Labour endorsing candidates in DCC election
Incumbent Dunedin city councillor Steve Walker (right) and hopeful Jett Groshinski, pictured yesterday in George St, have been given Labour Party endorsement for the coming October local body elections for the Dunedin City Council. PHOTO: PETER MCINTOSH
Labour has announced it is endorsing two candidates for the Dunedin City Council at this year's election.
They are incumbent councillor Steve Walker and Jett Groshinski, who at present holds the post of political representative at the Otago University Students' Association (OUSA).
A statement from the Labour Party yesterday said that there had been a "a robust and considered selection process".
Cr Walker, who was first elected to the council in 2019, had served two successful terms as a Labour-endorsed councillor, the statement said.
Mr Groshinski, a former mayoral and council candidate in the 2022 elections, was actively involved in community advocacy, with a focus on student wellbeing, accessible public transport and creating inclusive civic spaces, the statement said.
"Southern Labour is confident that both candidates bring the experience, passion and progressive values needed to represent the diverse voices of Dunedin and build a fairer, more sustainable city for all," it said.
In 2022, Labour endorsed Cr Walker and Mosgiel-Taieri Community Board chairwoman Joy Davis, who was unsuccessful in her bid to join the council. — APL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
PM Must Stop Changes Further Failing Children
Press Release – New Zealand Labour Party Christopher Luxon must step in and cancel boot camps and restore funding to frontline community providers before its too late, Labour childrens spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said. Today's damning report on Oranga Tamariki shows Māori children are being left with little chance of success, or even survival, after their experiences in the state care system, and Minister for Children Karen Chhour is making it worse. 'This report is the first of its kind and reveals a disturbing and urgent problem which can no longer be ignored by the Prime Minister who has overseen dangerous changes to Oranga Tamariki during his term in government,' Labour children's spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said. 'The Government has cut early intervention, continued with botched bootcamps that have never worked, and taken away funding from community-run services that help children and whānau. 'Christopher Luxon has allowed an ACT Minister to recklessly erode the services that have been built up to support children. 'As well as repealing Section 7AA, Karen Chhour has removed a key target for placement of children with whanau, and removed the target for investment for services provided by Iwi organisations. 'The Government has taken away actions specifically put in place to address the significant disparities for Māori children in care. 'Christopher Luxon must step in and cancel boot camps and restore funding to frontline community providers before it's too late,' Willow-Jean Prime said.
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Raising speed limit next to beach 'doesn't make any sense'
The stretch of road next to Hatfields Beach, where the speed limit is rising from 50 km/h to 70 km/h. Photo: Google Maps Increasing the speed limit right next to a beach north of Auckland that has little room for pedestrians to move is "completely illogical", according to a local councillor. The stretch of road on the Hibiscus Coast Highway has gone from 50km/h back up to 70 km/h ass part of the government's policy to reverse Labour's speed limit reductions. The government claims the reduction slowed Kiwis and the economy down, but some locals have complained about the rise in the speed limit, saying the stretch of highway between Orewa village and Hatfields beach is busy with campervans, boats and people crossing the road from the beach to the reserve. In a letter to locals, Auckland Transport said it did not think the change to 70 km/h was "desirable or appropriate", but it was legally obligated to make the change. Auckland councillor for Albany John Watson told Checkpoint the speed increase was completely illogical at this particular location. "You've got the road that is really close to the beach, you've got pedestrians, kite surfers, people with kids going across to the other side of the road, so it's probably the last place where you want the speed to be increased. "There are other places outside that area that can be increased, where ironically enough it's slower on the open road than it is through the beach area. But the beach area is just dangerous, it doesn't make any sense." Photo: AFP He said there was an increasing amount of people going across that stretch of road, and they did not have a lot of room to move. "It's a pretty restricted corridor. So I think it's pretty dangerous, you have a lot of overseas people who have campervans who camp