UK parliament votes in favour of assisted dying law
Britain's parliament voted in favour of a bill to legalise assisted dying, paving the way for the country's biggest social change in a generation.
The legislation passed by a vote of 314-291, clearing its biggest parliamentary hurdle.
The 'Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)' law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help.
The bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that has been passed by elected members of the House of Commons. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some US states, in permitting assisted dying.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Starmer voted in favour.
Supporters of the bill say it will provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. Hundreds of people gathered outside parliament to hear news of the vote.
When the result was read out, those in favour of the legislation hugged, clapped and cheered. They shouted 'victory,' 'we won' and waved placards. Those opposed to it stood in silence.
Emma Bray, who has motor neurone disease, said she hoped the result would help people in her condition.
Bray, who is 42 and has two children, said she plans to starve herself to death next month to help relieve the pain after being told she only has six months to live. 'This result will mean that people will not have to go through the same suffering I have faced,' she told Reuters.
Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying. Friday's vote followed hours of emotional debate and references to personal stories in the chamber and followed a vote in November that approved the legislation in principle.
Opponents of the bill had argued that ill people may feel they should end their lives for fear of being a burden to their families and society. Some lawmakers withdrew their support after the initial vote last year, saying safeguards had been weakened.
Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
France conducting own analysis of Iranian nuclear facilities: Macron
French President Emmanuel Macron said France is conducting its own assessments of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities inflicted by US and Israeli air strikes. Trump had said earlier on Wednesday that the damage from the strikes was severe and "there was obliteration", though he also conceded that US intelligence had been inconclusive. Meanwhile, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei, said that Iran's nuclear facilities were "badly damaged", according to an Al Jazeera report. Reporting by Reuters
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Musk Lays Claim to Redefine Human Knowledge with AI
Elon Musk has disclosed plans to overhaul xAI's conversational system Grok by essentially reconstructing its entire knowledge foundation. Frustrated with what he describes as 'garbage' and 'uncorrected data' in the model, Musk intends to launch Grok 3.5—potentially rebranded as Grok 4—with enhanced reasoning capabilities that will first re-write the entire corpus of human knowledge before retraining the model on that curated dataset. Musk wilted no words on X, characterising the endeavour as necessary to purge errors and integrate missing information—a process he says will counter the mainstream constraints he believes afflict existing AI systems. He also solicited 'divisive facts' from users—material that is politically incorrect yet supposedly factual—to enrich training, a move that elicited responses including Holocaust denial claims and conspiracy narratives. Experts have raised alarms about the proposal. Gary Marcus, professor emeritus at New York University, warned that the plan evokes a totalitarian impulse, likening it to Orwellian efforts to rewrite history for ideological alignment. Other ethicists emphasise that any attempt to curate a knowledge base to reflect particular values risks embedding hard‑to‑detect bias through subtle manipulation—what some describe as 'data poisoning'—even more insidiously than overt interventions. ADVERTISEMENT Grok's performance history reveals why Musk may feel compelled to act. Earlier this year, an 'unauthorised modification' led the model to spontaneously reference a conspiracy theory known as 'white genocide' in South Africa—often in contexts unrelated to the topic—raising significant concerns about its reliability. That glitch prompted xAI to launch an internal review and reinforce measures to increase the bot's transparency and stability. Institutional interest in Grok continues despite these setbacks. Sources told Reuters that entities such as the US Department of Homeland Security have been testing the system for data analysis and reporting, though officials clarified no formal endorsement has been issued. The proposed timeline for deploying Grok 3.5 or Grok 4 is expected by late 2025, with Musk pivoting xAI's effort away from public scrutiny and more towards curated, Musk‑aligned content. Critics caution that this shift could entrench a corporate agenda within the core of the AI, producing outputs that reflect ideological preferences rather than objective accuracy. This initiative occurs against a backdrop of broader AI regulation efforts. While governments wrestle with proposals ranging from state-level moratoria to risk-based frameworks, the question of how AI systems calibrate values remains contested. Musk's move intensifies that debate: will AI be a vessel for neutral knowledge, or a tool shaped—perhaps weaponised—by powerful individuals? The discussion now centers on transparency and accountability. Analysts argue that redefining a model's data foundation under the stewardship of a single corporate leader demands oversight mechanisms akin to those in utilities or public infrastructure. Ethical guidelines suggest dataset documentation, traceability, and multi‑stakeholder governance are essential to mitigate risks of ideological capture. Academic work on 'model disgorgement' offers technical approaches to remove or correct problematic knowledge, but experts emphasise that full transparency remains practically elusive at scale. Musk's declaration marks a turning point not just for Grok, but for the trajectory of AI governance. It anticipates a future in which elite designers may directly shape the content of civilisation's shared memory. As work begins on this ambitious rewrite, key questions emerge: who determines what qualifies as 'error'? Who adjudicates 'missing information'? And how will the public ensure that history remains a mosaic of perspectives, not a curated narrative?
Khaleej Times
6 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UK to reintroduce nuclear weapon-capable aircraft under Nato
Britain will reintroduce fighter jets capable of carrying atomic weapons to support Nato's nuclear mission, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office said, as he prepares for a Nato summit Wednesday. The country will purchase 12 nuclear weapon-capable F-35A fighters, expanding the country's deterrence arsenal, which is currently limited to submarine-launched missiles. "These F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies," Starmer said in a statement on Tuesday. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte was quoted in the statement as saying: "I strongly welcome today's announcement," calling it "yet another robust British contribution to Nato". Downing Street described it as the "biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation", adding that Starmer would announce the plan at summit on Wednesday. Since the end of the Cold War, British nuclear deterrence within the Atlantic alliance was provided solely by missiles aboard Royal Navy submarines. Heloise Fayet, a nuclear specialist at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri), told AFP the announcement illustrates "the continued re-nuclearization of Europe, the renewed need for nuclear weapons, and the strengthening of Nato's deterrence, in the face of an adversary, Russia". The F-35A, manufactured by US company Lockheed Martin, is a variant of the F-35B already used by the United Kingdom, but which can carry nuclear warheads in addition to conventional weapons. The acquisition has been a long-standing request from the Royal Air Force. The planes are expected to be stationed at Marham Air Force Base in eastern England. 'New risks' Leaders from Nato countries are gathering in The Hague this week where they are expected to pledge that they will spend five percent of GDP on defence by 2035, under pressure from US President Donald Trump. The UK had already committed on Monday that it would meet the spending target. London said in February that it would hike its defence budget to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2027 and three percent after 2029. British Defence Secretary John Healey warned on Tuesday that the UK faced "new nuclear risks, with other states increasing, modernising and diversifying their nuclear arsenals". Seven NATO members, including the US, Germany and Italy, currently have dual-capable aircraft stored on European soil that can carry American B61 nuclear warheads -- the same type that Britain is expected to use. In June, Britain announced that it would build up to 12 new attack submarines and six munitions factories as part of efforts to re-arm the country in the face of "threats", particularly from Russia. The dozen nuclear-powered subs will be equipped with conventional weapons and form part of the AUKUS military alliance between the UK, the US and Australia. Starmer also confirmed that London would spend £15 billion ($20.4 billion) on its nuclear warhead programme.
