one level, it's about reducing coal dependence and meeting net-zero targets. At another, it's about establishing hydro-sovereignty: the idea that whoever controls the headwaters controls the future. This becomes starkly provocative when we consider Asia's hydro-geometry. China sits upstream of the Brahmaputra, Mekong, Irrawaddy, and Salween—rivers that snake into India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Unlike India, which is bound by the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan and the Ganges Treaty with Bangladesh, China has signed no binding transboundary water agreements. It prefers soft, bilateral deals—tools it can adjust as strategic needs evolve. India's Strategic Counter: Deterrence Through Waterworks That's why India is alarmed. From New Delhi's perspective, this is not just another dam— it's a hydrological threat vector. It gives China the power to flood, throttle, or reroute a river that nourishes India's northeast, sustains Bangladesh's delta, and symbolises shared South Asian destiny. Indian policymakers worry Beijing could weaponise seasonal flows— triggering sudden surges during monsoons or withholding water during critical planting seasons. That's not paranoia. That's strategic realism in an age of gray-zone conflict. India's response? Not missiles—but megawatts. The revival of its Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP), just downstream of the proposed Chinese dam, is both symbolic and strategic. On paper, it's about power generation. In reality, it's about deterrence. It sends a message: You control the upstream, but we can shape the downstream. And there's more. India's recent suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan— once a pillar of regional stability—marks a sharp turn in water diplomacy. The 1960 World Bank-brokered agreement had weathered decades of war and tension. But following a recent conflict and accusations of cross-border terrorism, India withdrew, citing Islamabad's refusal to renegotiate outdated terms. For Pakistan, which depends heavily on the Indus for irrigation, the implications are severe. And here's the kicker: the Brahmaputra has no treaty at all—no buffer, no arbitrator—just rising stakes and deepening mistrust. Ecology at the Edge: Sacred Lands Under Siege The fallout isn't just political. It's ecological. The Yarlung Tsangpo Canyon is a vertical Eden—home to snow leopards, Bengal tigers, 330-foot-tall cypress trees, and thousands of plant species. It's a living archive of Asia's natural history, shaped over millennia. Yet both Chinese and Indian dam projects threaten to unravel this biodiversity in the name of "national interest." The canyon is sacred to the Indigenous Adi and Monpa peoples, who have lived in its shadow for centuries. But their voices are absent from the rooms where dam blueprints are being drawn. This is no longer just a clash between nations. It's a collision between technocracy and tradition, between megaprojects and memory. Asia's Water Reckoning: From Cooperation to Contestation All of this plays into a larger game—the Asian chessboard of the 21st century. China and India are nominally partners in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. But beneath that façade lies a contest over spheres of influence, connectivity, and now, hydrology. China's Belt and Road Initiative has already expanded into Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh. Through "dam diplomacy," it's turning infrastructure into influence. India, in turn, is hedging—through its Act East policy, its Quad alignment with the US, Japan, and Australia, and its Indo-Pacific strategy. But none of these frameworks were designed to manage river flows or mediate water disputes. That leaves a strategic vacuum—one that China is swiftly filling with pipelines, rail links, and now, river control. And while Chinese officials insist their mega-dam is safe and non-threatening, the reality is more complex. The site is near a seismic hotspot—just 300 miles from where the strongest inland earthquake on record struck in 1950. A breach triggered by seismic activity could be catastrophic for India, Bangladesh, and the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta. Add melting Himalayan glaciers and climate volatility to the mix, and you have a fragile ecological equation—made more dangerous by opacity and mistrust. What Now? A Blue Bretton Woods for Asia's Rivers So what do we do? We stop pretending this is just a bilateral issue. It's not. This is Asia's water reckoning, and it demands a multilateral response. The world has institutions for trade (WTO), finance (IMF), and carbon (UNFCCC). But for transboundary water governance? We have nothing binding. What we need is a Blue Bretton Woods—a pan-Asian water regime with enforceable rules, real-time data sharing, independent monitoring, and ecological safeguards. Because if hydro-diplomacy collapses into hydro-nationalism, the consequences won't just ripple through Asia—they'll surge. The water wars of the 21st century won't begin with gunfire. They'll begin with closed sluice gates, unpredictable flows, and displaced communities—from the Himalayas to the Bay of Bengal. Asia's rivers once gave birth to its civilisations. The question now is whether they will define its conflicts—or its cooperation. ————-—————————————————- Author Bio: Samirul Ariff Othman is an international relations analyst and economic commentator. A former senior researcher at the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER), he has written extensively for numerous regional outlets. Currently he is a senior consultant with Global Asia Consulting and an adjunct lecturer at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP)