down there, and they're going across to the toilets and stuff, so there is just too much pedestrian traffic right by a beach to really justify that kind of increase." Watson said there were six different speed limits across six kilometres of road in that area. "It goes at 50, then down to 30 through the town zone, out to 50 again, then into 70 - including past the beach - then reduces to 60 when it should actually be increasing, then finally it gets to 80 at the Waiwera Bridge. "And it's changed multiple times since 2020, so it's really confusing, you stick your head out wondering what the speed limit is going to be today, and that's for local people, so goodness knows what it's like for people passing through." He said feedback from locals had been strongly against the raising of the speed limit. "The word that just keeps coming up is 'illogical', it's just not practical, and I don't think there would be too many people who would disagree with that." Transport Minister Chris Bishop has responded to concerns about the increased limit, saying a Road Controlling Authority like Auckland Transport could reverse it - provided the process met requirements. Those requirements included Auckland Transport producing a cost benefit disclosure statement and undertaking public consultation for a minimum of six weeks. Auckland Transport said that based on the level of feedback from the community, it will begin that process by carrying out an initial data collection, then seek local board endorsement to consult on re-lowering the speed limit later in the year. But Watson said it did not feel like a pragmatic response to the issue. "It's getting rolled out across the country and there might be any number of areas where it's working, but in instances like this, it doesn't make any sense." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Speech: Hon Andrew Hoggard To Federated Farmers At Fieldays
Speech – ACT New Zealand We want to see a thriving primary sector thats not weighed down by complexity, but supported to innovate, grow, and lead, says ACT MP Hon Andrew Hoggard. ACT MP Hon Andrew Hoggard Federated Farmers Rural Advocacy Hub Speaking Engagement Wednesday 11 June, 11:30 am Good morning, everyone. It's great to be back, and thank you for the opportunity to speak here today. I'd like to start by acknowledging the significant effort that's gone into organising this year's Fieldays Rural Advocacy Hub. These events don't happen without a lot of hard work behind the scenes, and it shows. I also want to acknowledge Federated Farmers and the many other farmer-led organisations who work tirelessly to support and advocate for the sector. As a dairy farmer and a former President of Federated Farmers, I know firsthand how important your work is. Whether it's in the regions or on the national stage, you give voice to rural communities, bring practical solutions to the table, and stand up for the interests of farmers and growers across New Zealand. This Government is firmly committed to backing you—by reducing costs, cutting unnecessary red tape, and strengthening frontline support. When I spoke at Fieldays last year, interest rates were a massive challenge for rural New Zealand. Make no mistake, that was Wellington's fault. It was the hangover from a Labour-led pandemic response that pumped out easy money without a productivity boost to match. Now we've reined in waste, got inflation back to the target range, and farmers are finally seeing real interest rates relief. We need to do more to cut the waste in Wellington, because the less resource the Government sucks up, the more is left over for people like you out in the real world trying to grow things. Over the past year, we've made real progress on red tape. We've started delivering on our promise to fix the resource management system and reduce the regulatory burden. Amending intensive winter grazing and stock exclusion rules. Pausing the rollout of freshwater farm plans while we make them more practical and affordable, and halting the identification of new Significant Natural Areas. Right now, we're consulting on a package of proposals aimed at streamlining or removing regulations that are holding the primary sector back. Most critically, we are consulting on changes to the NPS Freshwater 2020. There are several options being put forward. Now, if I remove my Minister hat and put on my ACT Party hat, we need to be bold. By that I mean Te Mana o te Wai needs to go. Worrying about the Paris Accord, whilst still a concern, is a sideshow compared to the hard calls we need to make with regards to RMA reform and the NPS Freshwater. Make no mistake, as a Party we have no interest in taxing the most carbon efficient farmers in the world, having methane targets far in excess of what is needed to play our part, sending billions offshore to be carbon neutral, or turning the lights off in homes or businesses through misguided energy policies. But if you ask me what area of policy scares me the