Cairo hosts strategic talks between President El-Sisi, Lebanon's Aoun
CAIRO - 19 MAY 2025: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi held high-level talks on Monday with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun at Al-Ittihadiya Palace, focusing on strengthening bilateral relations and coordinating efforts to restore regional stability. During a joint press conference following their meeting, President Aoun delivered a powerful speech steeped in historical and cultural symbolism, emphasizing the deep-rooted brotherhood between Lebanon and Egypt.
'People say Egypt is the 'Mother of the World' and Beirut is the 'Lady of the World' – and this reflects a truth engraved in our shared history,' Aoun stated. He cited ancient inscriptions from Karnak Temple that mention Byblos (Jbeil), underlining millennia of cultural and civilizational ties.
Egypt's President El-Sisi Stresses Military Solidarity with Lebanon in High-Level Talks
The Lebanese president paid tribute to Egypt's historic role as a sanctuary for freedom of thought and expression, recalling how Cairo welcomed Lebanese intellectuals and journalists during times of political repression. 'When Beirut's pens were silenced, they flowed with literature and politics on the banks of the Nile,' he said. Calling for a renewed Arab brotherhood, Aoun proposed the creation of a joint Arab interest system, beginning with a shared regional economic market between any two willing countries and expanding from there. 'We must anchor our unity in a forward-looking Arabism based on mutual interests and modern cooperation,' he added.
President Aoun stressed that achieving peace and stability in the region requires a just and lasting resolution to ongoing conflicts – first and foremost the Palestinian cause. He reiterated Lebanon's firm adherence to UN Security Council Resolution 1701 and emphasized the importance of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).
He called on Israel to cease hostilities, respect Lebanon's sovereignty, and fully withdraw from all occupied Lebanese territory, including Shebaa Farms and Kfarshouba Hills. He also highlighted the urgency of resolving the Syrian refugee crisis, emphasizing the need for the safe and dignified return of Syrian nationals to their country. Aoun revealed that Lebanon and Syria had agreed to form joint committees to coordinate this process. Lebanon, he affirmed, supports all efforts to preserve Syria's unity and sovereignty, welcoming the recent easing of sanctions on Damascus and expressing hope for a broader regional recovery. 'Lebanon's strength lies in its people, in its freedom and pluralism,' Aoun concluded. 'We are ready to embrace a peace rooted in justice. And we are confident that, with Egypt's voice and support, the world will listen.'
The visit marks a significant step in reaffirming the historic bonds between Egypt and Lebanon, and underscores Cairo's ongoing diplomatic role in promoting regional dialogue and stability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Syria orders women to cover up on beaches with conservative new dress code
CNN — Syria issued a conservative new dress code Tuesday requiring women to wear burkinis or full-body swimwear on all public beaches, the latest cultural shift since Syria issued a conservative new dress code Tuesday requiring women to wear burkinis or full-body swimwear on all public beaches, the latest cultural shift since Islamist-led rebels toppled dictator Bashar al-Assad's regime last December. The Tourism Ministry said the new guidelines were made in 'the requirements of public interest.' 'Visitors to public beaches and pools, whether tourists or locals, are required to wear appropriate swimwear that takes into account public taste and the sensibilities of various segments of society,' Tourism Minister Mazen al-Salhani said in a directive posted to Facebook. 'More modest swimwear is required at public beaches and pools (burkinis or swimsuits that cover more of the body),' said the directive, adding, 'When moving between the beach and other places, it is necessary to wear a beach cover-up or loose-fitting robe (for women) over swimsuits.' Men are required to wear shirts under the new guidance, which says that 'topless clothing is not permitted in public areas outside of swimming areas, hotel lobbies, and food service areas.' 'In public areas outside of beaches and pools, it is preferable to wear loose clothing, covering shoulders and knees, and avoid transparent or overly tight clothing,' according to the directive. However, the ministry said that in resorts and hotels 'classified as international and premium (4-star)' and in private beaches and swimming pools 'typical Western swimwear is permitted.' It's unclear what repercussions people who do not follow the guidelines will face, but the ministry said that 'lifeguards and beach supervisors' would monitor people to ensure compliance. The new regulations reflect the influence of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the Islamist coalition now leading Syria's transitional government. Formerly known as Al-Nusra Front, HTS is designated as a terrorist group by the US and UK. Interim Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, who signed the dress-code directive, led HTS in the lightning offensive that led to the fall of Assad, whose regime had been in power for several decades. In March, al-Sharaa signed an interim constitution mandating Islamist rule for a transitional phase of five years. Al-Sharaa said in December that rewriting Syria's constitution might take three years, with elections potentially taking place within five years. The US-based Human Rights Watch said in March that Al-Sharaa's 'broad authority raises serious concerns about the durability of the rule of law and human rights protections unless clear safeguards are put in place.' Tourism Minister al-Salhani, who recently courted Qatari and Saudi investors for tourism projects worth 'billions of dollars,' framed the rules as respecting Syria's cultural, social, and religious diversity.' The announcement comes amid a push to revive Syria's tourism industry following the lifting of US sanctions in May 2025 – a move US President Donald Trump described as a 'chance at greatness' for Syria.
