EU Must Take Strong Response against Israel: EX-Foreign Policy Chief
The EU's former Foreign Policy Chief, Josep Borrell, stated that the bloc must take a more assertive stance against Israel that has been violating the international law in its war on Gaza, according to Arab News.
In an article for Foreign Affairs magazine, Borrell stressed that the EU has a 'duty' to intervene over the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Need for Joint Plan
Co-authored with Kalypso Nicolaidis, the article affirmed that the EU has to make its joint plan as Europe can no longer afford to linger at the margin.
'Not only is Europe's own security at stake, but more important, European history imposes a duty on Europeans to intervene in response to Israel's violations of international law,' the article said.
Last week, EU's Foreign Policy Chief, Kaja Kallas, said that it was 'very clear' Israel had violated its human rights commitments during its war on Gaza.
In May, Borrell accused Israel of 'carrying out the largest ethnic-cleansing operation since the end of the Second World War.' Authors' Suggestions
Both authors said that Europe's conflicting response to Gaza's humanitarian crisis can be partly explained by the hesitation of some countries such as Germany, Hungary and Austria to take action against Israel for historical reasons.
They wrote that EU member states could use Article 20 of the EU's treaty to 'allow for at least nine member states to come together to utilize certain foreign policy tools not related to defense.'
'Because such an action has never been taken before, those states would have to explore what (it) … would concretely allow them to do,' the Foreign Affairs article said.
The authors also stated that the bloc should act as a powerful mediator in the Middle East.
'Some EU leaders cautiously backed the International Criminal Court's investigations, while others, such as Austria and Germany, have declined to implement its arrest warrants against Israeli officials,' they wrote.
Overall, the EU, as a bloc, has been 'largely relegated to the sidelines, divided internally and overshadowed in ceasefire diplomacy by the US and regional actors such as Egypt and Qatar. Shouldn't the EU also have acted as a mediator?'
Related Topics:
Saudi Arabia Condemns Israeli Settlers' Violence against Palestinians
Israel Kills Palestinian Aid Seekers as Rights Groups Warn GHF of Legal Consequences
Israel Leading Middle East to 'Total Disaster': Turkish FM
Short link :
Post Views: 14
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Israel must be pressured into a full ceasefire
For a dozen days, the eyes of the world were focused on Israel's aggression on Iran and its consequences. The ramifications could have been 100 times worse, with the region plunged into a catastrophic war. Yet, in those two weeks, Israel's genocide in Gaza was not on hold, with more than 860 Palestinians killed in that time. The regime of occupation and apartheid in the West Bank also intensified. Palestinians can only dream of a ceasefire. Unlike the rest of the world, the Israeli leadership has shown itself willing and capable of prosecuting multiple fronts at the same time. Yes, European leaders did make references to Gaza throughout the Iran war, but they made no new policy shifts. Netanyahu successfully distracted them, releasing the pressure that was building on Israel and obtaining bizarre commitments to the country's right to self-defense even though it was undeniably the aggressor. Palestinians also have a right to self-defense, in theory, but it is akin to blasphemy to invoke it — ditto for Syrians, Lebanese and Iranians. In more than 30 years, I have yet to hear this expressed a single time by a European or American leader. Selective morality is barely camouflaged. Palestinians in Gaza await their doom. A lethal lottery of life haunts their existence. The death rattle may come courtesy of bombs, disease or starvation. Families have told me how they crave instantaneous collective death, not the macabre and tortuous process of emaciation, the transition from human to spectral presence. The horrors in Gaza have become normalized. When Israel first bombed a hospital, a degree of shock wafted around the globe. Since then, every single one of Gaza's 35 hospitals has endured an Israeli attack. When one Israeli hospital was struck by an Iranian missile, Israelis stood appalled. European leaders did make references to Gaza throughout the Iran war, but they made no new policy shifts Chris Doyle The starvation of Palestinians in Gaza continues unabated. The fuel blockade is in force, meaning water wells cannot be pumped. Potable water is akin to liquid gold. A fresh way to die is imminent — death by thirst. The Gaza hunger games has food distribution points nestled in the heart of militarized zones. This means walking miles to join the starving hordes who dare to dodge the bullets and shells to scrap for lifesaving food boxes. Thus far, at least 549 Palestinians have been killed at these four locations since May 26, according to Gaza Health Ministry figures. Sixty lives alone were terminated by a barrage of tank shells. Anti-Palestinian groups ranted that Israeli forces had not committed these atrocities. This latest lie fell apart when even Israeli officials conceded the point. Israeli forces have also admitted they were ordered to open