most for the future of New Zealand farming, it is resource management and freshwater policy. Te Mana o te Wai has caused confusion amongst councils, and I see that if left in place its current trajectory will likely lead towards co-governance for regional councils, not just in policy but consenting as well, and policies that are based on vague spiritual concepts, not clear and simple water science balanced with societal needs. This debate will undoubtedly be noisy, but farming groups need to advocate strongly for clear unambiguous language in the NPS, individual farmers need to submit on what they are seeing and the stress this concept has caused many of them with regards to consenting. At the Treaty Principles Bill second reading debate many coalition party MPs stated that the Bill was too general, too broad-brushed, and that we should just focus on ensuring that we don't have unclear language and vague concepts in future bills and policies. Well I would suggest that this NPS Freshwater is a good test for those statements. You will see plenty of MPs here for the next few days playing farmer dress up, make sure you let them know you expect them to keep their word. Now, while I'm being a staunch ACT MP I also want to give a shout out to the Regulatory Standards Bill, for many of you undoubtedly are thinking, why should I care about something that sounds that boring. Real simple. If this Bill had been in place during my Feds presidency it would have made the job so much easier, as it would have highlighted some of the more impractical and stupid regulations that were dreamed up. Even if it didn't make the politicians think twice, at least the system would have shone a spotlight on the issues. We are so lucky that Bernadette Hunt got on the Hosking show and was able to show up some of the more daft parts of the winter grazing regs and they got changed within days, but they shouldn't have got that far. That's what the Regulatory Standards Bill will hopefully show up. But also, government doesn't just take away your hard-earned dollars through its fiscal policies. It also can take away your property rights through its regulatory policies, so this Bill will ensure that if those property rights are taken away then compensation should be forthcoming. This whole concept has complete distaste from the Left, and some lukewarm reception from everyone else but ACT. So, if more protection for property rights is something you want to see, make sure you put your case forward for it. Okay, back to being a Minister, if I can just highlight some of the other Government work that is going on that is relevant for farming. In the health and safety space, we've got Brooke van Velden leading reforms to get rid of over compliance, reduce paperwork, and make WorkSafe helpful, not harmful. I'm especially pleased about her work to protect landowners from liability when they allow recreational activities like horse trekking, hunting, or hiking on their land. It's about a shift from fear to freedom, opening up land for maximum enjoyment and enhancing the Kiwi way of life. We're also keen to empower farmers on the conservation front. I believe farmers are natural environmentalists. We live off the land, so we have every incentive to care for it. Many of us work to maintain stands of native bush or wetland on our land. For too long, the approach has been to punish this work, with councils looking at your land and saying, ' that looks pretty, in fact that natural area looks 'significant' and you're going to lose your property rights over that. ' It's all stick and no carrot. I think farmers deserve real credit for their contributions to biodiversity, and I'll have more to say about that at the Beef + Lamb stall tomorrow. In this year's Budget, we announced a 20% funding increase to tackle the spread of wilding pines—a major win for our landscapes and productive land. Another important change in this year's Budget is Investment Boost—a major new tax incentive to encourage business investment, support economic growth, and lift wages. If you're a farmer, tradie, manufacturer, or run any business, this matters to you. When you invest in new equipment, machinery, tools, vehicles, or technology—you'll now be able to deduct 20% of that cost immediately from your taxable income. It's a straightforward way to help reduce your tax bill and support decisions that lift productivity and grow your business. To put it simply, we're backing your success. We want to see a thriving primary sector that's not weighed down by complexity, but supported to innovate, grow, and lead. I want to thank Federated Farmers, and many of you here, for the constructive role you've played in helping shape these changes. Your feedback is vital to making sure the final rules are workable, sensible, and fit for purpose. Thank you again for the chance to be here, and for everything you do to keep this sector moving forward. All the best for a successful and enjoyable Fieldays. Thank you.