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
UK, Canada and Western allies sanction two far-right Israeli government ministers
London CNN — The United Kingdom, Canada and other allies announced sanctions Tuesday on two hardline Israeli government ministers for repeatedly 'inciting violence against Palestinians,' in a stark joint move that comes amid growing Western condemnation of Israel's actions in the occupied West Bank and Gaza. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich will face a travel ban and an asset freeze, the UK government said. Ben Gvir and Smotrich both lead far-right political parties that help keep Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fragile government coalition afloat. Both men have faced criticism for their inflammatory comments about the occupied West Bank as well as their positions on the war in Gaza. The sanctions are being jointly implemented by Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK, according to a joint statement by the five countries' foreign ministers. 'We are steadfastly committed to the two-state solution which is the only way to guarantee security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians and ensure long term stability in the region, but it is imperilled by extremist settler violence and settlement expansion,' the joint statement said. 'Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights. Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous,' the statement added. 'We have engaged the Israeli Government on this issue extensively, yet violent perpetrators continue to act with encouragement and impunity.' The sanctions imposed by the five Western nations represent a break in policy with the United States. While European and Commonwealth allies have increasingly put pressure on Netanyahu's government, the Trump administration has repeatedly reaffirmed the US-Israel alliance. The US has also called for the conflict in Gaza to end, but last week, the US vetoed a UN Security Council resolution demanding a permanent ceasefire in Gaza. While the sanctions are in relation to the West Bank, the Western allies' joint statement added that 'of course this cannot be seen in isolation from the catastrophe in Gaza. We continue to be appalled by the immense suffering of civilians, including the denial of essential aid.' A Palestinian girl waits to receive food at a distribution point in Nuseirat, central Gaza, on June 2. Israel has faced growing condemnation over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Eyad Baba/AFP/Getty Images Smotrich and Ben Gvir both live in settlements in the West Bank, which Palestinians and the vast majority of the international community hold as part of a future Palestinian state. Both ministers responded defiantly to the travel bans and financial sanctions on Tuesday afternoon, vowing to continue their agenda and accusing Britain of echoing its colonial-era restrictions on Jewish migration to British-mandate Palestine. Ben Gvir, the leader of the Jewish Power party, said that 'the sanctions do not scare me,' adding, 'I will continue to act for our country, for our people, I will continue to act and make sure that they do not let humanitarian aid into Hamas.' Smotrich, speaking during the inauguration of the new Jewish settlement of Mitzpe Ziv in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday, said that he 'heard that Britain has decided to impose sanctions on me because I'm thwarting the establishment of a Palestinian state. There couldn't be better timing than this.' 'Britain already tried once to prevent us from settling the cradle of our homeland, and we will not let it happen again. With God's help, we are determined to continue building,' said Smotrich, who leads the National Religious Party–Religious Zionism. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said the government will hold a 'special meeting' early next week 'to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.' 'It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to this kind of measure,' Saar said. Meanwhile, the foreign ministers of the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway said in their statement: 'The measures announced today do not deviate from our unwavering support for Israel's security and we continue to condemn the horrific terror attacks of 7 October by Hamas. Today's measures are targeted towards individuals who in our view undermine Israel's own security and its standing in the world.' Ben Gvir quit Netanyahu's government in January to protest the ceasefire in Gaza, only rejoining the government after Israel returned to war in March. He has repeatedly called for Palestinians to be driven out of Gaza and previously said Israel should 'encourage voluntary migration of Gazans to countries around the world.' Smotrich, who as finance minister has a seat on the Israeli security cabinet and holds significant sway over Netanyahu, has previously called for the formal annexation of settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. In May, he said his idea of victory in Gaza would be that the territory is 'destroyed' and civilians are moved to a 'humanitarian zone' in the south of the strip or leave for third countries. Last month, UK Foreign Minister David Lammy slammed Smotrich's comments on the possible destruction and cleansing of Gaza, telling British lawmakers: 'It is extremism. It is dangerous. It is repellent. It is monstrous, and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms.' At the time, the UK paused trade talks with Israel and imposed sanctions on West Bank settlers, but stopped short of sanctioning the far-right Israeli minister. CNN's Rob Picheta, Sharon Braithwaite and Abbas Al Lawati contributed to this report.