fire at unarmed Palestinians in food queues, even if they posed no threat. Who knows how many of Gaza's 2.3 million inhabitants remain alive? The official death toll hovers at about 56,000, but academic evaluations show the figure could be far higher. Two surveys indicate the official figures may be as much as 40 percent too low. One survey estimated that excess mortality — those who have died due to the indirect consequences of Israel's genocide — may have been 8,500 in January. The survivors have been hemmed in to just 17 percent of the Gaza Strip. Rumors encircle Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as ever. Does he want to prepare the way for elections? Will he bring military operations in Gaza to a halt? This does not guarantee the release of the hostages. Given that he has just terminated the last remaining UN food distribution program in the north, the militarized food distribution system will not be abandoned. Can the hostages' families dent the bloodied will of the coalition's leaders? Their cause is backed by as many as three-quarters of Israelis, who want a ceasefire in exchange for the return of hostages. Trump issued the most dramatic ultimatum in recent history, ordering Israeli planes back from their mission to bomb Iran Chris Doyle The ceasefire with Iran must be buttressed with an end to the genocide in Gaza. Halting the genocide in Gaza requires a reheating of the cauldron of pressure on Israel that saw two Cabinet ministers sanctioned last month by the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway. It means retreading the weary debates of what other measures are required. Above all, it requires determined steps from the US and European powers that compel Israel to stop. President Donald Trump last week issued the most dramatic ultimatum in recent history, ordering Israeli planes back from their mission to bomb Iran. 'All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly 'Plane Wave' to Iran,' he posted on social media. It is time for just such a decisive blow to the Netanyahu solar plexus from Trump by demanding that Israel permanently halt its attacks on Gaza and the West Bank and allow all humanitarian agencies full unhindered access to Gaza, while Hamas releases the remaining hostages. Trump should also insist on an end to the Israeli occupation and the creation of a viable Palestinian state — but that is wishful thinking. Trump could back this up by encouraging, in private if needs be, European states to be even tougher on Israel. Do this and the president could be heading to Oslo in October to pick up a much-cherished peace prize.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
If Israel cannot stand alone, why do we let it?
The Israeli genocide in Gaza, along with the escalating regional wars it has ignited, has brought two chilling truths into focus: first, Israel is deliberately and aggressively undermining the security and stability of the entire Middle East and, second, Israel is utterly incapable of surviving on its own. These two assertions, though seemingly distinct, are inextricably linked. For, if those who relentlessly sustain Israel — militarily, politically and economically — were to finally withdraw their support, the Middle East would not be the powder keg it has been for decades, a situation that has catastrophically worsened since Oct. 7, 2023. Though no oversimplification is intended, the brutal reality is that all it would take is for Israel to withdraw from Gaza, allowing the devastated, genocide-stricken Strip the faintest chance to heal. More than 56,000 Palestinians, including some 17,000 children, have been brutally slaughtered since the commencement of this war, a horrifying tally that is expected to surge dramatically when comprehensive investigations into the missing are finally conducted. Only then could the process of returning to some semblance of normality begin, where the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people must be fiercely championed within an international system built, at least theoretically, on unwavering respect for basic human rights and international law. The abhorrent 'might makes right' maxim would have to be utterly expunged from any future political equation. Middle Eastern countries, both Arab and Muslim, must rise to the occasion, stepping up decisively to aid their brethren and to ensure that Israel is powerless to divide their ranks. For Israel, this demand is simply impossible, a nonstarter — and understandably so from its colonial perspective. Why? There are various theories as to why some Western governments dare to challenge Israel, while others stubbornly refuse Dr. Ramzy Baroud 'Invasion is a structure, not an event,' the influential scholar Patrick Wolfe famously asserted. This profound statement unequivocally means that Israel's wars — commencing with the ethnic cleansing of Palestine during the Nakba of 1948 and through all subsequent wars and military occupations — were not random historical coincidences, but rather integral components of an enduring structure of power designed to eliminate the indigenous population. This renders as false the notion that Israel's behavior since Oct. 7 has been solely driven by revenge and is devoid of strategy. We could perhaps be excused for failing to initially grasp this distinction, given the grisly, unspeakable nature of the Israeli actions in Gaza. However, the language emanating from Israel has been chillingly clear about its true motives. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared on the day of the Hamas attacks, 'we will turn Gaza into a deserted island.' That has always been an intrinsic, unchanging part of Israel's colonial structure and it will remain so unless it is decisively reined in. But who possesses the will and power to rein in Israel? Israel operates through a network of enablers; benefactors who have long viewed its existence as an indispensable fortress serving the interests of Western colonialism. 'The connection between the Israeli people and the American people is bone deep … We're united in our shared values,' US President Joe Biden declared with striking conviction in July 2022. Without even bothering to question those 'shared values,' which somehow permit Israel to perpetrate a genocide while the US actively sustains it, Biden was undeniably honest in his stark depiction that the relationship between the two countries transcends mere politics. Other Western leaders blindly parrot the same lines. The unfolding genocide, however, has spurred some Western — and a multitude of non-Western — governments to courageously speak out against the Israeli war and Netanyahu and his extremist ideology in unprecedented ways. For some of these countries, notably Spain, Norway, Ireland and Slovenia, the proverbial 'bond' is demonstrably 'breakable' and their support is most certainly not 'unequivocal.' There are various theories as to why some Western governments dare to challenge Israel, while others stubbornly refuse. That important discussion aside, shattering the bond between Israel and the West is critical, not only for a just peace to finally prevail, but for the very survival of the Palestinian people. Governments like that of Spain are doing what many had thought was not possible only a few years ago Dr. Ramzy Baroud The nearly 21 agonizing months of unrelenting Israeli genocide have taught us a brutal lesson: Israel is a vassal state, utterly unable to fight its own wars, defend itself or even sustain its own economy without the direct and massive support of the US and others. Prior to the war, there were occasional outbursts from Israeli officials proclaiming that Israel was an independent country, not 'another star on the US flag.' These voices have largely been silenced, replaced by a constant stream of begging and pleading for the US to come to Israel's rescue. While Palestinians continue to stand with legendary courage to resist the Israeli military occupation and apartheid, those who genuinely care about international law, justice and peace must take decisive action by directly confronting governments that persist in helping Israel sustain its genocide in Gaza and destabilization of the Middle East. Governments like that of Spain are doing what many had thought was not possible only a few years ago. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez is powerfully advocating for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, an extensive trade deal that has been in place since 2000, due to 'the catastrophic situation of genocide.' If more governments were willing to adopt a similar, uncompromising stance, Israel would be choked off, at least from acquiring the weapons it uses to carry out its barbaric genocide. It is our collective responsibility to march in lockstep behind such courageous voices and demand uncompromising accountability, not only from Israel but also from those who are actively sustaining its settler-colonial structure.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Cyprus invites Turkiye's Erdogan to summit despite long rift over 1974 invasion
NICOSIA: Cyprus said on Monday it would invite arch-foe Turkiye to a summit during its European Union presidency next year despite a decades-long rift over Ankara's 1974 invasion and its backing of a breakaway state on the divided island. Nicosia will hold the rotating EU presidency in the first six months of 2026 and plans a summit of regional leaders, including Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, on issues related to the Middle East, Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides said. 'You can't change geography — Turkiye will always be a neighbor state to the Republic of Cyprus .. will of course be welcome to this summit to discuss developments in the area,' he told journalists in Nicosia. Christodoulides had earlier said the same in a British podcast aired on Monday in response to a question, saying the summit was planned for April 2026. The Turkish presidency did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the invitation to Erdogan. Cyprus and Turkiye have no diplomatic relations and hosting a Turkish president might prove challenging both because of the diplomatic tightrope arising from past conflict and logistical issues. The eastern Mediterranean island was partitioned by a Turkish invasion in 1974 sparked by a brief Greek-inspired coup, and Ankara supports a breakaway, unrecognized state in north Cyprus where it stations thousands of troops. Christodoulides heads a Greek Cypriot administration that represents all of Cyprus within the EU but with its powers stopping at a ceasefire line splitting the island into northern and southern sections. Erdogan has never visited the south.
