logo
Ben & Jerry's Accuses Unilever of Firing Its C.E.O. for Political Reasons

Ben & Jerry's Accuses Unilever of Firing Its C.E.O. for Political Reasons

New York Times19-03-2025

Ben & Jerry's accused Unilever, its parent company, of firing its chief executive because he allowed the ice cream maker to speak out on political issues, according to a complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan on Tuesday.
In the filing, Ben & Jerry's said Unilever had fired David Stever because of his commitment to the company's social mission rather than his job performance. He had held the ice cream company's top job since 2023.
'Unilever has repeatedly threatened Ben & Jerry's personnel, including C.E.O. David Stever, should they fail to comply with Unilever's efforts to silence the social mission,' Ben & Jerry's said in the filing.
Unilever informed the Ben and Jerry's board on March 3 that it was planning to remove and replace Mr. Stever as chief executive, the filing said. This was done without the approval of an advisory board, and went against an agreement the two companies signed when they merged in 2000, Ben & Jerry's claimed in the filing. It added that, 'under Mr. Stever's tenure, Ben & Jerry's outperformed Unilever's ice cream portfolio.'
In 2024, sales at Ben & Jerry's grew faster than at Magnum, another one of Unilever's major ice cream brands, according to a Unilever presentation on its financial performance.
Under the acquisition deal between the two companies, Unilever agreed to let Ben & Jerry's maintain an independent board to oversee the brand. This allowed Ben & Jerry's to place 'guardrails' around its social activism and gave its founders continued control of the company.
The amended complaint filed on Tuesday was part of a lawsuit that Ben & Jerry's filed in November accusing Unilever of censorship and threats over the ice cream maker's efforts to express support for Palestinian refugees.
That lawsuit claimed that Unilever tried to dismantle the ice cream maker's independent board and to stop it from taking certain political stances, including calling for a cease-fire in Gaza, supporting U.S. students protesting civilian deaths in the territory and urging an end to U.S. military aid to Israel.
Unilever did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Last year, it said in a statement that it would strongly defend itself against the accusations in the lawsuit. Ben & Jerry's also did not respond to a request for comment.
The founders of Ben & Jerry's, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, have long been outspoken on social issues. Tensions flared in 2021, when Ben & Jerry's said it would stop selling its ice cream in Israeli-occupied territories.
In March 2024, Unilever announced plans to spin off its ice cream unit, which includes Ben & Jerry's. The move is expected to be completed at the end of this year, and, if successful, will end the 25-year, often rocky marriage between the two companies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Procter & Gamble slashing up to 7,000 jobs amid restructuring effort
Procter & Gamble slashing up to 7,000 jobs amid restructuring effort

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Procter & Gamble slashing up to 7,000 jobs amid restructuring effort

Procter & Gamble on Thursday said that it will cut up to 7,000 jobs, or 15% of its non-manufacturing workforce, over the next two years as part of a broader restructuring effort. "As always, employee separations will be managed with support and respect, and in line with our principles and values and local laws," P&G said. "Specific impacts by region or site are not available at this time." The two-year restructuring plan comes as consumer goods giants P&G and Unilever brace for muted demand in 2025, stemming from growing uncertainty due to U.S. tariffs. P&G's restructuring is not a reaction to a specific part of the external operational environment, which includes tariffs and other global headwinds. Disney Cuts Hundreds Of Tv And Film Jobs Amid Streaming Expansion "This is not a new approach, rather an intentional acceleration of the current strategy… to win in the increasingly challenging environment in which we compete," P&G executives said at a Deutsche Bank Consumer Conference in Paris on Thursday. With the organizational changes, P&G said it is seeking to make "roles broader, teams smaller, work more fulfilling and more efficient, including leveraging digitalization and automation." Read On The Fox Business App Under the restructuring, it is also looking to adjust its portfolio. That could include exiting some categories, brands and products in certain markets, as well as some possible brand divestitures. Chevron To Lay Off Approximately 200 Employees In Texas In 2025 Its portfolio changes will help "drive various benefits, including efficiencies, faster innovation, and cost reduction" within its supply chain as well, according to the company. "Looking ahead, consumers face greater uncertainty. Competition is fierce. The geopolitical environment is unpredictable. And technology is rapidly transforming nearly every aspect of daily life," P&G said. "At the same time, we can unlock significant growth by better meeting the needs of currently unserved and under-served consumers, expanding into new segments, and growing markets to best-in-class levels." The company said "disciplined execution of our integrated growth strategy and even more disciplined resource allocation" would help the company pursue "growth opportunities" and deal with "increasing near-term challenges." The maker of Tide detergent and Pampers diapers had about 108,000 employees as of June 2024. Microsoft Will Lay Off Nearly 6,000 Employees In Push For Efficiency P&G expects to record charges of $1 billion to $1.6 billion before tax over the two-year period, with a quarter of the charges expected to be non-cash. Reuters contributed to this article source: Procter & Gamble slashing up to 7,000 jobs amid restructuring effort

Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.

Citi Bike agrees to curb e-bike speeds at 15 mph after service suspension threat from NYC Mayor Eric Adams admin
Citi Bike agrees to curb e-bike speeds at 15 mph after service suspension threat from NYC Mayor Eric Adams admin

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Citi Bike agrees to curb e-bike speeds at 15 mph after service suspension threat from NYC Mayor Eric Adams admin

NEW YORK — Citi Bike has agreed to curb the speed at which its e-bikes can go at 15 miles per hour — a move that came in response to a service suspension threat from Mayor Eric Adams' administration. The electric Citi Bikes can currently ride at 18 miles per hour, a limit the service's operator, Lyft, previously set as part of an agreement with Adams' Department of Transportation. But late Thursday, Citi Bike general manager Patrick Knoth said that due to 'direction from City Hall,' the new speed cap will be 15 miles per hour. 'We're working to meet that mandate and best serve our riders,' Knoth added without offering a timeline for how soon the lower speed cap could be effective on the hundreds of e-bikes Lyft operates across the city. Knoth's announcement came after the Daily News first reported Wednesday that Adams, citing growing concern in neighborhoods over the dangers posed by e-bikes, would enact a 15 mph speed limit on all e-bikes in the city. In response to The News' report, Knoth said late Wednesday the mayor's office had not told Lyft of the policy shift and said he would 'express deep concern' about it. Randy Mastro, Adams' first deputy mayor, then sent a letter to Lyft late Thursday saying that due to its refusal to comply with the demand for a new 15 mph speed limit he was declaring the current 18 mph speed limit an 'emergency threat to life and property.' Under that declaration, Mastro's letter, which was also signed by Transportation Commissioner Ydanis Rodriguez, said Lyft had to come into compliance with the new 15 mph speed limit within 15 days. If it didn't, Mastro suggested Adams' administration could invoke a provision of Lyft's contract that says the city government reserves the right to start 'removing, replacing, relocating, reinstalling or locking all or any portion' of Citi Bike's fleet if doesn't comply with rules set by the city in the event of a 'threat to life' emergency. Within hours of Mastro making that threat, Knoth announced Citi Bike was 'working' on complying with the new mandate. Mastro, a controversial attorney who served in the Giuliani administration, cited the need to invoke such a drastic emergency to the fact that 11 people have died on electric Citi Bikes since 2021. He also noted 1,170 have been injured in that stretch. Since becoming Adams' top deputy at City Hall in early April, Mastro has been at the center of several other controversial policy disputes, including signing a legally disputed order to let ICE back on Rikers, issuing a directive to freeze certain fines on landlords and pressuring a concert promoter to cancel a performance by a pro-Palestinian singer. Most private e-bikes can currently ride at 20 mph, a limit that would have to be lowered under the Adams administration's new regime. It remains unclear how exactly the administration will enforce the new speed limit, but Mastro acknowledged in the letter to Lyft that the matter still needs to go through a formal rulemaking process, meaning its official implementation is likely still over a month away. Since Adams took office in 2022, the Department of Transportation has fallen way short of bike lane construction targets set as part of a citywide master plan. In his letter to Lyft, Mastro argued the city's progress on bike lane construction is being inhibited by e-bike fatalities. 'The lack of action to address this issue is hindering the city's ability to advance bike lane and micro-mobility infrastructure and safety across the city,' he wrote. The mayor has recently portrayed cracking down on bike riding as a matter of public safety amid widespread concern. Last month, his NYPD started handing out criminal instead of civil summonses to bike riders for running red lights or otherwise riding recklessly, a drastic shift that has outraged transit advocates and City Council members who note car drivers do not face such penalties for similar infractions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store