Daily News Egypt
6 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal
Israel harbours deeper concerns over US President Donald Trump's potential nuclear deal with Iran than it ever did regarding the agreement negotiated under Barack Obama. According to Tel Aviv, the imminent accord would leave Iran merely months away from acquiring a nuclear weapon while severely limiting Israel's ability to deliver a decisive military strike against Tehran's nuclear infrastructure. In this scenario, Iran would preserve its controversial program, and Israel would lose what it perceives as a historic opportunity to dismantle Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Over a month ago, Trump unexpectedly announced the beginning of direct negotiations with Tehran, aiming to curtail Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the easing of economic sanctions. His declaration came in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington seeking American approval for pre-emptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Over the past two years, Israel has weakened Iran's regional influence through sustained military operations against its allies—Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon—and by the removal of its key ally, former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. At the same time, severe Western sanctions have crippled Iran's oil-dependent economy. Upon finalizing the deal, Trump is expected to assert that he has extracted greater concessions from Iran than his predecessors, Obama and Joe Biden. His claim would hinge on two major factors: the inclusion of US nuclear inspectors alongside IAEA monitors in Iran's nuclear sites and a complete halt to uranium enrichment—even at low levels—for a symbolic period that may last a year. However, Israeli officials remain deeply concerned, viewing this agreement as even riskier than the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015, which they largely dismissed as flawed. Dr. Hatem Sadek President Biden's most significant diplomatic achievement was persuading Tehran to freeze its 60% uranium enrichment—a feat achieved in 2023 through a US agreement releasing $6 billion of Iran's frozen assets. Obama, on the other hand, succeeded in reducing Iran's medium-enriched uranium stockpile to 3.67% but failed to halt enrichment entirely or secure Tehran's consent for American inspectors to participate in monitoring. There are several additional concessions Trump may secure that neither Biden nor Obama could—such as guarantees against attacks on US forces or a temporary moratorium on Iran's ballistic missile tests, which have both conventional and nuclear applications. If accomplished, why does this alarm Israeli officials? Israeli intelligence leaders, including the Mossad Director and the head of military intelligence, have spent substantial diplomatic capital lobbying the Trump administration and its envoy, Steve Witkoff, in numerous meetings across the Middle East, Europe, and the US Their objective was to push negotiations toward two extreme outcomes: Tehran's submission or a decisive military strike. However, these efforts clashed with Trump's transactional style, which prioritizes immediate gains over long-term strategy. While Israeli officials believe they made some progress, fears persist that Trump's main goal is securing a deal—regardless of whether it aligns with Israel's stringent security concerns. Additionally, if Trump pressures Israel to abandon military action, it might not only prevent overt strikes but also hinder covert operations, such as Mossad-led sabotage missions that have delayed Iran's nuclear weapons program in recent years. In 2015, Iran relied on about 20,000 aging IR-1 centrifuges, requiring roughly a year to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb. By 2025, however, Iran possesses thousands of advanced IR-4 and IR-6 centrifuges, a fraction of which could be concealed in undisclosed facilities much smaller than the known sites at Natanz and Fordow. This would allow Tehran to achieve weapons-grade uranium within months. Reports indicate Iran's current enrichment levels reach 60%—a threshold demonstrating mastery of nuclear science, making bomb acquisition more a matter of timing than technical capability. From Israel's perspective, any agreement at this stage would consolidate Iran's nuclear potential while lifting international sanctions, enabling Tehran to accelerate its program. By contrast, Israeli leadership sees the current moment as an unparalleled strategic opportunity: with Hamas and Hezbollah weakened, no time is more suitable for a pre-emptive strike. In conclusion, whatever restrictions and safeguards Trump's team negotiates, at best they would leave Iran just months from a nuclear breakout while denying Israel its clearest chance in decades to strike. Tehran may be open to a deal but remains wary of Trump's unpredictable leadership and sceptical of any non-binding agreement that a future US administration might discard. The most it would likely accept is a temporary enrichment suspension in exchange for the release of frozen funds and recognition of its right to civilian nuclear energy—an outcome Israel would see as disastrous. Meanwhile, Gulf states and regional actors, while wary of Iran's ambitions, increasingly prefer uneasy coexistence over a catastrophic war that could disrupt economies and stall development plans. The negotiation landscape remains murky and fraught with uncertainty for all involved. Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University The post Opinion | Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal appeared first on Dailynewsegypt.
